197,506 research outputs found

    Chimarra sedlaceki Sykora 1967

    No full text
    Chimarra sedlaceki Sykora, 1967 Figures 70–71 Chimarra sedlaceki Sykora, 1967:588, fig. 3.— Neboiss, 1986: 106. Type material not seen. Holotype. Male. North-east New Guinea (PNG), Wau, 1500 m (about 6° 20' S, 145° 53' E), at light, 10 October 1966, J. Illies (Bishop 7470). Material examined. PNG. 1 male (dried, pinned specimen PT-1252 figured), Wau, Morobe District, 1200 m (7° 20' S, 146° 43' E), Malaise trap, 25 October 1965, J.M. Sedlacek (BPBM); 1 male (dried, pinned specimen CT-713), Wau, Morobe District, 1250 m (7° 20'S, 146° 43'E), Malaise trap, 20 March 1965, J.M. Sedlacek (BPBM); 2 males (CT-716; Western Highlands Province), Baiyer River Sanctuary, Trauna River, 5° 35' S, 144° 10' E, UV light, 17 June 1986, A. Wells (NMV); 4 males, (Western Highlands Province), Baiyer River Sanctuary, Trauna River, 1160 m, 5° 30' S, 144° 10' E, UV light, 16 June 1986, A. Wells (NMV). Diagnosis. The males of C. sedlaceki can be separated from all other New Guinea species, including C. pindua, C. aiyura and C. newguineana, by the combination of the slender, almost perpendicular inferior appendages, the lateral lobes of segment X with the out turned subapical flange and the short, apically rounded ventral process on segment IX. Description (revised after Sykora, 1967). General body colour and wings light brown to brownish. Wings (Sykora, 1967: fig. 3) similar to those of C. ukarumpana (fig. 7). Length of forewing: male 5.0– 7 mm. Forewings with forks 1, 2, 3 and 5 present, Rs slightly to moderately sinuous or curved, moderately thickened basad of discoidal cell, and fork 1 with short footstalk (Sykora, 1967: fig. 3) or sessile (personal observation); hind wing with forks 1, 2, 3 and 5 present. Male. Segment IX anterior margin in lateral view, with rounded extension ventrally, ventral process short, basal to distal margin of segment IX, in lateral view, short, keel-shape, length about 1.2 times width (fig. 70; Sykora, 1967: fig. 3A), preanal appendages, relatively large, slightly laterally compressed (figs 70, 71), in lateral view appear rounded (fig. 70), in dorsal view appear elongate with rounded apices (fig. 71). Segment X lateral lobes situated slightly below phallus in distal third, slightly rounded apically, with sensilla not discerned (figs 70, 71), in lateral view, robust basally, narrowed in distal third (fig. 70), in dorsal view, with triangular flange subapically (fig. 71). Phallus with one or two short spines embedded subapically (figs 70, 71; Sykora, 1967: fig. 3D) and broadbased ventral projection (in lateral view, obscured by lateral lobe of segment X; fig. 70; Sykora, 1967: fig. 3A). Inferior appendages slender, broadest in basal third, narrowed slightly near middle, tapered slightly in distal half, with apices acute and directed posteromesally (figs 70, 71), in lateral view angled at about 75° to horizontal, length about 5 times width, dorsal margin almost straight and ventral margin slightly irregular in basal half, obtusely angled near middle and almost straight in distal half (fig. 70; Sykora, 1967: fig. 3A), in dorsal view, strongly angled near middle, mesal margin curved (fig. 71). Female. Unknown. Remarks. Chimarra sedlaceki is known from nine males from three localities in north-east PNG and two sites about 420 km west in the Western Highlands of PNG. New figures have been drawn to allow direct comparisons and to accompany the description that is revised in light of new interpretations of Chimarra genitalic structures from Sykora’s (1967) original description.Published as part of Cartwright, David, 2020, A review of the New Guinea species of Chimarra Stephens (Trichoptera: Philopotamidae), pp. 1-49 in Memoirs of Museum Victoria 79 on page 23, DOI: 10.24199/j.mmv.2020.79.01, http://zenodo.org/record/806529

    Chimarra goroca Sykora 1967

    No full text
    Chimarra goroca Sykora, 1967 Figures 132, 133 Chimarra goroca Sykora, 1967: 589; fig. 4.—Neboiss, 1986: 106. Type material not seen. Holotype. Male, PNG, north-east, Goroka, Omaheka River, 2200 m, 28 September 1966, J. Illies (BPBM, Type 7471). Material examined. 1 male (dried, pinned specimen CT-389, partly figured), PNG, Southern Highlands Province, ridge west of Dimifa, south of Mount Giluwe, 2350 m, about 6° 02' S, 143° 51' E, 11 October 1958, J.L. Gressitt (BPBM). Diagnosis. Chimarra goroca can be separated from other New Guinea species particularly C. stella, by the combination of the spatulate lateral lobes of segment X and inferior appendages that are broad-based and sub-triangular, the broad-based keel-like ventral process on segment IX, in lateral view and the absence of a pair of large, hooked spines partly embedded subapically in the phallus. Description. (Revised after Sykora, 1967). General body colour and wings light yellowish (Sykora 1967) to brownish. Wings (Sykora, 1967: fig. 4), similar to those of C. ukarumpana (fig. 7). Length of forewing: male 5.5–7.0 mm. Forewing with forks 1, 2, 3 and 5 present, Rs straight to slightly sinuous or curved, thickened, basad of discoidal cell; hind wing with forks 1, 2, 3 and 5 present. Male. Segment IX anterior margin in lateral view, anteroventrally angular (fig. 132; Sykora 1967: fig. 4A), in lateral view, ventral process on segment IX broad-based, keel-like, length about 0.25 times basal width. Preanal appendages rounded (fig. 132; Sykora, 1967: fig. 4A; Neboiss, 1986a: fig. p. 106). Segment X lateral lobes angled posteromesally, spatulate, apices rounded, with sensilla not discerned (figs 132, 133; Sykora, 1967: fig. 4A; Neboiss, 1986a: fig. p. 106), in lateral view sub-quadrate, angled at about 45° posteroventrally, apices below phallus (fig. 132; Sykora, 1967: fig. 4A; Neboiss, 1986a: fig. p. 106). Phallus with two small, hooked, internal spines subapically (figs 132, 133) and an elongate spine more basally (Sykora, 1967: fig. 4E; Neboiss, 1986a: fig. p. 106). Inferior appendages tapered slightly in distal third, apices angled posteromesally, acute (figs 132, 133; Sykora, 1967: figs 4A–C; Neboiss, 1986a: fig. p. 106), in lateral view appear sub-triangular, broad-based, angled at about 45° to horizontal, length about 2.3 times width (fig. 132; Sykora, 1967: fig. 4A). Female. Unknown. Remarks. Chimarra goroca is known from two males from two sites in central and north-east PNG, with both males collected at relatively high altitudes. New figures have been drawn to allow direct comparisons and to accompany the description that is revised in light of new interpretations of Chimarra genitalic structures from Sykora’s (1967) original description.Published as part of Cartwright, David, 2020, A review of the New Guinea species of Chimarra Stephens (Trichoptera: Philopotamidae), pp. 1-49 in Memoirs of Museum Victoria 79 on pages 40-42, DOI: 10.24199/j.mmv.2020.79.01, http://zenodo.org/record/806529

    Mortoniella (Mortoniella) bifurcata Sykora 1999

    No full text
    Mortoniella (Mortoniella) bifurcata Sykora, 1999 Fig. 18 Mortoniella bifurcata Sykora 1999: 382 [member of flinti subgroup]; Blahnik and Holzenthal 2008: 70 [member of bilineata group]. This species is probably most closely related to M. flinti Sykora. Both species are very dark in color and have 2 white wing bands, and also have the apex of the dorsal phallic spine modified, bifurcate or asymmetric (as in the specimen illustrated) in M. bifurcata and trifurcate in M. flinti. The other two species in the group are dark in color, without wing bands, and have the dorsal phallic spine symmetric and either narrowed or rounded apically. The most diagnostic difference between M. bifurcata and M. flinti is in the apex of tergum X, which is only very shallowly notched apically in M. bifurcata and much more distinctly so in M. flinti. The difference in the shape of the inferior appendages, as illustrated by Sykora, is inaccurate and does not seem to be diagnostic. However, the spines from the mesal pockets of the inferior appendages in M. bifurcata are somewhat longer than In M. flinti; also, the paramere appendages are longer, but not nearly as long as in M. tanyrhabdos, n. sp. Adult —Length of forewing: male 3.8 mm. Forewing with forks I, II, and III present, hind wing with forks II and V. Spur formula 0:3:4. Overall color dark brownish-black (fuscous). Mesotarsi whitish, except at very apex. Tibial spurs slightly darker than legs, not strongly contrasting with legs. Forewing with distinct white wing bar at anastomosis, and evidence (on one wing of somewhat rubbed specimen) of second white wing bar on proximal part of wing, closer to base than anastomosis. Male genitalia —Ventral process of segment VI posteriorly projecting, prominent, narrow basally, length about 3½ times width at base. Tergum VIII narrow, subtending ventral margin of segment IX, membranous connection to tergum IX moderately elongate. Segment IX with anterolateral margin rounded and produced in ventral half, posterolateral margin nearly straight, without distinct projection; segment deeply mesally excised dorsally and ventrally, forming lateral lobes, separated dorsomesally by less than ½ width of segment. Tergum X elongate, apex rounded, with only slight mesal invagination, lateral margins subparallel, with paired longitudinal ridges extending from basolateral margins to past midlength, ridges somewhat converging posteriorly; tergum with bluntly rounded ventrolateral lobes, ventromesal lobes absent. Inferior appendages with short rounded dorsolateral lobes, each with fringing row of very elongate setae, and short, bluntly rounded, ventromesal projection, subtending apical spine-like projections of mesal pockets of inferior appendages. Mesal pockets of inferior appendage with moderately elongate, posterodorsally curved, spine-like, apicoventral projections, projecting distinctly below ventral margin of phallicata. Paramere appendage relatively elongate, not extending to apex of dorsal phallic spine, narrow, nearly uniform in width, apex acute, strongly bent in about apical 1/3; fused basal segments of appendages articulating near base of dorsal phallic spine. Phallobase with evident rounded, laterally compressed, dorsomesal apodeme. Dorsal phallic spine, as viewed laterally, relatively narrow throughout, tapering apically, slightly dorsally curved in about apical 1/4, apex acutely bifid in holotype, unilaterally asymmetric in paratype (Fig. 18D); base of spine with short, curved stalk and distinct, rounded, ventral deflection in basal ¼; spine, as viewed dorsally, nearly uniformly narrow in width throughout length, apex bifid or acute and asymmetric. Phallicata with elongate sclerotized basodorsal projection, articulating with rounded ventral deflection of dorsal phallic spine, basolaterally with small rounded projection, ventral margin sclerotized and strongly arched. Endophallic membrane simple in structure, without membranous lateral lobes; phallotremal spines absent. Material examined — VENEZUELA: Barinas: 22 km NW Barinitas, 19.ii.1976, CM and OS Flint, Jr– 1 male Paratype (pinned) (NMNH). Distribution — Venezuela.Published as part of Blahnik, Roger J. & Holzenthal, Ralph W., 2017, Revision of the northern South American species of Mortoniella Ulmer 1906 (Trichoptera: Glossosomatidae: Protoptilinae) *, pp. 1-251 in Insecta Mundi 2017 (602) on page 34, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.517020

    Polycentropus ariensis Denning & Sykora 1966

    No full text
    Polycentropus ariensis Denning & Sykora 1966 Previous distribution. México [Estado de México, Guerrero, Michoacán, Morelos, Oaxaca (Candelaria de Loxicha), Puebla]. Material examined. MÉXICO: Oaxaca, Santa Catarina Lachatao, El Arco, 17°15’56”N, 96°29’28”W, 1934 m asl, 23.v.2013, light trap, V.S. Jiménez-Hernández, J.A. Casasola-González & M. Razo-González, 16 males (alcohol). Remarks. The altitudinal range is extended from 450 m asl (Candelaria de Loxicha) to 1934 m asl.Published as part of Razo-González, María, 2018, Caddisflies (Insecta: Trichoptera) from Santa Catarina Lachatao, Oaxaca, México: New species, new geographical records, and checklist in Zootaxa 4388 (1), DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4388.1.2, http://zenodo.org/record/118780

    Digital intermediaries in pandemic times: social media and the role of bots in communicating emotions and stress about Coronavirus

    No full text
    This project contains the relevant files, including R code for the publication: Elayan S. and Sykora M. (2024) Digital intermediaries in pandemic times: social media and the role of bots in communicating emotions and stress about Coronavirus, Journal of Computational Social Science, doi:10.1007/s42001-024-00314-2

    Smicridea (Smicridea) sattleri Denning & Sykora 1968

    No full text
    Smicridea (Smicridea) sattleri Denning & Sykora, 1968 Fig. 17B Smicridea sattleri Denning & Sykora, 1968: 175 (type locality: Brazil, Sao Paulo, waterfall on Iporanga Beach, Guaruja Island near Santos; CAS; ♂). Smicridea sattleri – Paprocki et al. 2004: 10 (checklist). — Calor 2011: 321 (checklist). — Paprocki & França 2014: 38 (checklist). — Rocha et al. 2016: 429 (distribution). — Holzenthal & Calor 2017: 182 (catalog). Material examined BRAZIL – Bahia • 1 ♂; Camacan, Reserva Particular do Patrimônio Natural Serra Bonita; 15°22′59.1″ S, 39°33′21.2″ W; 2Aug. 2010; N. Hamada, R. Querino and R. Boldrini leg.; INPA • 1 ♂; Camacan, Reserva Particular do Patrimônio Natural Serra Bonita, Córrego Fechadinho; 15°23′9.1″ S, 39°33′21.2″ W; 27 Nov. 2011; A.R. Calor leg.; UV light pan trap; UFBA • 5 ♂♂; Wesceslau Guimarães, E.E.E.W.G. Riacho Serra Grande, Cachoeira; 13°35′35.4″ S, 39°42′51.2″ W; 513 m a.s.l.; 6 Sep. 2013; A.R. Calor, T. Duarte and E.S. Dias leg.; entomological net; UFBA • 1 ♂; same collection data as for preceding; 7 Sep. 2013; UV light pan trap; UFBA • 2 ♂♂; same collection data as for preceding; 8 Sep. 2013; UFBA – Espírito Santo • 3 ♂♂; Espírito Santo, Alegre, Cachoeira da Fumaça, trilha do remanso; 20°37′52.1″ S, 41°36′18.8″ W; 27 May 2011; J.M.C. Nascimento, P. Barcelos-Silva, K. Angeli and K. Bertazo leg.; white sheet with an LED light; INPA • 2 ♂♂; Fundão, Timbuí, Hotel Fazenda Monte Sião; 19°56′02.0″ S, 40°24′45.0″ W; 57 m a.s.l.; Sep. 2014; P. Barcelos-Silva leg.; Malaise trap; INPA • 1 ♂; Santa Leopoldina, Rio da Prata, acima da cachoeira Véu da Noiva; 20°02′49.7″ S, 40°31′55.9″ W; 487 m a.s.l.; 3 Apr. 2011; L.L. Dumas and J.L. Nessimian leg.; DZRJ • 3 ♂♂; Santa Teresa, REBIO Santa Lúcia; 9–10 Jan. 2013; A.L. Carvalho leg.; DZRJ • 6 ♂♂; Santa Teresa, REBIO Santa Lúcia, Córrego Bonito, acima da Cachoeira Heloísa Torres; 19°58′25.9″ S, 40°31′46.3″ W; 695 m a.s.l.; 3Apr. 2011; L.L. Dumas and G.A. Jardim leg.; DZRJ. Distribution (Fig. 17B) Brazil: Atlantic Forest (Bahia [new record], Espírito Santo [new record], São Paulo [Denning & Sykora 1968]), Cerrado (Minas Gerais [Rocha et al. 2016]).Published as part of Desiderio, Gleison Robson, Pes, Ana Maria, Andrade-Souza, Vanderly & Hamada, Neusa, 2021, The Smicridea (Smicridea) fasciatella species group (Trichoptera: Hydropsychidae) in Brazil: six new species and new distributional records, pp. 156-196 in European Journal of Taxonomy 750 (1) on page 189, DOI: 10.5852/ejt.2021.750.1371, http://zenodo.org/record/545171

    Gracilipsodes Sykora 1967

    No full text
    GRACILIPSODES SYKORA, 1967 Gracilipsodes Sykora, 1967: 594; Morse, 1981: 262; St Clair, 1994: 176; Ward, 2001: 73–82. Type species: Gracilipsodes psocopterus Sykora, 1967, by original designation. Revised generic description, males Adult: Body and wing colour yellowish brown to dark greyish brown (denuded in alcohol). Head: Antennae with broadly oval scape, about as long as eye diameter (Fig. 1A). Frontal setal warts (f.w.) oval (Fig. 1B); anterior setal wart (a.w.) narrowly triangular or diamond shaped (Fig. 1B, C); anterolateral (al.w.) and posterolateral setal (pl.w.) warts oval (Fig. 1C). Maxillary palps five-segmented (Fig. 1A, B), labial palps three-segmented (Fig. 1A). Thorax: Prothorax with one pair of transversely elongate pronotal setal warts (Fig. 1C). Legs slender; tibial spur (sp.) formula 0, 1, 1–2, 2, 2 (e.g. Fig. 1D–H); hind tibia with 15–35 blackish spines (s.) (Fig. 1G). Forewing (Fig. 2A) narrow, slightly widening towards rounded apex, forks 1 and 5 present; discoidal cell (dc) about as long as thyroidal cell (tc). Hind wing (Fig. 2D) discoidal cell absent; crossvein r 1 –r 2 absent; crossvein r–m straight or convex; forks 1, 3, and 5, 1 and 5, or only 5, present; anterior edge with rasp-like, basal hairs (Fig. 2B) and 15–25 hamuli present past midway (Fig. 2C). Nygma (n): present in both wings in apical cell posterior to R 4 (Fig. 2A, D). Male genitalia (Fig. 2E–I): Segment IX (t.IX and s.IX) annular, laterally setose, narrowest at base of superior appendages (s.app.) or ventrally; in lateral view tergite IX (t.IX) narrower to wider than sternite IX (s.IX) in lateral view. Superior appendages setose, flattened dorsoventrally, and as long as or longer than tergum X (t.X). Tergum X with median process bifurcated or entire along its length, membranous, and bearing small spines; pair of pre-apical, lateral, sclerotized processes (pl.p.) either absent or present. Inferior appendages bipartite, setose; basal part (if.b.) produced into posteromesal lip, with small, strong spines along dorsal margin; apical part of inferior appendage (if.ap.) long, digitate, with 25–60 mesal spines, mesal process with between four and nine mesal spines. Harpago (h.) absent or small. Phallic apparatus simple, phallicata basally tubular, fused with phallobase, curving to various degrees ventrad along its length; pair of sclerotized, ventrally produced lateral processes present apically; phallotremal sclerite (ph.sc.) U-shaped. Inclusive species: Gracilipsodes aoupiniensis sp. nov.; Gracilipsodes aureus sp. nov.; Gracilipsodes aurorus sp. nov.; Gracilipsodes grandis sp. nov.; Gracilipsodes koghiensis sp. nov.; Gracilipsodes lanceolatus sp. nov.; Gracilipsodes robustus sp. nov.; Gracilipsodes psocopterus Sykora (1967); Gracilipsodes similis Ward (2001).Published as part of Malm, Tobias & Johanson, Kjell A., 2008, Revision of the New Caledonian endemic genus Gracilipsodes (Trichoptera: Leptoceridae: Grumichellini), pp. 425-452 in Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 153 (3) on page 428, DOI: 10.1111/j.1096-3642.2008.00403.x, http://zenodo.org/record/544633

    Smicridea (Smicridea) sattleri Denning & Sykora 1968

    No full text
    Smicridea (Smicridea) sattleri Denning & Sykora 1968 (Figure 3 in Denning & Sykora 1968) Remarks. Smicridea (S.) sattleri can be easily distinguished from others species of S. (Smicridea) by the presence of paired crescent-shaped and single Y-shaped internal plates on the endothecal membrane of the phallic apparatus. This species was originally described from a waterfall on Iporanga beach, Guarujá municipality, São Paulo state, southeastern Brazil. Herein, this species is reported for the first time from Minas Gerais state, southeastern Brazil (São Francisco river headwater at São Roque de Minas municipality). Material examined. Brazil: Minas Gerais State: São Roque de Minas, Parque Nacional da Serra da Canastra, nascente do Rio São Francisco, 20 ° 14 ’ 37.2 ”S 46 ° 26 ’ 47.2 ”W, el. 1364 m, 30.iii. 2014, JL Nessimian, LL Dumas, ALH Oliveira & SP Gomes leg., 1 male (DZRJ).Published as part of Rocha, Isabela Cristina, Dumas, Leandro Lourenço & Nessimian, Jorge Luiz, 2016, Three new species and a new record of Smicridea McLachlan 1871 (Trichoptera: Hydropsychidae) from Minas Gerais state, Brazil, pp. 423-430 in Zootaxa 4107 (3) on page 429, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4107.3.10, http://zenodo.org/record/25601

    Deliberative Qualities of Online Abortion Discourse: Incivility and Intolerance in the American and Irish Abortion Discussions on Twitter

    No full text
    This project contains the classifier code and dictionary files for the publication of: Oh, D., Elayan, S., & Sykora, M. (2023). Deliberative Qualities of Online Abortion Discourse: Incivility and Intolerance in the American and Irish Abortion Discussions on Twitter. Journal of Deliberative Democracy, 19(1)

    Mortoniella (Mortoniella) paraenchrysa Sykora 1999

    No full text
    Mortoniella (Mortoniella) paraenchrysa Sykora, 1999 Fig. 15 Mortoniella n. sp. 3, Flint 1996: 383 [member of enchrysa subgroup]. Mortoniella paraenchrysa Sykora 1999: 381 [member of enchrysa subgroup]; Blahnik and Holzenthal 2008: 70 [member of bilineata group]; Blahnik and Holzenthal 2011: 63 [member of enchrysa subgroup]. This species is probably most readily diagnosed by its golden color and the form of the inferior appendage, which has an elongate, narrow dorsal projection that is very strongly and almost hemispherically curved. The projection is somewhat similar to that in M. denticulata Sykora, which differs in so many other respects (the separated and angulate ventrolateral projection of segment X, spines on the apex of the dorsal phallic spine, and minutely spined membranous lobes of the endophallic membrane) that it is hardly likely to be confused. Adult —Length of forewing: male 6.4 mm. Forewing with forks I, II, and III present, hind wing with forks II, III, and V. Spur formula 0:4:4. Dorsal side of forewings, head, basal segments of antennae, and legs golden-orange; ventral side of forewings (and apicomarginal setae), hind wings, apices of antennae, and palps dark brownish-black (fuscous). Wing membrane not apparently infuscated. Tibial spurs brownish-black, contrasting with legs. Wing bars absent. Male genitalia —Ventral process of segment VI posteriorly projecting, very short, narrow basally, length about 1½ times width at base. Tergum VIII relatively narrow, subtending ventral margin of segment IX, membranous connection to tergum IX elongate. Segment IX with anterolateral margin rounded and produced in ventral half, posterolateral margin with distinctly angular projection in dorsal half; segment deeply mesally excised dorsally and ventrally, forming lateral lobes, separated dorsomesally by more than ½ width of segment. Tergum X with basal part slightly inflated, distinctly set off from apical part, tergum moderately elongate, lateral margins rounded, ventrolaterally with short acute lateral lobes, each with prominent apical seta; apex of tergum distinctly sclerotized, emarginate, with ventrolateral margins incurved and approaching each other mesally, but separated by distinct gap, apicodorsally with broad U-shaped connection near apex (mesal notch distinct); tergum ventromesally with paired, rounded and sclerotized, ventromesal lobes in basal half, each with short setae. Inferior appendages with short narrow setose dorsolateral lobes and paired ventromesal lobes, each with narrow, strongly hemispherically curved, dorsal process and short acute apicomesal process. Mesal pockets of inferior appendage with very elongate, posteriorly-directed, spine-like, apicoventral projections. Paramere appendages elongate, narrow, slightly widened preapically, apices acute, subequal in length to dorsal phallic spine; fused basal segments of parameres articulating near base of dorsal phallic spine. Phallobase with relatively small rounded, laterally compressed, dorsomesal apodeme. Dorsal phallic spine, as viewed laterally, with dorsal margin curved basally, slightly undulate in middle, and nearly rectilinearly upturned in apical ¼, apex of spine rounded; base of spine narrow, undulately curved and stalk-like, abruptly and very strongly widened on ventral margin in basal ½, forming obtusely angular ventral projection, narrowing apically from projection; spine, as viewed dorsally, somewhat widened in middle, apex rounded. Phallicata with sclerotized basodorsal projection, articulating with angular ventral projection of dorsal phallic spine; phallicata ventrally with elongate, lightly sclerotized, lobes, extending about same length as paramere appendage, lateral margins of lobes subparallel, apices mesally curved. Endophallic membrane with conspicuous, membranously pleated, lateral lobes; phallotremal spines absent. Material examined — PERU: Cuzco: Paucartambo, E Buenos Aires, km 135, 13.13333° S, 71.55000° W, 2150 m, 28-29.viii.1989, N Adams– 1 male (NMNH). Distribution — Bolivia, Peru.Published as part of Blahnik, Roger J. & Holzenthal, Ralph W., 2017, Revision of the northern South American species of Mortoniella Ulmer 1906 (Trichoptera: Glossosomatidae: Protoptilinae) *, pp. 1-251 in Insecta Mundi 2017 (602) on pages 30-31, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.517020
    corecore