200 research outputs found
Il progressivo riconoscimento della natura contrattuale dell’istituto concessorio. Prospettive di indagine alla luce dell’evoluzione storica della concessione tra tentazioni privatizzanti e perseguimento dell’interesse pubblico
No full textTutela civilistica del lavoratore infortunato e profili problematici: le prestazioni indennitarie a carico dell’Inail e gli spazi di operatività del risarcimento del «danno differenziale».
No full text
IL LITISCONSORZIO NECESSARIO DEL PROPRIETARIO DEL VEICOLO NELLA PROCEDURA DI RISARCIMENTO DIRETTO
No full textLa nozione di "trattamenti di sostegno vitale" dopo la sentenza 242/2019 della Corte Costituzionale: il caso Trentini
No full textBlockchain e fornitura di energia. Riflessioni in materia di responsabilità tra decentralizzazione e tutela dei consumatori
No full textSmart grids are essential for a more sustainable and reliable energy supply system. They facilitate
the integration of decentralized electricity generation and encourage prosumers production.
Blockchain technology can support and streamline this process. The application of
blockchain to smart grids can help coordinate distributed energy production and promises to
enable peer-to-peer transactions through smart contracts. The intersection of smart grids and
blockchain ledgers recalibrates the relationships within energy supply systems in favour of a
decentralized energy-sharing network. Within this context, whether there is – or should be – a
middleman responsible for energy supply is a core issue to investigate. While intermediaries
challenge the technological – and philosophical – assumptions of blockchain systems, they also
enormously ease the allocation of liability in case of dysfunctions. The main question this paper
aims to address is where responsibility and liability stand in a complex system that combines the
traditional energy infrastructure with an automated digital grid based on blockchain technology.
Different models of blockchain and the impact they have on liability are considered. The article
concludes that the energy supply system needs intermediation. Eventually, it explores the
concept of «distributed liability» as a means for managing risks in highly decentralized systems
Contratto e principio dello sviluppo sostenibile. Il caso degli Energy Performance Contracts
No full textThis paper is based on the analysis of the sustainable development
principle as an instrument to balance environmental protection with the market
imperatives. In this context, the energy performance contract (EPC) represents
the example of a new regulatory private law, which leads the market regulation
not only to ensure competition but also to meet social needs, as the
environmental ones. This model fits within the idea of a highly competitive
social market economy, according to article 3.3 of TEU. Moreover, it complies
with the institutional relationships between legislative and judicial power in the field of contract law. As a result, the legislative action could design a legal
framework in which the contract could achieve public interest goals, as the
promotion of energy efficiency, without stretching its function
Profili privatistici delle nuove discipline in materia di promozione dell’energia rinnovabile e regolazione del mercato elettrico (d.lgs. 8 novembre 2021, n. 199 e d.lgs. 8 novembre 2021, n. 210)
No full textLa compensatio lucri cum damno all'esame delle Sezioni Unite. La definizione delle "classi di casi" in cui è ammesso il cumulo tra risarcimento e indennizzo alla luce della ragione giustificatrice delle attribuzioni
No full textThe legal qualification of collaborative platforms offering composite services. What consequences for consumer protection?
No full text- …
