612 research outputs found
Cassandra - WP400 - final report of living lab 2
No full textThis CASSANDRA LL2 final deliverable contains all information regarding the CASSANDRA Living Lab Europe – USA via Bremerhaven including information from two intermediate reports (CASSANDRA D4.21 and D4.22) about the very same Living Lab handed in during runtime of the Living Lab. CASSANDRA Living Lab 2 shows in a practical way how to improve security and visibility of transatlantic supply chains embedded in the overall CASSANDRA ideas and structure. The enhanced security concepts combine technological, organisational and operational measures also in line with governmental supply chain security programmes such as AEO or C-TPAT. Mechanical and electronic devices such as HS-Seals, e-Seals or advanced monitoring systems can be used to physically secure container transport whereas associated data may use digital watermarks to verify information sources or encryption methods as protection against manipulation. The aim of CASSANDRA is to demonstrate methods for enhancing supply chain security beyond state-of-the-art by integrating existing data management systems to create a Data Pipeline and introduce a Risk-Based Approach across entire logistics chains and is totally inline with the proposed Multilayer Approach. These types of approach have also been advocated in government publications from the beginning of the project such as the Joint Statement on supply-chain security (EU and US, July 2011) and National Strategy for Global Supply Chain Security (US, Jan. 2012). In General the Living Lab was organized and executed during the runtime of the CASSANDRA project. This living lab is centered around the 6 Use Cases, each representing specific obstacles stakeholders face at daily work. This is derived from the high-tech environment US transports are embedded and the used levels of abstraction to pinpoint single problems. The used process for the successful LL2 can be summarized as follows: The LL started with discussions among the partners to get a common understanding about the objectives and steps to be taken. This was mainly done in the CASSSANDRA WP3. The first part was to create a white paper to inform parties not involved in the consortium about the project in general and this living lab in particular. These parties (EU and US Authorities, Shippers) were informed, involved and Use Cases showing the current obstacles in US trades created. The Use Cases were then used as the content for demonstration, discussion and evaluation of the LL. All this information was passed to LL2 partners responsible for creating demonstration systems such as the business and the customs dashboard, not as the goal in itself but as a system of systems needed for discussion and evaluation of general CASSANDRA ideas in an environment which is dominated by technical solutions as a proof of security to fight attacks to countries as a whole. These discussions were done when the visualisation systems were in a final stage late in the project. During runtime 3 reports were created, which were the MS4 report and two LL2 intermediate reports. These two are not part of the initial DoW but were seen to be useful for reporting purposes due to postponement of this report by DoW amendment. The consortium partners in LL2 are the two freight forwarders Kühne + Nagel from Vienna, Austria (K+N) and Deutsche Handels-Logistik (DHL) from Bonn, Germany. Data is collected in the CASSANDRA backbone hub, processed and visualised in a Business Dashboard by The Descartes Systems Group Inc. (Descartes) from Lier, Belgium. The relevant Port Community System for all Ports in Bremen and Bremerhaven in charge (Bremer Hafentelematik (BHT)) is run by the Datenbank Bremische Häfen (dbh) located in Bremen, Germany. Additional visualization of Customs Data is provided by IBM, NL and Intrasoft, GR. LL2 is organised by the Institute of Shipping Economics and Logistics (ISL), Bremen, Germany with the political and procedural support by the Senator für Wirtschaft, Arbeit und Häfen, (Senator for Economy Labour and Ports), SWH, Bremen, Germany.Multi Actor SystemsTechnology, Policy and Managemen
Cassandra - D7.3.5 - M30 status: Report dissemination results
No full textThis deliverable is a status report on the dissemination activities and results in the CASSANDRA project. These status reports are made regularly, with one more to come at the project’s finish. Together, these make up deliverable D7.3 – Dissemination results. In this report, the results of the dissemination activities that have taken place in the past period are described. It builds on the first five status reports, delivered in M4, M6, M12, M18, and M24 (D7.3, D7.3.1, D7.3.2, D7.3.3, and D7.3.4). The first report covered the starting phase of the project. Therefore, it described many activities related to presenting the project to the world. Results included the project logo, press releases, the project website, templates, a brochure and other dissemination material. The subsequent reports, including this status update, primarily describe an update of the various dissemination results in Section 4. The first year of dissemination primarily included presenting the CASSANDRA project, key concepts and initial outcomes to various audiences (policy makers, industry and science) all over the world. During the project’s second year, more results are becoming available and find their way into (scientific) papers and presentations at conferences and in journals. This report is issued at halftime of the third and final year, which is marked by a steady stream of (scientific) articles and presentations and by presentations that include the initial results of the project and the experiences gained in the Living Labs.Multi Actor SystemsTechnology, Policy and Managemen
The Family History of Cassandra M. Swisher
Full text linkThe Family History of Cassandra M. Swisher
May 2022
Cassandra Michelle Swisher authored this family history as part of the course requirements for HIST 550/700 Your Family in History offered online in Spring 2022 and was submitted to the Pittsburg State University Digital Commons. Please contact the author directly with any questions or comments: [email protected]
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License
A Literary Studies Perspective:Creative Communities, 1750–1830
No full textThis co-written chapter draws on its authors’ individual research as well as their collaboration on the 'Creative Communities, 1750–1830' research network. This time period has traditionally been associated with a psychological and individualised paradigm of the relationship between creativity and culture, and therefore offers a particularly rich terrain for thinking about the relationship in much more communal and contextual ways. We discuss some of the key findings to emerge from the network: most importantly, the value of a critical focus on creativity as embodied in process and interaction rather than individual product. This does not mean that the literary text itself is neglected in our case studies, but rather that we are concerned with how texts encode their own productive processes. Thus, John Whale shows how the account of Michelangelo in Roscoe’s Life of Lorenzo de’ Medici reflects on the communicative properties of genius to suggest a parallel between Renaissance France and Romantic-period Liverpool; Cassandra Ulph examines how Piozzi’s Anecdotes of Samuel Johnson simultaneously acknowledges and undercuts its subject’s tendency to monologue; and David Higgins discusses how Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein draws on her Alpine collaboration with Percy Bysshe Shelley while self-consciously offering an alternative to the anthropocentric sublimity of his work
Cassandra - D6.3 - final protocol: Seventh Framework Programme THEME Monitoring and Tracking of Shipping Containers Security
No full textThe Cassandra project addressed procedures and methods (protocols) for government supervision of international trade lanes. Specifically, it looked at the impact of the Cassandra innovations on the procedures and methods to assess risks (risk assessment protocols). This covers the way in which the businesses of a specific trade lane interact with government inspection authorities. More specifically, it was assessed how the Cassandra RBA will enable government organisations to assess the risks of the supply chain better. The Cassandra business RBA, combined with a data pipeline for data capture and exchange, enables government to piggyback on data from better sources and on business controls. To do this steps needs to be taken to move from Trusted Traders to Trusted Trade Lanes, for this the four elements from the AEO framework can be translated to trade lanes. A key topic that needs to be addressed is what comprises sufficient or good level of control over the supply chain. Also, developing strategies for dealing with residual risk is necessary. The main focus of the Cassandra project was on the ‘good-guy’ perspective, trusted traders that want to optimize their business in cooperation with government agencies. The next step is to also include the ‘bad-guy’ perspective that is more suitable for police related tasks. Severe and organised crime is currently not included in the chain control framework. The Cassandra EU risk management can be linked to the approach of the EU policy cycle on organised crime. Nine priorities have been defined in the EMPACT framework (European Multidisciplinary Platform Against Crime Threat).These priorities are: 1. Criminal networks related to illegal immigration. 2. Human trafficking, sexual and labour abuse. 3. Synthetic drugs and poly-drugs networks. 4. Cocaine- and heroin trafficking. 5. Cybercrime, including high-tech crime, child porno and credit card fraud. 6. Organised crime against assets (burglaries, holdups and vehicle/cargo crime. 7. Illegal trade of weapons. 8. Counterfeiting with risks for public health. 9. International tax fraud. Each of these SOCTA threats can be linked, to a certain extent, to the Cassandra data pipeline. It has to be analysed if Cassandra Supply Chain data can support the police perspective and if it can be linked to the Cassandra dashboard for authorities. It is estimated that there is potential for that with a system based European Risk based Approach protocol that would be satisfactory for the Police, including the following: - Use data pipeline for backtracking and reconstructing supply chain - Use data pipeline for typical risk based approach not covered by customs risk engines - Motivate trusted traders to act as gate keepers and whistle blowers Moreover, there is Potential of major joint control operations using data in the Cassandra pipeline.Multi Actor SystemsTechnology, Policy and Managemen
Cassandra. [electronic resource] : (but I hope not) Telling what will come of it. Num. 1. In answer to the Occasional letter. Num. I. Wherein the New-Associations, &c. are considered.
No full textAnonymous. By Charles Leslie.Also issued, without the titlepage, as part of: 'A collection of tracts written by the author of The snake in the grass, John Brydal Esq; Dr. S--ll, &c.', London, [1706?].Text continuous despite pagination.E report final unnumbered leaf containing 'Books lately printed.' including adv. for this book and 'Cassandra. Num. II, etc.'Reprint. Originally published: London, 1704.Electronic reproduction.English Short Title Catalog,Reproduction of original from British Library
Cassandra - D7.3 - final report: Dissemination results
No full textThis deliverable is the final report on the dissemination activities and results in the CASSANDRA project. During the project, several status reports were made and published. In this report, the results of the dissemination activities that have taken place during the project are described. During the first year, many dissemination results were related to presenting the project to the world. Results included the project logo, press releases, the project website, templates, a brochure and other dissemination material. The dissemination during that phase primarily focused on presenting the CASSANDRA project, key concepts and initial outcomes to various audiences (policy makers, industry and science) all over the world. During the project’s second year, more results were becoming available and found their way into (scientific) papers and presentations at conferences and in journals. In the third and final year, a steady stream of (scientific) articles and presentations come from the project, and presentations concern the results of the project and the experiences gained in the Living Labs. Apart from giving a full overview of all dissemination results, a number of highlights are given specific attention.Multi Actor SystemsTechnology, Policy and Managemen
Cassandra - D7.3.4 - M24 status report dissemination results
No full textThis deliverable is a status report on the dissemination activities and results in the CASSANDRA project. These status reports are made regularly, with two more to come. Together, these make up deliverable D7.3 – Dissemination results. In this fifth report, the results of the dissemination activities that have taken place in the first year of the project are discussed. It builds on the first four status reports, delivered in M4, M6, M12, and M18 (D7.3, D7.3.1, D7.3.2, and D7.3.3). The M4 report covered the starting phase of the project. Therefore, it described many activities related to presenting the project to the world. Results included the project logo, press releases, the project website, templates, a brochure and other dissemination material. The subsequent reports, including this status update, primarily describe an update of the various dissemination results in Section 4. The first year of dissemination primarily included presenting the CASSANDRA project, key concepts and initial outcomes to various audiences (policy makers, industry and science) all over the world. Now that the project is finalizing its second year, more results are becoming available and find their way into (scientific) papers and presentations at conferences and in journals.Multi Actor SystemsTechnology, Policy and Managemen
Authoring the “Author of My Being” in Memoirs of Doctor Burney
No full textThe formative influence on Frances Burney’s work of the artistic-professional context of her upbringing has only recently begun to be recognized. Early experiences in her father’s musical household informed Burney’s construction of a literary identity that balanced her professionally specialized labor with an aesthetic of domestic privacy. In Memoirs of Doctor Burney, Burney collapses this separation, using her professional abilities in combination with her own intimate, domestic experience. From this, she constructs a public version of her father, Charles Burney, as a polite, sociable man-of-letters rather than a musical professional. In Memoirs, Burney uses biography as a vehicle for the establishment of her own literary authority. In transforming her father from artisanal musician to man-of-letters, she establishes an artistic-professional genealogy in which to site her own literary genius. Most significantly, Burney exerts final creative authority over her father, reimagining inheritance as evolution. Burney simultaneously invokes and obscures her family history in a what I argue is a relational biography: one in which the narrative of her father’s life is indistinguishable from the narrative of her own creative development
The Mary Hamilton Papers (c. 1740-c.1850)
No full textThe Mary Hamilton Papers (c.1740–c.1850). Compiled by David Denison, Nuria Yáñez-Bouza, Tino Oudesluijs, Cassandra Ulph, Christine Wallis, Hannah Barker and Sophie Coulombeau, University of Manchester, 2019-2023. https://doi.org/10.48420/21687809 (v.x)The Mary Hamilton Papers. Prepared for indexing in CQPweb by Sebastian Hoffmann with the assistance of David Denison, 2022-2023, version 10 November 2023. CQPweb created and CQPweb server maintained by Andrew Hardie, UCREL, Lancaster University. https://cqpweb.lancs.ac.uk<br/
- …
