2 research outputs found
The Middle Passage: Migration and Displacement of Sri Lankan Tamil Women of the Diaspora
No full textThe article attempts to grapple with the different facets of marginalisation produced by a specific type of Diasporic activity - as women, as Sri Lankan Tamils, and as participations that must negotiate a process that is at once transnational and postcolonial. Through the examination of different cultural modes of expression, novels, stories, and pamphlets, it attempts to answer as to how the Sri Lankan Tamil woman, away-from-home, makes sense of her world and how she sees it vis-a-vis her \u27homeland.\u27 Though displaccement itself contains the libertatory potential, is this \u27truth\u27 of a better world often distorted by the indirect and direct controls imposed by a hegemonic West? Through the metaphor of the woman\u27s body, the author attempts to map the contours of identity=politics that are at aplay on trans-border women. By marking the different phases in the process of Tamil migration, she notes the change that has come about in the constitution of \u27nationalist\u27 identities, the role of transnational locations, and in the final phase, the reformulation of identity with changes in class. Of particular interest here is the continuation of the Tamil nation, and the role it plays in the re-production of the marginalisation of women. What way out is there then? For the author, there is a \u27middle passage,\u27 one that re-negotiates the contours of her own body, and thus her nation, through her own modes of expression, not radically or transgressively, but less violently
Assessing the Origins, Evolution and Prospects of National Innovation Systems
No full text[EN] This paper assesses the origins, evolution and prospects of national innovation systems (NISs) using bibliometric techniques. All available data in the Web of Science Core Collection database up to and including the year 2017 are considered in the analysis. Both the number of NIS studies and the number of citations of these studies reflect the influence of this topic and the attention and growing interest of the scientific community, public administrations and international organisations in NIS research. The co-citation analysis of cited references provides a historical view of the origins of the NIS, and the bibliographic coupling between the documents gives a current overview of the status of NIS research. Our approach highlights the fact that many studies belong to previous, well-developed research streams. We also examine the topics covered by recent studies in each stream and the evolution of the most common keywords over time. In conclusion, we propose a research agenda based on three pillars: (1) the adaptation of innovation systems to the current global economic crisis and the application of the Quintuple Helix model to deal with this new scenario, (2) the adaptation of innovation systems to developing countries and (3) the specific fit of entrepreneurship and entrepreneurial innovations into NIS research.López-Rubio, P.; Roig-Tierno, N.; Mas Verdú, F. (2022). Assessing the Origins, Evolution and Prospects of National Innovation Systems. Journal of the Knowledge Economy. 13(1):161-184. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-020-00712-7S161184131Acs, Z. J., Autio, E., & Szerb, L. (2014). National systems of entrepreneurship: measurement issues and policy implications. Research Policy, 43(3), 476–494. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.08.016.Archibugi, D., & Michie, J. (1995). The globalisation of technology: a new taxonomy. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 19(1), 121–140. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.cje.a035299.Autio, E., Kenney, M., Mustar, P., Siegel, D., & Wright, M. (2014). Entrepreneurial innovation: the importance of context. Research Policy, 43(7), 1097–1108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2014.01.015.Bergek, A., Jacobsson, S., Carlsson, B., Lindmark, S., & Rickne, A. (2008). Analyzing the functional dynamics of technological innovation systems: a scheme of analysis. Research Policy, 37(3), 407–429. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2007.12.003.Borras, S., & Edquist, C. (2013). The choice of innovation policy instruments. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 80(8), 1513–1522. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2013.03.002.Callon, M., Courtial, J. P., Turner, W. A., & Bauin, S. (1983). From translations to problematic networks: an introduction to co-word analysis. Social Science Information, 22(2), 191–235. https://doi.org/10.1177/053901883022002003.Campbell, D. F. J., Carayannis, E. G., & Rehman, S. S. (2015). Quadruple helix structures of quality of democracy in innovation systems: the USA, OECD countries, and EU member countries in global comparison. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 6, 467–493. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-015-0246-7.Carayannis, E. G., Barth, T. D., & Campbell, D. F. J. (2012). The quintuple helix innovation model: global warming as a challenge and driver for innovation. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 1, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/2192-5372-1-2.Carlsson, B. (2006). Internationalization of innovation systems: a survey of the literature. Research Policy, 35(1), 56–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2005.08.003.Chiang, J. T. (1990). Management of national technology programs in a newly industrialized country – Taiwan. Technovation, 10(8), 531–554. https://doi.org/10.1016/0166-4972(90)90049-P.Cobo, M. J., López-Herrera, A. G., Herrera-Viedma, E., & Herrera, F. (2011). Science mapping software tools: review, analysis, and cooperative study among tools. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(7), 1382–1402. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21525.Colombo, M. G., & Delmastro, M. (2002). How effective are technology incubators?: evidence from Italy. Research Policy, 31(7), 1103–1122. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00178-0.Cooke, P. (2001). Regional innovation systems, clusters, and the knowledge economy. Industrial and Corporate Change, 10(4), 945–974. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/10.4.945.Cooke, P., Uranga, M. G., & Etxebarria, G. (1997). Regional innovation systems: institutional and organisational dimensions. Research Policy, 26(4-5), 475–491. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(97)00025-5.Cooke, P., Uranga, M. G., & Etxebarria, G. (1998). Regional systems of innovation: an evolutionary perspective. Environment and Planning A, 30, 1563–1584. https://doi.org/10.1068/a301563.Dosi, G., Freeman, C., Nelson, R., Silverberg, G., & Soete, L. (Eds.). (1988). Technical change and economic theory. London: Pinter.Edquist, C. (Ed.). (1997). Systems of innovation: technologies, institutions and organizations. London: Frances Pinter.Edquist, C. (2004). Systems of innovation: perspectives and challenges. In J. Fagerberg, D. Mowery, & R. Nelson (Eds.), Oxford handbook of innovation (pp. 181–208). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Egghe, L. (2006). Theory and practice of the g-index. Scientometrics, 69(1), 131–152. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-006-0144-7.Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and “Mode 2” to a Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations. Research Policy, 29, 109–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00055-4.European Commission. (2014). The European Union explained: Research and innovation (Vol. 2014). Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2775/74012.Faber, J., & Hesen, A. B. (2004). Innovation capabilities of European nations: cross-national analyses of patents and sales of product. Research Policy, 33(2), 193–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(03)00122-7.Fagerberg, J. (2017). Innovation policy: rationales, lessons and challenges. Journal of Economic Surveys, 31(2), 497–512. https://doi.org/10.1111/joes.12164.Fagerberg, J., & Srholec, M. (2008). National innovation systems, capabilities and economic development. Research Policy, 37(9), 1417–1435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2008.06.003.Filippetti, A., & Archibugi, D. (2011). Innovation in times of crisis: National Systems of Innovation, structure, and demand. Research Policy, 40(2), 179–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.09.001.Fischer, M. (2001). Innovation, knowledge creation and systems of innovation. The Annals of Regional Science, 35, 199–216. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001680000034.Flanagan, K., Uyarra, E., & Laranja, M. (2011). Reconceptualising the ‘policymix’ for innovation. Research Policy, 40(5), 702–713. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.02.005.Freeman, C. (1987). Technology policy and economic performance: lessons from Japan. Pinter Publishers.Freeman, C. (1995). The National System of Innovation in historical perspective. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 19, 5–24. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.cje.a035309.Freeman, C. (2002). Continental, national and sub-national innovation systems – complementarity and economic growth. Research Policy, 31(2), 191–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00136-6.Furman, J. L., Porter, M. E., & Stern, S. (2002). The determinants of national innovative capacity. Research Policy, 31(6), 899–933. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00152-4.Garfield, E. (2001). From bibliographic coupling to co-citation analysis via algorithmic historio-bibliography: a citationist’s tribute to Belver C. Griffith. Philadelphia: Drexel University.Glänzel, W., & Czerwon, H. J. (1996). A new methodological approach to bibliographic coupling and its application to the national, regional and institutional level. Scientometrics, 37, 195–221. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02093621.Gregersen, B., & Johnson, B. (1997). Learning economics, innovation systems and European integration. Regional Studies, 31(5), 479–490. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343409750132270.Griliches, Z. (1990). Patent statistics as economic indicators: a survey. Journal of Economic Literature, 28(4), 1661–1707 https://www.jstor.org/stable/2727442.Hall, A., Bockett, G., Taylor, S., Sivamohan, M. V. K., & Clark, N. (2001). Why research partnerships really matter: innovation theory, institutional arrangements and implications for developing new technology for the poor. World Development, 29(5), 783–797. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(01)00004-3.Hirsch, J. E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102, 16569–16572. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0507655102.Jarvening, B. (2007). Bibliographic coupling and its application to research-front and other core documents. Journal of Informetrics, 1(4), 287–307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2007.07.004.Kessler, M. M. (1963). Bibliographic coupling between scientific papers. American Documentation, 14, 10–25. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.5090140103.List, F. (1841). The national system of political economy. English Edition (1904). London, Longman.Liu, X., & White, S. (2001). Comparing innovation systems: a framework and application to China’s transitional context. Research Policy, 30(7), 1091–1114. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(00)00132-3.López-Rubio, P., Roig-Tierno, N., & Mas-Verdú, F. (2018). Technology transfer: a comparison between Web of Science Core Collection and Scopus. Information and Innovations, 13(2), 53–69. https://doi.org/10.31432/1994-2443-2018-13-2-53-69.López-Rubio, P., Roig-Tierno, N., & Mas-Tur, A. (2020). Regional innovation system research trends: toward knowledge management and entrepreneurial ecosystems. International Journal of Quality Innovation, 6(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40887-020-00038-x.Lundvall, B. A. (1985). Product innovation and user-producer interaction. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/251542478_Product_Innovation_and_User-Producer_Interaction.Lundvall, B. A. (1992). National systems of innovation: towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning. London: Pinter.Lundvall, B. A. (2007). National Innovation Systems – analytical concept and development tool. Industry & Innovation, 14, 95–119. https://doi.org/10.1080/13662710601130863.Lundvall, B. A. (2016). The learning economy and the economics of hope. NY: Anthem Press ISBN: 9781783085965.Lundvall, B. A., Johnson, B., Andersen, E. S., & Dalum, B. (2002). National systems of production, innovation and competence-building. Research Policy, 31(2), 213–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00137-8.Lundvall, B. A., Joseph, K. J., Chaminade, C., & Vang, J. (2011). Handbook of innovation systems and developing countries. Building Domestic Capabilities in a Global Setting. In B. A. Lundvall, K. J. Joseph, C. Chaminade, & J. Vang (Eds.), ISBN: 978 1 84720 609 1.Martin, B. (1996). The use of multiple indicators in the assessment of basic research. Scientometrics, 36(3), 343–362. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02129599.Martin, C. R., & Johnston, R. (1999). Technology foresight for wiring up the National Innovation System: experiences in Britain, Australia, and New Zealand. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 60(1), 37–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0040-1625(98)00022-5.McKelvey, M. (1991). How do National Systems of Innovation differ?: a critical analysis of Porter, Freeman, Lundvall and Nelson. In G. M. Hodgson & E. Screpanti (Eds.), Rethinking economics. Markets, technology and economics evolution (pp. 117–137). Aldershot: Elgar, ISBN 1852784164.Metcalfe, J. S. (1995). Technology systems and technology policy in an evolutionary framework. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 19(1), 25–46. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.cje.a035307.Mowery, D. C. (1992). The U.S. National Innovation System: origins and prospects for change. Research Policy, 21(2), 125–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(92)90037-5.Muller, E., & Zenker, A. (2001). Business services as actors of knowledge transformation: the role of KIBS in regional and national innovation systems. Research Policy, 30(9), 1501–1516. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00164-0.Nelson, R. R. (1993). National Innovation Systems. A comparative analysis. Edited by Richard R. Nelson. ISBN: 9780195076172.Nelson, R., & Winter, S. (1982). An evolutionary theory of economic change. Cambridge: Bellknap.OECD. (1996). The knowledge-based economy. Paris: OECD Publishing.OECD. (1999). Managing National Innovation Systems. Paris: OECD Publishing.OECD. (2011). Regions and innovation policy. OECD Reviews of Regional Innovation. Paris: OECD Publishing.OECD. (2015). The innovation imperative: contributing to productivity, growth and well-being. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264239814-en.Owen-Smith, J., Riccaboni, M., Pammolli, F., & Powell, W. W. (2002). A comparison of U.S. and European university-industry relation in the life sciences. Management Science, 48(1), 1–34. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.48.1.24.14275.Patel, P., & Pavitt, K. (1994). National innovation systems: why they are important, and how they might be measured and compared. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 3(1), 77–95. https://doi.org/10.1080/10438599400000004.Phene, A., Fladmoe-Lindquist, K., & Marsh, L. (2006). Breakthrough innovations in the U.S. biotechnology industry: the effects of technological space and geographic origin. Strategic Management Journal, 27(4), 369–388. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.522.Pittaway, L., Robertson, M., Munir, K., & Neely, A. (2004). Networking and innovation: a systematic review of the evidence. International Journal of Management Reviews, 5/6(3&4), 137–168. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-8545.2004.00101.x.Porter, M. (1990). The competitive advantages of nations. The Free Press Edition.Schneider, M. R., Schulze-Bentrop, C., & Paunescu, M. (2010). Mapping the institutional capital of high-tech firms: a fuzzy-set analysis of capitalist variety and export performance. Journal of International Business Studies, 41, 246–266. https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2009.36.Small, H. (1973). Co-citation in the scientific literature: a new measure of relationship between two documents. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 24, 265–269.Small, H. (1999). Visualizing science by citation mapping. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50(9), 799–813. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(1999)50:93.0.CO;2-G.Suominen, A., Seppänen, M., & Dedehayir, O. (2019). A bibliometric review on innovation systems and ecosystems: a research agenda. European Journal of Innovation Management, 22(2), 335–360. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-12-2017-0188.Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: Vosviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523–538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3.Vertova, G. (2014). The state and national systems of innovation: a sympathetic critique. The Levy Institute Working Paper Collection. Working Paper No. 823.White, H. D., & Griffith, B. C. (1981). Author co-citation: a literature measure of intellectual structure. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 21, 163–172. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.4630320302.Youtie, J., Kay, L., & Melkers, J. (2013). Bibliographic coupling and network analysis to assess knowledge coalescence in a research center environment. Research Evaluation, 22(3), 145–156. https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvt002
