4 research outputs found
Physiological versus Self-Report Measures of Arousal During Tactical Training Involving a Synthetic Topographic Environment
No full textThis research examines the relationship between the electrodermal activity (EDA) of 43 West Point Cadets while viewing military tactics displays and compares that to results from the Self-Assessment Manikin (SAM; Bradley & Lang, 1994). First there is a need to understand how EDA varies between two different types of presentation formats. Second it was expected that the EDA data would negatively correlate to self-report data based on previous research (Boyce, Reyes, et al., 2016), and third was that EDA and self-report data would be able to predict performance. Results did not indicate significant differences based on display type, however the results did support the negative correlation between EDA and SAM. Finally there was a trend toward predicting performance but it did not reach statistically significant levels, warranting the need for further investigation
Podcast on the Art of the Patient Conversation: Healthcare Provider Perspectives to Improve Outcomes in Multiple Sclerosis
No full text
Article full text
The article associated with this page has been accepted for online publication and is in the final stages of production. The link to the full text will be made available on this page in the next few days.
The above podcast audio and infographic represent the opinions of the authors. For a full list of declarations, including funding and author disclosure statements, and copyright information, please see the full text online. (see “read the peer-reviewed publication” opposite). </p
Health-Related Quality of Life with Diroximel Fumarate in Patients with Relapsing Forms of Multiple Sclerosis: Findings from Qualitative Research Using Patient Interviews
No full textThe above graphic abstract represents the opinions of the authors. For a full list of declarations, including funding and author disclosure statements, please see the full text online (see “read the peer-reviewed publication” opposite).
© The authors, CC-BY-NC 2022. </p
