1,299 research outputs found
Sean Rubin: Cook Prize 2025, Silver Medal Acceptance Speech
Author and illustrator Sean Rubin gives an acceptance speech for The Iguanodon’s Horn (Clarion/HarperCollins)https://educate.bankstreet.edu/cook/1015/thumbnail.jp
Puppet Motive in the Novel by D. Rubin «Punch’s Syndrome»
The article is devoted to the puppet motive in the novel by D. Rubin «Punch’s Syndrome». The author analyzes the forms and methods of representation of this motive on different levels of the novel: conceptual, compositional, narrative, figurative; the author reveals a link of motive with motives of duality, the lost childhood, of rebellion. The underlying artistic concept actually metaphorical model is analyzed like «Life is a puppet theater». Typology of images of dolls and puppeteers presented in the novel is characterized. Analysis, which has been done, determines the motive of the puppet as a figurative meaning of the core of the novel, which reflects the originality of the author's concept
Countering the Rhetoric of Emerging Domestic Markets: Why More Information Alone Will Not Address the Capital Needs of Underserved Communities
This article critiques the idea that the private sector can take the lead in addressing the capital needs of underserved communities, focusing specifically on the emerging domestic markets approach advocated by Milken Institute researchers. This approach has three limitations. First, it treats all underserved communities as interchangeable, ignoring that they differ in important ways in the nature and causes of their capital constraints. Second, it claims that underserved communities lack access to capital primarily as a result of information failure, overlooking numerous other obstacles that discourage investment in such communities. Third, its overarching assumption that the private sector can take the lead in meeting the capital needs of underserved communities is unrealistic because it fails to address these additional barriers to investment. The article recommends a more individualized approach to understanding the capital needs of underserved communities and recognition of the need for public sector leadership in solving this problem.Peer reviewe
New Jersey Charter School Funding
Are New Jersey charter schools underfunded relative to district schools?
Advocates’ claims that charter schools are receiving almost 50% less than they should convinced the Christie Administration and the New Jersey Legislature to shift an additional $107.6 million from school districts to charter schools for the combined 2014-15 and 2015-16 academic years.
However, claims of dramatic underfunding of charter schools are based on faulty comparisons and are not accurate. The reality of charter school funding is much more complicated than advocates suggest.
There are differences in the per-pupil funding levels of individual charter schools, just as there are differences in funding levels among school districts. However, all New Jersey charter schools are receiving at least what they should under the state’s charter school law. And, some charter schools are actually funded at higher levels than their sending school districts, particularly when considering they're much less expensive to educate student populations.
The confusion surrounding charter school funding is understandable given the complexity of the charter school funding formula and the fact that the New Jersey Department of Education (NJDOE) does not make charter school funding information accessible to the public, as it does school district data.
This report is intended to help dispel the confusion around charter school funding by providing a detailed explanation of the mechanics of that funding
New Jersey’s primary ballot design enables party insiders to pick winners
The infamous Florida butterfly ballot of 2000, which may have cost Al Gore the Presidency, highlights the dramatic consequences of bad ballot design for general election outcomes. The design of primary election ballots can also have substantial consequences by determining which candidates advance to the general election.This research brief demonstrates how a unique ballot design has been helping shape electoral outcomes in New Jersey for more than two decades, shifting the power to decide who wins primary elections away from the voters and towards a small group of party insiders who control the candidate endorsement process
New Jersey Charter School Funding
Are New Jersey charter schools underfunded relative to district schools?
Advocates’ claims that charter schools are receiving almost 50% less than they should convinced the Christie Administration and the New Jersey Legislature to shift an additional $107.6 million from school districts to charter schools for the combined 2014-15 and 2015-16 academic years.
However, claims of dramatic underfunding of charter schools are based on faulty comparisons and are not accurate. The reality of charter school funding is much more complicated than advocates suggest.
There are differences in the per-pupil funding levels of individual charter schools, just as there are differences in funding levels among school districts. However, all New Jersey charter schools are receiving at least what they should under the state’s charter school law. And, some charter schools are actually funded at higher levels than their sending school districts, particularly when considering their much less expensive to educate student populations.
The confusion surrounding charter school funding is understandable given the complexity of the charter school funding formula and the fact that the New Jersey Department of Education (NJDOE) does not make charter school funding information easily accessible to the public. For example, there is no charter equivalent of the User Friendly Budget Summaries, which the NJDOE makes available for each school district. The NJDOE also does not make public the charter aid summaries, which show the amount of funding that each charter school receives from each sending school district and how that amount is calculated. In contrast, the NJDOE publishes detailed aid summaries for all school districts.
This report helps dispel the confusion around charter school funding by providing a detailed explanation of the mechanics of that funding. The report does so in part by examining several specific school districts. The first district—Jersey City—was selected because it is home to a large number of charter schools. Jersey City also is frequently singled out as having particularly inequitable charter school funding. Several Jersey City charter schools have even filed a lawsuit challenging the amount of funding that they receive from the district.
The second district—Red Bank—was selected because it is home to a charter school that draws students only from that school district and serves the same grade span as the district, facilitating a more direct comparison of district and charter school funding. The Red Bank case study helps highlight some of the methodological challenges of such comparisons.
This report also examines trends related to charter and district student demographic composition in the nine districts with the largest charter school enrollments. Appendixes A, B, and C to the report provide additional specifics about New Jersey’s charter school funding, including facility funding. The report concludes with policy and research recommendations
New Jersey Charter Schools: A Data-Driven View - 2018 Update, Part I
New Jersey charter schools have grown significantly over the last decade in enrollment, in the number of sending school districts, and in financial impact:
•In the 2017-18 school year, enrollment in New Jersey’s traditional and renaissance charter schools surpassed 53,000 students, accounting for 3.6% of the state’s publicly funded student population.
•Charter enrollment has more than tripled over the last decade.
•Almost half of all New Jersey school districts send students and funding to charter schools. The number of such districts has increased from 198 in 2007-08 to 273 in 2017-18.
•In the 2017-18 school year, traditional and renaissance charter schools will receive an anticipated 164 million transferred to charter schools a decade ago.
New Jersey charter schools enroll a fundamentally different student population than the districts where their students reside:
•New Jersey charter schools continue to enroll proportionally fewer special education and Limited English Proficient students than their sending district public schools.
•The special education students enrolled in charter schools tend to have less-costly disabilities compared to special education students in the district public schools.
•Measures of student poverty are becoming increasingly unreliable because of school district participation in the US Department of Agriculture’s Community Eligibility Provision (CEP), which allows high-poverty school districts and charter schools to provide free meals to all of their students. However, data for non-CEP districts shows that many charter schools continue to enroll fewer at-risk students then their sending district public schools.
In light of these findings, we recommend that:
•New Jersey should amend the state’s charter school law, The Charter School Program Act, to align the power to authorize new charter schools and expand existing charter schools with the financial impact of those decisions.
•The New Jersey Department of Education (NJDOE) should modify the criteria used for evaluating charter schools for approval, renewal, expansion, and closure, to give substantial weight to how closely individual charter schools mirror the student population characteristics of their sending school districts, including Limited English Proficiency, economic disadvantage, and special education disability classifications.
•NJDOE should examine why New Jersey charter schools do not reflect the population of their sending school districts and make public the data that is already collected, to enable researchers to further study this problem.
•NJDOE should explore more accurate ways of measuring differences in student socio-economic status, including survey and sampling methods.Research report
Cwbr Author Interview: Through The Heart Of Dixie: Sherman\u27s March And American Memory
Interview with Anne Sarah Rubin, Associate Professor of History at the University of Maryland, Baltimore County Interviewed by Zach Isenhower
Civil War Book Review (CWBR): Today the Civil War Book Review is excited to speak with Anne Sarah Rubin, associate professor of history at the University of Maryland Baltimore County. Professor Rubin previously authored, A Shattered Nation: The Rise and Fall of the Confederacy, 1861-1868. Today we get to discuss her most recent book, Through the Heart of Dixie: Sherman\u27s March and American Memory. Professor Rubin, thank you for joining us today.Anne Sarah Rubin (ASR): Thank you very much for having me
- …
