328 research outputs found
In a nutshell : the book of charm, by far the best book the author has written /
No full textAlso available online http://nla.gov.au/nla.aus-vn449757; FERG copy from Ferguson First World War, 1914-1919 pamphlet collection
Attitude-Dependent Reasons. Kolloquium "Meeting the Author" mit Prof. Thomas Scanlon/Harvard University, Universität Zürich, Dezember 2010
No full textTom Mortenson: The impact of financial decisions on access and opportunity
No full textTom Mortenson: The impact of financial decisions on access and opportunity is a podcast interview with Tom Mortenson, Senior Scholar at the Pell Institute and Editor/Publisher of Postsecondary Education Opportunity. Mortenson notes how high school performance, transition to college, persistence in college, and the transition to the working world are contributing factors to access. He is particularly concerned about access to higher education for low-income students and male students. Mortenson discusses how changes in policy since 1980 have had a negative effect on the United States competitive standing with other developed democracies with regard to attaining higher education. Citing data from the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), he discusses this decline and its relationship to a lack of state support for higher education along with a shift in federal aid from need-based grants to loans. Additionally, Mortenson notes how exclusivity as a value within higher education is contributing to a persistent class-gap in the United States.
Interview facilitation, commentary and discussion presented by Kathryn Dodge, Alison Griffin, and Elise Scanlon of Radio Higher Ed
Author Correction:Cation disorder engineering yields AgBiS<sub>2</sub> nanocrystals with enhanced optical absorption for efficient ultrathin solar cells (Nature Photonics, (2022), 16, 3, (235-241), 10.1038/s41566-021-00950-4)
No full textCorrection to: Nature Photonics https://doi.org/10.1038/s41566-021-00950-4, published online 14 February 2022.In the version of this article initially published, the middle initial for David O. Scanlon was missing in the author list. The error has been corrected in the HTML and PDF versions of the article.</p
Memorandum of Written Evidence to the Committee – January 2015
No full textDr Sara Ward. Dr Tom Scanlon and Professor Tony Hines form the Football Research
Cluster at MMUBS. Since 2009, they have analysed governance structures within
supporter owned football clubs. Sara Ward’s research focused on six football clubs
adopting varying supporter ownership models with differing fortunes.1
The sample
encompassed clubs who had matured with the model (Hamburger SV), clubs who had
adopted it out of financial necessity (Brentford FC, Stockport County FC & Exeter City
FC) and newly formed clubs (Chester FC & FC United of Manchester) which have
evolved using the model. Results from their research form the basis of this submission.
Development of a cost-effectiveness model for optimisation of the screening interval in diabetic retinopathy screening
No full textBACKGROUND:
The English NHS Diabetic Eye Screening Programme was established in 2003. Eligible people are invited annually for digital retinal photography screening. Those found to have potentially sight-threatening diabetic retinopathy (STDR) are referred to surveillance clinics or to Hospital Eye Services.
OBJECTIVES:
To determine whether personalised screening intervals are cost-effective.
DESIGN:
Risk factors were identified in Gloucestershire, UK using survival modelling. A probabilistic decision hidden (unobserved) Markov model with a misgrading matrix was developed. This informed estimation of lifetime costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) in patients without STDR. Two personalised risk stratification models were employed: two screening episodes (SEs) (low, medium or high risk) or one SE with clinical information (low, medium-low, medium-high or high risk). The risk factor models were validated in other populations.
SETTING:
Gloucestershire, Nottinghamshire, South London and East Anglia (all UK).
PARTICIPANTS:
People with diabetes in Gloucestershire with risk stratification model validation using data from Nottinghamshire, South London and East Anglia.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES:
Personalised risk-based algorithm for screening interval; cost-effectiveness of different screening intervals.
RESULTS:
Data were obtained in Gloucestershire from 12,790 people with diabetes with known risk factors to derive the risk estimation models, from 15,877 people to inform the uptake of screening and from 17,043 people to inform the health-care resource-usage costs. Two stratification models were developed: one using only results from previous screening events and one using previous screening and some commonly available GP data. Both models were capable of differentiating groups at low and high risk of development of STDR. The rate of progression to STDR was 5 per 1000 person-years (PYs) in the lowest decile of risk and 75 per 1000 PYs in the highest decile. In the absence of personalised risk stratification, the most cost-effective screening interval was to screen all patients every 3 years, with a 46% probability of this being cost-effective at a £30,000 per QALY threshold. Using either risk stratification models, screening patients at low risk every 5 years was the most cost-effective option, with a probability of 99-100% at a £30,000 per QALY threshold. For the medium-risk groups screening every 3 years had a probability of 43-48% while screening high-risk groups every 2 years was cost-effective with a probability of 55-59%.
CONCLUSIONS:
The study found that annual screening of all patients for STDR was not cost-effective. Screening this entire cohort every 3 years was most likely to be cost-effective. When personalised intervals are applied, screening those in our low-risk groups every 5 years was found to be cost-effective. Screening high-risk groups every 2 years further improved the cost-effectiveness of the programme. There was considerable uncertainty in the estimated incremental costs and in the incremental QALYs, particularly with regard to implications of an increasing proportion of maculopathy cases receiving intravitreal injection rather than laser treatment. Future work should focus on improving the understanding of risk, validating in further populations and investigating quality issues in imaging and assessment including the potential for automated image grading
Cheerleading Team, 1982-1983
No full textChristian Brothers College's cheerleading team for 1982-1983 members were:
Top row: Dawn Blalack, Susan Taylor, Diana Scanlon, Debbie Funk, Kim Baird, Carolyn Partin.
Bottom row: Tom Dolan, Todd Stiles, Tom Barrett, Greg Barber, Buddy DeGruy, Chris Collins
Cheerleaders, 1982-1983
No full textChristian Brothers College Cheerleaders. Standing (L-R); Tom Dolan, Todd Stiles, Tom Barrett, Greg Barber, Buddy DeGruy. Kneeling (L-R): Dawn Blalack, Susan Taylor, Diana Scanlon, Debbie Funk, Chris Collins, Kim Baird, Carolyn Partin
Author Correction: Global water resources and the role of groundwater in a resilient water future
No full textIn the version of this article originally published, reference 9 was incorrectly cited in the last sentence of the second paragraph under ‘Introduction’ and in the first sentence of the second paragraph under the ‘Water scarcity’ subsection. Scanlon et al. (Environ. Res. Lett. https://doi.org/ 10.1088/1748-9326/ac3bfc, 2022) was incorrectly cited in the last sentence under ‘Drivers of water-resource variability’ but is now replaced with reference 38, and Figure 3 was wrongly stated to be adapted from reference 19 instead of reference 36. Reference 40 was mistakenly cited in the last sentence of the second paragraph under the ‘Increasing water access and supplies’ subsection, and reference 37 was inadvertently duplicated in the reference list. References 28 (now reading ‘Winter, T. C., Harvey, J. W., Franke, O. L. and Alley, W. M. Ground Water and Surface Water: A Single Resource. Circular 1139 (United States Geological Survey, 1998)’) and 94 (now reading ‘Scanlon, B. R., Reedy, R. C., Faunt, C. C., Pool, D. and Uhlman, K. Enhancing drought resilience with conjunctive use and managed aquifer recharge in California and Arizona. Environ. Res. Lett. 11, 035013 (2016)’) initially referred to incorrect sources. Lastly, the name of author Hannes Müller Schmied was incorrectly spelled Hannes Mueller Schmied, and an affiliation for him was missing: Senckenberg Leibniz Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre (SBiK-F), Frankfurt am Main, Germany. The errors have been corrected in the HTML and PDF versions of the article
Author Correction: Global water resources and the role of groundwater in a resilient water future
No full textIn the version of this article originally published, reference 9 was incorrectly cited in the last sentence of the second paragraph under ‘Introduction’ and in the first sentence of the second paragraph under the ‘Water scarcity’ subsection. Scanlon et al. (Environ. Res. Lett. https://doi.org/ 10.1088/1748-9326/ac3bfc, 2022) was incorrectly cited in the last sentence under ‘Drivers of water-resource variability’ but is now replaced with reference 38, and Figure 3 was wrongly stated to be adapted from reference 19 instead of reference 36. Reference 40 was mistakenly cited in the last sentence of the second paragraph under the ‘Increasing water access and supplies’ subsection, and reference 37 was inadvertently duplicated in the reference list. References 28 (now reading ‘Winter, T. C., Harvey, J. W., Franke, O. L. and Alley, W. M. Ground Water and Surface Water: A Single Resource. Circular 1139 (United States Geological Survey, 1998)’) and 94 (now reading ‘Scanlon, B. R., Reedy, R. C., Faunt, C. C., Pool, D. and Uhlman, K. Enhancing drought resilience with conjunctive use and managed aquifer recharge in California and Arizona. Environ. Res. Lett. 11, 035013 (2016)’) initially referred to incorrect sources. Lastly, the name of author Hannes Müller Schmied was incorrectly spelled Hannes Mueller Schmied, and an affiliation for him was missing: Senckenberg Leibniz Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre (SBiK-F), Frankfurt am Main, Germany. The errors have been corrected in the HTML and PDF versions of the article
- …
