1,720,975 research outputs found

    Against the Motion "Violence and violation are at the heart of racism" (The 2017 debate of the Group for Debates in Anthropological Theory, Manchester)

    Get PDF
    This article comprises the edited version of the 2017 meeting of the Group for Debates in Anthropological theory held at Manchester. The motion debated was: Violence and Violation are at the Heart of Racism. It is edited by Soumhya Venkatesan (Manchester). Pnina Werbner (Keele) and Christopher (Kit) Davis (SOAS) proposed the motion; Peter Wade (Manchester) and John Hartigan Jr. (Texas) opposed it

    Against the Motion "Violence and violation are at the heart of racism" (The 2017 debate of the Group for Debates in Anthropological Theory, Manchester)

    Get PDF
    This article comprises the edited version of the 2017 meeting of the Group for Debates in Anthropological theory held at Manchester. The motion debated was: Violence and Violation are at the Heart of Racism. It is edited by Soumhya Venkatesan (Manchester). Pnina Werbner (Keele) and Christopher (Kit) Davis (SOAS) proposed the motion; Peter Wade (Manchester) and John Hartigan Jr. (Texas) opposed it

    Against the Motion "Violence and violation are at the heart of racism" (The 2017 debate of the Group for Debates in Anthropological Theory, Manchester)

    Get PDF
    This article comprises the edited version of the 2017 meeting of the Group for Debates in Anthropological theory held at Manchester. The motion debated was: Violence and Violation are at the Heart of Racism. It is edited by Soumhya Venkatesan (Manchester). Pnina Werbner (Keele) and Christopher (Kit) Davis (SOAS) proposed the motion; Peter Wade (Manchester) and John Hartigan Jr. (Texas) opposed it

    Auto-relations

    No full text

    Object, subject, thing

    No full text

    Charity: Conversations about Need and Greed

    No full text

    The concept of neo-liberalism has become an obstacle to the anthropological understanding of the twenty-first century:2012 debate of the Group for Debates in Anthropological Theory

    Get PDF
    The following discussion developed from a debate held on the motion: ‘The concept of neoliberalism has become an obstacle to the anthropological understanding of the twenty-first century’, held at the 2012 meeting of the Group for Debates in Anthropological Theory (GDAT) at the University of Manchester. The debate was organized and edited for publication by Soumhya Venkatesan. A full transcription of the debate is hosted on the JRAI website: http://www.jrai.net; a full podcast of the debate can be heard at the Talking Anthropology website: http://www.talkinganthropology.com/2013/01/18/ta45-gdat1-neoliberalism/#t=2:49:40.219

    The concept of neo-liberalism has become an obstacle to the anthropological understanding of the twenty-first century:2012 debate of the Group for Debates in Anthropological Theory

    Get PDF
    The following discussion developed from a debate held on the motion: ‘The concept of neoliberalism has become an obstacle to the anthropological understanding of the twenty-first century’, held at the 2012 meeting of the Group for Debates in Anthropological Theory (GDAT) at the University of Manchester. The debate was organized and edited for publication by Soumhya Venkatesan. A full transcription of the debate is hosted on the JRAI website: http://www.jrai.net; a full podcast of the debate can be heard at the Talking Anthropology website: http://www.talkinganthropology.com/2013/01/18/ta45-gdat1-neoliberalism/#t=2:49:40.219
    corecore