204,576 research outputs found
Stuart D. Lawson Letter
No full textA letter sent by Stuart D. Lawson from Gunter Field, Alabama on September 30, 1942 to the First Christian Church of Morehead, Kentucky.https://scholarworks.moreheadstate.edu/mfcc_ww2_letters/1015/thumbnail.jp
Stuart D. Lawson Letter
No full textA letter sent by Stuart D. Lawson from from Gunter Field, Alabama on September 30, 1942 to the First Christian Church of Morehead, Kentucky.https://scholarworks.moreheadstate.edu/mfcc_ww2_letters/1005/thumbnail.jp
Personal Papers (MS 80-0002)
No full textLetter from I. H. Kempner to D. Stuart Godwin Jr. discussing travel plans for Lilly Barry. Kempner discusses various lines as well as their cost, boarding options, and departure dates as they relate to the preferences that Barry has for travelling
Policy
No full textMore than ever, the media dominate public life and shape public perceptions. At the same time, the rise of digital technologies means that demarcations between different forms of media are fading. Radio can be heard on an iPod, data accompanies television programs, and news snippets are available on mobile phones. The Media and Communications in Australia offers a systematic introduction to this dynamic and often bewildering field. Fully updated and revised to take account of recent developments, this second edition outlines the key media industries and explains how communications technologies are impacting on them. It provides a thorough overview of the main approaches taken in studying the media, and examines the thorny issues of media ethics, youth media, the media’s role in celebrity culture and the future of public broadcasting. With contributions from some of Australia’s best researchers and teachers in the field, The Media and Communications in Australia is the most comprehensive and reliable introduction to media and communications available. It is an ideal student text, and a reference for teachers of media and anyone interested in this influential industry
Personal Papers (MS 80-0002)
No full textLetter from I. H. Kempner to D. Stuart Godwin Jr. discussing travel plans for Lilly Barry. Kempner discusses various lines as well as their cost, boarding options, and departure dates as they relate to the preferences that Barry has for travelling
Personal Papers (MS 80-0002)
No full textLetter from D. Stuart Godwin, Jr. to V. J. Long inquiring about I. H. Kempner's missing ticket claim
Stuart D. Lawson Letter
No full textA letter sent by Stuart Lawson from Maxwell Field, Alabama on May 14, 1942 to the First Christian Church of Morehead, Kentucky.https://scholarworks.moreheadstate.edu/mfcc_ww2_letters/1014/thumbnail.jp
Michel Foucault and Judith Butler: troubling Butler's appropriation of Foucault's work
No full textOne of the main influences on Judith Butler‘s thinking has been the work of Michel Foucault. Although this relationship is often commented on, it is rarely discussed in any detail. My thesis makes a contribution in this area. It presents an analysis of Foucault‘s work with the aim of countering Butler‘s representation of his thinking. In the first part of the thesis, I show how Butler initially interprets Foucault‘s project through Nietzschean genealogy, psychoanalysis and Derridean discourse, and how she later develops this interpretation in line with the progress of her own project. In the main part of the thesis, I present an analysis of Foucault‘s thinking in the period from The Archaeology of Knowledge (1969) to The History of Sexuality volume 1 (1976). This analysis focuses on the aspect of his work which has most influenced Butler‘s thinking: namely the notion of a relationship between knowledge, discourse and power. The other issues in his work which Butler addresses—genealogy, the subject, the body, abnormality, and sexuality—are discussed within this framework. I show how, in the early 1970s, Foucault develops the notion of power-knowledge, and sets out a relationship between power-knowledge and discourse which is overlooked by Butler. I argue that Butler interprets Foucaultian power through the notions of repression and social norms, and ignores the concepts of technology and strategy which form a key part of Foucault‘s thinking. I show how, from The Archaeology of Knowledge on, Foucault develops a socio-historical ontology and a genealogy of the subject, both of which are at variance with Butler‘s interpretation of his thinking
- …
