114 research outputs found
Surreal(ist) Chair’s Techno-liberation
Get PDFThe "Surreal(ist) Chair’s Techno-liberation" by Katucha Bento and Matjaz Vidmar reimagines the metaphor of having "a seat at the table" as an inclusive space where all forms of existence are respected. Challenging Euro- white-cis-hetero-abled-male-centric norms, the project critiques fixed ideas of identity and stability, advocating for flexibility and transience to dismantle power imbalances shaped by colonialism and systemic inequalities. By integrating algorithms, Afrofuturism, ecological justice, and ancestral knowledge, it envisions a utopian reality where humanity collaborates with digital agency, fostering new forms of coexistence beyond binaries and rigid structures. The chair becomes a dreamscape—a surreal, multisensory metaphor that inspires radical imagination, co-creation, and liberation, expressed through algorithmic art and digital materiality. This vision aligns with Suzanne Césaire’s call for a permanent readiness for the marvellous
Surreal(ist) Chair’s Techno-liberation
Get PDFThe "Surreal(ist) Chair’s Techno-liberation" by Katucha Bento and Matjaz Vidmar reimagines the metaphor of having "a seat at the table" as an inclusive space where all forms of existence are respected. Challenging Euro- white-cis-hetero-abled-male-centric norms, the project critiques fixed ideas of identity and stability, advocating for flexibility and transience to dismantle power imbalances shaped by colonialism and systemic inequalities. By integrating algorithms, Afrofuturism, ecological justice, and ancestral knowledge, it envisions a utopian reality where humanity collaborates with digital agency, fostering new forms of coexistence beyond binaries and rigid structures. The chair becomes a dreamscape—a surreal, multisensory metaphor that inspires radical imagination, co-creation, and liberation, expressed through algorithmic art and digital materiality. This vision aligns with Suzanne Césaire’s call for a permanent readiness for the marvellous
Scottish space sector and innovation: a PERIpatetic study of an emerging innovation system and the roles of innovation intermediaries
Get PDFThis thesis seeks a more effective understanding of Open Innovation (OI) and the available strategies for its development within (geographically–bound) sectoral systems of innovation (GSSIs). Theoretically, it draws upon the competing intellectual traditions (from innovation studies and from science and technology studies) with their different presumptions, which alternatively favour either macro-level positivist or micro-level interpretativist perspectives. These divides prevent a more holistic theoretical understanding of OI, and present a challenge to practitioners, who struggle to operationalise the theories’ insights.
Hence, this thesis proposes a novel Practical Epistemology for Researching Innovation, i.e. the PERIpatetic Approach, which aims to integrate multiple theoretical and empirical perspectives for a flexible, problem-driven academic enquiry. This new framework for participatory action research is based on “abductive” theory development, which uses bottom-up empirical engagement to identify emergent challenges to state-of-the-art understanding. The research methodology put forward for this approach is centred on strategic ethnography of innovation, which combines multi-sited mixed-method research design, with constructive embeddedness in the field.
The empirical focus of this thesis is on the emergence of the (New) Space Sector in Scotland - mainly made up of small-to-medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). Here, miniaturisation and cheapening of core technologies and increased access to space data has been driving significant sectoral growth and diversification – which is of interest to entrepreneurs and politicians alike. I approached the field by being embedded within an active intermediary, which wanted to understand and respond to these trends and opportunities. Consequently, this thesis analyses the modelling of OI between macro-level trends and micro-level practices, through a focus on the activities and organisational behaviour of a network of SMEs and opportunities to support them through the work of innovation intermediaries.
In its first part, the thesis analyses the UK/Scottish innovation policy in the Space Sector, exposing the dispersion of public investment, which is creating divergent clusters. These clusters attempt to integrate through the concept of “Agile Space” into a collaborative “Living Laboratory”, constructing new markets and developing products. Applying social network analysis and outlining a new concept of innovation moments, I focus on the structures at play within this integrative framing, identifying processes of organisational learning which develop structural absorptive capacity. Thus, I form an integrated multi-level perspective on a (geographically–bound) sectoral system of innovation (MLP-GSSI), which can be applied to other OI contexts and can be adapted for analysing other aspects of complex innovation systems.
In the thesis’ second part, the analysis seeks to redress the lack of systemic understanding of the central role of innovation intermediaries, by developing new classification and prototypology of their interventions. To validate and operationalise this new model, I apply it to the network of innovation intermediaries in the Scottish (New) Space Sector. I further contextualise this insight through a detailed case study of two large investments in innovation intermediation in similarly positioned Space Sectors - examining the tension between business development and R&D support for OI-driven smart specialisation
The Ten Million Euro Question: How Do Innovation Intermediaries Support Smart Specialization?
Get PDFSmart Specialization Strategy (S3) has become a dominant regional economic development field with significant policy traction, in particular within the European Union. However, questions are being raised about its operationalization and a gap has been identified with respect to the role of innovation intermediaries’ interventions in support of the developing regional-sectoral innovation systems. In particular, reasons for diverging policy approaches of “niche specialization” versus “regional advantage” in comparable situations should be examined to illuminate the contextual factors impacting the interpretation of the intermediaries’ mandates. In this paper, the cases of two leading investments in innovation intermediation in the emerging New Space sector are analyzed (Space-SI and Higgs Centre for Innovation) in two EU NUTS level 1 regions (Slovenia and Scotland), which were previously peripheral players in this technological domain. In particular, using a novel innovation intermediation interventions’ classification, this paper identifies the difference between research and development (R&D) and business development (BD) support foci in the two locales, noting some of the contextual factors associated with them and arguing for the long-term balancing of the two approaches
The New Real Observatory: Art and AI in Conversation with the Environment
Get PDFAn artist stares intently at a computer screen. She\u27s not looking at environmental data in the usual way – charts, graphs or satellite imagery. Instead, she\u27s using an AI system to explore how machines and humans might together make sense of our changing planet. As she adjusts parameters on the screen, the system generates new interpretations of local greenery, revealing something profound about how both humans and machines perceive nature. This is The New Real Observatory, where artists and scientists are working together to create new ways of seeing our changing world
- …
