1,720,968 research outputs found
Solving International Investment Dispute Through Means of International Arbitration:Drafting a Compromis in Respect to the Icesave Dispute
No full textIs Taxation Always Subject to Ambiguities?
No full textThe news article was a response to a report by the economists dr. Ásgeir Jónsson and dr. Hersir Sigurgeirsson regarding the winding up proceedings of the collapsed banks in Iceland, where they expressed views that taxation of the estates of the collapsed banks would always be subject to great ambiguities. The article briefly dicusses views on the constitutionality of taxation by means of the Icelandic Supreme Court and the European Court of Human Rights
The Breach of Rules on Investor Protection in the Practice of Financial Institutions and its Legal Implications
No full textThe Effects of Capital Gains on Income Related Compensation During Settlement Pursuant to §5.4 of the Compensation Act
No full textThe Constitutionality of the Emergency Act and the Right to Property
No full textOn 6 October 2008 the Icelandic legislature enacted the Emergency Act no. 125/2008 as a response to an impending collapse of the State´s banking system. Clause 6 of the act amended the Icelandic Bankruptcy Act with regard to priorities of claims filed by creditors of financial institutions subject to bankruptcy proceedings, i.e. liquidation. Unsecured claims, e.g. claims for deposits and securities, were equal in terms of priority prior to the Emergency Act. However, Clause 6 entailed the suprepriority of claims for deposits over other unsecured claims. The provision was challenged by several unsecured creditors of the Icelandic bank Landbanki Íslands hf. who claimed they had thereby been deprived of their possessions. The Supreme Court of Iceland upheld the constitutionality of Clause 6 in the Case of the Financial Services Compenstion Scheme on 28 October 2011 (case no. 340/2011). To both illustrate and test the proprietary aspects of the Supreme Court´s findings, the article decribes the legal foundation of the right to property pursuant to Clause 72, Section 1 of the Icelandic Constitution and Article 1 of Protocol no. 1 to the European Convention on Human Rights and attempts to shed a light on the provisions´ scope, content and limitations by means of the Supreme Court of Iceland and the European Court of Human Rights
Følger af overtrædelse af reglerne om beskyttelse af investorer of finansvirksomheders forretningsmetoder:Eksempler fra retspraksis i Islands Højesteret og Norges Højesteret
No full text- …
