903 research outputs found
Synthesis of the Data on COVID-19 Skin Manifestations: Underlying Mechanisms and Potential Outcomes
No full textThe incidence of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-related skin manifestations has progressively grown, in parallel with the global severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) spreading. The available evidence indicates that cutaneous signs are heterogeneous and can be divided as follows: a) erythematous rashes, b) lesions of vascular origin, c) vesicular rashes, d) urticarial rashes, and e) acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis (AGEP), erythema multiforme (EM) and other polymorphic/atypical reactions. Most cutaneous manifestations appear simultaneously or after respiratory and/or systemic symptoms such as fever, even if rarely urticaria has been reported as the first sign of the disease. It has been proposed that erythematous and vesicular rashes, as well as urticaria, are the result of immunological activation against Sars-CoV-2, similarly to other viral exanthems; alternatively, reactivation or co-infection of herpesviruses and drug hypersensitivity represent possible etiologic diagnosis that has to be considered. Regarding lesions of vascular origin, ischemic ones are the result of systemic hypercoagulability established in severe infections, whereas chilblains seem to be linked to the type I-interferon massively produced to halt virus replication. AGEP is triggered by drugs, whereas EM could represent a delayed immune response to the virus or a hypersensitivity reaction to drugs elicited by the inflammatory process built to fight the infection. A further pathogenic hypothesis is that the virus, or its particles detected in the skin (particularly in endothelium and eccrine glands), could be responsible for certain skin reactions, including chilblains and EM. From the available data, it appears that chilblains are correlated with younger age and less severe disease, while ischemic manifestations occur in the elderly with severe infection. In conclusion, larger studies are needed to confirm the suggested pathogenetic mechanisms of COVID-19-related skin reactions and to determine the potential prognostic significance of each one
Photo and radiosensitizing effects of hypericin on human renal cell carcinoma cells in vitro
No full textPhoto and radiosensitizing effects of hypericin on human renal cell carcinoma cells in vitro
No full text
S2k Guideline – Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC, neuroendocrine carcinoma of the skin) – Update 2022
No full textPhotosensitizing and radiosensitizing effects of hypericin on human renal carcinoma cells in Vitro
No full textThe renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is extremely resistant to chemotherapy and radiotherapy. The prognosis of patients with metastatic RCC still remains poor, the median survival is less than 12 months. Therefore, new therapeutic options are desirable. The aim of this study was to investigate the photosensitizing and radiosensitizing effects of hypericin on human RCC cells in vitro. First the RCC-derived cell lines A498 and ACHN were incubated with different concentrations of hypericin. In vitro uptake and intracellular distribution of hypericin were confirmed by fluorescence microscopy. Subsequently cells were illuminated and irradiated with a dose of 2-8 Gy, respectively. Finally, metabolic activity, apoptosis and clonogenic survival were investigated. Uptake of hypericin was observed for almost all cells. Hypericin treatment combined with illumination led to a 94-97% decrease in metabolic activity and caused apoptosis in nearly 100% of RCC cells. Hypericin enhanced the radiosensitivity of A498 cells in vitro. The clonogenic survival after irradiation was significantly reduced by hypericin treatment. Taken together, the photosensitizing and radiosensitizing effects of hypericin on human RCC cells we found in this investigation could be of clinical relevance, e.g. for radiotherapy and intraoperative photodynamic therapy, respectively
- …
