94 research outputs found

    ANALISIS WACANA TEKS SKENARIO JALAN PERKAWINAN KARYA ARTHUR S. NALAN

    No full text
    A scenario is a blueprint or work script for the production team for a film or audio-visual work. It contains scenes, places, circumstances and dialogue. The object scenario becomes research in the text analysis carried out. In this research, the object of research is the screenplay for the film "Jalan Perkawinan" by Arthur S. Nalan. The screenplay for the film "Jalan Perkawinan" by Arthur S. Nalan, was the first winner of the screenplay writing competition held by the Ministry of Culture and Tourism of the Republic of Indonesia in 2006. The scenario "Jalan Perkawinan" contains travel stories or different romance/marriage stories regarding the background of the trip crossing Jalan Daendels from Anyer to Panarukan which displays various arts and culture of the archipelago. The research method uses qualitative research with Teun Van Djik\u27s discourse theory analysis approach which examines aspects of text, social cognition and social context. First, from the text aspect it can be seen that the scenario has a marriage theme of different nationalities and religions. Second, in the social cognition aspect, the scriptwriter\u27s knowledge, understanding and experience are very strong in the process of creating the scenario. Meanwhile, thirdly, in the social context aspect, people\u27s emotional feelings towards marriages of different nationalities and religions as well as historical events regarding the construction of Jalan Daendels are very visible. The discourse analysis carried out provides a complete understanding of the "Marriage Road" scenario in terms of the text as a social text, the text as the author\u27s knowledge, and the text in terms of understanding the context regarding the issues raised. Keywords: discourse analysis, arts, culture, film scenarios, marriage path

    Pandemonium and order: Suretyship, surveillance, and taxation in early nineteenth-century Istanbul

    No full text
    This article analyzes the practice of suretyship (kefalet), surveillance and taxation in early nineteenth-century Istanbul. it deals with how the practice of suretyship functioned to achieve social control; it provided shelter for some but at the same time marginalized others with little or no social status. This article also analyzes the extent to which the state maintained order through suretyship. In this way, it intends to capture where and how state and society interacted through social and state control mechanisms. To this end, this article takes into consideration two particular events, the Greek uprising of 1821 and the abolition of the Janissary Corps in 1826, and demonstrates a growing tendency towards impersonal relations in terms of governmental practices of surveillance. Briefly, it illustrates how suretyship changed over time and how a gradual transition took place from personal to impersonal relations as well as within governmental practices. Furthermore, this article provides examples of similar practices by focusing on an institutional development that involved the government systematically accumulating knowledge about the population. Finally, it explores taxation practices by the government in order to show how the pre-modern (contractual) and the modern (statutory) state were not substitutes for each other, but rather shaped each other
    corecore