3 research outputs found
Timara Tyler Interview
Timara Tyler (M.S. 2017) was interviewed by Valeria Reynosa via the Zoom internet-based videoconferencing software on July 3, 2020. She was born in Memphis, Tennessee and spent her early childhood there. Ms. Tyler moved to Texas with her mother when she was eight years old, where they lived in the Carrollton-Lewisville area. In high school, she was involved in volleyball, basketball, and orchestra. She then attended Stephen F. Austin University, where she participated in groups like the NAACP (National Association for the Advancement of Colored People), Generation Texas, and a sign language organization. Tyler graduated from SFA with a bachelor's in psychology and minors in American sign language and hospitality administration, and applied to SMU for graduate school shortly after. She describes her experience as a working-class and full-time graduate student. After acquiring her master's in family and marriage therapy, she became a substance abuse counselor for Dallas County students. Tyler details how the COVID-19 pandemic has affected counseling. At the time of the interview, Ms. Tyler's goals include acquiring her Ph.D. and opening up a music and arts charter school
The polarity sensitivity factor (PSF) of some fluorescent probe molecules used for studying supramolecular systems and other heterogeneous environments
When is Green Nudging Ethically Permissible?
This review article provides a new perspective on the ethics of green nudging. We advance a new model for assessing the ethical permissibility of green nudges (GNs). On this model, which provides normative guidance for policymakers, a GN is ethically permissible when the intervention is (1) efficacious, (2) cost-effective, and (3) the advantages of the GN (i.e. reducing the environmental harm) are not outweighed by countervailing costs/harms (i.e. for nudgees). While traditional ethical objections to nudges (paternalism, etc.) remain potential normative costs associated with GNs, any such costs must be weighed against the injunction to reduce environmental harm to third parties
