11,082 research outputs found
Genieridium Vaz-De-Mello 2008
No full textKey to species of Genieridium 1. Eyes hidden dorsally (Fig. 64). Central Colombia......... 6.5. G. medinae (Gill & Vaz-de-Mello, 2004) -. Eyes small but visible dorsally............................................................................................................. 2 2(1). Clypeal teeth lacking (Figs. 57, 68)...................................................................................................... 3 -. Two clypeal teeth present...................................................................................................................... 4 3(2). Elytral striae without evident punctures. Venezuela.......................... 6.2. G. bordoni (Martínez, 1992) -. Elytral striae with ocellated punctures. Southern Brazil..................... 6.6. G. paranense (Arrow, 1932) 4(2). Clypeal teeth very acute, sides almost parallel in the apical part (Figs. 60, 70).................................... 5 -. Clypeal teeth obtuse, short, and equilateral (Figs. 55, 62).................................................................... 6 5(4). Clypeal teeth arising from below clypeal margin (Fig. 60). Central Brazil, Northern Argentina, Paraguay and Bolivia.................................................................................... 6.3. G. cryptops (Arrow, 1913) -. Clypeal teeth at same plane as clypeal margin (Fig. 70). Southeastern Brazil.................................................................................................................. 6.7. G. zanunciorum (Vaz-de-Mello & Canhedo, 1998) 6(4). Elytral striae straight, without punctures. Central Brazil and Paraguay................................................................................................................................................................ 6.1. G. bidens (Balthasar, 1938) -. Elytral striae marked by inconspicuous punctures that make striae appear sinuated. Northeastern and Central Brazil....................................................... 6.4. G. margareteae (Génier & Vaz-de-Mello, 2002)Published as part of Vaz-De-Mello, Fernando Z., 2008, Synopsis of the new subtribe Scatimina (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Scarabaeinae: Ateuchini), with descriptions of twelve new genera and review of Genieridium, new genus, pp. 1-75 in Zootaxa 1955 on pages 27-2
A casa Pina Vaz em Ofir - reflexos do regionalismo crítico
No full text“A Casa Pina Vaz em Ofir. Reflexos do regionalismo crítico” é um pequeno ensaio sobre um projecto da fase final da carreira do arquitecto portuense Alcino Soutinho, que procura perceber até que ponto esta e outras obras deste autor poderão ter sido influenciadas pelo movimento denominado “Regionalismo Crítico”.“The Pina Vaz House in Ofir. Reflections of Critical Regionalism” is a short essay on a project of the final phase of the career of the Porto architect Alcino Soutinho, that seeks to understand the extent to which this and other works of this author have been influenced by the movement called “Critical Regionalism”.info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersio
Onorius Frolov & Vaz-de-Mello 2015
No full textOnorius Frolov & Vaz-de-Mello, 2015 Type species Onorius inexpectatus Frolov & Vaz-de-Mello, 2015, by original designation.Published as part of Frolov, Andrey V., Akhmetova, Lilia A. & Vaz-de-Mello, Fernando Z., 2019, Contribution to the knowledge of the Neotropical canopy dwelling genus Onorius (Coleopteraı Scarabaeidaeı Orphninae): another species from southern Ecuador and notes on the hind gut morphology in the Orphninae, pp. 1071-1077 in Journal of Natural History 53 (17) on page 1072, DOI: 10.1080/00222933.2019.1632952, http://zenodo.org/record/367333
Plectris singularis Fuhrmann & Vaz-De 2017, comb. nov.
No full textPlectris singularis (Blanchard, 1850) comb. nov. Fig. 20 C–D Anomalochilus singularis Blanchard, 1850: 123. Note Anomalochilus singularis was described based on an undetermined number of specimens. Material examined Lectotype (Fig. 20 C–D) BRAZIL: ♂, MNHN, labels: [5215 | 34.] [MUSÉUM PARIS | Rio Janeiro | d’Orbigny] [LECTOTYPE ♂ | Anomalochilus singularis | Blanchard, 1850 | des. J. Fuhrmann & | F.Z. Vaz-de-Mello, 2014]. Paralectotypes BRAZIL: 2 ♂♂, MNHN, labels: [MUSÉUM PARIS | d’Orbigny] [PARALECTOTYPE ♂ | Anomalochilus singularis | Blanchard, 1850 | des. J. Fuhrmann & | F.Z. Vaz-de-Mello, 2014].Published as part of Fuhrmann, Juares & Vaz-De-Mello, Fernando Z., 2017, Macrodactylini (Coleoptera, Scarabaeidae, Melolonthinae): primary types of type species and taxonomic changes to the generic classification, pp. 1-71 in European Journal of Taxonomy 350 on page 47, DOI: 10.5852/ejt.2017.350, http://zenodo.org/record/383268
Pereiraidium almeidai Vaz-De-Mello 2008, new combination
No full text12.1. Pereiraidium almeidai (Pereira, 1946), new combination Pedaridium almeidai: Pereira 1946: 289; Ferreira & Galileo 1993: 6, 10–11; Vaz-de-Mello 2000: 194; Verdú & Galante 2001: 597–599 Type series: Holotype ♂ and allotype ♀: BRAZIL: Paraná: Deodoro, V-1942, Hatsbach (MZSP). Paratypes: BRAZIL: Paraná: Guaraúna, V-1937, J. Pinheiro Machado (1 CMNC); XII-1937 (1 CMNC); Deodoro, V-1942, Hatsbach (2 MZSP); Rio Grande do Sul: Glória, 1927, P. Buck (1 IRSN). Non-type material examined: BRAZIL: Rio Grande do Sul: Glória, 06-VI-1927, P. Buck (2 CMNC); 20- IX-1927 (1 CMNC); X-1927 (1 NMHB); 26-VII-1928, P Buck (1 FVMC); São Paulo: Est Biol. Boracéia, 24- VIII-1996, JR Verdú (2 FVMC).Published as part of Vaz-De-Mello, Fernando Z., 2008, Synopsis of the new subtribe Scatimina (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Scarabaeinae: Ateuchini), with descriptions of twelve new genera and review of Genieridium, new genus, pp. 1-75 in Zootaxa 1955 on page 4
Philochloenia castaneipennis Fuhrmann & Vaz-De 2017, comb. nov.
No full textPhilochloenia castaneipennis (Guérin-Méneville, 1831) comb. nov. Figs 12K, 20 A–B Pachycerus castaneipennis Guérin-Méneville, 1831: fig. 3. Hadrocerus castaneipennis – Guérin-Méneville 1838: 83. Note Pachycerus castaneipennis was described based on an undetermined number of specimens. Material examined Lectotype (here designated, Fig. 20 A–B) BRAZIL: ♂, MNHN, labels: [St. Catherine | Brésil | Durville] [MUSÉUM PARIS] [TYPE] [Pachycerus | castaneipennis | Guerin “illegible” | Duperris pl. 3 f. 8] [P. castaneipennis | “illegible” | St. Catherine | Durville] [LECTOTYPE ♂ | Pachycerus castaneipennis | Guérin-Méneville, 1831 | des. J. Fuhrmann & | F.Z. Vaz-de-Mello, 2014] [Philochloenia castaneipennis | (Guérin-Méneville, 1831) ♂ | det. J. Fuhrmann & | F.Z. Vaz-de-Mello, 2014].Published as part of Fuhrmann, Juares & Vaz-De-Mello, Fernando Z., 2017, Macrodactylini (Coleoptera, Scarabaeidae, Melolonthinae): primary types of type species and taxonomic changes to the generic classification, pp. 1-71 in European Journal of Taxonomy 350 on page 46, DOI: 10.5852/ejt.2017.350, http://zenodo.org/record/383268
Philochloenia armata Fuhrmann & Vaz-De 2017
No full textPhilochloenia armata Fuhrmann & Vaz-de-Mello, 2017 nom. nov. Figs 12J, 19 M–N Aulanota sulcipennis Moser, 1924: 157. Note Aulanota sulcipennis was described based on an undetermined number of males. Etymology The specific epithet refers to Latin ‘armata’: armed, and alludes to the metatibial ornamentation. Material examined Lectotype (here designated, Fig. 19 M–N) BRAZIL: ♂, ZMHU, labels: [Petropolis | 23.II.99] [Aulanota | sulcipennis | Type Mos] [sulcipennis Mos] [LECTOTYPE | Aulanota | sulcipennis | Moser, 1924 | ♂ | des. J. Fuhrmann & | F.Z. Vaz-de-Mello, 2014]. Remarks The new replacement name Philochloenia armata nom. nov. is hereby erected for Aulanota sulcipennis to avoid the secondary homonymy with Philochloenia sulcipennis (Moser, 1918) comb. nov. (described as Anoplosiagum sulcipenne). See Discussion “Male morphology and nomenclature” (below) for more information about the new synonymy.Published as part of Fuhrmann, Juares & Vaz-De-Mello, Fernando Z., 2017, Macrodactylini (Coleoptera, Scarabaeidae, Melolonthinae): primary types of type species and taxonomic changes to the generic classification, pp. 1-71 in European Journal of Taxonomy 350 on page 45, DOI: 10.5852/ejt.2017.350, http://zenodo.org/record/383268
Trichillum pseudoarrowi Vaz-de-Mello & Genier 2005
No full text17.10. <i>Trichillum pseudoarrowi</i> Vaz-de-Mello & Génier, 2005 <p> <i>Trichillum arrowi</i> (misidentification, not Saylor, 1935): Pereira & Martínez 1959: 453–458; Forsyth <i>et al.</i> 1998: 371; Spector & Ayzama 2003: 399</p> <p> <i>Trichillum (Trichillum) arrowi</i> (misidentification, not Saylor, 1935): Martínez 1969: 123, 127; Verdú & Galante 1997: 96 <i>Trichillum pseudoarrowi</i>: Vaz-de-Mello & Génier 2005: 49–50; Hamel <i>et al.</i> 2006: 12.</p> <p> Type series: Holotype ♂: PARAGUAY: <b>Boquerón:</b> Gran Chaco, km 145 de Pto. Casado, 25-XI-1950, A. Martínez (CMNC).</p> <p> Paratypes: BOLIVIA: <b>Tarija?:</b> Boyoiú, IV-1949, Daguerre (1 CMNC); PARAGUAY: <b>Boquerón:</b> Gran Chaco, km 145 de Pto. Casado, XI-1950, A Martínez (1 BDGC); 25-XI-1950 (8 CMNC); 25-XI-1950 (1 FVMC); <b>Concepción:</b> Horquetá, IV-1934, Schultze (2 CMNC).</p>Published as part of <i>Vaz-De-Mello, Fernando Z., 2008, Synopsis of the new subtribe Scatimina (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Scarabaeinae: Ateuchini), with descriptions of twelve new genera and review of Genieridium, new genus, pp. 1-75 in Zootaxa 1955</i> on pages 52-5
Dichotomius (Cephagonus) paresi Nunes & Vaz-de-Mello 2015
No full text4.4. Dichotomius (Cephagonus) paresi Nunes & Vaz-de-Mello 2015 (Figure 41 (c)) Dichotomius (selenocopris) paresi Nunes & Vaz-de-Melloı 2016ı p. 85 (description) Diagnosis. In the groupı D. paresi is separated of other species in the group (including the brachypterous) by the following combined characters: posterior portion of the pronotal disc bearing ocellate punctures; elytral striae widened near the basis and lacking punctures and anterior portion of pronotal border flattened (dorsal view) (Figure 6 (a-b)). Distribution. Chapada dos Parecisı municipality of Tangará da Serraı state of Mato Grossoı Brazil (Figure 42).Published as part of Nunes, Rafael V. & Vaz-de-Mello, Fernando Z., 2019, Taxonomic revision of Dichotomius (Cephagonus) Luederwaldt 1929 and the taxonomic status of remaining Dichotomius Hope 1838 subgenera (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Scarabaeinae: Dichotomiini), pp. 2231-2351 in Journal of Natural History 53 (37) on page 2330, DOI: 10.1080/00222933.2019.1692088, http://zenodo.org/record/366551
Philochloenia rufipennis Fuhrmann & Vaz-De 2017, comb. nov.
No full textPhilochloenia rufipennis (Fabricius, 1801) comb. nov. Fig. 19 O–P Melolontha rufipennis Fabricius, 1801: 167 Melolontha filitarsis Germar, 1824: 125. Anoplosiagum rufipenne – Guérin-Méneville 1838: 83. Melolontha filitarsis – Blanchard 1850: 119 (synonymy). Note Melolontha rufipennis was described based on an undetermined number of specimens. Material examined Lectotype (here designated, Fig. 19 O–P) BRAZIL: ♂, MNHN, labels: [rufipennis | Brasil “illegible”] [MUSÉUM PARIS | Collection | “illegible”] [Anoplosiagum |!sucatulum | Bl.] [LECTOTYPE ♂ | Melolontha rufipennis | Fabricius, 1801 | des. J. Fuhrmann & | F.Z. Vaz-de-Mello, 2014] [Philochloenia | rufipennis ♂ | (Fabricius, 1801) | det. J. Fuhrmann & | F.Z. Vaz-de-Mello, 2014]. Remarks Most of Fabricius’ types are currently housed at Staten Naturrhistoriske Museum (Copenhagen, Denmark), but the type series of Melolontha rufipennis was part of the Lous Bosc collection, now housed in NMHN (Cambefort 2006). Fabricius’ original labels were identified using Horn (1990a, b).Published as part of Fuhrmann, Juares & Vaz-De-Mello, Fernando Z., 2017, Macrodactylini (Coleoptera, Scarabaeidae, Melolonthinae): primary types of type species and taxonomic changes to the generic classification, pp. 1-71 in European Journal of Taxonomy 350 on pages 45-46, DOI: 10.5852/ejt.2017.350, http://zenodo.org/record/383268
- …
