1,721,846 research outputs found
Iris susiana Linnaeus, 1753, spec. nov.
No full textIris susiana, spec. nov. 1. Iris corollis barbatis, caule foliis longiore unifloro. Hort. cliff. 18. Roy. lugdb.17. Iris susiana, flore maximo ex albo nigricante. Bauh. pin. 31. theatr. 579. Habitat in Oriente ; venit constantinopoli in Belgium 1573. ♃ Caulis teres; Germen trigono-teretiusculum; Petala 3 interiora majora reflexa.Published as part of Linnaeus, Carolus, 1753, Species plantarum: exhibentes plantas rite cognitas, ad genera relatas, cum differentiis specificis, nominibus trivialibus, synonymis selectis, locis natalibus, secundum systema sexuale digestas, Stockholm :Laurentius Salvius on page 38, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.393198
Susiana Nugraha's Quick Files
No full textThe Quick Files feature was discontinued and it’s files were migrated into this Project on March 11, 2022. The file URL’s will still resolve properly, and the Quick Files logs are available in the Project’s Recent Activity
Crocidura susiana Redding & Lay 1978
No full text309. Iranian White-toothed Shrew Crocidura susiana French: Crocidure de Susiane / German: Iran-WeilRzahnspitzmaus / Spanish: Musarana de Iran Other common names: Iranian Shrew, Susiana Shrew Taxonomy. Crocidura susiana Redding & Lay, 1978, 8 km SSW of Dezful (32°19’N, 48°21’E), Khuzestan Province, Iran. Relationship with other shrews from region needs to be assessed by molecular studies. Monotypic. Distribution. Known only from the vicinity of Dezful, Khuzestan Province, SW Iran, but may have a wider distribution. Descriptive notes. Head-body 78-85 mm, tail 56-63 mm, ear 8-9 mm, hindfoot 15-17 mm. No specific data are available for body weight. Condylo-incisive length 20-6— 21 mm. The Iranian White-toothed Shrew is a relatively large shrew. In total length (134-148 mm), it exceeds the other Crocidura species from Iran, e.g. Zarudny’s Whitetoothed Shrew (C. zarudnyi), the Bicolored White-toothed Shrew (C. leucodon), and Guldenstadt’s White-toothed Shrew (CC. gueldenstaedti). A tail ratio of greater than 70% of head-body length separates the Iranian Tail is long and unicolored brown. Whitetoothed Shrew and Zarudny’s White-toothed Shrew from the Bicolored White-toothed Shrew and Guldenstadt’s White-toothed Shrew. Fur on dorsal pelage is warm sepia brown and 5-6 mm long; underparts are gray, washed light brown on the pectoral region and light gray on abdominal, hairs 4-5 mm long; no sharp demarcation between upperparts and underparts. Habitat. Semiarid steppes, banks of almost permanent rivers and brooks with a thick layer of grass, and some shrubs (Tamarix, Tamaricaceae; Populus, Salicaceae; Ziziphus, Rhamnaceae). All seven specimens of the type series of the Iranian White-toothed Shrew were captured together with House Mice (Mus musculus) at three localities in the Susiana Plain that lies between the Zagros Mountains and the Mesopotamian Plain. Elevational range is 100-300 m. Food and Feeding. No information. Breeding. No information. Activity patterns. Iranian White-toothed Shrews are terrestrial and probably nocturnal. Movements, Home range and Social organization. No information. Status and Conservation. Classified as Data Deficient on The IUCN Red List because there is no information available regarding extent of occurrence, area of occupancy, population size or population trends. No specific conservation measures are known to be in place for the Iranian White-toothed Shrew. Bibliography. Hutterer (2005b), Karami et al. (2008), Kennerley (2016i), Redding & Lay (1978).Published as part of Russell A. Mittermeier & Don E. Wilson, 2018, Soricidae, pp. 332-551 in Handbook of the Mammals of the World – Volume 8 Insectivores, Sloths and Colugos, Barcelona :Lynx Edicions on page 506, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.687084
Crocidura susiana Redding and Lay 1978
No full textCrocidura susiana Redding and Lay, 1978. Z. Saugetierk., 43:307. TYPE LOCALITY: Iran, Khuzistan Province, 8 km S.S.W. of Dezful (32° 19' N. and 48° 21 ' E.). DISTRIBUTION: Known only from vicinity of Dezful (S.W. Iran).Published as part of James H. Honacki, Kenneth E. Kinman & James W. Koeppl, 1982, Order Insectivora, pp. 58-106 in Mammal Species of the World (1 st Edition), Lawrence, Kansas, USA :Alien Press, Inc. & The Association of Systematics Collections on page 83, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.735300
Iris susiana Linnaeus 1753
No full text<p> <b>Iris susiana</b> Linnaeus, <i>Species Plantarum</i> 1: 38. 1753.</p> <p>"Habitat in Oriente; venit constantinopoli in Belgium 1573." RCN: 317.</p> <p>Type not designated.</p> <p>Original material: Herb. Linn. No. 61.3 (LINN); [icon] in Bauhin, Theatri Bot.: 579. 1658.</p> <p> Current name: <i> <i>Iris susiana</i> L. (Iridaceae).</i></p> <p> <i>Note:</i> See Sealy (in <i>Curtis’s Bot. Mag.</i> 177: t. 550. 1970) on the history of this taxon.</p>Published as part of <i>Jarvis, Charlie, 2007, Chapter 7: Linnaean Plant Names and their Types (part I), pp. 586-598 in Order out of Chaos. Linnaean Plant Types and their Types, London :Linnaean Society of London in association with the Natural History Museum</i> on page 595, DOI: <a href="http://zenodo.org/record/291971">10.5281/zenodo.291971</a>
The Riverine Landscape of Formative and Archaic Susiana (SW Iran); A Suggestion Based on Recent Geoarchaeological Evidence
Get PDFThe settlement evolution of the Early Neolithic period is considered a milestone in the human cultural history.While the archaeological implications of this period are discussed extensively, the landscape of Early Neolithic Iran has remained underrepresented, mostly due to lack of geoarchaeological investigations. The early periods Formative and Archaic Susiana, attested in several sites in the Susiana plain in southwestern Iran, are of utmostimportance as they bear witness to the first implications of standardization of material culture and intra-regional organization. This paper summarizes our current understanding of these periods as well as their landscape in the seventh and sixth millennia BCE. Then, it proposes a preliminary reconstruction of the landscape in this period based on recent geoarchaeological investigations by the author, applying a combination of different methods such as remote sensing, GIS analysis, and original geoarchaeological data including sediment cores, soil profiles, as well as laboratory analyses including sedimentological and chemical analyses (and lithological description in the field) and OSL dating. The results widen our perspective regarding the region’s hydrology. The Early Neolithic landscape of Susiana seems to have been different from the current one, primarily due to the tangible changes in watercourses and the noticeable differences in the surface soil and vegetation. The results further confirm thatheavy sedimentation of later periods covers most of the surface of this buried landscape including now buried watercourses and small wetlands
Crocidura susiana Redding and Lay 1978
No full textCrocidura susiana Redding and Lay, 1978. Z. Säugetierk., 43:307. TYPE LOCALITY: Iran, Khuzistan Province, 8 km SSW of Dezful (32°19'N, 48°21'E). DISTRIBUTION: Known only from the vicinity of Dezful (SW Iran), but may have a wider distribution.Published as part of Rainer Hutterer, 1993, Order Insectivora, pp. 69-130 in Mammal Species of the World (2 nd Edition), Washington and London :Smithsonian Institution Press on page 96, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.735308
Problems of the Uruk-Period in Susiana, viewed from Uruk
No full textNissen Hans. Problems of the Uruk-Period in Susiana, viewed from Uruk. In: Paléorient, 1985, vol. 11, n°2. Actes du séminaire CNRS/NSF de Bellevaux (24-29 juin 1985) : L'évolution des sociétés complexes du sud-ouest de l'Iran. pp. 39-40
Crocidura susiana Redding & Lay 1978
No full text<i>Crocidura susiana</i> Redding & Lay, 1978 <p> <i>Crocidura susiana</i> Redding & Lay, 1978: 307.</p> <p>COMMON NAME. — Iranian Shrew.</p> <p>HOLOTYPE. — Not traced.</p> <p>TYPE LOCALITY. — Khuzestan Province, 8 km South West of Dezful (32°19’N, 48°21’E).</p> <p>DISTRIBUTION. — Known only from the vicinity of Dezful, Khuzestan Province but may have a wider distribution (Redding & Lay 1978; Hutterer 2005; Ziaie 2008).</p> <p> HABITAT. — This species inhabits semi-arid stepps and the edges of permanent streams with herbaceous plants and scattered shrubs (Karami <i>et al.</i> 2016).</p> <p>IUCN. — Data deficient.</p> <p>REMARK</p> <p> Description postdates Lay (1967). This species is known only from a very restricted area, but may range more widely. There is no information available regarding extent of occurrence, area of occupancy and other aspects (Hutterer 2005; Karami <i>et al.</i> 2008).</p> <p> REFERENCES. — Redding & Lay (1978); Hutterer (2005); Karami <i>et al.</i> (2008, 2016); Ziaie (2008).</p>Published as part of <i>Eskandarzadeh, Naeimeh, Rastegar-Pouyani, Nasrullah, Rastegar-Pouyani, Eskandar, Fathinia, Behzad, Bahmani, Zahed, Hamidi, Kordiyeh & Gholamifard, Ali, 2018, Annotated checklist of the endemic Tetrapoda species of Iran, pp. 507-537 in Zoosystema 40 (24)</i> on page 527, DOI: 10.5252/zoosystema2018v40a24, <a href="http://zenodo.org/record/4336795">http://zenodo.org/record/4336795</a>
The Organization of Susiana Society. Periodization of Site Distributions
No full textHole Frank. The Organization of Susiana Society. Periodization of Site Distributions. In: Paléorient, 1985, vol. 11, n°2. Actes du séminaire CNRS/NSF de Bellevaux (24-29 juin 1985) : L'évolution des sociétés complexes du sud-ouest de l'Iran. pp. 21-24
- …
