1,721,513 research outputs found

    Two Notes on the Jurisprudence of Privacy.

    Full text link
    Tushnet, Mark. (1991). Two Notes on the Jurisprudence of Privacy.. Retrieved from the University Digital Conservancy, https://hdl.handle.net/11299/166011

    Sloppiness in the Supreme Court, O.T. 1935- O.T. 1944.

    Full text link
    Tushnet, Mark. (1986). Sloppiness in the Supreme Court, O.T. 1935- O.T. 1944.. Retrieved from the University Digital Conservancy, https://hdl.handle.net/11299/164757

    Style and the Supreme Court's Educational Role in Government.

    Full text link
    Tushnet, Mark. (1994). Style and the Supreme Court's Educational Role in Government.. Retrieved from the University Digital Conservancy, https://hdl.handle.net/11299/167073

    Constitutional Scholarship: What Next?

    No full text
    Part of Symposium "Constitutional Scholarship: What Next?"Tushnet, Mark. (1988). Constitutional Scholarship: What Next?. Retrieved from the University Digital Conservancy, https://hdl.handle.net/11299/165013

    The Project of the Harvard Forewords: A Social and Intellectual Inquiry.

    Full text link
    Tushnet, Mark; Lynch, Timothy. (1995). The Project of the Harvard Forewords: A Social and Intellectual Inquiry.. Retrieved from the University Digital Conservancy, https://hdl.handle.net/11299/167152

    Tushnet, Mark

    No full text

    Self-Historicism

    Full text link
    Among the contributors to this symposium, I may be the person with the longest acquaintance with Sandy Levinson. I want to begin, therefore, with a recollection of the period of my earliest contacts with Sandy - a recollection that, as I hope to show, has some bearing on some of the aspects of Sandy's work that most interest me . . . I use these examples to introduce an argument connected to Sandy's longstanding interest in historical memory. The casebook of which he is a co-author is organized historically-relentlessly so, I would put it, to the point where I personally would find it quite difficult to teach from. I take the implicit argument of the casebook to be that students cannot understand constitutional law, even contemporary constitutional law, without reflecting on the historical circumstances in which constitutional doctrine was articulated.Version of Recor
    corecore