1,721,023 research outputs found
A Survey on Knowledge and Attitudes Towards Vaccination Against Herpes Zoster Virus Among Medical Oncologists for Patients with Solid Tumors
Herpes zoster (HZ) virus reactivation is a significant medical problem among immunocompromised patients, especially considering its potential complications. Although the recombinant HZ vaccine has demonstrated > 90% efficacy against HZ in adults, its use is not as frequent as needed in daily oncology practice due to several barriers, including oncologists' knowledge, patients' willingness, and organizational issues. A web-based survey was sent to 139 oncologists treating solid tumors concerning their knowledge and attitudes toward the adjuvanted gE-based recombinant HZ vaccination. The survey included questions regarding the characteristics of medical oncologists participating, such as the type of hospital, main field of expertise, percent of work with patients, awareness of the HZ risk in cancer patients, knowledge of scientific data and scientific societies guidelines on HZ vaccination, familiarity with vaccinations, frequency of HZ detection in clinical practice, barriers, and challenges toward vaccine administration. Fifty-four physicians (46%; 95% CI 0.2918 to 0.5069) responded to all the questions. The main reason for non-response was the lack of time due to the overwhelming burden of assistance. When the survey was launched, 31 participants reported good knowledge of scientific and clinical data of HZ vaccines, 10% none, and 36 were aware of guidelines. Reported barriers included knowledge of the problem, patients' willingness, and organizational issues. Surveying medical oncologists on the adjuvanted gE-based recombinant HZ vaccination provides essential insights into their knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding vaccination for cancer patients. These data suggest that continuing medical education is necessary to implement HZ vaccination prescription among oncologists
Patients With Cancer and COVID-19: A WhatsApp Messenger-Based Survey of Patients' Queries, Needs, Fears, and Actions Taken
Purpose: This descriptive investigation was undertaken at three oncology units to report queries, needs, and fears related to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (COVID-19) of patients with cancer and to avoid uncontrolled treatment delays or withdrawal, behavioral mistakes, and panic.
Patients and methods: All queries spontaneously delivered through the WhatsApp instant messaging system commonly used by patients to communicate with oncology units were collected and grouped by homology in five categories. Responses to the queries were given according to recommendations by the Italian Association of Medical Oncology through WhatsApp and by subsequent phone calls. Patients were also classified according to the site of the primary tumor, stage of disease, and current treatments. Analysis of the association between these data and queries was carried out.
Results: The social scenario in Italy is a nationwide lockdown except for hospitals, pharmacies, and food supplies. Overall, 446 different patients' WhatsApp conversations were analyzed between March 1 and March 13 and comprised the following: requirement of visit delay by patients undergoing oral therapies or in follow-up, delays in chemotherapy or immunotherapy administration, queries about possible immunosuppression, and changes in lifestyle or daily activities. Delay requirements were statistically more frequent among patients with prostate or breast cancer compared with those with lung or pancreatic cancer. Actions taken by oncologists are also reported.
Conclusion: To our knowledge, the WhatsApp instant messaging system has been occasionally used in other medical settings with controversial results. In our experience, WhatsApp turned out to be adequate to give a rapid answer to most queries from patients with cancer in the COVID-19 pandemic scenario
A Narrative Review of the Role of Immunotherapy in Metastatic Carcinoma of the Colon Harboring a BRAF Mutation
Patients affected by metastatic carcinoma of the colon/rectum (mCRC) harboring mutations in the BRAF gene (MBRAF) respond poorly to conventional therapy and have a prognosis worse than that of patients without mutations. Despite the promising outcomes of targeted therapy utilizing multi-targeted inhibition of the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling system, the therapeutic efficacy, especially for the microsatellite stable/DNA proficient mismatch repair (MSS/PMMR) subtype, remains inadequate. Patients with MBRAF/mCRC and high microsatellite instability or DNA deficient mismatch repair (MSI-H/DMMR) exhibit a substantial tumor mutation burden, suggesting a high probability of response to immunotherapy. It is widely acknowledged that MSS/pMMR/mCRC is an immunologically "cold" malignancy that exhibits resistance to immunotherapy. The integration of targeted therapy and immunotherapy may enhance clinical outcomes in patients with MBRAF/mCRC. Efforts to enhance outcomes are exclusively focused on MSS/DMMR-BRAF mutant cancers, which constitute the largest proportion. This review evaluates the clinical efficacy and advancement of novel immune checkpoint blockade therapies for MSI-H/DMMR and MSS/PMMR BRAF mutant mCRC. We examine potential indicators in the tumor immune milieu for forecasting immunotherapeutic response in BRAF mutant mCRC
Current Role of Intraoperative Frozen Section Examination of Sentinel Lymph Node in Early Breast Cancer
Background/Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the current role of frozen section in identifying patients who could benefit from an immediate axillary lymph node dissection (ALND), following the criteria of the ASOCOG Z0011 and IBCSG 23-10 trials. Patients and Methods: A retrospective review was performed involving 2,079 patients with early breast cancer who underwent conservative surgery or total mastectomy with sentinel lymph node biopsy. Results: Sensitivity and diagnostic accuracy were 63.8% and 90.3%, respectively. Sensitivity was significantly higher (p<0.001) in finding macrometastases (81.8%) compared to micrometastases (11.9%). Frozen section was useful only in 7.7% of the patients who met the criteria of the IBCSG 23-01 and ACOSOG Z0011 trials. Conclusion: Frozen section continues to be very useful in the intraoperative assessment of the SLN, offering a high sensitivity and diagnostic accuracy. Omission of ALND in 24.4% of patients who met the ACOSOG Z0011 criteria would have resulted in their undertreatment
A Survey on the Prescribing Orientation Towards Complementary Therapies Among Oncologists in Italy: Symptoms and Unmet Patient Needs
Background/aim: A high percentage of cancer patients use complementary therapies (CM) during their disease journey. Several barriers for CM prescription still exist among oncologists. This study explored oncologists' attitudes toward prescribing CM with oral supplements or confirming prescriptions made by others. Materials and methods: The study employed a mixed semi-quantitative and qualitative research strategy via a web-based platform interview as a preliminary step for a program of observational studies on the oncologist's prescriptions of oral supplements in cancer management, in Italy. Results: Out of 95 invited oncologists, 40 participated in the study, mainly working in a general hospital or a cancer center. The deep knowledge of guidelines on integrative medicine was generally poor. The symptoms driving oncologists to initiate discussions on CM with patients were fatigue, anorexia/poor appetite, weight loss, insomnia, distress, neuropathy, or pain. The presence of reliable data in the medical literature on prescribing CM was a significant factor in choosing a supplement. Conclusion: This study reveals that oncologists' limited knowledge and lack of standardized guidelines hinder the prescription of CM, despite recognizing its potential benefits. CM discussions are primarily patient-driven, with prescriptions influenced by reliable scientific data and symptom management. Expanding integrative medicine services and research on CM efficacy could enhance oncologists' confidence, improve patient care, and address unmet needs in oncology
Axillary Nodal Burden in Breast Cancer Patients With Pre-operative Fine Needle Aspiration-proven Positive Lymph Nodes Compared to Those With Positive Sentinel Nodes
BACKGROUND/AIM: Recent years have seen a considerable shift to a more conservative management of the axilla in patients with positive axillary sentinel lymph nodes. The aim of this study was to determine whether some breast cancer patients with a preoperative ultrasound-guided needle aspiration biopsy proven positive node could potentially be spared an axillary lymph node dissection according to the ACOSOG Z0011 trial criteria.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective review was performed involving 623 breast cancer patients who underwent axillary lymph node dissection after either ultrasound-guided needle aspiration biopsy proven positive node or sentinel lymph node biopsy.
RESULTS: Patients with fine needle aspiration biopsy-proven positive node had worse prognosis and a higher nodal burden (6.7 vs 1.9 nodes, p<0.001), compared to those with positive sentinel lymph nodes.
CONCLUSION: Patients with an ultrasound guided needle aspiration biopsy proven positive node are more likely to have tumor with more aggressive pathological characteristics and a higher nodal burden than those with a positive sentinel lymph node biopsy
Risk-reducing mastectomy in healthy women with BRCA mutation: a narrative review.
Introduction: Breast cancer (BC) prevention in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers remains a significant clinical challenge. Risk-reducing mastectomy (RRM) is the most effective preventive option, lowering BC incidence by over 90%. Despite its survival benefit, the decision to undergo RRM is complex and shaped by psychological, social, and healthcare access factors. Areas covered: This narrative review synthesizes evidence on the oncologic efficacy, safety, and outcomes of RRM in BRCA mutation carriers. Literature was identified through PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science up to March 2025. Large cohort studies and systematic reviews confirm the effectiveness of RRM. Nipple-sparing mastectomy offers comparable oncologic safety with improved cosmetic and psychological outcomes. Histopathologic analyses frequently reveal occult malignancies, supporting the role of early surgery. However, surgical complications, sensory loss, and sexual health impacts remain important considerations. Expert opinion: RRM is cost-effective, especially when performed at younger ages, but disparities in access to genetic testing and surgery persist. Special populations, such as ovarian cancer survivors and those diagnosed before genetic testing, require individualized care. Advances in risk stratification, surgical techniques, and psychosocial support will enhance outcomes. A multidisciplinary, patient-centered approach is essential for informed decision-making
Unusual presentation of luminal breast carcinoma metastatic to the brain and coma: a case report of dramatic response to abemaciclib and literature review
Patients with luminal breast cancer (BC) may develop central nervous system
metastases in 20%–40% of cases. Radiation or surgical therapy represents the cornerstone of treating central nervous system metastases. Meanwhile, the best practice for metastatic luminal BC involves using cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors combined with endocrine therapy. To our knowledge, this is the first case to report a dramatic response of breast metastases to abemaciclib plus endocrine therapy without radiation therapy, particularly in a patient who presented with seizures and sudden coma. She received brain surgery to control
a large bleeding metastasis. Abemaciclib was crushed and diluted in water for administration via the nasogastric tube, while an upfront fulvestrant was given since aromatase inhibitors cannot be diluted. Beyond the radiological response, the clinical improvement was notable, with complete symptom recovery to the point where she is again working. Our paper supports the activity of abemaciclib in brain metastases from luminal BC and includes a review of the medical literature. Further investigation is warranted in this clinical setting
Surviving Twenty Years to Bone and Liver Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Case Reported by Treating Oncologists and the Patient Herself
Introduction: Metastatic breast cancer (MBC) presents an enduring and significant challenge for affected women, requiring sustained commitment over the years. Case Presentation: This paper presents a case of a woman affected by bone and visceral MBC with a very long 20-year survival, excellent quality of life, and high resilience. She is now 51 years old and underwent quadrantectomy for breast cancer in 2005, and in 2013, she developed a recurrence with bone and liver metastases. Despite the widespread stage of the disease with visceral compromise, the patient was treated with a multidisciplinary approach that included surgery, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, hormone therapy, bone target agents, metabolic radiotherapy, and ozone therapy for medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw. Multidisciplinary management results in a complete clinical and metabolic response to treatment in a visceral metastatic setting. Conclusion: This report supports the possibility of achieving unusual survival outcomes in patients with MBC. This study also highlights the importance of resilience in breast cancer carepatients who continue to manage their disease and pursue treatment for over 2 decades. Understanding these resilience factors can improve clinical practice and support patients’ long- term care
Is G8 geriatric assessment tool useful in managing elderly patients with metastatic pancreatic carcinoma?
Aim: This paper aims to analyze the usefulness of the G8 geriatric oncology questionnaire in patients with advanced/metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma (aPAC) and its possible association with different clinical outcomes.
Methods: Patients age > 70 years were screened with the G8 tool and treated with intravenous nab-paclitaxel 125
mg/m2 and gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 for 3 consecutive weeks followed by one-week rest as prescribed after
clinical evaluation by treating oncologists. Patient’s charts were evaluated for type and severity of toxicity, 2
cycle rate of completion, discontinuation rate, delays, dose reductions, and other outcomes response rates,
progression-free, and overall survival. Sensitivity, specificity, and possible correlations were analyzed.
Results: Sensitivity and specificity of the G8 score for severe toxicity were respectively 55.9% and 50%. No association between all types of severe grade 3-4 toxicity, delays, or dose reductions, and the G8 score was present (p=
0.622). ORR was 32.5% with no complete responses. Median PFS and OS were 4.5 months and 8.1 months, respectively. Correlation between G8 score and PFS was not statistically significant (p=0.0652). Correlation between
G8 score and OS was statistically significant (p=0.0251). Although median survival of G8 fit patients was superior to that of G8 vulnerable patients (6.5 versus 4 months), the difference was not statistically different (p=
0.1975).
Conclusion: Clinical results in terms of response rate, survival outcomes, and side-effects were in the range reported by others. However, the G8 questionnaire is not a reliable diagnostic tool to predict the risk of severe toxicity, and clinical outcomes in older patients with aPAC
- …
