13,143 research outputs found
Rank-into-rank hypotheses and the failure of GCH
In this paper we are concerned about the ways GCH can fail in relation to rank-into-rank hypotheses, i.e., very large cardinals usually denoted by I3, I2, I1 and I0. The main results are a satisfactory analysis of the way the power function can vary on regular cardinals in the presence of rank-into-rank hypotheses and the consistency under I0 of the existence of j:Vλ+1≺Vλ+1 with the failure of GCH at λ
David Friedman Collection 1923-2006
David Friedman (Friedmann; 1893-1980) was an artist in Berlin. During the Nazi Holocaust, he was incarcerated in the Lodz Ghetto and Auschwitz-Birkenau. His papers include art work, memoirs, and essays focusing on his experiences in the Holocaust.see also : "Friedman, David: Trieb zur Kunst" (Me 159); "Taussig Family Collection" (AR 25025); : "Taussig Friedman, Hildegard: "The memoirs of Hildegard Taussig Friedman" (Me 1256); "Taussig Friedman, Hildegard: "Meine Lebensgeschichte" (Me 1257);digitize
David Friedman microfilm collection 1910-1983
Four brief memoirs by David Friedman, describing his experiences from 1933-1945 including the end of his career in Berlin, his move to Prague with his wife and baby, deportation to the ghetto of Lodz and later to Auschwitz, forced labor in Gleiwitz I, liberation in the camp Blechhammer, his emotional collapse and life the first months after the liberation in Cracow, Prague and Ostrava where he resumed to work as a painter and graphic artist; letter by David Friedman to the German periodical "Quick"; clippings regarding a survivors' gathering in Washington, D.C. in 1983 including drawings by Friedman and information on his second wife, Hildegard Taussig Friedman; ICJC Newsletter from 1983 refering to David Friedman's art in a Yad Vashem publication; photocopy of postcards by Hilde Taussig from Theresienstadt in 1942.Hildegard Friedman, 7545 Lynn Avenue, St.Louis, MO 63130 (1983)Dav. Friedman(n) a.k.a. David Friedmann was born in 1893 in Maehrisch Ostrau, Austria, now Ostrava, Czech Republic. He ventured from this industrial city to Berlin in 1911. With the onset of World War I, Friedmann volunteered for the Austro-Hungarian Army, serving between 1917-1918 as an army artist.After returning to Berlin, in the spring of 1919 Friedmann presented his first exhibition at the Akademie der Künste, on Pariser Platz, and published some of his works in the Jewish journal "Schlemiel."In December 1938, with his wife Mathilde and infant daughter Mirjam Helene, Friedmann fled to Prague, escaping from the Nazis with only his artistic talent as a means to survive.The Friedmann family was deported on October 16, 1941, on the first transport from Prague to the Lodz Ghetto in Poland. Through hunger and sickness, Friedmann kept a diary and painted scenes of his family and the infernal life in the Ghetto. His art, his diary, would be his testimony, but they were destroyed. When the Ghetto was evacuated at the end of August of 1944, Friedmann was separated from his wife and child, neither of whom survived the Holocaust.He was transported to concentration camps Auschwitz-Birkenau and Gleiwitz I, followed by a grueling death march to Blechhammer. Friedmann was liberated January 25, 1945 at the age of fifty-one years.David Friedmann married Hildegard Taussig in 1948, but instead of settling down in Czechoslovakia to enjoy their new life together, they fled to Israel in 1949. In 1954, the Friedmann family, now including a daughter also named Miriam, immigrated to the United States. To support his family, Friedmann embarked on a new career in commercial art with General Outdoor Advertising Company. GOA transferred the family from New York City to Chicago, and finally to the St. Louis branch of the company. In 1960, the Friedmann family became United States citizens and dropped the double “n” spelling in their name. He died in 1980, at the age of eighty-six, in St. Louis, Missouri.A full biography, written by his daughter Miriam Friedman Morris, is in the David Friedman collection, AR 6988.Notes for "Trieb zur Kunst" by Miriam Friedman Morris in file (December 19, 2000)see also "David Friedman Collection" (AR 6988
Resources on David Friedman 2001
This collection contains information about the artist David Friedmann. Included are: a photocopied picture with brief biographical notes; a three page biography, and a single page entitled "Notes for Trieb zur Kunst."David Friedman (Friedmann; 1893-1980) was an artist in Berlin. During the Nazi period, he was incarcerated in the Lodz Ghetto and Auschwitz. After the war, he resumed his artistic career. He emigrated first to Israel and then to the United States. His papers include art work, memoirs, and essays focusing on his experiences in the Holocaust.Processed for digitizatio
Some results on PA-provably recursive functions
We provide some results which emerged from joint research carried out at
CRM. The theorems are inspired by analogy with situations related to forcin
Foundational implications of the Inner Model Hypothesis
AbstractThe Inner Model Hypothesis (IMH) is a new axiomatic approach in set theory formulated by Sy-D. Friedman. The purpose of this paper is to illustrate the hypothesis, and discuss it with respect to the current debate on the consequences of independence results in set theory
Who is Afraid of the Friedman Rule?
In this paper, we explore the connection between optimal monetary policy and heterogeneity among agents. We study a standard monetary economy with two types of agents in which the stationary distribution of money holdings is non-degenerate. Sans type-specific fiscal policy, we show that the zero-nominal-interest rate policy (the Friedman rule) does not maximize type-specific welfare; it may not maximize aggregate social welfare either. Indeed, one or, more surprisingly, both types may benefit if the central bank deviates from the Friedman rule. Our results suggest a positive explanation for why central banks around the world do not implement the Friedman rule.Friedman rule; monetary policy; money-in-the-utility-function
Who is Afraid of the Friedman Rule?
In this paper, we explore the connection between optimal monetary policy and heterogeneity among agents. We study a standard monetary economy with two types of agents in which the stationary distribution of money holdings is non-degenerate. Sans type-specific fiscal policy, we show that the zero-nominal-interest rate policy (the Friedman rule) does not maximize type-specific welfare; it may not maximize aggregate social welfare either. Indeed, one or, more surprisingly, both types may benefit if the central bank deviates from the Friedman rule. Our results suggest a positive explanation for why central banks around the world do not implement the Friedman rule.Friedman rule, monetary policy, money-in-the-utility-function
David D. Friedman talk globalization
Color studio image of David D. Friedman who gave a talk in relation to the Institute on Globalization
- …
