1,720,995 research outputs found
Figure 4 in Rediscovery and re-description of Rhaphaulus assamicus Godwin-Austenı 1886ı an endemic pupinid land snail from India (Gastropoda: Pupinidae)
No full textFigure 4. (a) Field photograph of Rhaphaulus assamicus Godwin-Austen, 1886 [1882–1920]; (b–f) the habitats of R. assamicus in Namdapha National Park, Arunachal Pradesh, India.Published as part of Sajan, Sheikh, Tripathy, Basudev, Chandra, Kailash & Sivakumar, Kuppusamy, 2019, Rediscovery and re-description of Rhaphaulus assamicus Godwin-Austenı 1886ı an endemic pupinid land snail from India (Gastropoda: Pupinidae), pp. 2553-2562 in Journal of Natural History 53 (41) on page 2560, DOI: 10.1080/00222933.2019.1707893, http://zenodo.org/record/366650
FIGURE 8 in New record of Megalestes gyalsey Gyeltshen, Kalkman & Orr, 2017 (Zygoptera Synlestidae) from India, with first description of female and larva
No full textFIGURE 8. Geographical distribution of Megalestes gyalsey.Published as part of Payra, Arajush, Dawn, Prosenjit, Subramanian, K. A., Deepak, C. K., Chandra, Kailash & Tripathy, Basudev, 2021, New record of Megalestes gyalsey Gyeltshen, Kalkman & Orr, 2017 (Zygoptera Synlestidae) from India, with first description of female and larva, pp. 233-242 in Zootaxa 4938 (2) on page 241, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4938.2.4, http://zenodo.org/record/456386
FIGURE 2 in New record of Megalestes gyalsey Gyeltshen, Kalkman & Orr, 2017 (Zygoptera Synlestidae) from India, with first description of female and larva
No full textFIGURE 2. Male of M. gyalsey (Neora Valley NP, West Bengal): (A) head and thorax, dorsal view; (B) thorax, lateral view; (C) anal appendages, lateral view; (D) terminal segments and anal appendages, dorsal view; (E) head, frontal view; (F) right fore and hind wing (Photos: PD).Published as part of Payra, Arajush, Dawn, Prosenjit, Subramanian, K. A., Deepak, C. K., Chandra, Kailash & Tripathy, Basudev, 2021, New record of Megalestes gyalsey Gyeltshen, Kalkman & Orr, 2017 (Zygoptera Synlestidae) from India, with first description of female and larva, pp. 233-242 in Zootaxa 4938 (2) on page 236, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4938.2.4, http://zenodo.org/record/456386
Streptaxidae Gray 1860
No full textFamily Streptaxidae Gray, 1860 Streptaxidae Gray, 1860: 268. Remarks. The genera Ennea and Gulella (Huttonella) are presented here for comparative purposes, no taxonomic action is done in relation to them.Published as part of Páll-Gergely, Barna, Hunyadi, András, Grego, Jozef, Sajan, Sheikh, Tripathy, Basudev & Chen, Zhe-Yu, 2020, A review of the Diapheridae (Gastropoda: Eupulmonata: Streptaxoidea), with special emphasis on India and Myanmar, pp. 682-718 in Raffles Bulletin of Zoology 68 on page 712, DOI: 10.26107/RBZ-2020-0083, http://zenodo.org/record/534976
Ennea H. Adams & A. Adams 1855
No full textEnnea H. Adams & A. Adams, 1855 Ennea H. Adams & A. Adams, 1855: 171. Ennea — Zilch, 1960: 577. Ennea — Richardson, 1988: 19. Ennea — Schileyko, 2000: 798. Type species. Pupa elegantula L. Pfeiffer, 1847 (Fig. 20), by subsequent designation (Martens, 1860: 302). Remarks. Ennea is characterised by deeply situated long parietal plicae, which are absent in the genus Sinoennea. Although the southern Indian Rowsonia, new genus, has similar plicae, the close relationship between African Ennea and Rowsonia is unlikely due to biogeographical reasons (see also under Rowsonia, new genus).Published as part of Páll-Gergely, Barna, Hunyadi, András, Grego, Jozef, Sajan, Sheikh, Tripathy, Basudev & Chen, Zhe-Yu, 2020, A review of the Diapheridae (Gastropoda: Eupulmonata: Streptaxoidea), with special emphasis on India and Myanmar, pp. 682-718 in Raffles Bulletin of Zoology 68 on page 712, DOI: 10.26107/RBZ-2020-0083, http://zenodo.org/record/534976
Sinoennea austeni
No full textSinoennea austeni (Peile, 1929) Indoennea austeni Peile, 1929b: 271, fig. 3. Sinoennea austeni — Richardson, 1988: 154. Type locality. “ Burrail Range, Naga Hills ”. Material examined. Holotype + 9 paratypes (NHMUK 1903.07.01.779), Burrail Range, coll. Godwin-Austen. Remarks. The original description states that the only livecollected specimen (which is the largest among the others) is the type (= holotype). The shell shape and apertural dentition agrees with other Sinoennea species.Published as part of Páll-Gergely, Barna, Hunyadi, András, Grego, Jozef, Sajan, Sheikh, Tripathy, Basudev & Chen, Zhe-Yu, 2020, A review of the Diapheridae (Gastropoda: Eupulmonata: Streptaxoidea), with special emphasis on India and Myanmar, pp. 682-718 in Raffles Bulletin of Zoology 68 on page 704, DOI: 10.26107/RBZ-2020-0083, http://zenodo.org/record/534976
Tonkinia J. Mabille 1887
No full textTonkinia J. Mabille, 1887 Tonkinia J. Mabille, 1887: 9. Tonkinia — Zilch, 1960: 560. Tonkinia — Richardson, 1988: 263. Tonkinia — Schileyko, 2000: 785. Type species. Tonkinia mirabilis Mabille, 1887, by monotypy. Diagnosis. “Shell depressed, lenticular, thin, transparent, glass-like, of 3–4 slightly convex, somewhat shouldered whorls. Last whorl turned upward, with peripheral keel or angle. Colourless. Embryonic whorls smooth, subsequent whorls without regular sculpture. Aperture solute, irregularly quadrangular, nearly horizontal, with a little thickened, expanded margins and small parietal lamella. Palatal margin with thickening. Umbilicus wide, perspective” (Schileyko, 2000). Distribution. Northern Vietnam.Published as part of Páll-Gergely, Barna, Hunyadi, András, Grego, Jozef, Sajan, Sheikh, Tripathy, Basudev & Chen, Zhe-Yu, 2020, A review of the Diapheridae (Gastropoda: Eupulmonata: Streptaxoidea), with special emphasis on India and Myanmar, pp. 682-718 in Raffles Bulletin of Zoology 68 on page 712, DOI: 10.26107/RBZ-2020-0083, http://zenodo.org/record/534976
Rowsonia sculpta
No full textRowsonia sculpta (W.T. Blanford, 1869) Ennea sculpta W.T. Blanford, 1869: 141, pl. 16, fig. 10. Ennea (Huttonella) sculpta — Nevill, 1878: 7. Ennea (Indoennea) sculpta — Kobelt, 1904b: 158, pl. 20, fig. 20. Ennea (Huttonella) sculpta — W.T. Blanford & Godwin-Austen, 1908: 22. Gulella sculpta — Richardson, 1988: 120. Gulella (Huttonella) sculpta — Ramakrishna et al., 2010: 194. Sinoennea sculpta — Raheem et al., 2014: 145, fig. 95C, D. Type locality. “In montibus Pulney, Indiae meridionalis”. Material examined. Lectotype, designated in Raheem et al. (2014) (NHMUK 1906.03.03.80/1) + 8 paralectotypes (NHMUK 1906.03.03.80), “Palney Hills, S. India ”, “ W.T. Blanford colln.”. Remarks. Apertural barriers are similar to those of R. beddomei.Published as part of Páll-Gergely, Barna, Hunyadi, András, Grego, Jozef, Sajan, Sheikh, Tripathy, Basudev & Chen, Zhe-Yu, 2020, A review of the Diapheridae (Gastropoda: Eupulmonata: Streptaxoidea), with special emphasis on India and Myanmar, pp. 682-718 in Raffles Bulletin of Zoology 68 on page 702, DOI: 10.26107/RBZ-2020-0083, http://zenodo.org/record/534976
Huttonella L. Pfeiffer 1856
No full textSubgenus Huttonella L. Pfeiffer, 1856 Ennea (Huttonella) L. Pfeiffer, 1856: 174. Gulella (Huttonella) — Zilch, 1960: 570. Huttonella — Schileyko, 2000: 821. Type species. Pupa bicolor Hutton, 1834, by subsequent designation (Nevill, 1878: 6). Remarks. The type species of Huttonella has a pantropical distribution (Berry, 1965; Simone, 2013), and it probably originated from Asia (Naggs, 1989; Rowson & Herbert, 2016). Molecular phylogeny showed that it is closely related to “true” Gulella L. Pfeiffer, 1856 (Rowson et al., 2010), and it was treated as a subgenus of Gulella in the most recent revision (Rowson & Herbert, 2016).Published as part of Páll-Gergely, Barna, Hunyadi, András, Grego, Jozef, Sajan, Sheikh, Tripathy, Basudev & Chen, Zhe-Yu, 2020, A review of the Diapheridae (Gastropoda: Eupulmonata: Streptaxoidea), with special emphasis on India and Myanmar, pp. 682-718 in Raffles Bulletin of Zoology 68 on page 712, DOI: 10.26107/RBZ-2020-0083, http://zenodo.org/record/534976
Diapheridae Panha & Naggs 2010
No full textFamily Diapheridae Panha & Naggs in Sutcharit, Naggs, Wade, Fontanilla & Panha, 2010 Diapheridae Panha & Naggs in Sutcharit et al., 2010: 5. Included genera. Bruggennea Dance, 1972, Diaphera Albers, 1850, Laoennea Páll-Gergely in Páll-Gergely et al., 2020, Parasinoennea Z.-Y. Chen & Páll-Gergely, new genus, Platycochlium Laidlaw, 1950, Platylennea Páll-Gergely, new genus, Rowsonia Páll-Gergely, new genus, Sinoennea Kobelt, 1904, Tonkinia J. Mabille, 1887 (see Fig. 2). Remarks. Due to the lack of anatomical and molecular evidence, the inclusion of the genera other than Diaphera and Sinoennea in the Diapheridae is questionable (see Discussion).Published as part of Páll-Gergely, Barna, Hunyadi, András, Grego, Jozef, Sajan, Sheikh, Tripathy, Basudev & Chen, Zhe-Yu, 2020, A review of the Diapheridae (Gastropoda: Eupulmonata: Streptaxoidea), with special emphasis on India and Myanmar, pp. 682-718 in Raffles Bulletin of Zoology 68 on page 688, DOI: 10.26107/RBZ-2020-0083, http://zenodo.org/record/534976
- …
