1,721,049 research outputs found

    Data from: Going with the flow: the role of ocean circulation in global marine ecosystems under a changing climate

    No full text
    Ocean warming, acidification, deoxygenation and reduced productivity are widely considered to be the major stressors to ocean ecosystems induced by emissions of CO2. However, an overlooked stressor is the change in ocean circulation in response to climate change. Strong changes in the intensity and position of the western boundary currents have already been observed, and the consequences of such changes for ecosystems are beginning to emerge. In this study, we address climatically induced changes in ocean circulation on a global scale but relevant to propagule dispersal for species inhabiting global shelf ecosystems, using a high resolution global ocean model run under the IPCC RCP 8.5 scenario. The &frac14; degree model resolution allows improved regional realism of the ocean circulation beyond that of available CMIP5-class models. We use a Lagrangian approach forced by modelled ocean circulation to simulate the circulation pathways that disperse planktonic life stages. Based on trajectory backtracking, we identify present-day coastal retention, dominant flow and dispersal range for coastal regions at the global scale. Projecting into the future, we identify areas of the strongest projected circulation change and present regional examples with the most significant modifications in their dominant pathways. Climatically-induced changes in ocean circulation should be considered as an additional stressor of marine ecosystems in a similar way to ocean warming or acidification.,Asia and Oceania releasesThe dataset contains the particle tracking runs for the coastline of Asia and Oceania. 3 runs were carried out using the velocity field of three different decades: 2000-09, 2050-59 and 2090-99 and released particles were tracked backwards in time for 12 months.Releases_Asia_Oceania.tar.gzReleases Europe and AfricaReleases_Europe_Africa.tar.gzReleases North AmericaReleases_Nth_America.tar.gzReleases South AmericaReleases_Sth_America.tar.gzMatlab script to extract each ASCIIdataA step by step procedure to extract trajectories from the datasetsExtract_ASCIIdata.mExplanation_ASCII_dataDescription of datasets content</span

    Rarity and beta diversity assessment as tools for guiding conservation strategies in marine tropical subtidal communities

    Get PDF
    Aim: Our aim was to uncover patterns of distribution of marine subtidal rocky reef communities across six taxonomic groups and decompose the relative roles of species loss and turnover in total community variation. Additionally, we propose an easily calculated index that can be used to highlight areas with unique species composition for conservation planning. We estimated the strengths of associations between environmental factors and species richness and rarity. Location: Ilha Grande Bay, Brazil, covering about 150,000 ha harbouring different marine habitats. Methods: We used the Marine Rapid Assessment Protocol at 42 sites to gather information on environmental variables and species in six subtidal marine groups. We determined “singular” sites as the regions harbouring higher numbers of rare species. Then, we estimated the roles of species loss and turnover on the observed total variation among sites. We used Generalized Linear Model to partition the relative importance of the selected environmental factors in driving variation in species richness and singularity. Results: The singularity index and richness showed that the bay could be divided into three subregions for subtidal communities. Richness and rarity were structured at different spatial scales and associated with environmental variables related to water productivity and nutrients but varied among taxonomic groups. Community variation over space was largely associated with turnover of species. Main conclusions: Higher singularity and richness on the western side of the bay and around the main island suggested that these regions should be conservation priorities, but high species turnover across the whole bay indicated that portions of the central channel should be included in conservation strategies. This draws attention to the importance of community variation rather than just species numbers in conservation and management planning. The high species turnover indicated that these rocky reefs have high beta diversity when compared to other studied biological systems

    Impact assessment of coastal marine range shifts to support proactive management

    No full text
    Climate change is reshuffling Earth's biota as species ranges shift to track increasing habitat temperatures. While redistribution may be necessary for species persistence, there can also be impacts on existing communities upon arrival of novel, range-shifting species. Anticipating the beneficial versus deleterious impacts of range-shifting species is essential for determining whether active management is needed, which could include employing strategies from facilitation (eg managed relocation) to suppression (eg prevention/control). We employ an impact assessment protocol developed for invasive species to evaluate potential consequences of range shifts in coastal marine ecosystems of North America. Our review demonstrates how invasion impact assessment combined with species vulnerability assessment could support decisions about management of range shifts. We found that ~50% of these shifting coastal species have had negative impacts in their expanded range. Thus, the importance of proactive management is likely to increase as the number and extent of range shifts accelerates.The uploaded data includes an Excel spreadsheet with formatting that contains the database and the metadata on separate sheets. In addition, there are four .csv files. First, the impact assessment database. Second, metadata with description of columns. Third, the reference list of country names used, and fourth, the reference list for habitats. A second spreadsheet with meta-data information about columns. See README file for more information. Funding provided by: National Science FoundationCrossref Funder Registry ID: http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000001Award Number: ICER-1852060Identification of study species We identified 40 marine species with documented shifts in range limits along the coastline (<15 km from shore) of North America, including plants, invertebrates, fish, a protist, and a bird. Of these, 26 species were compiled by Sorte et al. (2010), and we added 14 species from an updated literature review. We searched Google Scholar (on 08/20/2019) using this search string: marine "range expansion" species "range shift". We reviewed titles and, when appropriate, abstracts and text of the first 600 results, identifying 12 additional species from eight papers. We added two species (Brachidontes adamsianus and Mexacanthina lugubris) from our literature files and personal observations. We excluded migratory or pelagic species with large biogeographic ranges, for which it was difficult to confirm historical native ranges. Review of published impacts Evidence of species' impacts was compiled from online database searches and literature review. We conducted individual Web of Science searches for the 40 shifting species using each species' scientific name (and synonyms). Papers reporting species impacts were identified by reviewing titles and abstracts. For species with >800 Web of Science results, the first 400 results were scanned and remaining results were filtered using this search string: "ecology" OR "invas*" OR "impact". For species with <100 Web of Science results, we also performed Google Scholar searches, and relevant papers were identified from the first 400 results. Additional impact studies were added opportunistically from citations within papers found in database searches). In total, we reviewed 11,508 papers for this impact assessment of 40 range-shifting species. Impact assessment We evaluated environmental and socioeconomic impacts using modified versions of the Environmental Impact Classification of Alien Taxa (EICAT; Hawkins et al. 2015) and Socio-economic Impact Classification of Alien Taxa (SEICAT; Bacher et al. 2017) protocols. The EICAT and SEICAT protocols focus on impacts on native, non-human populations and human activities, respectively. Primary modifications were the inclusion of beneficial (rather than only detrimental) impacts and use of studies in species' native and expanded ranges to estimate impacts (rather than only non-native ranges). Impacts were classified by mechanism. The following are mechanisms that we identified as responsible for negative impacts by shifting species on native (non-human) species: competition, predation, herbivory, parasitism, disease transmission, interaction with other invaders, biofouling, bioturbation, physical disturbance, poisoning/toxicity, and "other" negative impacts (including those with an unknown mechanism). We also found evidence of positive ecological impacts by the following mechanisms: food provisioning, habitat provisioning, and "other" positive impacts. Our SEICAT analysis revealed socioeconomic impacts associated with alterations in health, material and immaterial assets, and social, spiritual or cultural relations.We assigned levels of impacts based on categories described in the EICAT and SEICAT protocols (Hawkins et al. 2015, Bacher et al. 2017). Impacts range across a semi-quantitative gradient from 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest). For each published study, we scored impacts of shifting species based on the highest level response from the categories. Impact scores, thus, represent the maximum impact that has been observed. Both EICAT and SEICAT protocols were modified to incorporate positive impacts, essentially switching the direction or sign of negative impacts (Table 1). Species for which we found no published papers on impacts were categorized as "data deficient". For both EICAT and SEICAT assessments, we collected additional information about the shifting species and study. These characteristics included taxonomic classifications, study location, and whether the study was conducted in the shifting species' "native" or non-native, "expanded" range. Ranges were defined as "native"or "expanded" based primarily on documentation within the source reporting the range shift. "Expanded" ranges were designated as such conservatively, acknowledging potential lack of benchmark data for species ranges, with most range shifts documented after 1985 (Sorte et al. 2010). (Virnstein and Hall 2009, Canning-Clode 2011, Goddard et al. 2011, Poloczanska et al. 2013, Gericke et al. 2014, Heck et al. 2015, Cannizzo and Griffen 2016, Timbs et al. 2019

    Mortality risk across life stages and habitats of an intertidal mussel (Mytilus californianus)

    No full text
    These data are associated with the manuscript "Mortality risk across life stages and habitats of an intertidal mussel (Mytilus californianus)". Code for statsitical analyses can be found on L. Pandori's GitHub (https://github.com/llmpandori/Mussel_Habitat_Risk). Feel free to conatct L. Pandori with any requests regarding this dataset
    corecore