196,363 research outputs found
Stylogaster kakamegensis Stuke 2012
Stylogaster kakamegensis Stuke, 2012 Material. KENYA: 1 ♂, 19.vii.– 1.viii. 2007, Eastern Province, Njuki-ini Forest near Forest station, 1455 m [0.51660 °N 37.41843 °E], leg. R. Copeland, coll. NMKE.Published as part of Stuke, Jens-Hermann, 2015, New Conopid records from the Afrotropical Region (Diptera). Part 1: Paramyopa Kröber, Pseudoconops Camras, Stylogaster Macquart, Thecophora Rondani, and Zodion Latreille, pp. 101-159 in Zootaxa 3963 (2) on page 143, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3963.2.1, http://zenodo.org/record/23760
Stylogaster irwini Stuke 2012
Stylogaster irwini Stuke, 2012 Material. MADAGASCAR: 1 ♂, 20.– 25.v. 2004, Tuléar (Toliara), Manombo, 165 m [2248 ′ 44 ′′S 4344 ′ 22 ′′E], leg. Frontier Wilderness Project, coll. CAS.Published as part of Stuke, Jens-Hermann, 2015, New Conopid records from the Afrotropical Region (Diptera). Part 1: Paramyopa Kröber, Pseudoconops Camras, Stylogaster Macquart, Thecophora Rondani, and Zodion Latreille, pp. 101-159 in Zootaxa 3963 (2) on page 139, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3963.2.1, http://zenodo.org/record/23760
Stylogaster hirsutifemora Stuke 2012
<i>Stylogaster hirsutifemora</i> Stuke, 2012 <p> <b>Material.</b> MADAGASCAR: 1♂, 23.iii.–3.iv.2005, Province Antananarivo, 46 km ne Ankazobe Ambohitanty, 700 m [1811.88′S 716.89′E], leg. M. Irwin & R. Harin’Hala, coll. CAS.</p>Published as part of <i>Stuke, Jens-Hermann, 2015, New Conopid records from the Afrotropical Region (Diptera). Part 1: Paramyopa Kröber, Pseudoconops Camras, Stylogaster Macquart, Thecophora Rondani, and Zodion Latreille, pp. 101-159 in Zootaxa 3963 (2)</i> on page 139, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3963.2.1, <a href="http://zenodo.org/record/237609">http://zenodo.org/record/237609</a>
Stylogaster pseudofanjae Stuke 2012
<i>Stylogaster pseudofanjae</i> Stuke, 2012 <p> <b>Material.</b> MADAGASCAR: 1♂, 25.vii.–3.viii.2002, Fianarantsoa Province, 12 km w Ranomafana National Parc entrance, 1215 m, montane tropical forest [2115.05′S 4724.43′E], leg. R. Harin’Hala, M. E. Irwin, coll. CAS.</p>Published as part of <i>Stuke, Jens-Hermann, 2015, New Conopid records from the Afrotropical Region (Diptera). Part 1: Paramyopa Kröber, Pseudoconops Camras, Stylogaster Macquart, Thecophora Rondani, and Zodion Latreille, pp. 101-159 in Zootaxa 3963 (2)</i> on page 150, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3963.2.1, <a href="http://zenodo.org/record/237609">http://zenodo.org/record/237609</a>
Stylogaster copelandi Stuke 2012
<i>Stylogaster copelandi</i> Stuke, 2012 <p> <b>Material.</b> KENYA: 1♂, 27.viii.–10.ix.2006, Western Province, Kakamega Forest near Rondo Guest House, 1630 m [0.22767°N 34.88533°E], leg. R. Copeland, coll. NMKE.</p>Published as part of <i>Stuke, Jens-Hermann, 2015, New Conopid records from the Afrotropical Region (Diptera). Part 1: Paramyopa Kröber, Pseudoconops Camras, Stylogaster Macquart, Thecophora Rondani, and Zodion Latreille, pp. 101-159 in Zootaxa 3963 (2)</i> on page 133, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3963.2.1, <a href="http://zenodo.org/record/237609">http://zenodo.org/record/237609</a>
Stylogaster amplicercus Stuke 2012
<i>Stylogaster amplicercus</i> Stuke, 2012 <p> <b>Material.</b> MADAGASCAR: 1♂, 26.–31.iii.2002, Fianarantsoa Province, 1.2 km km s Ranomafana National Park entrance, 1095 m [2115.99′S 4725.21′E], leg. R. Harin’Hala, M. E. Irwin, coll. CAS; 1♂, 19.–26.ii.2002, ditto; 1♂, 29.vi.–6.vii.2003, Fianarantsoa Province, 12 km w Ranomafana National Park entrance, 1215 m, montane tropical forest [2115.05′S 4724.43′E], leg. R. Harin’Hala, M. E. Irwin, coll. CAS.</p> <p> <b>Discussion.</b> Having now seen more specimens of <i>Stylogaster amplicercus</i> it seems apparent that the characteristic lateral lappets of the cercus referred to in the species description may in fact be unique to the holotype and possibly just an artefact of preservation. As a result it is probable that <i>Stylogaster amplicercus</i> is conspecific with the illustration of the male postabdomen of <i>Stylogaster nilssoni</i> Smith, 1984. The situation is complicated, however, by the fact that Smith (1984) chose a female holotype and it is not absolutely certain that the male paratype is necessarily conspecific, although given that the male paratype of <i>Stylogaster nilssoni</i> was collected together with the female holotype, and was caught at the same flower species, it is quite probable that the two specimens are conspecific, and that <i>Stylogaster amplicercus</i> Stuke, 2012 is therefore a junior synonym of <i>Stylogaster nilssoni</i> Smith, 1984. The description of <i>Stylogaster nilssoni</i> does not refer to certain important characters, however, and it is therefore necessary to inspect the paratype male before a formal synonymy can be established.</p>Published as part of <i>Stuke, Jens-Hermann, 2015, New Conopid records from the Afrotropical Region (Diptera). Part 1: Paramyopa Kröber, Pseudoconops Camras, Stylogaster Macquart, Thecophora Rondani, and Zodion Latreille, pp. 101-159 in Zootaxa 3963 (2)</i> on page 129, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3963.2.1, <a href="http://zenodo.org/record/237609">http://zenodo.org/record/237609</a>
Stylogaster amplicercus Stuke 2012
<i>Stylogaster amplicercus</i> Stuke, 2012 <p> <b>Material.</b> MADAGASCAR: 1♂, 26.–31.iii.2002, Fianarantsoa Province, 1.2 km km s Ranomafana National Park entrance, 1095 m [2115.99′S 4725.21′E], leg. R. Harin’Hala, M. E. Irwin, coll. CAS; 1♂, 19.–26.ii.2002, ditto; 1♂, 29.vi.–6.vii.2003, Fianarantsoa Province, 12 km w Ranomafana National Park entrance, 1215 m, montane tropical forest [2115.05′S 4724.43′E], leg. R. Harin’Hala, M. E. Irwin, coll. CAS.</p> <p> <b>Discussion.</b> Having now seen more specimens of <i>Stylogaster amplicercus</i> it seems apparent that the characteristic lateral lappets of the cercus referred to in the species description may in fact be unique to the holotype and possibly just an artefact of preservation. As a result it is probable that <i>Stylogaster amplicercus</i> is conspecific with the illustration of the male postabdomen of <i>Stylogaster nilssoni</i> Smith, 1984. The situation is complicated, however, by the fact that Smith (1984) chose a female holotype and it is not absolutely certain that the male paratype is necessarily conspecific, although given that the male paratype of <i>Stylogaster nilssoni</i> was collected together with the female holotype, and was caught at the same flower species, it is quite probable that the two specimens are conspecific, and that <i>Stylogaster amplicercus</i> Stuke, 2012 is therefore a junior synonym of <i>Stylogaster nilssoni</i> Smith, 1984. The description of <i>Stylogaster nilssoni</i> does not refer to certain important characters, however, and it is therefore necessary to inspect the paratype male before a formal synonymy can be established.</p>Published as part of <i>Stuke, Jens-Hermann, 2015, New Conopid records from the Afrotropical Region (Diptera). Part 1: Paramyopa Kröber, Pseudoconops Camras, Stylogaster Macquart, Thecophora Rondani, and Zodion Latreille, pp. 101-159 in Zootaxa 3963 (2)</i> on page 129, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3963.2.1, <a href="http://zenodo.org/record/237609">http://zenodo.org/record/237609</a>
Meoneura mucki Stuke & Barták 2019, spec. nov.
Meoneura mucki spec. nov. (Figs. 19–23) Holotype ♂: (1) „ SU: Amankutan / pasture / 39.19N / 66.55E 1300 m / Barták, 23.v.1989 “; (2) „ Holotypus / Meoneura mucki / spec. nov. ♂ / det. Stuke 2018“. The holotype is deposited in the collection of the Czech University of Life Sciences, Czech Republic, Prague (CULSP). The specimen is glued on a card point and therefore only the left side of head without proboscis and thorax could be examined. Otherwise the specimen is in good condition. The posterior part of abdomen is dissected, macerated and stored in a glycerine microvial pinned underneath the specimen. Description of holotype (male). Length about 1.9 mm. Wing length 1.4 mm. Head height 0.4 mm. Head black with anterior half of frons yellow brown. Antenna black to dark brown. Arista without pubescence. Maximum eye length: maximum eye height = 0.9. Posteroventral margin of gena closest to eye margin: maximum eye height = 0.5. Frons slightly microtomentose to subshining, frontal triangle shining. Frontal triangle distinct, reaching about 1/2 distance from anterior ocellus to frontal margin. Face and proboscis cannot be examined due to preparation of the specimen. Postcranium slightly microtomentose. 1 distinct ocellar seta; supralunular setae convergent; 4 fronto-orbital setae (2 anterior mesoclinate, 2 posterior lateroclinate); 2 vertical setae; 2 mesoclinate postorbital setae; postocellar setae slightly divergent; 1 strong vibrissal seta; 2 supravibrissal setae, the ventral one indistinct and much smaller; 2 strong genal setae. Scutum shining to subshining, anterior 2/3 covered with black setulae. Scutellum microtomentose. Pleurae —as far as can be seen in the type—shining. Scutum with only 1 long posterior, 1 intermediate medial, and 1 smaller anterior dorsocentral seta. 1 postpronotal seta; 1 praesutural seta; 1 anterior and 2 posterior notopleural setae; 1 long and 1 inconspicuous short supraalar seta; 2 postalar setae; 1 praescutellar seta; 1 apical and 1 lateral scutellar seta. 1 seta at posterior margin of anepisternum. 1 dorsal seta and 1 ventral seta on katepisternum. Costa with no obvious setae beyond radial vein R 1. Wing hyaline, costa light brown, other veins white to light yellow. R 4+5 slightly curved to apex of wing. Knob of haltere whitish yellow, base of haltere brown. Legs black to brown. Fore femur apically with 3 and basally with 2 strong posteroventral setae. Hind femur apically with 1 strong anteroventral seta. Hind metatarsus ventrally with dense yellow golden setae. Length metatarsus 2: length tibia 2 = 0.6. Tergites with no obvious depressions or tufts of setulae. Abdominal pleura with scattered setae on abdominal segments 4–5. Abdominal segments 1–5 narrow, width of tergite 3: length of tergite 3 = 2.5. Tergites 2–4 each with 1 short lateral seta at the posterior margin, and with 2–4 indistinct setae at the posterior margin. Sternite 5 almost rectangular, about as long as broad (Fig. 23). Sternite 5 with 2 lateral setae, the posterior obvious long (Fig. 23). Midventral tergite 7 not recognized. Protandrium small, slightly shorter than epandrium and about 0.5 of length of tergite 5. Epandrium with few setae (Fig. 19). Maximum length dorsally in the middle of epandrium: maximum width of epandrium = 0.5. Cerci indistinct, not projecting, and with a few setulae only. Subepandrial plate hardly sclerotised with the exception of a x-shaped brown structure. Subepandrial plate with scattered, hardly visible fine setulae. Obvious proceeding of hypoproct with 4 large setae on the laterally projecting part and several fine setulae basally. No tooth on subepandrial plate. Surstylus as Figs. 19, 21–22: with a slightly broadened base, falcated, and with a broad apical tip. Surstylus with short, strong setae apically, and long setae ventrally. No lamella. Postgonite as in Fig. 20: distinctly sclerotised, with a small base, elongated, pointed, apically bent like a hook. Distiphallus —as far as can be seen in the type—short and with dense brown setulae. Diagnosis. Meoneura mucki belongs to the Meoneura obscurella -group that is characterised by a distinct process of hypoproct that has long distinct setae (Fig. 19). From all other species of this group M. mucki is easily distinguished by the unique falcated surstylus with a densely haired tip (Figs. 19, 21). Process of hypoproct has 4 large setae (Fig. 19). Mesoscutum and pleurae are shiny and contrasting with the microtomentose scutellum. If characters of setation turn out to be constant 3 notopleural setae, 2 postalar setae and 2 mesoclinate postorbital setae are remarkable characters. A key of the Meoneura obscurella -group is published by Stuke & Freidberg (2017). M. mucki will run to the last couplet 11 together with Meoneura prima (Becker, 1903) and Meoneura goldemari Stuke & Freidberg, 2017 but will not be assigned to one of these species due to the very different shape of the surstylus. Etymology. The „Kleine Muck“ is a participant of Wilhelm Hauf´s fairy tale „Die Karavane“. The Kleine Muck is a small misshapen figure and outsider as Carnidae are small inconspicious Diptera in which hardly anybody is interested in. Distribution. Meoneura mucki is hitherto only known from the locus typicus Aman-Kutan (near Samarkand, Uzbekistan). Meoneura neottiophila COLLIN , 1930 CZECH REPUBLIC: 5♂♂, 11.–25.iv.2009, Čertova voda, right lake shore [50°48’47.3’’N 14°13’35.3’’E], 130 m, Malaise trap, meat baited, leg. M. Barták, coll. CULSP, PJHS; 1♂, 7.–14.v.2012, Praha, Troja [50°07’15’’N 14°23’53’’E], 184 m, emergence trap baited with pig carcas, leg. M. Barták, coll. CULSP; 1♂, 10.v.–4.vi.2011, Vráž nr. Písek near brook [49°23’59’’N 14’07’58’’E], 400 m, Malaise trap, leg. M. Barták, coll. CULSP; 7♂♂, 2.iv.–10.v.2011, dito; 1♂, 10.iv.–4.vi.2011, Vráž nr. Písek near brook [49°23’59’’N 14’07’58’’E], 400 m, Malaise trap, leg. M. Barták, coll. CULSP; 1♂, 21.–24.vi.2010, Vráž nr. Písek, wood [49°24’8’’N 14°7’8’’E], 430 m, pyramid trap, leg. M. Barták, coll. CULSP; 3♂♂, 24.vi.–19.vii.2010, Vráž nr. Písek, wood [49°24’12’’N 14°6’57’’E], 400 m, pyramid trap, leg. M. Barták, coll. CULSP, PJHS; 1♂, 13.vi.–30. ix.2014, Vráž nr. Písek, wood, protein trap [49°24’12’’N 14°7’03’’E], 400 m, protein trap, leg. M. Barták, coll. CULSP; TURKEY: 3♂♂, xi.2012 – iii.2013, Muğla, pine wood [37°09’41’’N 28°22’21’’E], 700 m, Malaise trap, leg. M. Barták & Š. Kubík, coll. CULSP, PJHS; 3♂♂, v.–vi.2013, Muğla, pine wood [37°09’41’’N 28°22’21’’E], 700 m, protein trap, leg. O. Dursun, coll. CULSP, PJHS. Diagnosis: Stuke & Freidberg (2017). M. neottiophila has not been reported from Turkey before. Meoneura obscurella (FALLÉN , 1823) Material: CZECH REPUBLIC: 1♂, 11.viii.–11.ix.2010, 5 km nnw of Uhlířské Janovice [49°53’27.5’’N 15°1’48.2’’E], 400 m, pyramid trap, leg. M. Barták, coll. CULSP. Diagnosis: Stuke & Freidberg (2017) Meoneura occulta STUKE , 2015 Material: ITALY: 1♂, 4.viii.1988, Lago di Campotosto, 4 km s, pasture [42.29°N 13.20°E], 1300 m, leg. M. Barták, coll. PJHS. Diagnosis: Stuke & Bächli (2015). Prior to this record only the type material from Switzerland was known. Meoneura palaestinensis HENNIG , 1937 Material: TURKEY: 1♂, 8.–20.viii.2015, Dalyan, farm [36°48’54’’N 28°39’04’’E], 1m, Malaise trap, leg. O. Dursun, coll. CULSP; 1♂, 19.viii.–17.ix.2015, Muğla, University campus [37°09’42’’N 28°22’13’’E], 720 m, Malaise trap, leg. H. Kavak, coll. PJHS; UNITED ARABIAN EMIRATES: 4♂♂, 1.–30.vi.2016, Houbara protected area [24.08°N 52.97°E], AD 1021, Malaise trap, leg. A. Saji & A. van Harten, coll. PJHS. Diagnosis: Stuke & Freidberg (2017). These are the first records of M. palaestinensis from Turkey. Meoneura pappi STUKE , 2015 Material: AUSTRIA: 1♂, 31.vii.1988, Heiligenblut [47.00°N 12.46°E], 1700 m, on Compositae, leg. M. Barták, coll. CULSP; CZECH REPUBLIC: 3♂♂, 5.–12.x.1995, 5 km w of Uhlířské Janovice, damp meadow [49.53°N 15.03°E], 460 m, pan trap, leg. M. Barták, coll. CULSP, PJHS; 1♂, 16.–17.vi.2005, Krkonoše, Labská and Pančavská louka [50°46’07’’N 15°32’31’’E], 1340 m, leg. M. Barták, coll. CULSP; 2♂♂, 12.–13.viii.2005, Krkonoše, Labská bouda environment [50°46’18.6’’N 15°32’47.2’’E], 1300 m, pan trap +sweeping, leg. M. Barták, coll. CULSP; 1♂, 23.–26.v.2001, Krkonoše, Labská louka [50°46’11’’N 15°32’32’’E], 1350 m, pan trap, leg. J. Vaněk, coll. CULSP; 4♂♂, 3.–4.vii.2005, Krkonoše, Luční hora (maringotka) [50°43’14.4’’N 15°41’00.9’’E], 1450 m, leg. M. Barták, coll. CULSP, PJHS; 3♂♂, 2.viii.2007, Krkonoše, Obří důl nr. brook [50°43’36’’N 15°43’40’’E], 950 m, pan trap +sweeping, leg. M. Barták, coll. CULSP, PJHS; 1♂, 12.–13.viii.2005, Krkonoše, Pančavská louka [50°46’06’’N 15°32’31’’E], 1330 m, pan trap, leg. M. Barták, coll. CULSP; 2♂♂, ix.2008, Krkonoše, Slunečná stráň, meadow [50°38’00’’N 15°49’30.4’’E], 650 m, pan trap, leg. J. Vaněk, coll. CULSP, PJHS; 1♂, 22.–24. vii.2006, Lrkonoše Mountains, Labská rokle near brook [50°46’20’’N 15°32’45’’E], 1330 m, pan trap +sweeping, leg. M. Barták, coll. CULSP; 2♂♂, 10.vi.1995, MS Beskydy, Muřinkový vrch [49.31°N 18- 39°E], 950 m, pan trap, leg. M. Barták, coll. CULSP; ITALY: 1♂, 5.vii.2011, Passo Nigra, meadow and wood [46°26’39’’N 11°35’18’’E], 1700 m, leg. M. Barták, coll. CULSP; 1♂, 8.viii.1988, Passo Rolle, alpine meadow [46.13°N 11.42°E], 1900 m, leg. M. Barták, coll. CULSP; 1♂, 4. vii.2011, Weisslahnbad, edge of forest [46°28’40’’N 11°34’11’’E], 1400 m, leg. M. Barták, coll. CULSP; SLOVAKIA: 1♂, 28.vii.2002, Nizké Tatry Mountains [7083], alpine zone between Dereše Mountain and Ďumbier Mt., 1700–2000 m, leg. J. Farkač, K. Farkačová, V. Zedek, coll. CULSP. Diagnosis: Stuke & Bächli (2015). M. pappi is herewith reported the first time from Austria and Slovakia. Meoneura prima (BECKER , 1903) Material: ALGERIA: 2♂♂, 24.–28.x.2015, Ghardaia garden [32°30’24’’N 3°37’43’’E], 520 m, leg. B. Aissa, coll. CULSP, PJHS; CZECH REPUBLIC: 1♂, 9.x.–17.xi.2011, Kunice [49°56’1.4’’N 14°40’7.5’’E], 435 m, pyramid trap meat & fruit, leg. M. Barták, coll. CULSP; UZBEKISTAN: 2♂♂, 18.v.1989, Chimgan, alpine meadow [41.38°N 70.06°E], 1800 m, leg. M. Barták, coll. CULSP, PJHS; 1♂, 18.v.1989, Karamazar, alpine meadow [41.30°N 69.49°E], 800 m, leg. M. Barták, coll. CULSP. Diagnosis: Stuke & Freidberg (2017) M. prima has not been known from Algeria before. Meoneura pseudoflavifacies PAPP , 1997 Material: BULGARIA: 7♂♂, 21.vii.1987, Sliven, 13 km n, damp valley [42.49°N 26.16°E], 700 m, leg. M. Barták, coll. CULSP, PJHS; ITALY: 2♂♂, 12.vii.1990, Cesana, mixed wood [44.57°N 6.47°E], 1000 m, leg. M. Barták, coll. CULSP, PJHS. Diagnosis: Stuke & Bächli (2015). These are the first records of M. pseudoflavifacies from Bulgaria. Meoneura triangularis COLLIN , 1930 Material: CZECH REPUBLIC: 2♂♂, 11.viii.–11.ix.2010, 5 km nnw of Uhlířské Janovice [49°53’27.5’’N 15°1’48.2’’E], 400 m, pyramidal trap, leg. M. Barták, coll. CULSP; 1♂, 2.iv.–10.v.2011, Vráž nr. Písek near brook [49°23’59’’N 14’07’58’’E], 400 m, Malaise trap, leg. M. Barták, coll. CULSP; 1♂, 16.–20.vi.2008, Vráž nr. Písek, damp meadow [49°24’12’’N 14°7’13’’E], 430 m, leg. M. Barták, coll. CULSP; TURKEY: 6♂♂, xi.2012 – iii.2013, Muğla, pine wood [37°09’41’’N 28°22’21’’E], 700 m, protein trap, leg. M. Barták & Š. Kubik, coll. CULSP, PJHS; 1♂, 21.–24.ix.2012, Muğla, University campus, 700 m [37°09’42’’N 28°22’21’’E], 700 m, pan trap, leg. M. Barták & Š. Kubik, coll. CULSP; 1♂, 21.–24.ix.2012, Muğla, University campus, 700 m [37°09’42’’N 28°22’21’’E], 700 m, Malaise trap, leg. M. Barták & Š. Kubik, coll. PJHS. Diagnosis: Stuke & Freidberg (2017). M. triangularis has not been reported from Turkey before. Meoneura vagans (FALLÉN , 1823) Material: BULGARIA: 1♂, 23.vi.2016, 9 km nee of Dospat, meadow nr wood [41°40’13’’N 24°15’50’’E], 1170 m, leg. M. Barták & Š. Kubík, coll. CULSP; CZECH REPUBLIC: 4♂♂, 11.viii.–11.ix.2010, 5 km nnw of Uhlířské Janovice [49°53’27.5’’N 15°1’48.2’’E], 400 m, pyramidal trap, leg. M. Barták, coll. CULSP, PJHS; 1♂, 11.vii.–11.viii.2010, 5 km w of Uhlířské Janovice [49°53’28’’N 15°01’48’’E], 410 m, pyramidal trap, leg. M. Barták, coll. CULSP; 1♂, 5.–12.x.1995, 5 km w of Uhlířské Janovice, damp meadow [49.53°N 15.03°E], 460 m, leg. M. Barták, coll. CULSP; 1♂, 17.–18.vii.2005, Bystřice near Třinec, shore of Olše river [49°38’08’’N 18°42’46’’E], leg. M. Barták, coll. CULSP; 1♂, 23.–26.v.2001, Krkonoše, Labská louka [50°46’11’’N 15°32’32’’E], 1350 m, pyramid trap, leg. J.Vaněk, coll. CULSP; 2♂♂, viii.2008, Krkonoše, Slunečná stráň, meadow [50°38’00’’N 15°49’30.4’’E], 650 m, pyramid trap, leg. J.Vaněk, coll. CULSP, PJHS; 1♂, 15.–22.v.2012, Praha, Troja [50°07’15’’N 14°23’53’’E], 184 m, emergence trap baited with pig carcas, leg. M. Barták, coll. CULSP; 1♂, 26. iv.–2.v.2012, dito; 1♂, 22.–29.v.2012, Praha, Troja [50°07’15’’N 14°23’53’’E], 184 m, emergence trap baited with pig carcas, leg. M. Barták, coll. PJHS; 3♂♂, 16.–20.vi.2008, Vráž nr. Písek, damp meadow [49°24’12’’N 14°7’13’’E], 430 m, leg. M. Barták, coll. CULSP, PJHS; 1♂, 30.v.–3.vi.2005, Vráž u Písku, damp meadow [49°24’13’’N 14°07’15’’E], 400 m, leg. M. Barták, coll. CULSP; 1♂, 22.v.1995, Vráž u Písku, near pond [49.23°N 14.08°E], 400 m, leg. M. Barták, coll. CULSP. Diagnosis: Collin (1930).Published as part of Stuke, Jens-Hermann & Barták, Miroslav, 2019, Records of Carnidae from the collection of Miroslav Barták (Diptera: Carnidae), with the description of five new species, pp. 326-346 in Zootaxa 4567 (2) on pages 340-345, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4567.2.6, http://zenodo.org/record/259499
Meoneura artoodetoo Stuke & Barták 2019, spec. nov.
Meoneura artoodetoo spec. nov. (Figs. 2–6) Holotype ♂: (1) „ SU: Chimgan / alpine meadow / 41.38N / 70.06E 1800 m / Barták, 18.v.1989 “; (2) „ Holotypus / Meoneura / artoodetoo / spec. nov. ♂ / det. Stuke 2018“. The holotype is deposited in the collection of the Czech University of Life Sciences, Czech Republic, Prague (CULSP). The specimen is glued on a card point. The right wing is missing and the left wing is incomplete. Otherwise the specimen is in good condition. The posterior part of abdomen is dissected, macerated and stored in a glycerine microvial pinned underneath the specimen. Description of holotype (male). Length about 1.8 mm. Wing length about 1.6 mm. Head height 0.4 mm. Head black with anterior half of frons black brown. Antenna black to dark brown. Arista without pubescence. Maximum eye length: maximum eye height = 1.0. Posteroventral margin of gena closest to eye margin: maximum eye height = 0.5. Frons microtomentose, frontal triangle shining. Frontal triangle indistinct and short, hardly reaching further than anterior ocellus. Face microtomentose. Carina narrow. Postcranium microtomentose. Prementum longer and wider than labellum. Palpus brown, about 1/4 as long as the haustellum. 1 distinct ocellar seta; supralunular setae only slightly convergent; 4 fronto-orbital setae (2 anterior mesoclinate, 2 posterior lateroclinate); 2 vertical setae; 2 mesoclinate postorbital setae; postocellar setae parallel; 1 strong vibrissal seta; 2 supravibrissal setae, the ventral one much smaller; 4 genal setae, the anterior one strongest. Scutum shining to subshining, anterior 2/3 covered with black setulae. Scutellum microtomentose. Pleurae shining to slightly microtomentose. Scutum with only 1 long posterior and 2 smaller anterior dorsocentral setae. 2 postpronotal setae; 1 praesutural seta; 2 notopleural setae; 1 supraalar seta; 2 postalar setae; 1 praescutellar seta; 1 apical and 1 lateral scutellar seta. 1 seta at posterior margin of anepisternum. 1 dorsal seta and 1 ventral seta on katepisternum. Costa with no obvious setae beyond radial vein R 1. Wing hyaline, veins white to light yellow. Knob of haltere whitish yellow, base of haltere brown. Legs black to brown. Fore femur apically with 2 and basally with 1 strong posteroventral setae. Hind femur apically with 1 strong anteroventral seta. All coxae with single black setae. Hind metatarsus ventrally with dense yellow golden setae. Length metatarsus 2: length tibia 2 = 0.6. Tergites with no obvious depressions or tufts of setulae. Abdominal pleura with scattered setae on abdominal segment 5 only. Abdominal segments 1–5 narrow, width of tergite 3: length of tergite 3 = 2.6. Tergites 2–5 each with 1 distinct lateral seta at the posterior margin, and with 4 indistinct setae at the posterior margin. Sternite 5 almost rectangular, slightly longer than broad, with 2 anterior setae and few additional setulae (Fig. 5). Midventral tergite 7 not recognized. Protandrium very small, shorter than epandrium and about 0.3 of length of tergite 5. Epandrium with two strong lateral setae and several smaller setae (Fig. 2, 6). Maximum length dorsally in the middle of epandrium: maximum width of epandrium = 0.4. Cerci indistinct, not projecting, and with a few setulae only. Subepandrial plate distinctly sclerotised with a pair of strongly sclerotized dark brown bars. Subepandrial plate with scattered, hardly visible fine setulae. Obvious proceeding of hypoproct with 10–11 large and obvious flat setae on the projecting part. No tooth on subepandrial plate. Surstylus as in Fig. 3: with an obviously broadened base due to a ventral expansion, concave dorsally, and a slightly rounded tip. Surstylus with several inconspicuous setae apically and 1 inconspicuous but longer medially directed setae at the tip. The ventral expansion at base of surstylus is lamella-like and has several distinct setae. Postgonite as in Fig. 4: distinctly sclerotised, with a broad base, slightly elongated, pointed, apically bent like a hook. Distiphallus slightly longer than epandrium and surstylus, covered with setulae that form dorsobasally a field of dense setulae (Fig. 6). Basiphallus not recognized. Diagnosis. Meoneura artoodetoo belongs to the Meoneura obscurella -group that is characterised by a distinct process of hypoproct that has long distinct setae (Fig. 2). From all species of this group—with the exception of M. merzi Ozerov & Krivosheina, 2013 — M. artoodetoo is easily distinguished by the shape and setation of the surstylus as shown in Fig. 3. Especially the characteristic base of surstylus largely expanded ventrally to a lamellalike structure that bears several setulae (Fig. 3: ves) distinguishes this species easily. Meoneura artoodetoo will run in the key of the Meoneura obscurella -group of Stuke & Freidberg (2017) to couplet 4 where Meoneura paraseducta Papp, 1976 is identified. However M. artoodetoo has a completely black brown frons and no long seta on sternite 5 nor fits the shape of the surstylus. Later M. artoodetoo will run to couplet 9 where a decision to one of the keys alternatives is not possible anymore. M. merzi has been overlooked by Stuke & Freidberg (2017) and is very similar to M. artoodetoo. Compared with the original description of M. merzi, M. artoodetoo is distinguished by these characters: (i) postocellar setae parallel ("slightly diverging" in M. merzi); (ii) process of hypoproct with 10–11 obvious flattened setae distally (more setae that are not obvious flattened and that are not restricted to distal part of process of hypoproct in M. merzi), (iii) base of surstylus dorsally expanded and therefore dorsal margin of surstylus concave (base of surstylus less broad and therefore dorsal margin of surstylus almost straight in M. merzi); (iv) dull angle between surstylus and ventral expansion of surstylus (right angle between surstylus and ventral expansion of surstylus in M. merzi); (v) ventral expansion almost square (ventral expansion oblong in M. merzi); (vi) epandrium with two strong lateral setae (epandrium without strong setae in M. merzi). Etymology. This species is dedicated—as noun in apposition—to the fictional robot R2-D2 from George Lucas Star Wars movies. R2-D2 is a small and inconspicuous robot but saved the world. Distribution. Meoneura artoodetoo is hitherto only known from the locus typicus Chimgan (Uzbekistan). Meoneura atoma PAPP (1981) Material: Material: AUSTRIA: 2♂♂, 31.vii.1988, Heiligenblut [47.00°N 12.46°E], 1700 m, on Compositae, leg. M. Barták, coll. CULSP, PJHS; 2♂♂, 6.viii.1995, Niedere Tauern, Sölker Pass [47.16°N 14.04°E], 1900 m, leg. M. Barták, coll. CULSP, PJHS; CZECH REPUBLIC: 2♂♂, 10.vi.–16.vii.2015, Českolipsko, Provodín, pískovna pod hřbitovem, Malaise trap, leg. L. Blažej, coll. CULSP; 1♂, 3.–4.vii.2005, Krkonoše, Luční hora (maringotka) [50°43’14.4’’N 15°41’00.9’’E], 1450 m, leg. M. Barták, coll. CULSP; ITALY: 1♂, 8.viii.1988, Passo Rolle, alpine meadow [46.13°N 11.42°E], 1900 m, leg. M. Barták, coll. CULSP; 1♂, 6.viii.1988, Staggia, oak wood, leg. M. Barták, coll. CULSP. Diagnosis: Papp (1981).Published as part of Stuke, Jens-Hermann & Barták, Miroslav, 2019, Records of Carnidae from the collection of Miroslav Barták (Diptera: Carnidae), with the description of five new species, pp. 326-346 in Zootaxa 4567 (2) on pages 328-331, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4567.2.6, http://zenodo.org/record/259499
Meoneura joedaltoni Stuke & Barták 2019, spec. nov.
<i>Meoneura joedaltoni</i> spec. nov. <p>(Figs. 15–18)</p> <p> <b>Holotype</b> ♂: (1) „I: Amatrice-5kmS, pi- / ne wood nr.pasture / 42.39N / 13.20E 1700 m / Barták 3.viii.1988 “; (2) „ Holotypus / <i>Meoneura joedaltoni</i> / <b>spec. nov.</b> ♂ / det. Stuke 2018“.</p> <p>The holotype is deposited in the collection of the Czech University of Life Sciences, Czech Republic, Prague (CULSP). The specimen is glued on a card. Otherwise the specimen is in good condition. The posterior part of abdomen is dissected, macerated and stored in a glycerine microvial pinned underneath the specimen.</p> <p> <b>Description of holotype (male).</b> Length about 1.5 mm. Wing length 1.2 mm.</p> <p>Head height 0.4 mm. Face, anterior half of frons and gena below the eye orange brown. Posterior half of frons brown with frontal triangle black. Occiput and main part of gena black. Antenna brown. Arista without pubescence. Maximum eye length: maximum eye height = 1.0. Posteroventral margin of gena closest to eye margin: maximum eye height = 0.6. Frons slightly microtomentose, slightly microtomentose. Frontal triangle distinct, reaching about 1/3 distance from anterior ocellus to frontal margin. Face microtomentose. Carina broad, almost as broad as fore tibia. Postcranium microtomentose. Prementum and palpus cannot be examined at the holotype due to the preparation. 1 distinct ocellar seta; supralunular almost parallel; 4 fronto-orbital setae (2 anterior mesoclinate, 2 posterior lateroclinate), the posterior mesoclinate seta short, only 1/3 of the length of the anterior mesoclinate seta. Perhaps this short seta is an additional anterior mesoclinate seta and another larger mesoclinate seta is broken (on both sides of the head). 2 vertical setae; 2 mesoclinate postorbital setae; postocellar setae slightly divergent; 1 strong vibrissal seta; supravibrissal setae incomplete in the holotype; 1 strong and 2 slightly smaller genal setae.</p> <p> Scutum microtomentose, covered with short, semiadpressed black setulae. Scutellum microtomentose. Pleurae—as far as can be seen in the type—microtomentose. Scutum with 1 long posterior dorsocentral seta only. 2 postpronotal setae; 1 praesutural seta; 2 notopleural setae; 1 supraalar seta; 2 postalar setae; 1 praescutellar seta; 1 apical and 1 lateral scutellar seta. Setae on katepisternum and anepisternum cannot be examined in holotype. 1 dorsal seta and 1 ventral seta on katepisternum. Costa with no obvious setae beyond radial vein R 1. Wing hyaline, veins light yellow to yellow brown. R 4+5 slightly curved to apex of wing. Haltere brown, base of haltere brown. Legs black to brown. Fore femur basally with 2 and apically with 2 strong posteroventral setae. Hind femur apically with 1 strong anteroventral seta. All coxae with single inconspicuous black setae. Hind metatarsus ventrally with dense yellow golden setae. Length metatarsus 2: length tibia 2 = 0.5.</p> <p>Tergites with no obvious depressions or tufts of setulae. Abdominal pleura with scattered setae on abdominal segments 3–5. Abdominal segments 1–5 narrow, width of tergite 3: length of tergite 3 = 3.1. Tergites 2–5 each with 1 distinct lateral seta at the posterior margin, and tergite 5 with 2 setae at the posterior margin. Sternite 5 wider than long; the posterior margin slightly concave (Fig. 18). Sternite 5 with scattered setae in the posterior half. Midventral tergite 7 distinct. Protandrium small, shorter than epandrium and about 0.4 of length of tergite 5. In the holotype the protandrium is almost completely hidden by tergite 5. Epandrium with four outstanding lateral setae—the basal distinctly longer than the three other—and one smaller setae (Fig. 15). Maximum length dorsally in the middle of epandrium: maximum width of epandrium = 0.4. Cerci indistinct, not projecting, and no setulae recognized. Subepandrial plate distinctly sclerotised. No setula recognized on subepandrial plate. No proceeding of hypoproct. No tooth on subepandrial plate. Surstylus as in Fig. 16: large, parallel sided, anteriorly rounded. Surstylus with few setulae only. No lamella. Postgonite as in Fig. 17: distinctly sclerotised, broad, hardly elongated, dorsoapically pointed. Distiphallus small, inconspicuous, curved, longer than epandrium and surstylus, covered with dense light brown setulae. Basiphallus obviously sclerotised, long, narrow, at its base widened.</p> <p> <b>Diagnosis.</b> An exciting character of <i>M. joedaltoni</i> is the completely brown halter that is otherwise only known from European <i>Meoneura elongella</i> Zetterstedt, 1838, Nearctic <i>M. nigrifrons</i> Malloch, 1915 and Nearctic <i>M. wirthi</i> Sabrosky, 1959. While the two Nearctic species have completely different structures at the postabdomen (cf. Sabrosky 1959) the European <i>M. elongella</i> is only known from female specimens. The most obvious character to distinguish the holotype of <i>M. joedaltoni</i> and a female of <i>M. elongella</i> from Norway is the more yellow coloured head (face, gena at eye margin and about half of the frons) of <i>M. joedaltoni</i>. This character is important in other <i>Meoneura</i> species, for example to distinguish the closely related species of the <i>M. flavifacies</i> -group. It is described in Zetterstedt´s description of <i>M. elongella</i>. Another obvious character is the higher face between antennal groove and upper mouth opening (higher than fore tibia diameter) in <i>M. joedaltoni</i>.</p> <p> In regard to the postabdomen, <i>Meoneura joedaltoni</i> belongs to the <i>Meoneura palaestinensis</i> -group sensu Stuke & Freidberg (2017) that is characterised by a broad and anteriorly rounded surstylus and the lack of an adjected lamella (Fig. 16). <i>M. joedaltoni</i> is easily identified by this unique combination of characters: (1) face and anterior half of frons orange yellow; (2) carina about as broad as fore tibia; (3) scutum and scutellum distinctly microtomentose; (4) 1 dorsocentral only; (5) haltere completely brown; (6) epandrium with 1 outstanding and 3 distinct setae (Fig. 15); (7) cercus indistinct and without recognized setae; (8) surstylus as in Fig. 16: large, almost as long as epandrium, parallel sided, not narrowing basally, apically rounded, not tapering and not hyaline apically; (9) hypoproct without any proceeding; (10) sternite 5 slightly wider than long, hind margin slightly concave (Fig. 18). A key of the <i>Meoneura palaestinensis</i> -group was published by Stuke & Freidberg (2017). <i>M. joedaltoni</i> will run to the last couplet 4 together with <i>M grimmorum</i> Stuke & Freidberg, 2017 and <i>M. palaestinensis</i> Hennig, 1937, but will not be assigned to one of these species due to the very different shape of the surstylus and the combination of characters mentioned above.</p> <p> <b>Etymology.</b> The species is named after Joe Dalton, the smallest of the four Dalton brothers, who appear in the Lucky Luke comic book series of Maurice de Bevere (Morris) and René Goscinny. Joe is the smallest of the four Dalton brothers as <i>Meoneura joedaltoni</i> is one of the smallest Acalyptratae.</p> <p> <b>Distribution.</b> <i>Meoneura joedaltoni</i> has been caught only at the locus typicus, a pine wood 5 km south of Amatrice (Latium, Italy). The coordinates of the label don´t fit exactly to this description but are about 4 km ssw of Amatrice.</p> <p> <b> <i>Meoneura lacteipennis</i> (FALLÉN, 1823)</b> </p> <p> <b>Material:</b> CZECH REPUBLIC: 1♂, 22.v.1995, Vráž u Písku, near pond [49.23°N 14.08°E], 400 m, leg. M. Barták, coll. CULSP; TURKEY: 1♂, 17.–22.v.2011, Muğla, University campus, 700 m [37°09’42’’N 28°22’21’’E], 700 m, pan trap +sweeping, leg. M. Barták & Š. Kubik, coll. CULSP.</p> <p> <b>Diagnosis:</b> Collin (1930).</p> <p> <b> <i>Meoneura lamellata</i> COLLIN, 1930</b> </p> <p> <b>Material:</b> CZECH REPUBLIC: 1♂, 30.vi.–7.vii.2015, Praha, Troja [50°07’15’’N 14°23’53’’E], 184 m, emergence trap, pig caracas, exp. 9.xii.2014, leg. M. Barták, coll. PJHS; 1♂, 27.v.–2.vi.2015, dito, coll. CULSP; 1♂, 22.–29.v.2012, Praha, Troja [50°07’15’’N 14°23’53’’E], 184m, emergence trap baited with pig caracas, leg. M. Barták, coll. CULSP; 1♂, 27.vi.–3.vii.2012, dito.</p> <p> <b>Diagnosis:</b> Collin (1930).</p> <p> <i>M. lamellata</i> is new for the Czech Republic.</p>Published as part of <i>Stuke, Jens-Hermann & Barták, Miroslav, 2019, Records of Carnidae from the collection of Miroslav Barták (Diptera: Carnidae), with the description of five new species, pp. 326-346 in Zootaxa 4567 (2)</i> on pages 338-340, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4567.2.6, <a href="http://zenodo.org/record/2594992">http://zenodo.org/record/2594992</a>
- …
