48 research outputs found
sj-pdf-2-asu-10.1177_00031348211038581 – Supplemental Material for Neoadjuvant Radiotherapy is Associated With Improved Pathologic Outcomes and Survival in Resected Stage II-III Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma Treated With Multiagent Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in the Modern Era
No full textSupplemental Material, sj-pdf-2-asu-10.1177_00031348211038581 for Neoadjuvant Radiotherapy is Associated With Improved Pathologic Outcomes and Survival in Resected Stage II-III Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma Treated With Multiagent Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in the Modern Era by Jonathan J. Hue, Jennifer Dorth, Kavin Sugumar, Jeffrey M. Hardacre, John B. Ammori, Luke D.Rothermel, Joel Saltzman, Amr Mohamed, Jennifer E. Selfridge, David Bajor, Jordan M. Winter and Lee M. Ocuin in The American Surgeon</p
sj-pdf-1-asu-10.1177_00031348211038581 – Supplemental Material for Neoadjuvant Radiotherapy is Associated With Improved Pathologic Outcomes and Survival in Resected Stage II-III Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma Treated With Multiagent Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in the Modern Era
No full textSupplemental Material, sj-pdf-1-asu-10.1177_00031348211038581 for Neoadjuvant Radiotherapy is Associated With Improved Pathologic Outcomes and Survival in Resected Stage II-III Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma Treated With Multiagent Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in the Modern Era by Jonathan J. Hue, Jennifer Dorth, Kavin Sugumar, Jeffrey M. Hardacre, John B. Ammori, Luke D.Rothermel, Joel Saltzman, Amr Mohamed, Jennifer E. Selfridge, David Bajor, Jordan M. Winter and Lee M. Ocuin in The American Surgeon</p
sj-pdf-3-asu-10.1177_00031348211038581 – Supplemental Material for Neoadjuvant Radiotherapy is Associated With Improved Pathologic Outcomes and Survival in Resected Stage II-III Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma Treated With Multiagent Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in the Modern Era
No full textSupplemental Material, sj-pdf-3-asu-10.1177_00031348211038581 for Neoadjuvant Radiotherapy is Associated With Improved Pathologic Outcomes and Survival in Resected Stage II-III Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma Treated With Multiagent Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in the Modern Era by Jonathan J. Hue, Jennifer Dorth, Kavin Sugumar, Jeffrey M. Hardacre, John B. Ammori, Luke D.Rothermel, Joel Saltzman, Amr Mohamed, Jennifer E. Selfridge, David Bajor, Jordan M. Winter and Lee M. Ocuin in The American Surgeon</p
ASO Author Reflections: Outcomes of Hepatic Artery-Based Therapies and Systemic Multiagent Chemotherapy in Unresectable Colorectal Liver Metastases: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
No full textWATERING Crop Growth Reusable Building Block
No full textThis asset is available at Zenodo: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6323653This NetLogo model is a reusable component (also referred to as a Reusable Building Block or RBB) called WATERING_CROPGROWTH_RBB. Please:Download the WATERING_CROPGROWTH_RBB.nlogo fileOpen downloaded fileClick on the Info. tab for model description, context specification, executable demonstration, and suggestions to extend/adapt/use the modelWATERING_CROPGROWTH_RBB is a sub-model of the WATER user associations at the Interface of Nexus Governance (WATERING) model (for further information about WATERING, please see https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U-nqs9ak2nY)Please email Dr Kavin Narasimhan ([email protected]) for comments or questions.If you adapt/use the WATERING_CROPGROWTH_RBB model, we would appreciate if you cite our repo, as well as the Watershed model (http://ccl.northwestern.edu/netlogo/models/community/watershed) licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike License based on which we have created the irrigation component of WATERING_CROPGROWTH_RBB.Note: WATERING was developed as an exploratory tool to understand and explain how participatory irrigation management through Water User Associations (WUAs) work. The model allows exploring the impact of community-based water management (through WUAs) on water availability, water use and economic productivity within an irrigation scheme. While WATERING_CROPGROWTH_RBB is not WATERING, it is a sub-model of WATERING to simulate water flow and crop growth within an irrigation scheme - you can change the values of the input controls via the Interface and see how that affects water use and crop growth within the scheme (through visualisation in the NetLogo world and output plots). Our complete WATERING model includes other components to simulate various aspects of community-based water management through WUAs. Please get in touch with the author if you are interested in the complete WATERING model
Aerodynamic benefits of propeller-wing interactions in a leading edge distributed propeller configuration system
No full textPropeller-based propulsion technology is experiencing renewed interest owing to its superior propulsive efficiency in comparison to conventional jet engines. This phenomenon is attributed to the capacity to generate thrust by accelerating a significant volume of air through a small velocity differential. Additionally, owing to its compatibility with electrical power systems, propeller-based propulsion offers an opportunity to utilize more environmentally friendly energy sources and configurations like the distributed propulsion systems. To optimize the integration between the propeller-based propulsion system and the airframe, it is imperative to thoroughly understand the interactive aerodynamics of the propeller-wing system.This thesis presents a comprehensive study on the aerodynamics of propeller-wing interactions, with a specific focus on leading-edge distributed propeller configurations.The research was conducted through a comparative analysis, employing a single propeller-wing system, modeled based on the ATR 42/300 as the baseline. This involved comparing a conventional single tractor propeller configuration with a three-propeller leading edge distributed configuration. The methodology used is an unsteady panel methodsolver, FlightStream, which is a commercially available software, allowing for an in-depthexamination of the two-way interactions between the propeller and wing (Full interaction mode), and allowing for a force-free wake.The findings of the study highlighted significant aerodynamic benefits of the leading-edge distributed propeller configuration over the traditional single propeller setup. Notably, there was a 2.5% increase in wing efficiency and a 6.1% reduction in induced drag. Additionally, the propeller efficiency in the distributed system saw a 3% increase compared to the single propeller system. However, it’s crucial to note that these propellers operated at different, non-optimal points, which influences their comparative performance. A key result was the reduced power consumption of the three-propeller system, which required 8.1% less power to maintain steady level-flight conditions than the baseline single-propeller model. This finding suggests potential for increased efficiency in aircraft designs incorporating such configurations.Aerospace Engineerin
729 The impact of immune and targeted therapies for melanoma in asian populations: a national cancer database analysis 2004–2016
No full textA Novel Modification of the Endorectal Advancement Flap for Complex Anal Fistulas: Surgical Technique and Outcomes
No full text
The importance of time to treatment in early onset colon cancer: A National Cancer Database analysis
No full text2025 ASCO Annual Meeting I, May 30-June 3, 2025, Chicago, I
