1,720,990 research outputs found
Il distretto culturale evoluto: una “rete di reti” per il rinnovamento delle politiche urbane.
No full textIl distretto culturale evoluto Beni culturali e pianificazione del territorio nella sfida futura
No full textCreatività e place-based development: buone pratiche e strumenti di rigenerazione creativa per la competitività territoriale
No full textLe politiche urbane in Italia e in Europa: dalle sperimentazioni dell’ultimo ventennio alla programmazione 2007-2013
No full textCultural planning: the impact of the European Funds System on regional and urban development,
No full textCultural policies have been a typical expression of national states since the beginning of the XIX century. For this reason, they are mainly focused on conservation and enhancement of historical and artistic heritage and they are lead by State bodies, directly or through public-private partnerships.
At the end of the Nineties, the growth of urban regeneration policies has foster the coordinated implementation of strategic initiatives related to cultural heritage within the framework of local development policies. This strategies, firstly defined as planning for the arts, are now collected under the “label” of cultural planning as they are involving a wider range of cultural resources (natural assets, industrial heritage sites, forms of intangible heritage, etc.).
Recently, the economic theories on technological innovation have lead the attention on creative absorptive capacity of culture, supporting a cultural development of the economy. This procedural and creative dimension of culture, however, is so broad that induce to question what is or is not art for the purpose of programming and when public policies end living space to cultural planning.
In Europe this emerges evaluating the effects of EU cultural planning on urban and regional development in its member countries because European projects sometimes are managed directly by the Directorates of the European Commission (centralized management), other through national and regional Operative Programs linked to national cultural policies (de-centralized management of the Cohesion Policy). The study tries to shed light on this aspect, firstly describing facilities and resources devoted to culture within the European Union and, then, analyzing the 2007-2014 programming and the preliminary documents of the 2014-2020 cycle. In the final part, the useful elements emerged are discussed providing some considerations on the role of central governments and regions in the implementation of cultural planning initiatives financed with Structural Funds
Le ‘mutazioni’ del territorio storico. Patrimonio ed economia creativa nella dimensione locale. Il caso sardo
No full textIn Italy, the application of the organizational model of the traditional industrial district to the management of cultural heritage and activities has fostered the establishment and the diffusion of cultural districts throughout the country. Research conducted on Italian Regions, including Sardinia, have revealed the peculiarities of the organizational models that govern the sector of cultural heritage from protection to valorisation: the ability to generate ‘hybrid’ district forms linked to technological innovation, agribusiness and tourism, but even the weak emergence of advanced cultural districts and meta-districts as supra-local business conglomerates (creative and cultural clusters). Analysing the experiences of the Sulcis and Iglesiente areas in Sardinia, selected as case studies, the paper investigates the reasons and factors that influence and limit the affirmation of supra-local clusters in the valorisation of the historical territory, highlighting the contribution of urban planning to overcome them
Federalismo demaniale e autonomie locali: gli strumenti per regolare i rapporti interistituzionali nel trasferimento dei beni costieri appartenenti al ministero della Difesa
No full textState Property Federalism and Local Autonomies: The Instruments to Adjust the Inter-institutional Relations in the Transfer of Coastal Assets Belonging to the Ministry of Defence
In recent years the lack of reforms in the field of public real estate assets (Articles 822-823 Civil Code) has led to the proliferation of measures to encourage management models in line with EU's programming. The LD. 85/2010 on the transfer of State properties to Regions and provinces has been approved in this context. Region and provinces must be able to manage these properties through real estate investment trusts or publicly owned companies. However, according to the rules on fiscal federalism, the State properties' transfer cannot be applied to devolved territories (Autonomous Regions: Friuli Venezia Giulia, Sardinia, Sicily, Trentino Alto Adige, Aosta Valley; Autonomous provinces: Trento and Bolzano). As a result, a substantial portion of the Defense's estates located in the Alps and in the coastal areas have been excluded from transfer leading to contrasted reactions. By reference to the case of Sardinia, we propose a reflection on the solutions put in place by devolved territories to regulate relations with institutional bodies involved in the transfer of Defense's properties in coastal areas trying not to be excluded from the benefits of the LD. 85/2010
Un nuovo modello territoriale di sviluppo per un territorio in transizione. La bioregione urbana sarda.
No full textGuidelines for creative practices and regeneration urban planning. The case study of Cagliari
No full textLa valorizzazione dei beni immobili pubblici del demanio culturale tra rischi e opportunità. La proposta di un modello di gestione
No full textLa Circolare MiBAC n.18/2011 descrive in modo dettagliato la procedura del DLgs.85/2010 art.5 comma 5 per
il trasferimento dei beni immobili pubblici del federalismo demaniale culturale. Tuttavia, nel definire i contenuti
dell’accordo e del programma di valorizzazione alla base del trasferimento, essa non detta alcuna norma
riguardo le modalità di attuazione degli interventi di recupero e le modalità di gestione del bene trasferito. Il
contributo indaga su quest’aspetto analizzando gli accordi e i programmi di valorizzazione dei beni culturali già
trasferiti, le loro ricadute urbanistiche e i modelli gestionali adottati. La ricerca trova argomentazioni nella
letteratura giuridica sulla riforma dei beni immobili pubblici, divenuta oramai necessaria alla luce dei recenti
provvedimenti che interessano il trasferimento di beni statali agli enti territoriali per la costituzione di
partnership pubblico-privato locali. Lo studio apre nuove prospettive di lavoro nell’ambito delle forme di
collaborazione tra pubblico e privato previste dal DLgs. 42/2004 per il patrimonio cultural
- …
