1,720,975 research outputs found
Against the Motion "Violence and violation are at the heart of racism" (The 2017 debate of the Group for Debates in Anthropological Theory, Manchester)
This article comprises the edited version of the 2017 meeting of the Group for Debates in Anthropological theory held at Manchester. The motion debated was: Violence and Violation are at the Heart of Racism. It is edited by Soumhya Venkatesan (Manchester). Pnina Werbner (Keele) and Christopher (Kit) Davis (SOAS) proposed the motion; Peter Wade (Manchester) and John Hartigan Jr. (Texas) opposed it
Against the Motion "Violence and violation are at the heart of racism" (The 2017 debate of the Group for Debates in Anthropological Theory, Manchester)
This article comprises the edited version of the 2017 meeting of the Group for Debates in Anthropological theory held at Manchester. The motion debated was: Violence and Violation are at the Heart of Racism. It is edited by Soumhya Venkatesan (Manchester). Pnina Werbner (Keele) and Christopher (Kit) Davis (SOAS) proposed the motion; Peter Wade (Manchester) and John Hartigan Jr. (Texas) opposed it
Against the Motion "Violence and violation are at the heart of racism" (The 2017 debate of the Group for Debates in Anthropological Theory, Manchester)
This article comprises the edited version of the 2017 meeting of the Group for Debates in Anthropological theory held at Manchester. The motion debated was: Violence and Violation are at the Heart of Racism. It is edited by Soumhya Venkatesan (Manchester). Pnina Werbner (Keele) and Christopher (Kit) Davis (SOAS) proposed the motion; Peter Wade (Manchester) and John Hartigan Jr. (Texas) opposed it
Tamil geographies: cultural constructions of space and place in South India - Edited by Martha Ann Selby & Indira Viswanathan Peterson
Book Review: Mark Harris (ed.), Ways of Knowing: New Approaches in the Anthropology of Experience and Learning. Oxford: Berghahn, 2007
The concept of neo-liberalism has become an obstacle to the anthropological understanding of the twenty-first century:2012 debate of the Group for Debates in Anthropological Theory
The following discussion developed from a debate held on the motion: ‘The concept of neoliberalism has become an obstacle to the anthropological understanding of the twenty-first century’, held at the 2012 meeting of the Group for Debates in Anthropological Theory (GDAT) at the University of Manchester. The debate was organized and edited for publication by Soumhya Venkatesan. A full transcription of the debate is hosted on the JRAI website: http://www.jrai.net; a full podcast of the debate can be heard at the Talking Anthropology website: http://www.talkinganthropology.com/2013/01/18/ta45-gdat1-neoliberalism/#t=2:49:40.219
The concept of neo-liberalism has become an obstacle to the anthropological understanding of the twenty-first century:2012 debate of the Group for Debates in Anthropological Theory
The following discussion developed from a debate held on the motion: ‘The concept of neoliberalism has become an obstacle to the anthropological understanding of the twenty-first century’, held at the 2012 meeting of the Group for Debates in Anthropological Theory (GDAT) at the University of Manchester. The debate was organized and edited for publication by Soumhya Venkatesan. A full transcription of the debate is hosted on the JRAI website: http://www.jrai.net; a full podcast of the debate can be heard at the Talking Anthropology website: http://www.talkinganthropology.com/2013/01/18/ta45-gdat1-neoliberalism/#t=2:49:40.219
- …
