1,088 research outputs found
Bryobiella desertorum Tuttle & Baker 1968
No full textBryobiella desertorum Tuttle & Baker 1968 (Figs. 1–38) Diagnosis. Within Bryobiella. Female: dorsal setae barbed; dorsal central setae (v 2, sc 1, c 1, d 1, e 1) 1/3 to 1/2 as long as distance between their bases. Prodorsal striae longitudinal centrally; hysterosomal striae transverse between c 1 to f 1, longitudinal behind f 1; empodium with one pair of tenent hairs; tarsus I with 8 to 10 tactile setae, two solenidia and three eupathidia; tarsus II with 8 to 9 tactile setae, one solenidion and three eupathidia.Anal setae forked. Male: dorsal setae similar to female. Prodorsal striae longitudinal centrally; hysterosomal striae entirely transverse centrally. Femur I, femur II, genua I, genua II and tibia II with extra solenidia. Anal setae smooth. Aedeagus very long, slender, tapering to tip. Distribution. United States (Arizona). Type specimens examined: One paratype male, ex. Euphorbia polycarpa, from Gila Bend, Arizona, USA, on April 9, 1963, coll. D.M. Tuttle. Non-type specimens examined: One female, ex. E. albomarginata, from Dateland, Yuma, Arizona, on June 27, U.S.A., coll. D.M. Tuttle (OSAL, OSAL 0052119). One protonymph, ex. E. albomarginata, from Gila Bend, Arizona, USA, on October 15, 1963, coll. D.M. Tuttle. One female, three deutonymphs, four protonymphs and 10 larvae, ex. E. albomarginata, from Gila Bend, Arizona, USA, on June 27, 1966, coll. D.M. Tuttle. One protonymph (molting), ex. E. albomarginata, from Gila Bend, Arizona, USA, on July 27, 1966, coll. D.M. Tuttle. Two larvae, ex. Bouteloua aristidoides, from Gila Bend, Arizona, USA, on September 13, 1969, coll. D.M. Tuttle. One female, ex. Atriplex elegans, Yuma, Arizona, USA, on August 18, 1979, coll. D.M. Tuttle. Two females, ex. A. elegans, Yuma, Arizona, USA, on August 19, 1979, coll. D.M. Tuttle. One female, ex. A. elegans, Yuma, Arizona, USA, on August 20, 1979, coll. D.M. Tuttle. One male, ex. A. elegans, Yuma, Arizona, USA, on September 3, 1979, coll. D.M. Tuttle.One male, ex. Tiquilia palmeri, from Yuma, Arizona, U.S. A, on May 14, 1964, coll. D.M. Tuttle. One deutonymph, ex. T. palmeri, from Yuma, Arizona, U.S. A, on September 18, 1964, coll. D.M. Tuttle.Published as part of Yi, Tian-Ci & Ochoa, Ronald, 2018, Revision of Bryobiella Tuttle & Baker (Acari, Tetranychidae), with ontogenetic development and redescription of B. desertorum, pp. 93-131 in Zootaxa 4540 (1) on pages 100-101, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4540.1.9, http://zenodo.org/record/261627
FIGURE 10 in Revision of Neotrichobia Tuttle & Baker (Acari, Tetranychidae) with ontogenetic development and redescription of N. arizonensis
No full textFIGURE 10. Neotrichobia arizonensis Tuttle & Baker, male, aedeagus, A, paratype, ex. Aristida adscensionis; B, ex. Boerhaavia sp.; C–E, ex. Allionia incarnata; F, ex. Tidestromia lanuginose.Published as part of He, Hu-Die, Yi, Tian-Ci, Jin, Dao-Chao & Ochoa, Ronald, 2023, Revision of Neotrichobia Tuttle & Baker (Acari, Tetranychidae) with ontogenetic development and redescription of N. arizonensis, pp. 157-184 in Zootaxa 5324 (1) on page 172, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5324.1.12, http://zenodo.org/record/821367
An Inverse Kinematic Mathematical Model Using Groebner Basis Theory for Arm Swing Movement in the Gait Cycle
No full text1 online resource (PDF, 7 pages, includes illustrations)Kendricks, Kimberly D.; Fullenkamp, Adam M.; McGrellis, Robert; Juhl, Jonathan; Tuttle, Ronald F.. (2010). An Inverse Kinematic Mathematical Model Using Groebner Basis Theory for Arm Swing Movement in the Gait Cycle. Retrieved from the University Digital Conservancy, https://hdl.handle.net/11299/180919
Neotrichobia Tuttle & Baker 1968
No full text<p> <i>Neotrichobia</i> Tuttle & Baker, 1968</p> <p> Type species: <i>Neotrichobia arizonensis</i> Tuttle & Baker, 1968</p> Diagnosis <p> Within tribe Petrobiini, prodorsum with three pairs of setae (<i>v</i> 2, <i>sc</i> 1 and <i>sc</i> 2), hysterosoma with nine pairs of setae (<i>c</i> 1–3, <i>d</i> 1–2, <i>e</i> 1–2, <i>f</i> 1–2) inserted on small tubercles dorsally and three pairs of lyriforms (<i>ia</i>, <i>im</i> and <i>ip</i>); central region of adult prodorsum and opisthodorsum smooth without striae (Fig. 1 and 5); a narrow band of transverse striae between prosoma and opisthosoma; podosomal venter of adult and nymph with many coxal setae and intercoxal setae, that of larva with same coxal setae and intercoxal setae of the family Tetranychidae; peritreme anastomosing distally; tarsus I and tarsus II with typical duplex setae, tibia II–IV with one solenidion respectively.</p> Remarks <p> Previously, <i>Neotrichobia</i> was placed in its own tribe Neotrichobiini (Tuttle & Baker 1968). It is unique in having many ventral and coxal setae in the post-larval stages. Normally, adult Tetranychidae have two pairs of setae on coxae I (<i>1b</i>, <i>1c</i>), no more than two pairs on coxae II (<i>2b</i>, <i>2c</i>), and one pair on both coxae III (<i>3b</i>) and coxae IV (<i>4b</i>), and three pairs of intercoxal setae, <i>1a</i> between coxae I, <i>3a</i> between coxae III, <i>4a</i> between coxae IV. Departures from the typical body setation of spider mites is unusual but not unique to <i>Neotrichobia</i>, with coxal hypertrichy also being present in <i>Tauriobia</i> and the subgenus <i>Paraplonobia Brachynychus</i>, and dorsal hypertrichy in <i>Dasyobia</i> (Lindquist 1985).</p>Published as part of <i>He, Hu-Die, Yi, Tian-Ci, Jin, Dao-Chao & Ochoa, Ronald, 2023, Revision of Neotrichobia Tuttle & Baker (Acari, Tetranychidae) with ontogenetic development and redescription of N. arizonensis, pp. 157-184 in Zootaxa 5324 (1)</i> on page 158, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5324.1.12, <a href="http://zenodo.org/record/8213678">http://zenodo.org/record/8213678</a>
Lasting impressions: greater Newark's Jewish legacy, an exhibition in the galleries of The Newark Public Library
No full textAn exhibition in the galleries of the Newark Public Library, April 24, 1995 - July 3, 1995, curated by William J. Dane and Charles F. Cumming
Neotrichobia arizonensis Tuttle & Baker 1968
No full text<i>Neotrichobia arizonensis</i> Tuttle & Baker, 1968 <p>(Figures 1–22, Table 1)</p> Specimens examined <p> <b>Type specimens examined</b>: paratypes, one male and one deutonymph, <i>ex</i>. <i>Aristida adscensionis</i> L. (Poaceae), Tucson Arizona, US, June 24, 1964, coll. D.M. Tuttle.</p> <p> <b>Non-type specimens examined</b>: Two females and two males, <i>ex</i>. <b> <i>Boerhaavia</i> sp</b> . (Nyctaginaceae), Torreon, Mexico, August 4, 1974, coll. D.M. Tuttle, E.W. Baker, and M. Abbatiello. Two females, one deutonymph, one molting deutonymph and one molting protonymph, <i>ex</i>. <i>Allionia incarnata</i> L. (Nyctaginaceae), Tucson, Arizona, US, October 21, 1982, coll. D.M. Tuttle. One female, <i>ex</i>. <i>A. incarnata</i> L., Hermosillo, Mexico, July 18, 1970, coll. D.M. Tuttle, E.W. Baker, and M. Abbatiello. Two females, two males, one deutonymph, one molting deutonymph, <i>ex</i>. <i>A. incarnata</i> L., ten miles south of Chihuahua, Mexico, August 7, 1976, coll. D.M. Tuttle. Two males, two deutonymph, five molting deutonymph, three protonymph, one molting protonymph, <i>ex</i>. <i>A. incarnata</i> L., Cordes Jct. Arizona, US, August 20, 1984, coll. D.M. Tuttle. Six males, <i>A. incarnata</i> L., Quartzsite, Arizona, US, October 1, 1974, coll. D.M. Tuttle. One protonymph and two larvae, <i>ex</i>. <i>Tidestromia lanuginosa</i> (Amaranthaceae), Quartzsite, Arizona, US, October 1, 1974, coll. D.M. Tuttle. Two larvae, <i>ex</i>. <i>Pectis papposa</i> (Asteraceae), Agua Caliente, Arizona, US, September 12, 1962, coll. D.M. Tuttle. One larva, <i>ex</i>. <i>Plantago insueris</i> (Plantaginaceae), Gila Bind, Arizona, US, February 27, 1968, coll. D.M. Tuttle. One larva, <i>ex</i>. <i>Artemisia ludoviciana</i> (Asteraceae), Chihuahua, Mexico, August 5, 1970, coll. D.M. Tuttle, E.W. Baker, and M.Abbatiello. Three larvae, <i>ex</i>. <b> <i>Fouquieria</i> sp</b> . (Fouquieriaceae) Aermosillo Mexico, February 20, 1968, coll. CH. Sactzer.</p> Female (n = 7) <p> <i>Dorsum</i> (Fig. 1). Idiosomal length 481–564 from <i>v</i> 2 to <i>h</i> 1, width from <i>c</i> 3 to <i>c</i> 3 396–448; prodorsum with 3 pairs of setae (<i>v</i> 2, <i>sc</i> 1–2), covered with barbs; striae between seta <i>v</i> 2 broken, somewhat transverse; median prodorsum smooth, forming a plate bearing setae <i>sc</i> 1; area around bases of setae <i>sc</i> 2 smooth forming a pair of plates; median plate following transverse striae, a narrow band of transverse striae between prodorsum and opisthosoma; dorsal setal length various among checked specimens, near-continuous change, herein consider as intraspecific variation; hysterosoma with nine pairs of setae (<i>c</i> 1–3, <i>d</i> 1–2, <i>e</i> 1–2, <i>f</i> 1–2) inserted on small tubercles dorsally and three pairs of lyriform fissures (<i>ia</i>, <i>im</i> and <i>ip</i>); one median plate bearing <i>c</i> 1–2, <i>d</i> 1–2, <i>e</i> 1–2, <i>f</i> 1–2 and two pairs of lysirforms <i>ia</i> and <i>im</i>, one small plate lateral to <i>c</i> 2 visible each side; hysterosoma dorsal setae barbed on small tubercles; setal length <i>v</i> 1 51– 79, <i>sc</i> 1 54–71, <i>sc</i> 2 36–62, <i>c</i> 1 62–79, <i>c</i> 2 36–59, <i>c</i> 3 39–40, <i>d</i> 1 39–79, <i>d</i> 2 44–59, <i>e</i> 1 39 –77, <i>e</i> 2 41 –42, <i>f</i> 1 52–76, <i>f</i> 2 50–74, <i>h</i> 1 44–69; distance between setal bases <i>v</i> 2 – <i>v</i> 2 26–45, <i>sc</i> 1 – <i>sc</i> 1 127–170, <i>sc</i> 2 – <i>sc</i> 2 228–296, <i>c</i> 1 – <i>c</i> 1 135–176, <i>c</i> 2 – <i>c</i> 2 305–334, <i>c</i> 3 – <i>c</i> 3 396–448, <i>d</i> 1 – <i>d</i> 1 92–125, <i>d</i> 2 – <i>d</i> 2 239–306, <i>e</i> 1 – <i>e</i> 1 94–122, <i>e</i> 2 – <i>e</i> 2 93–154, <i>f</i> 1 – <i>f</i> 1 55–75, <i>f</i> 2 – <i>f</i> 2 108–128, <i>h</i> 1 – <i>h</i> 1 36–44.</p> <p> <i>Venter</i> (Fig. 2). 28–30 plumose setae between coxae I and II, difficult to differentiate coxal setae and intercoxal setae; 16–17 setae on coxae II; about 90 setae between coxae III and coxae IV; striae between coxae I and II transverse, becoming somewhat longitudinal between coxae III and IV, and longitudinal anterior to setae <i>ag</i>; genital plate with longitudinal striae; with one pair of smooth aggenital setae (<i>ag</i>), two pairs of smooth genital setae (<i>g</i> 1–2), and three pairs of smooth pseudanal setae (<i>ps</i> 1–3); setae <i>h</i> 2 and <i>h</i> 3 plumose.</p> <p> <i>Gnathosoma</i> (Figs 3A–C). Peritreme anastomosing distally (Fig. 3C); ventral infracapitular setae <i>m</i> plumose; one pairs of adoral setae (<i>or</i> 1) visible; dorsal surface of palpcoxal bases with a pair of supracoxal setae (<i>ep</i>) with blunt end; setae <i>d</i> PFe and <i>l′</i> PGe strong plumose; all three palptibial setae (<i>l′</i> PTi, <i>l″</i> PTi and <i>d</i> PTi) smooth; terminal eupathidium (<i>suζ</i>) longer than two lateral eupathidia (<i>ul′ζ</i> and <i>ul″ζ</i>) subequal in length; solenidion (<i>ω</i>) shorter lateral eupathidia; three short, smooth, tactile setae (<i>a</i>, <i>b</i>, <i>c</i>).</p> <p> <i>Legs</i> (Fig. 4). Segments of legs I–IV plethotrichous, unable to notate all leg setae as in Lindquist (1985); tarsus I with two sets of duplex setae and two solenidia, tibiae I with two solenidia, tarsus II with one duplex setae, tibiae II with one solenidion; tarsus III, tibiae III, tarsus IV and tibiae IV with a solenidion respectively; both tarsus III and IV without typical duplex setae; all tactile setae plumose.</p> Male (n = 11) <p> <i>Dorsum</i> (Fig. 5). Idiosomal length 298–374 from <i>v</i> 2 to <i>h</i> 1, width from <i>c</i> 3 to <i>c</i> 3 239–283; prodorsum with 3 pairs of setae (<i>v</i> 2, <i>sc</i> 1–2), covered with barbs; striae between setae <i>v</i> 2 broken, somewhat transverse; prodorsal plate bearing setae <i>sc</i> 1 and <i>sc</i> 2; with a narrow band of transverse striae between prodorsum and opisthodorsum; hysterosomal plate covering most of hysterosomal dorsum with broken sparse striae, bearing (<i>c</i> 1–3, <i>d</i> 1–2, <i>e</i> 1–2, <i>f</i> 1–2, <i>h</i> 1) and three pairs of lyriforms (<i>ia</i>, <i>im</i> and <i>ip</i>); setae <i>h</i> 2 and <i>h</i> 3 off plate; setal length <i>v</i> 1 35–48 <i>sc</i> 1 34–48, <i>sc</i> 2 34–44, <i>c</i> 1 39–54, <i>c</i> 2 33–44, <i>c</i> 3 36–50, <i>d</i> 1 35–47, <i>d</i> 2 35–45, <i>e</i> 1 34 –48, <i>e</i> 2 34 –50, <i>f</i> 1 37–48, <i>f</i> 2 35–48, <i>h</i> 1 33–43; distance between setal bases <i>v</i> 2 – <i>v</i> 2 29–42, <i>sc</i> 1 – <i>sc</i> 1 104–130, <i>sc</i> 2 – <i>sc</i> 2 158–198, <i>c</i> 1 – <i>c</i> 1 87–106, <i>c</i> 2 – <i>c</i> 2 155–196, <i>c</i> 3 – <i>c</i> 3 239–283, <i>d</i> 1 – <i>d</i> 1 60–81, <i>d</i> 2 – <i>d</i> 2 136–175, <i>e</i> 1 – <i>e</i> 1 65–84, <i>e</i> 2 – <i>e</i> 2 98–121, <i>f</i> 1 – <i>f</i> 1 32–46, <i>f</i> 2 – <i>f</i> 2 58–74, <i>h</i> 1 – <i>h</i> 1 18–23.</p> <p> <i>Venter</i> (Fig. 6). Visible striae transverse; coxae I–IV and intercoxae I, III and IV with plumose setae; 40 setae on propodosoma venter, 13 on left coxa II, 14 on right coxa II, and 41 on post-podosoma venter in paratype; with one pair of smooth aggenital setae (<i>ag</i>), two pairs of smooth genital setae (<i>g</i> 1–2), and three pairs of smooth pseudanal setae (<i>ps</i> 1–3); setae <i>h</i> 2 and <i>h</i> 3 plumose.</p> <p> <i>Gnathosoma</i> (Fig. 7). Similar to female; peritreme anastomosing distally (Figs 6B, C); dorsal surface of palpcoxae base with a pair of supracoxal setae (<i>ep</i>); setae <i>d</i> PFe and <i>l′</i> PGe strong plumose; all three palptibial setae (<i>l′</i> PTi, <i>l″</i> PTi and <i>d</i> PTi) smooth; terminal eupathidium (<i>suζ</i>) longer than two lateral eupathidia (<i>ul′ζ</i> and <i>ul″ζ</i>) subequal in length; solenidion (<i>ω</i>) shorter lateral eupathidia; three short, smooth, tactile setae (<i>a</i>, <i>b</i>, <i>c</i>).</p> <p> <i>Legs</i> (Figs 8–9). Segments of legs I–IV plethotrichous, unable to notate all leg setae as Lindquist (1985); tarsus I with two sets of duplex setae and 18 solenidia in paratype, tibiae I with 20 solenidia in paratype, tarsus II with one duplex setae and two solenidia, tibiae II with one solenidion; tarsus III, tibiae III, tarsus IV and tibiae IV with a solenidion respectively; both tarsus III and IV without typical duplex setae; all tactile setae plumose; empodia I–IV with four pairs ventral hairs, of which proximal two pairs of contiguous in paratype male (Figs 9E–H), while with six pairs of ventral hairs, of which two proximal pairs contiguous in males <i>ex</i>. <i>Boerhaavia</i> sp. (Nyctaginaceae) (Figs A–D).</p> <p> <i>Aedeagus</i> (Figs 10A–G). Aedeagus long and slightly curved or somewhat straight.</p> Deutonymph (n = 4) <p> Dorsum (Fig. 11). Dorsum similar to that of female; idiosomal length 378–378 from <i>v</i> 2 to <i>h</i> 1, width from <i>c</i> 3 to <i>c</i> 3 267–338; setal length: <i>v</i> 2 48–60, <i>sc</i> 1 46–65, <i>sc</i> 2 31–44, <i>c</i> 1 40–64, <i>c</i> 2 25–32, <i>c</i> 3 33–44, <i>d</i> 1 38–55, <i>d</i> 2 32–41, <i>e</i> 1 39 –60, <i>e</i> 2 33 –51, <i>f</i> 1 42–63, <i>f</i> 2 41–52, <i>h</i> 1 41–44; distance between setal bases: <i>v</i> 2 – <i>v</i> 2 24–30, <i>sc</i> 1 – <i>sc</i> 1 88–129, <i>sc</i> 2 – <i>sc</i> 2 139–225, <i>c</i> 1 – <i>c</i> 1 91–117, <i>c</i> 2 – <i>c</i> 2 159–239, <i>c</i> 3 – <i>c</i> 3 267–338, <i>d</i> 1 – <i>d</i> 1 64–76, <i>d</i> 2 – <i>d</i> 2 179–223, <i>e</i> 1 – <i>e</i> 1 58 –72, <i>e</i> 2 – <i>e</i> 2 93–154, <i>f</i> 1 – <i>f</i> 1 27–43, <i>f</i> 2 – <i>f</i> 2 62–64, <i>h</i> 1 – <i>h</i> 1 20–30.</p> <p> <i>Venter</i> (Fig. 12). About 32 plumose setae on present on integument between coxae I and II, and difficult to differentiate coxal setae and intercoxal setae; 10–11 setae on coxae II; about 35 setae between coxae III and coxae IV; striae between coxae I and II transverse, following longitudinal between coxae III and IV, and longitudinal between setae <i>ag</i>; with one pair of smooth aggenital setae (<i>ag</i>), one pair of smooth genital setae (<i>g</i> 1), and three pairs of smooth pseudanal setae (<i>ps</i> 1–3); setae <i>h</i> 2 and <i>h</i> 3 plumose.</p> <p> <i>Gnathosoma</i> (Fig. 13). Similar to female; peritreme anastomosing distally (Fig. 13C); dorsal surface of palpcoxae base with a pair of supracoxal setae (<i>ep</i>); setae <i>d</i> PFe and <i>l′</i> PGe strong plumose; all three palptibial setae (<i>l′</i> PTi, <i>l″</i> PTi and <i>d</i> PTi) smooth; terminal eupathidium (<i>suζ</i>) slightly longer than two lateral eupathia (<i>ul′ζ</i> and <i>ul″ζ</i>) subequal in length; solenidion (<i>ω</i>) shorter lateral eupathia; three short, smooth, tactile setae (<i>a</i>, <i>b</i>, <i>c</i>).</p> <p> <i>Legs</i> (Fig. 14). Tarsus I with two sets of duplex setae and two solenidia, tibiae I with one solenidia, tarsus II with one duplex setae; tarsus III with one solenidion, tarsus IV with a solenidion respectively; solenidion on tarsus III occasionally absent; all tactile setae plumose.</p> Protonymph (n = 4) <p> <i>Dorsum</i> (Fig. 15). Dorsum similar to that of female; idiosomal length 378–378 from <i>v</i> 2 to <i>h</i> 1, width from <i>c</i> 3 to <i>c</i> 3 267–338; without prodorsal plate; median striae longitudinal; edge of hysterosomal plate not clear; setal lengths: <i>v</i> 2 44–47, <i>sc</i> 1 46–56, <i>sc</i> 2 31–36, <i>c</i> 1 41–48, <i>c</i> 2 28–31, <i>c</i> 3 33–36, <i>d</i> 1 33–39, <i>d</i> 2 28–30, <i>e</i> 1 41 –49, <i>e</i> 2 37 –39, <i>f</i> 1 45–56, <i>f</i> 2 43–46, <i>h</i> 1 41–43; distance between setal bases: <i>v</i> 2 – <i>v</i> 2 25–30, <i>sc</i> 1 – <i>sc</i> 1 98–105, <i>sc</i> 2 – <i>sc</i> 2 169–191, <i>c</i> 1 – <i>c</i> 1 94–107, <i>c</i> 2 – <i>c</i> 2 173–190, <i>c</i> 3 – <i>c</i> 3 284–329, <i>d</i> 1 – <i>d</i> 1 59–61, <i>d</i> 2 – <i>d</i> 2 173–179, <i>e</i> 1 – <i>e</i> 1 56 –62, <i>e</i> 2 – <i>e</i> 2 104–111, <i>f</i> 1 – <i>f</i> 1 26–31, <i>f</i> 2 – <i>f</i> 2 57–68, <i>h</i> 1 – <i>h</i> 1 24–27.</p> <p> <i>Venter</i> (Fig. 16). Ventral striae transverse between coxae I and II, longitudinal between coxae III and IV; four to five plumose setae on coxae I, six plumose setae on coxae II, three to four on coxae III, coxae nude; four pairs of intercoxae plumose setae; one pair of smooth aggenital setae (<i>ag</i>), three pairs of smooth pseudanal setae (<i>ps</i> 1–3); setae <i>h</i> 2 and <i>h</i> 3 plumose.</p> <p> <i>Gnathosoma</i> (Fig. 17). Similar to that of deutonymph.</p> <p> <i>Legs</i> (Fig. 18). Tarsus I with two sets of duplex setae, tibiae I with one solenidia, tarsus II with one duplex setae; all tactile setae plumose.</p> Larva (n = 9) <p> <i>Dorsum</i> (Fig. 19). Prodorsum with broken, bold, longitudinal striae, three pairs of setae (<i>v</i> 2, <i>sc</i> 1, <i>sc</i> 2); hysterosoma with 10 pairs of barbed setae (<i>d</i> 1–3, <i>e</i> 1–2, <i>f</i> 1–2, <i>h</i> 1), transverse striae and three pairs of lyrissures (<i>ia</i>, <i>im</i>, <i>ip</i>); length of setae near-continuously variable as in female, herein considered as intraspecific variation; setal length: <i>v</i> 2 24–56, <i>sc</i> 1 21–55, <i>sc</i> 2 22–68, <i>c</i> 1 26–65, <i>c</i> 2 18–48, <i>c</i> 3 21–82, <i>d</i> 1 21–75, <i>d</i> 2 18–83, <i>e</i> 1 25 –88, <i>e</i> 2 22 –74, <i>f</i> 1 28–81, <i>f</i> 2 23–62, <i>h</i> 1 18–50; distance between setal bases: <i>v</i> 2 – <i>v</i> 2 22–44, <i>sc</i> 1 – <i>sc</i> 1 77–117, <i>sc</i> 2 – <i>sc</i> 2 125–171, <i>c</i> 1 – <i>c</i> 1 70–95, <i>c</i> 2 – <i>c</i> 2 134–172, <i>c</i> 3 – <i>c</i> 3 173–198, <i>d</i> 1 – <i>d</i> 1 32–55, <i>d</i> 2 – <i>d</i> 2 131–150, <i>e</i> 1 – <i>e</i> 1 31 –32, <i>e</i> 2 – <i>e</i> 2 38 –73, <i>f</i> 1 – <i>f</i> 1 18–24, <i>f</i> 2 – <i>f</i> 2 44–55, <i>h</i> 1 – <i>h</i> 1 22–27.</p> <p> <i>Venter</i> (Fig.20).Striae transverse,except for longitudinal between setae <i>3a</i>; two larvae, <i>ex</i>. <i>Tidestromia lanuginosa</i> (Amaranthaceae), from Arizona, US, one larva, <i>ex</i>. <i>Plantago insueris</i> (Plantaginaceae), from Arizona, US, one larva, <i>ex</i>. <i>Artemisia ludoviciana</i> (Asteraceae), from Mexico, and three larvae, <i>ex</i>. <i>Fouquieria</i> sp. (Fouquieriaceae) from Aermosillo Mexico with forked intercoxal setae <i>1a</i> and <i>3a</i>; two larvae <i>ex</i>. <i>Pectis papposa</i> (Asteraceae), from Arizona, US, with two types of intercoxal setae, one smooth and anther forked.</p> <p> Larval setal shape is important to distinguish allied species of spider mites (Jeppson <i>et al.</i> 1975). We do not have available post larval specimens from the same host plants to check if specimens with smooth intercoxal setae represent another species. The taxonomic status of these larval specimens is thus unclear and we provisionally recognize this as intraspecific variation in <i>Neotrichobia arizonensis</i>.</p> <p> <i>Gnathosoma</i> (Fig. 21). Similar to that of deutonymph.</p> <p> <i>Legs</i> (Fig. 22). Empodia I–III with five pairs ventral hairs, of which proximal two pairs of contiguous; legs I–III with normal chaetotaxy in the family Tetranychidae; setal counts: femora, 3-3-1; genua, 4-4-4; tibiae, 5(1 <i>ω</i>)-5-4; tarsi, 6(1 <i>ω</i>)(2 <i>ζ</i>)-6(1 <i>ω</i>)(2 <i>ζ</i>)-6.</p> Remarks <p&
Classical conditioning Part III: Behavioral, neurophysiological and neurochemical studies in the rabbit
No full textW. Ronald Salafia is a contributing author, Pavlovian conditioning, information processing, and the hippocampus
Anuson Walter Vella
No full textCremation volume for Vella, Walter F. (Walter Francis), 1924-1980, American author on Thailand; comprises condolences and papers on Thailand by both crematee and others
RONALD DWORKIN’S CONCEPTION OF LEGAL PRINCIPLES
Get PDFAmong the greatest achievements of Ronald Dworkin as a law philosopher one usually mentions,
not only in the Polish theory of law, the distinguishing of two groups of normative statements:
rules and principles with other standards as the premise of making judgments; what is
more, it is accepted that in this division the two groups have no common components. The first
part of this article is devoted to an analysis of these defining elements of legal principles, suggested
by Dworkin himself, while in the other part the author makes an attempt to recreate Dworkin’s
conception of legal principles, in their connection with the scholar’s conception of political rights,
and in particular the true role legal principles play in the process of application o f law in the view
of Dworkin
Transactions Cost Theory influence in strategy research: A review through a bibliometric study in leading journals
Get PDFTransaction cost theory (TCT) is widely used in several management disciplines. Its value for explaining organizational phenomena and managers? decisions is well accepted and has been recognized with two Nobel laureates (Ronald Coase and Oliver Williamson). In this paper we examine the impact of the TCT on extant research in top tier management journals. We conduct a bibliometric study supported in the analysis of citations and co-citations to uncover the connections between authors and presumably theories. We conclude that the TCT, albeit its specific focus on the transactions as the unit of analysis, is present in a majority of management- and business-related research.transaction costs theory, bibliometric study, strategy research, review
- …
