Francine Friedman, The Bosnian Muslims: Denial of a Nation (Colorado: Westview Press, 1996), 288 pp., 35.00,ISBN0−8133−2096−8.EricD.Gordy,TheCultureofPowerinSerbia:NationalismandtheDestructionofAlternatives(UniversityPark,PA:PennsylvaniaStateUniversityPress,1999),230pp.,17.95, ISBN 0-271-01958-1. Lorraine M. Lees, Keeping Tito Afloat: The United States, Yugoslavia, and the Cold War (University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press, 1997), 246 pp., 40,ISBN0−271−01629−9.ReneoLukicandAllenLynch,EuropefromtheBalkanstotheUrals:TheDisintegrationofYugoslaviaandtheSovietUnion(Oxford:OxfordUniversityPressandStockholmInternationalPeaceResearchInstituteMonographs,1996),436pp.,£35.00,ISBN0−19−829200−7.ViktorMeier,Yugoslavia:AHistoryofitsDemise,trans.SabrinaPetraRamet(LondonandNewYork:Routledge,1999),279pp.,£16.99,ISBN0−415−18596−3.AleksandarPavkovic,TheFragmentationofYugoslavia:NationalismandWarintheBalkans,2ndedn(LondonandNewYork:MacmillanandSt.Martin′sPress,2000),243pp.,£42.50,ISBN0−312−23084−2.SabrinaPetraRamet,BalkanBabel:TheDisintegrationofYugoslaviafromtheDeathofTitotoEthnicWar,2ndedn(Boulder,CO:WestviewPress,1996),354pp.,30.00, ISBN 0-8133-2559-5. Richard H. Ullman, ed., The World and Yugoslavia's Wars (New York: Council on Foreign Relations, 1996), 230 pp., 18.95,ISBN0−87609−191−5.SusanL.Woodward,BalkanTragedy:ChaosandDissolutionaftertheColdWar(Washington,DC:BrookingsInstitution,1995),536pp.,16.95, ISBN 0-8157-9513-0.Vesna Drapa
The historiography of the Second World War in Yugoslavia rests on the dichotomous resistance/collaboration paradigm pitting “Yugoslav” resisters against extreme nationalist collaborators. This historiography also presents us with a Balkanist interpretation of the war as exceptionally savage and brutal. The collapse of Yugoslavia led to the collapse of the Partisan Epic. It also led to the rise of nationalist historiographies of the war and the rehabilitation of collaborators, notably the Serbian Chetniks. A corrective to the exceptionalism of many standard studies of the war in Yugosalvia may be found in an analysis of the experiences of Australian Yugoslavs and their perceptions of resistance and collaboration. Based almost entirely on hitherto underutilised archival sources, this article traces the differences between two rival Yugoslav groups in Australia: (mostly Serbian) royalist supporters of the Chetniks and the old centralist regime, and Croatian supporters of Tito's Partisans and the idea of a new, federative Yugoslavia. It demonstrates that both groups were adept at mobilising opinion and actively engaging in the political process to advance their cause. However, the Croats and their organisational structures had a wider reach. Furthermore, they were able to demonstrate that they were contributing more to the Allied cause - which was their own - than their rivals. This had an impact on their standing in Australian society and on attitudes towards Yugoslavs and Yugoslavia. Finally, this article sheds new light on the Australian home‐front, revealing the generally civil and tolerant attitude of state and commonwealth governments towards “friendly aliens” in their desire both to be connected to their country of birth and integrated into their adopted homeland.Vesna Drapa
Get PDF
No full text
No full text
No full text
No full text
No full text
