1,730,315 research outputs found
Stelletta wilsoni Van Soest & Hooper 2020
No full text<i>Stelletta wilsoni</i> Van Soest & Hooper, 2020 <p> <i>Stelletta wilsoni</i> Van Soest & Hooper, 2020: 50 (case 87) in Van Soest <i>et al.</i> 2020.</p> <p> For <i>Stelletta wilsoni</i> Van Soest & Hooper, 2020 it was erroneously stated it was ‘comb.nov.’ rather than nom.nov. It is here confirmed it was intended as a <i>nomen novum</i>.</p>Published as part of <i>Van Soest, Rob W. M., 2024, Correcting sponge names: nomenclatural update of lower taxa level Porifera, pp. 1-122 in Zootaxa 5398 (1)</i> on page 62, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5398.1.1, <a href="http://zenodo.org/record/10494167">http://zenodo.org/record/10494167</a>
Stelletta thomasi Van Soest & Hooper 2020
No full text<i>Stelletta thomasi</i> Van Soest & Hooper, 2020 <p> <i>Stelletta thomasi</i> Van Soest & Hooper, 2020: 50 (case 87) in Van Soest <i>et al.</i> 2020.</p> <p> For <i>Stelletta thomasi</i> Van Soest & Hooper, 2020 it was erroneously stated it was ‘comb.nov.’ rather than nom.nov. It is here confirmed it was intended as a <i>nomen novum</i>.</p>Published as part of <i>Van Soest, Rob W. M., 2024, Correcting sponge names: nomenclatural update of lower taxa level Porifera, pp. 1-122 in Zootaxa 5398 (1)</i> on page 62, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5398.1.1, <a href="http://zenodo.org/record/10494167">http://zenodo.org/record/10494167</a>
Hunteria Van Soest & Hooper 2020
No full text<p> <b> Genus <i>Hunteria</i> Van Soest & Hooper, 2020</b> </p> <p> Genus <i>Hunteria</i> Van Soest & Hooper, 2020: 274.</p> <p> The genus was erected to remove the homonymy of genus <i>Deanea</i> Bowerbank, 1875 (Van Soest <i>et al.</i> 2020: case nr. 119, p. 69) but the new name became a junior homonym of <i>Hunteria</i> Delfinado-Baker, Baker & Flechtmann, 1984 (Arachnida), which must be replaced (ICZN art. 57.2). I propose here <i>Reiswiginella</i> <b>nom.nov.</b>, named after the late Henry M. Reiswig to replace <i>Hunteria</i> Van Soest & Hooper, 2020 with type species <i>Deanea virgultosa</i> Bowerbank, 1875.</p>Published as part of <i>Van Soest, Rob W. M., 2024, Correcting sponge names: nomenclatural update of lower taxa level Porifera, pp. 1-122 in Zootaxa 5398 (1)</i> on page 91, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5398.1.1, <a href="http://zenodo.org/record/10494167">http://zenodo.org/record/10494167</a>
Winandus Ort de Steeg. Johann von Soest
No full textWINANDUS ORT DE STEEG. JOHANN VON SOEST
Winandus Ort de Steeg. Johann von Soest ( - )
Cover ( - )
Blank page (1r)
Winandus [Ort] de Steeg: Lapis angularis (pars 1,1) (2r)
[Johann von Soest: Sermones de sanctis] (228r)
Blank page (*1r)
Cover ( - )
Color chart ( - )
Fragment (Vorderspiegel): Urkunde (Ir
Ijimalophus Van Soest & Hooper 2020
No full text<i>Ijimalophus</i> Van Soest & Hooper, 2020 <p> <i>Ijimalophus</i> Van Soest & Hooper, 2020: 70.</p> <p> The genus name was erected to remove homonymy of the genus <i>Sericolophus</i> Ijima, 1901 (Van Soest <i>et al.</i> 2020: case nr. 121), but it should perhaps have been named <i>Hernandeziana</i> Strand, 1932 because Reiswig & Zgraggen (1991: 70) proposed their synonymy. There are several uncertain aspects of this proposed synonymy, e.g. the holotype of the type species <i>Sericolophus reflexus</i> Ijima, 1901 has not been identified as yet, while the holotype of the type species of <i>Hernandeziana</i>, i.e. <i>Corythophora ijimae</i> Ferrer Hernández, 1932: 99, redescribed by Reiswig & Zgraggen (1991) consists only of a root plume, lacking essential spicule types. I will not take a decision here to revert <i>Ijimalophus</i> to the synonymy of <i>Hernandeziana</i>, leaving this to future studies.</p>Published as part of <i>Van Soest, Rob W. M., 2024, Correcting sponge names: nomenclatural update of lower taxa level Porifera, pp. 1-122 in Zootaxa 5398 (1)</i> on page 91, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5398.1.1, <a href="http://zenodo.org/record/10494167">http://zenodo.org/record/10494167</a>
Spongia (Spongia) fuscoides Van Soest & Hooper 2020
No full text<i>Spongia (Spongia) fuscoides</i> Van Soest & Hooper, 2020 <p> <i>Spongia (Spongia) fuscoides</i> Van Soest & Hooper, 2020: 31.</p> <p> Van Soest <i>et al.</i> 2020 errroneously erected this name as a <i>nomen novum</i> for <i>Spongia agaricina</i> subsp. <i>corlosia</i> (sic) var. <i>fusca</i> Hyatt, 1877: 524 (from Nassau, Bahamas), an alleged junior homonym of <i>Spongia communis fusca</i> Lamarck, 1814. Because Hyatt’s name is not available for being a four-name taxon it cannot come into homonymy with an available name (ICZN art. 54.1). The present species name is unavailable. The specimen likely belongs to <i>Spongia (Spongia) tubulifera</i> Lamarck, 1814 in accordance with above discussed <i>Spongia agaricina</i> subsp. <i>coelosia</i> var. <i>fusca</i> Hyatt, 1877).</p>Published as part of <i>Van Soest, Rob W. M., 2024, Correcting sponge names: nomenclatural update of lower taxa level Porifera, pp. 1-122 in Zootaxa 5398 (1)</i> on page 29, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5398.1.1, <a href="http://zenodo.org/record/10494167">http://zenodo.org/record/10494167</a>
- …
