918 research outputs found
Edwin H. Sutherland, un iconoclasta gentile: alle origini della svolta dell’apprendimento nella teoria sociale e criminologica
No full textThe chapter introduces a critical evaluation of Edwin H. Sutherland criminological theory, taking into account his profound debt to the Chicago School and symbolic interactionism
Edwin H. Sutherland
No full textEdwin H. Sutherland is widely identified as the single most important and influential criminologist of the twentieth century. He is especially well-known for his path-breaking criminology textbook (first published in 1924), his promotion of a sociological (and scientific) approach to the understanding of crime and its control, his theory of differential association, and his work over his final ten years on white-collar crime, a term he is credited with having introduced.This book explores the contemporary meaning of Edwin Sutherland and considers why criminologists today should continue to engage with his work. What can and should Sutherland mean to future 21st century criminologists, those working in the field say between 2021 and 2050, or some one hundred years after the 1921 to 1950 period that encompassed Sutherland’s criminological career? Which dimensions of Sutherland’s work have best survived the march of time and which are most likely to – and deserve to – survive going forward?Making the case that Sutherland is important to both mainstream and critical criminologists, to positivistic criminologists and those who study crimes of the powerful, this book is essential reading for both students and scholars interested in exploring the enduring legacy of this key thinker in criminology
Edwin H. Sutherland
No full textEdwin H. Sutherland is widely identified as the single most important and influential criminologist of the twentieth century. He is especially well-known for his path-breaking criminology textbook (first published in 1924), his promotion of a sociological (and scientific) approach to the understanding of crime and its control, his theory of differential association, and his work over his final ten years on white-collar crime, a term he is credited with having introduced.This book explores the contemporary meaning of Edwin Sutherland and considers why criminologists today should continue to engage with his work. What can and should Sutherland mean to future 21st century criminologists, those working in the field say between 2021 and 2050, or some one hundred years after the 1921 to 1950 period that encompassed Sutherland’s criminological career? Which dimensions of Sutherland’s work have best survived the march of time and which are most likely to – and deserve to – survive going forward?Making the case that Sutherland is important to both mainstream and critical criminologists, to positivistic criminologists and those who study crimes of the powerful, this book is essential reading for both students and scholars interested in exploring the enduring legacy of this key thinker in criminology
Edwin H. Sutherland
No full textEdwin H. Sutherland is widely identified as the single most important and influential criminologist of the twentieth century. He is especially well-known for his path-breaking criminology textbook (first published in 1924), his promotion of a sociological (and scientific) approach to the understanding of crime and its control, his theory of differential association, and his work over his final ten years on white-collar crime, a term he is credited with having introduced.This book explores the contemporary meaning of Edwin Sutherland and considers why criminologists today should continue to engage with his work. What can and should Sutherland mean to future 21st century criminologists, those working in the field say between 2021 and 2050, or some one hundred years after the 1921 to 1950 period that encompassed Sutherland’s criminological career? Which dimensions of Sutherland’s work have best survived the march of time and which are most likely to – and deserve to – survive going forward?Making the case that Sutherland is important to both mainstream and critical criminologists, to positivistic criminologists and those who study crimes of the powerful, this book is essential reading for both students and scholars interested in exploring the enduring legacy of this key thinker in criminology
Edwin H. Sutherland. — White Collar Crime The Uncut Version
No full textRivière Jean. Edwin H. Sutherland. — White Collar Crime The Uncut Version. In: Revue Française d'Etudes Américaines, N°20, mai 1984. Sexualité, érotisme dans la littérature américaine. p. 303
La prisión como laboratorio criminológico
No full textIn this article of the early 30s, Edwin H. Sutherland defends the reasons to address the phenomenon of crime through the study of prisoners and their characteristics. With administrative objectives, he proposes to know the criminal behavior to establish profiles and categorizations of prisoners, but also in order to improve the training and skills of prison employees. Although he poses a series of methodological and technical obstacles that could call into question the validity of his approach, the author explores the way to overcome these limitations by describing some parallelisms with other research processes, and stressing the advantages of bringing the scientific method closer to study in prisons. Hence, he establishes the simile of prisons as "criminological laboratories."En este artículo de principios de los años 30, Edwin H. Sutherland defiende las razones por las que abordar el fenómeno de la delincuencia a través del estudio de los presos y sus características. Con objetivos administrativos, propone conocer la conducta criminal para establecer perfiles y categorizaciones de presos, pero también de cara a mejorar la formación y capacidades de los empleados de prisiones. Si bien parte de un serie de obstáculos metodológicos y técnicos que podrían poner en cuestión la validez de su planteamiento, este autor va desgranando la manera de salvar estas limitaciones describiendo paralelismo con otros procesos de investigación y reforzando las ventajas que supone acercar el método científico al estudio en prisiones. De ahí que establezca el símil de las prisiones como “laboratorios criminológicos”
Sutherland, Edwin H., \u3ci\u3eThe Professional Thief\u3c/i\u3e
No full textPerhaps because he was the son of a minister and raised in a very traditional home (Geis & Meier, 1977, p.24), Edwin Sutherland (1883-1950) had a populist streak and is known for two major contributions to American criminology: the theory of differential association (DA) and the concept of white collar crime (WCC). His classic book entitled The Professional Thief is at the intersection of these two interests, although its influence has been more acknowledged with respect to DA than WCC. This review traces scholarly reactions to the book and its enduring contributions to American criminology
White collar crime a la luz de la teoría del delito de Edwin Sutherland: Comentario a Sutherland, E. H., White collar crime, Nueva York, Dryden Press, 1949, 272 págs.
No full textEl artículo analiza la obra White collar crime, una investigación empírica realizada por el sociólogo y criminólogo estadounidense Edwin Hardin Sutherland (1883-1950), publicada originariamente en 1949 y que definió al “delito de cuello blanco” como aquel “…cometido por una persona de respetabilidad y alto estatus social en el curso de su ocupación”.
A estos efectos, realiza una relectura de la teoría especial del delito de cuello blanco a partir de la teoría general del delito de Sutherland, exponiendo los principales elementos de la teoría general del delito propuesta por Sutherland
Delitos de colarinho branco e direitos humanos: uma análise da teoria da associação diferencial de Edwin Hardin Sutherland
No full textThis article aims to analyze whether the concepts of differential association theory and white-collar crime, both formulated by Edwin H. Sutherland, are applicable in the context of contemporary criminality, especially regarding the crime of money laundering. Using a deductive method and an approach based on bibliographic analysis, the study begins with a theoretical exposition of the aforementioned concepts and then examines money laundering and its relationship with the premises of white-collar crime, culminating in an analysis of the trial of Criminal Action No. 470 (the “Mensalão” case). Results indicate that, although there has been progress in holding high-ranking officials criminally accountable, the legal system still exhibits structural selectivity, with unequal application of criminal law based on the socioeconomic status of those involved. The main conclusion indicates that Sutherland’s propositions remain valid to understand the punitive system’s asymmetries, revealing that white-collar crimes, although formally punishable, still receive privileged treatment, which compromises the effectiveness of penal justice and the protection of the human rights of marginalized groups.O artigo tem como objetivo analisar se os conceitos da teoria da associação diferencial e dos crimes de colarinho branco, ambos formulados por Edwin H. Sutherland, no contexto da criminalidade contemporânea, em especial no tocante ao delito de lavagem de capitais. Utilizando o método dedutivo e uma abordagem baseada em análise bibliográfica, o estudo parte da exposição teórica dos conceitos mencionados para, em seguida, examinar o crime de lavagem de dinheiro e sua relação com os pressupostos da criminalidade do colarinho branco, culminando na análise do julgamento da Ação Penal nº 470 (caso “mensalão”). Os resultados indicam que, embora haja avanços na responsabilização penal de agentes de alto escalão, o sistema jurídico ainda demonstra seletividade estrutural, com aplicação desigual do direito penal conforme o status socioeconômico dos envolvidos. A conclusão principal aponta que as proposições de Sutherland seguem válidas para compreender as assimetrias do sistema punitivo, revelando que os crimes de colarinho branco, embora formalmente puníveis, ainda recebem tratamento privilegiado, o que compromete a eficácia penal e a proteção dos direitos humanos de grupos marginalizados.El artículo tiene como objetivo analizar si los conceptos de la teoría de la asociación diferencial y de los crímenes de cuello blanco, ambos formulados por Edwin H. Sutherland, resultan aplicables en el contexto de la criminalidad contemporánea, en especial en lo referente al delito de lavado de capitales. Utilizando el método deductivo y una aproximación basada en el análisis bibliográfico, el estudio parte de la exposición teórica de los conceptos mencionados para, posteriormente, examinar el delito de lavado de dinero y su relación con los presupuestos de la criminalidad de cuello blanco, culminando en el análisis del juicio de la Acción Penal nº 470 (caso “mensalão”). Los resultados indican que, aunque existen avances en la responsabilización penal de agentes de alto rango, el sistema jurídico aún presenta una selectividad estructural, con aplicación desigual del derecho penal según el estatus socioeconómico de los involucrados. La principal conclusión señala que las proposiciones de Sutherland siguen siendo válidas para comprender las asimetrías del sistema punitivo, revelando que los crímenes de cuello blanco, aunque formalmente punibles, todavía reciben un tratamiento privilegiado, lo que compromete la eficacia penal y la protección de los derechos humanos de los grupos marginados
Delitos de colarinho branco e direitos humanos: uma análise da teoria da associação diferencial de Edwin Hardin Sutherland
No full textThis article aims to analyze whether the concepts of differential association theory and white-collar crime, both formulated by Edwin H. Sutherland, are applicable in the context of contemporary criminality, especially regarding the crime of money laundering. Using a deductive method and an approach based on bibliographic analysis, the study begins with a theoretical exposition of the aforementioned concepts and then examines money laundering and its relationship with the premises of white-collar crime, culminating in an analysis of the trial of Criminal Action No. 470 (the “Mensalão” case). Results indicate that, although there has been progress in holding high-ranking officials criminally accountable, the legal system still exhibits structural selectivity, with unequal application of criminal law based on the socioeconomic status of those involved. The main conclusion indicates that Sutherland’s propositions remain valid to understand the punitive system’s asymmetries, revealing that white-collar crimes, although formally punishable, still receive privileged treatment, which compromises the effectiveness of penal justice and the protection of the human rights of marginalized groups.El artículo tiene como objetivo analizar si los conceptos de la teoría de la asociación diferencial y de los crímenes de cuello blanco, ambos formulados por Edwin H. Sutherland, resultan aplicables en el contexto de la criminalidad contemporánea, en especial en lo referente al delito de lavado de capitales. Utilizando el método deductivo y una aproximación basada en el análisis bibliográfico, el estudio parte de la exposición teórica de los conceptos mencionados para, posteriormente, examinar el delito de lavado de dinero y su relación con los presupuestos de la criminalidad de cuello blanco, culminando en el análisis del juicio de la Acción Penal nº 470 (caso “mensalão”). Los resultados indican que, aunque existen avances en la responsabilización penal de agentes de alto rango, el sistema jurídico aún presenta una selectividad estructural, con aplicación desigual del derecho penal según el estatus socioeconómico de los involucrados. La principal conclusión señala que las proposiciones de Sutherland siguen siendo válidas para comprender las asimetrías del sistema punitivo, revelando que los crímenes de cuello blanco, aunque formalmente punibles, todavía reciben un tratamiento privilegiado, lo que compromete la eficacia penal y la protección de los derechos humanos de los grupos marginados.O artigo tem como objetivo analisar se os conceitos da teoria da associação diferencial e dos crimes de colarinho branco, ambos formulados por Edwin H. Sutherland, no contexto da criminalidade contemporânea, em especial no tocante ao delito de lavagem de capitais. Utilizando o método dedutivo e uma abordagem baseada em análise bibliográfica, o estudo parte da exposição teórica dos conceitos mencionados para, em seguida, examinar o crime de lavagem de dinheiro e sua relação com os pressupostos da criminalidade do colarinho branco, culminando na análise do julgamento da Ação Penal nº 470 (caso “mensalão”). Os resultados indicam que, embora haja avanços na responsabilização penal de agentes de alto escalão, o sistema jurídico ainda demonstra seletividade estrutural, com aplicação desigual do direito penal conforme o status socioeconômico dos envolvidos. A conclusão principal aponta que as proposições de Sutherland seguem válidas para compreender as assimetrias do sistema punitivo, revelando que os crimes de colarinho branco, embora formalmente puníveis, ainda recebem tratamento privilegiado, o que compromete a eficácia penal e a proteção dos direitos humanos de grupos marginalizados
- …
