93,295 research outputs found
A computer genereted induction system for hospitalized patients starting on oral anticoagulant therapy
Clinical trials of deep vein thrombosis prophylaxis in medical patients
Autopsies and clinical studies have shown that venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a common cause of morbidity and mortality in medical patients. Prophylaxis of VTE has been less extensively studied in medical patients than in surgical patients, and the results of recent practice audits indicate that the use of thromboprophylaxis is uncommon in medical patients. In the past few years, 3 large randomized clinical trials have demonstrated the efficacy and safety of prophylaxis of VTE in the medical setting. The prophylaxis in MEDical patients with ENOXaparin (MEDENOX), Prospective Evaluation of Dalteparin Efficacy for PREVENTion of VTE in Immobilized Patients Trial (PREVENT), and A Rixta for ThromboEmbolism Prevention in a Medical Indications Study (ARTEMIS) studies have compared the low-molecular-weight heparins enoxaparin and dalteparin, and the specific factor Xa inhibitor fondaparinux, respectively, with placebo in acutely ill medical patients hospitalized with heart failure, respiratory failure, infectious disease, or inflammatory disease. All studies showed both a statistically significant reduction in the rate of venous thromboembolic events (as assessed by venography or compression ultrasonography) and a rate of major bleeding events that were comparable to placebo. The results of these studies support the evidence-based recommendations for systematic use of thromboprophylaxis in this setting. © 2005 Excerpta Medica, Inc
Low-molecular-weight heparin in the treatment of pulmonary embolism
Unfractionated heparin is the traditional treatment of choice for patients presenting with submassive pulmonary embolism. However, newer low-molecular-weight heparins have been developed and tested in several clinical trials in the last 2 decades because of the many limitations of unfractionated heparin. The pharmacologic properties of the low-molecular-weight heparins allow them to be administered subcutaneously in fixed, weight-adjusted doses without need for laboratory monitoring. Different studies have recently proved their efficacy in the treatment of patients with deep vein thrombosis. Because there is good evidence that deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism are 2 expressions of a single disease, the use of low-molecular-weight heparins has been extended to patients presenting with clinically stable pulmonary embolism. In particular, the results of 2 important clinical trials, the Columbus and the Thesee, have conclusively proved that the low-molecular-weight heparins are as safe and effective as unfractionated heparin. In some centers, approximately 80% of patients with deep vein thrombosis are treated at home. This suggests that carefully selected patients with clinically stable pulmonary embolism can receive home treatment with low-molecular-weight heparins. Copyright (C) 2000 by W.B. Saunders Company
Low-molecular-weight heparin in the treatment of pulmonary embolism
Unfractionated heparin is the traditional treatment of choice for patients presenting with submassive pulmonary embolism. However, newer low-molecular-weight heparins have been developed and tested in several clinical trials in the last 2 decades because of the many limitations of unfractionated heparin. The pharmacologic properties of the low-molecular-weight heparins allow them to be administered subcutaneously in fixed, weight-adjusted doses without need for laboratory monitoring. Different studies have recently proved their efficacy in the treatment of patients with deep vein thrombosis. Because there is good evidence that deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism are 2 expressions of a single disease, the use of low-molecular-weight heparins has been extended to patients presenting with clinically stable pulmonary embolism. In particular, the results of 2 important clinical trials, the Columbus and the Thesee, have conclusively proved that the low-molecular-weight heparins are as safe and effective as unfractionated heparin. In some centers, approximately 80% of patients with deep vein thrombosis are treated at home. This suggests that carefully selected patients with clinically stable pulmonary embolism can receive home treatment with low-molecular-weight heparins. Copyright (C) 2000 by W.B. Saunders Company
- …
