56,828 research outputs found
[Letter from D. C. Starr to T. N. Carswell - January 18, 1965]
No full textA letter written to Mr. T. N. Carswell, Abilene, Texas, from D. C. Starr, Executive Service Sales, Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, N. J. 07632, dated January 18, 1965. Starr expresses his appreciation for the telephone call from Carswell regarding the Tax Guide subscription and the 1965 Federal Handbook. He advises Carswell that the volumes had shipped and apologizes for the manner in which his account had been handled
Recommended from our members
State of Texas Advanced Resource Recovery 2020-2022 Biennium Report
No full textCONTENTS: Executive Summary (p. 1) -- STARR Mission and Program (p. 4) -- STARR Revenue-Neutrality Metrics (p. 18) -- STARR Land, Water, and Energy NEXUS (p. 20) -- References (p. 24) -- Appendix A: Letters of Cooperation (p. 25) -- Appendix B: STARR Publications (p. 37) -- Appendix C: STARR Presentations (p. 41) -- Appendix D: STARR Workshops and Guidebooks (p. 46)Bureau of Economic Geolog
Recommended from our members
State of Texas Advanced Resource Recovery 2018-2020 Biennium Report
No full textCONTENTS: Executive Summary (p. 1) -- STARR Mission (p. 5) -- STARR Revenue-Neutrality Metrics (p. 10) -- References (p. 12) -- Appendix A: Letters of Cooperation (p. 12) -- Appendix B: STARR Publications (p. 18) -- Appendix C: STARR Presentations (p. 21) -- Appendix D: STARR Workshops and Guidebooks (p. 24) -- Additional Program Elements (p. 25) -- STARR Water/Energy Nexus (p. 25) -- STARR Hazards Mapping and Response (p. 32) -- STARR Endangered Species (p. 36) -- Mapping and Mineral Resources of Texas (p. 38)Bureau of Economic Geolog
Recommended from our members
State of Texas Advanced Resource Recovery 2022-2024 Biennium Report
No full textCONTENTS: Executive Summary (p. 1) -- STARR Mission and Program (p. 4) -- STARR Revenue-Neutrality Metrics (p. 18) -- STARR Land, Water, and Energy NEXUS (p. 25) -- Appendix A: Letters of Cooperation (p. 28) -- Appendix B: STARR Publications (p. 44) -- Appendix C: STARR Presentations and Abstracts (p. 50) -- Appendix D: STARR Workshops and Guidebooks (p. 60) -- Appendix E: STARR Media Coverage (p. 61)Bureau of Economic Geolog
Recommended from our members
State of Texas Advanced Oil and Gas Resource Recovery Progress Report, 2010
No full textCONTENTS: Executive Summary (p. 1) -- Introduction (p. 2) -- Historical Background on the Permanent School Fund (p. 8) -- Project STARR Methodologies (p. 8) -- Current Projects (p. 15) -- Project STARR's Return on State Investment for Current Biennium (September 2008 - August 2010) (p. 39) -- Project STARR's Projection of State Investment for 2010-2012 Biennium (p. 45) -- Project STARR Revenue Neutrality Metrics (p. 46) -- Recommendations (p. 48) -- References Cited (p. 49) -- All Well Data, Summary of Well Data, Search Parameters, and Table 2 (CD) -- Appendix A (p. 52) -- Appendix B (p. 59) -- Appendix C (p. 60) -- Appendix D (p. 74) -- Appendix E (p. 87)Bureau of Economic Geolog
Recommended from our members
State of Texas Advanced Oil and Gas Resource Recovery Progress Report, 2008
No full textCONTENTS: Executive Summary (p. 1) -- Introduction (p. 2) -- Historical Background on the Permanent School Fund (p. 8) -- Project STARR Methodologies (p. 9) -- Current Projects (p. 15) -- Project STARR's Return on State Investment for Current Biennium (September 2006 - August 2008) (p. 49) -- Project STARR's Projection on State Investment for 2008 to 2010 Biennium (p. 52) -- Project STARR Revenue Neutrality Metrics (p. 53) -- Recommendations (p. 55) -- References Cited (p. 56) -- Appendix A (p. 58) -- Appendix B (p. 69) -- Appendix C (p. 70) -- Appendix D (p. 80)Bureau of Economic Geolog
Recommended from our members
State of Texas Advanced Resource Recovery Progress Report, 2012
No full textCONTENTS: Executive Summary (p. 1) -- Introduction (p. 3) -- Project STARR Revenue Neutrality Metrics (p. 8) -- Projects in the 2010-2012 Biennium (p. 11) -- New Program Elements Added in Current Biennium (p. 36) -- References Cited (p. 38) -- Appendix A. 2010-2012 Letters of Cooperation (p. 42) -- Appendix B. Project STARR Awards (p. 48) -- Appendix C. Articles, Abstracts, Reports, Books, and Lectures (p. 49) -- Appendix D. Workshops and Guidebook Chapters (p. 64)Bureau of Economic Geolog
Recommended from our members
State of Texas Advanced Resource Recovery Progress Report, 2014
No full textCONTENTS: Executive Summary (p. 1) -- Introduction (p. 5) -- STARR Revenue-Neutrality Metrics (p. 11) -- Selected Projects in the 2012-2014 Biennium (p. 14) -- References Cited (p. 35) -- Additional Program Elements (p. 39) -- Appendix A. 2012-2014 Letters of Cooperation (p. 71) -- Appendix B. Project STARR Awards (p. 80) -- Appendix C. Articles, Abstracts, Presentations, and Books (p. 81) -- Appendix D. Workshops and Guidebook Chapters (p. 89)Bureau of Economic Geolog
C. G. Starr, Roman Imperial Navy , 31 Β. C.-A. D. 324, 1961
No full textThouvenot Raymond. C. G. Starr, Roman Imperial Navy , 31 Β. C.-A. D. 324, 1961. In: Revue des Études Anciennes. Tome 63, 1961, n°3-4. p. 526
STARR vs. internal Delorme procedure for obstructed defecation: functional and QoL long-term results
No full textBACKGROUND: Stapled trans-anal rectal resection (STARR) and trans-anal mucosectomy (internal Delorme) are two effective surgical ap-proaches for severe obstructed defecation syndrome (ODS) associated with rectocele and rectal intussusception. METHODS: Twelve consecutive patients with ODS underwent surgery at Luigi Sacco University Hospital of Milan between October 2009 and February 2011. After routinely preoperative diagnostic work-up, patients were randomly assigned either to STARR or Delorme study group. ODS score and Wexner Continence score were calculated before surgery, and 3, 12, 24, 48, and 96 months postoperatively. Furthermore, patients were administered the SF-36 questionnaire before and 3, 12, 24, and 96 months after surgery. 30-day postoperative complaints were recorded by a third investigator, different from the main surgeon. RESULTS: The mean ODS scores have improved with both surgical techniques at 3 months and 4 years (P<0.05). Mean ODS score had signifi-cantly improved just with Delorme procedure at the 8-year follow-up (P<0.05). STARR procedure reduces the hospital stay from 6 to 3 days and the operative time from 102 to 53 minutes (P=0.0009). CONCLUSIONS: Our study confirms the efficacy of both surgical approaches in selected patients with ODS. Global health and psychological well-being at 3 months, 1 year and 4 years after surgery are similar for both techniques, whilst STARR procedure seems to have worse outcome and impact on the mental status at a long-term follow-up (P<0,05)
- …
