8 research outputs found
Formation of prerequisites for the renovationist schism among the liberal nobility and clergy of Orel guberniya in 1900–1917
No full textBased on the analysis of the periodicals of Orel guberniya of the early 20th century, as well as information on the public utterances of provincial public fi gures on the Church question in the pre-revolutionary period, the author reconstructs the process of formation of Renovationist schism among the liberal nobility and clergy of the province of Orel, trying to explain the presence of succession between the supporters of the reform of the Church in diff erent periods. The author also traces the emergence of ideas of Christian socialism in the province, which later became central to Soviet Renovationism. The study of the genesis of these ideas in the province during the period from the First Russian revolution to the February revolution makes it possible to understand the connection between religious and political factors in this dramatic period. When describing the events known to historians of the “Church revolution” of 1917 in Orel guberniya, the article draws on a unique material of personal origin, i.e. a detailed description of these events by one of the priests who was a participant and witness. The author of the article formulates his view on the processes of using the ideas of reforming the Church by various political parties from the Cadets to the Bolsheviks, finds a point of convergence of interests of those who fought for political power, and those who, being a certain stratum of the regional clergy, expressed their readiness to ensure the interests of the existing power, quickly changing their “patrons” if necessary. Moreover, attention is drawn to the facts of a rapid and radical change in the political position of certain representatives of Orel priesthood precisely during the implementation of serious revolutionary changes in the Russian state. The author was able to identify these names, specify them in the article and establish the diff erences between the schismatic element and those who really cared about the welfare of the Church
The origin and activity of Yelets autocephaly in Orel diocese in the early 1920s: a history of resistance to the Renovationist Schism in the Russian Orthodox Church
No full textThe article discusses the process of creation in 1922-1923. Yelets autocephaly, whose leaders - as well as the leaders of the Petrograd, Ufa, Belev and Nizhny Tagil autocephalies - refused to recognize the authority of the renovationist "Supreme Church Administration" and continued to remain faithful to Patriarch Tikhon. The author of the study not only restores the history of the emergence and activity of the autocephalous Yelets diocesan administration in the Orel diocese that joined the Renovationists, but also reveals the features of the creation of the Yelets autocephaly in comparison with similar processes in other regions listed above. One of these features can be called the fact that in Yelets the creation of autocephaly, which began two weeks after the Renovationist coup in Moscow - at the end of May 1922, was already carried out by mid-September, and without the direct participation of the bishops who were imprisoned - by forces active parish clergy, who transferred the administration of autocephaly to Bishop Nikolai (Nikolsky) of Yelets, who was released in October 1922. The history of the Yelets diocesan administration went beyond the Oryol diocese and by 1923 reached the level of the highest executive authorities of the Soviet state. Yelets autocephaly was the only autocephaly considered in the article, created without the participation of bishops, by the forces of the clergy and laity - already in September 1922. The study of the example of self-organization of a part of the church people in Yelets during the schism of the 1920s, the study of the significance of church documents of 1917-1922 supporting the self-government of parishes and dioceses, acquires additional relevance for developing a strategy to minimize the spread of regional church-political unrest
The social makeup of Church parishes of Shchyolkovo industrial area of Moscow region in the 1920s as evidenced by documents on the renewal of registration of religious societies, 1923‒1926
No full textThe article deals with the topical issue of the social composition of parishes and parish councils of the Russian Church of the 1920s. The importance of this topic is due to the fact that the arguments about the social composition of parishes were actively used by the Bolsheviks, who planted the opinion that the members of the Church are exclusively backward strata of the population and representatives of counter-revolutionary-reactionary circles.
Based on archival materials of the re-registration of religious societies initiated by the Soviet authorities in 1922-1923, the author of the article managed to identify meaningful documents reflecting the social composition of the parishes of the temples of the settlements of the Shchelkovsky industrial bush, which was an advanced region of the textile industry in the Moscow province. The workers of this region were not only participants in the revolutionary demonstrations in 1905 and in October 1917, but also the heroes of the first issue of the revolutionary underground newspaper Iskra in 1901. Bolshevik agitation strenuously attributed to the "real proletarians" of such factory districts stable anti-religious beliefs.
However, the study of this problem showed that in the religious communities of those settlements of the Shchelkovsky bush, next to which large textile industrial productions were located, there were former ones. Fryanovo Wool-spinning Manufactory Partnership, former. The Partnership of the Gorodishchenskaya Cloth Factory of Chetverikov and a number of other large factories - workers made up a significant part of the active parishioners who acted as founders of religious societies in 1923, and were part of the parish councils.
It is also worth noting that the process of re-registration of religious societies coincided with the most acute phase of the Renovationist schism caused by the organization of the Renovationist Council of 1923, which adopted a number of anti-church decisions. The identification - based on documents from local archives - of the names of active believers at the most difficult moment in the history of the Russian Orthodox Church, associated with the attempts of the Soviet government to destroy the Church by the hands of Renovationists, can open additional ways for church historical work on the ground and actualize for the descendants of these people the church past of their surnames in the 1920s
AUTHOR-SPECIFIC ADJECTIVES FOUND IN POETIC TEXTS BY CONTEMPORARY POETESSES
No full textPurpose. This article is devoted to the analysis of author-specific adjectives as neologisms found in texts by contemporary poetesses. The author aims to both define derivational models for the formation of IAN adjectives and identify the features of the functioning of adjectives in the text.
Methodology. The method of the system scientific description is used in the work, implying the use of the methods of multi-aspect systematization of author-specific neologisms in accordance with the research task. Comparative-comparative method, implemented in observation, comparison and theoretical interpretation of the results of the new language material analysis, allows drawing conclusions upon carrying out the research.
Results. In the course of the conducted research it was revealed that author-specific adjectives, found in the texts by V. Polozkova, A. Kudryasheva, D. Balyko, A. Rivelote represent the most numerous group of authorial neologisms. Having been created by productive models of addition, suffixation and prefixation, these lexemes express new semantic nuances in poetic texts, thus reflecting the special state of the persona.
Practical implications. The results of this study can be used at university in the pedagogical practice of language teachers in the framework of studying Neology as an academic discipline as well as in analyzing contemporary poetry
Драматургія пакалення „Бум-Бам-Літ”
No full textThe article presents the works of young Belarusian dramatists who write in Belarusian: Viktar Zhybul, Volga Gapeyeva, or Hanna Tsikhanava. It compares their works with the dramas authored by their peers, Belarusian Russian-speaking dramatists: Pavel Pryazhko, Andrei Kureichik, Diana Balyko, and others. The author maintains that most plays in Belarusian were written in the aesthetics of the theater of the absurd, which already became history for contemporary art and was never popular with Belarusian audiences. In contrast, Russian-speaking authors imitate the tradition of the Russian psychological school or follow the model of Russian new drama; their works are more modern and more varied in terms of genres.The article presents the works of young Belarusian dramatists who write in Belarusian: Viktar Zhybul, Volga Gapeyeva, or Hanna Tsikhanava. It compares their works with the dramas authored by their peers, Belarusian Russian-speaking dramatists: Pavel Pryazhko, Andrei Kureichik, Diana Balyko, and others. The author maintains that most plays in Belarusian were written in the aesthetics of the theater of the absurd, which already became history for contemporary art and was never popular with Belarusian audiences. In contrast, Russian-speaking authors imitate the tradition of the Russian psychological school or follow the model of Russian new drama; their works are more modern and more varied in terms of genres.Artykuł nie zawiera streszczenia w języku białoruskim
Dramatic works of the “Bum-Bam-Lit” generation
No full textThe article presents the works of young Belarusian dramatists who write in Belarusian: Viktar Zhybul, Volga Gapeyeva, or Hanna Tsikhanava. It compares their works with the dramas authored by their peers, Belarusian Russian-speaking dramatists: Pavel Pryazhko, Andrei Kureichik, Diana Balyko, and others. The author maintains that most plays in Belarusian were written in the aesthetics of the theater of the absurd, which already became history for contemporary art and was never popular with Belarusian audiences. In contrast, Russian-speaking authors imitate the tradition of the Russian psychological school or follow the model of Russian new drama; their works are more modern and more varied in terms of genres
Generation X или Жизнь без секса, секс без жизни. Герои пьес Дианы Балыко
No full textThe article analyzes specific type of personages form plays by Diana Balyko, a young writer who belongs to Generation X. Based on sociological research it is possible to identify characteristics of dramatis personae who share a world with the Generation of Millennials — potential/virtual consumers, whose characteristic behavior is active use of multimedia technology and Internet resources. The author considers concepts of sex, love, and reality — regarded as „traditional” for the „X-es” — where ideas and principles of „Y-es” are becoming more and more conspicuous
„Новая драма” і (новая) духоўнасць. Праблема духоўных пошукаў у рускай і беларускай драматургіі ХХI ст. (на прыкладзе выбраных твораў)
No full textContemporary Russian-language “new drama" (both Russian and Belarusian) is most often identified with plays performed using verbatim-theatre techniques, and with works of a documentary character that feature hyper-realistic, naturalistic or Neo-Brutalist elements. However, this is not the only distinctive tendency in the poetics of contemporary Eastern Slavic drama. There exists a completely different, metaphorical and philosophical current of evolution of „new drama". The present article is devoted to the concept of spirituality in new Russian (Ivan Vyrypayev, Vasiliy Sigarev) and Belarusian (Diana Balyko, Pavel Priazhko, Andrey Kureychik) drama, as it explores the sacral and spiritual elements in the latter and attempts to unveil the deeper meaning of several selected works. The author wishes to evaluate how spiritual issues are depicted, and to what modifications the presentation of these issues is subject to. Due to the obvious anthropological character of the works analyzed, where the human being and its spiritual queries become a semantic carrier, the literary character constitutes a primary analytical category in itself. The article is an attempt to analyze and interpret religious and spiritual elements in works that may sometimes not be perceived as a manifestation of faith. The article draws attention to the use of motifs known from the Christian cultural sphere and to the referencing and modernization of old Ruthenian anthropological types (such as strannik, yurodivy). The author showcases how contemporary Russian and Belarusian playwrights depict the human being as a spiritual seeker, as they address both the sacred and the secularized understanding of spirituality.Współczesny rosyjskojęzyczny (zarówno rosyjski, jak i białoruski) „nowy dramat” utożsamiany jest najczęściej ze sztukami realizowanymi metodą verbatim, z utworami dokumentalnymi, w których wykorzystywane są elementy hiperrealistyczne, naturalistyczne czy neobrutalistyczne.Nie jest to jedyna tendencja charakterystyczna dla poetyki współczesnej dramaturgii wschodniosłowiańskiej. Równolegle funkcjonuje bowiem zgoła inny, metaforyczno-filozoficzny, kierunek rozwoju „nowego dramatu”. Artykuł poświęcony został problemowi duchowości w nowej dramaturgii rosyjskiej (Iwan Wyrypajew, Wasilij Sigariew) i białoruskiej (Diana Bałykо, Paweł Priażko, Andriej Kurejczyk). Celem była eksploracja elementów sakralnych i duchowych, dotarcie do sensów głębokich wybranych utworów. Autor postanowił zbadać, w jaki sposób prezentowane są problemy duchowe, jakim modyfikacjom podlega przedstawienie tej problematyki. Ze względu na wyraźny antropologiczny rys utworów, w których nośnikiem semantyki staje się człowiek i jego wewnętrzne poszukiwania, to postać literacka stanowi w tekście podstawową kategorię badawczą. Artykuł jest próbą analizy oraz interpretacji religijnych i duchowych elementów w tekstach niekiedy dalekich od manifestowania wiary. W artykule zwrócono uwagę na wykorzystanie motywów znanych z chrześcijańskiego kręgu kulturowego, przywołanie i uwspółcześnienie staroruskich typów antropologicznych (takich jak strannik, jurodiwy). Udowodniono, że współcześni dramatopisarze rosyjscy i białoruscy kreują obraz człowieka poszukującego, zwracając się zarówno ku religijnemu, jak również zsekularyzowanemu rozumieniu duchowości.Сучасная рускамоўная (як руская так i беларуская) „новая драма" асацыюецца найчасцей з п’есамі, напісанымі метадам verbatim, з дакументальнымі тэкстамі, у якіх выкарыстоўваюцца гіперрэалістычныя, натуралістычныя ці неабрутальныя элементы. Але гэта не адзіная тэндэнцыя, характэрная для паэтыкі сучаснай усходнеславянскай драматургіі. Паралельна развіваецца іншая, метафарычна-філасофская плынь “новай драмы”. Даны артыкул прысвечаны праблеме духоўнасці ў найноўшай рускай (Іван Вырыпаеў, Васілій Сігараў) і беларускай (Дзіяна Балыка, Павел Пражко, Андрэй Курэйчык) драматургіі. Мэта артыкула – выяўленне духоўных, сакральных элементаў выбраных твораў. Галоўная задача артыкула – аналіз спосабаў і мэтаў прадстаўлення духоўных пытанняў, даследаванне мадыфікацый выяўленння духоўнай праблематыкі. Аналізуемыя творы вылучаюцца сваім антрапалагічным характарам, а носьбітам семантыкі з'яўляецца чалавек і яго ўнутраныя пошукі, таму менавіта літаратурны персанаж становіцца асноўнай катэгорыяй даследавання. У артыкуле робіцца спроба аналізу і інтэрпрэтацыі рэлігійных і духоўных элементаў у творах, далёкіх ад маніфестацыі веры. Звяртаецца ўвага на выкарыстанне матываў і тэмаў хрысціянскай культуры, на актуалізацыю старажытнарускіх антрапалагічных тыпаў (такіх як скіталец, юродзівы). Даказваецца, што сучасныя рускія і беларускія драматургі ствараюць вобраз чалавека ў стане духоўнага пошуку, звяртаючыся як да рэлігійнага, так і да свецкага разумення духоўнасці
