1,721,102 research outputs found
From James Joyce to Katherine Mansfield: Epiphanic Poetics and Writing of the Self
No full textWith the term and notion of epiphany Joyce created not only what was to become a fundamental tool for the interpretation of his own work. He gave a name to – thus contributing to make visible – an issue which, to a large extent, characterised all modernist poetics and which determined the restless formal experimentation of the period. In this essay, I analyse some aspects of Katherine Mansfield’s reflection on the epiphanic moment, which she calls “glimpse”. My aim is twofold: on the one hand, I wish to highlight the original stance of this major and highly innovative author, whose deep theoretical awareness has long been undervalued; on the other hand, I intend to provide material for further critical investigation on the affinity and difference between Mansfield and Joyce on the notion of epiphany, thereby contributing to the general critical debate on the aesthetics which developed during the first decades of the twentieth century
The Routledge Companion to World Literature, edited by Theo D'haen, David Damrosch and Djelal Kadir, London-New York, Routledge, 2012, 544 pp.
No full textRecensione del volumeReview of the volum
Invited Short Report COST 48 (European Cooperation for Science and Technology) Subgroup 2:WORKING GROUP 3
No full textPaul Edmondson and Stanley Wells, ed., Shakespeare beyond Doubt: Evidence, Argument, Controversy, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2013, xiv+284 pp.
No full textReview of Shakespeare beyond Doubt: Evidence, Argument, Controversy, edited by Paul Edmondson and Stanley Wells, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2013, in Rosy Colombo and Gary Taylor (ed.), Memoria di Shakespeare. A Journal of Shakespearean Studies, n. 2 (2015) “On Biography
Ricerche sui pigmenti fotosintetici di Gracilaria verrucosa (Huds.)Papenfuss. Dosaggio quantitativo della ficoeritrina.
No full textL`iridescenza nelle Rhodophyta: osservazioni morfologiche ed ultrastrutturali sui corpi iridescenti di Chylocladia kaliformis (Good. et Wood.) Hooker (Champiaceae).
No full textUltrastructural characterization of the iridescence in Chylocladia kaliformis (Good. et Wood.) Hooker (Champiaceae, Rhodophyta).
No full textSub-Units and Aggregates of R-Phycoerythrin from some Rhodophyta: Ultrastructural and Biochemical Characterization. Invited Lecture.
No full textVendetta, ambizione, pensiero. Riflessioni sull’Amleto e sul Macbeth
No full textL’articolo parte da una riflessione sullo statuto canonico dell’Amleto e del Macbeth e sulla possibile inibizione di nuove interpretazioni che esso può provocare. Vengono poi evidenziate alcune affinità tra le due tragedie, che fanno sì che esse si prestino a una lettura congiunta. Al centro di entrambe campeggiano personaggi che sono diventati “miti” della modernità. Sono inoltre gli esempi più rappresentativi di due tipologie fondamentali del teatro elisabettiano e giacomiano, la tragedia di vendetta e la tragedia di ambizione, a ben vedere complementari tra loro. Al contempo, l’Amleto e il Macbeth determinano l’esplosione di tali paradigmi, in particolare mettendone a nudo la temporalità paradossale. Infine, in questi drammi viene problematizzato qualunque schema precostituito grazie all’eccezionale ed eccedente capacità di “pensare” dei protagonisti. L’Amleto e il Macbeth sembrano dunque sollecitare una lettura contrastiva e multiprospettica che, in quanto consapevole dei propri limiti, può forse consentire di superare l’impasse da cui le riflessioni proposte hanno preso avvio.The article starts from a reflection on the canonicity of Hamlet and Macbeth and on the possible inhibition of new interpretations this can cause. It then goes on to highlight some similarities between the two tragedies, which make them suitable for a joint reading. At the centre of both we find characters that have become “myths” of modernity. They moreover epitomize two fundamental types of Elizabethan and Jacobean drama, revenge tragedy and ambition tragedy, which are in fact complementary. At the same time, Hamlet and Macbeth explode these paradigms, particularly by exposing their paradoxical temporality. Finally, these plays question any pre-established pattern thanks to their protagonists’ exceptional and exceeding ability to “think”. Hamlet and Macbeth thus seem to call for a contrastive and multi-perspective reading which, aware of its own limitations, may enable us to overcome the impasse mentioned at the beginning
Sub-units and Aggregates of R-Phycoerythrin from some Rhodophyta:Ultrastructural and Biochemical Characterization
No full text- …
