254 research outputs found

    Review of Learning words from reading: A cognitive model of word-meaning inference; Author: Megumi Hamada; Publisher: Bloomsbury Academic, 2021; ISBN: 978-1-3501-5368-4; Pages: 168

    No full text
    Book Review: Learning words from reading: A cognitive model of word-meaning inference. Author: Megumi Hamada. Publisher: Bloomsbury Academic, 2021. ISBN: 978-1-3501-5368-4. Pages: 16

    Haliplus regili Benetti & Hamada, 2017, sp. n.

    No full text
    Haliplus regili sp. n. (Figs. 3–4, 13–20) Type locality. Brazil: Roraima state, Alto Alegre county, pond near the RR-205 road (02°59'39.8"N 61°06'46.2"W). Type material. Holotype male (INPA): Brazil: Roraima state, Alto Alegre county, pond near the RR-205 road (02°59'39.8"N 61°06'46.2"W), 05.vi.2015, leg. C.J. Benetti, K. Dias-Silva and B.G. Oliveira. Diagnosis. Haliplus regili sp. n. can be distinguished from other neotropical species of Haliplus by the following combination of characteristics: elytra brown with extensive but not clearly defined maculation consisting of dark patches (Fig. 3); prosternal process gradually widening anteriorly, slightly narrowed in posterior part; about 1.9 times longer than wide at base (Fig. 16); metaventral process with two well-defined impressions on both sides (Fig. 4) and median lobe of aedeagus in lateral view curved, straight in the apical third, with the apex strongly truncated (Fig. 19). Description. Habitus (Fig. 3). Body oval, tapering backwards, widest just behind the shoulders, with very narrow pronotum and shoulders pronounced. Measurements (n=1). TL: 3.36 mm; MW: 2.13 mm; PL: 0.7 mm; PW: 1.45 mm; DE: 0.26; EW: 0.25 mm. Head. Orange-brown with vague darkening near antennae and between eyes; strongly and densely punctured; narrower than pronotum, widest across eyes; width between eyes 0.9 × width of eye. Antennae yellow; placed anterior to eyes; with 11 antennomeres, 1st and 2nd short and broad, 3–11 long, 11th the largest (Fig. 13). Palpi yellow; maxillary palpi with four palpomeres, the last shorter than penultimate. Genal lines behind eyes double. Pronotum. Reddish-brown, with two vague dark spots at base; strongly and densely punctured, more strongly impressed along base; widest at base, narrow towards apex; lateral sides convex, not margined; base without plicae. Elytra. Brown, with extensive but not clearly defined maculation consisting of dark patches; dark marks along suture and base not darkened (Fig. 3). Primary puncture rows strongly impressed at base and finely impressed at apex; about 33 punctures in first row; fifth elytral puncture row not extended along base; secondary puncture rows dense and moderately strong, along suture strong, in two irregular rows; all punctures darkened (Fig. 14). Lateral margin completely bordered; shoulders weakly serrate; apical margin not serrate. Ventral side. Reddish-brown, darkened towards coxae. Epipleura reddish-brown, with double row of strong punctures in anterior part and single row of weaker punctures in posterior narrowed part, reaching to the end of fifth sternite. Prosternum bordered anteriorly, strongly punctured in the middle. Prosternal process gradually widening anteriorly, slightly narrowed in posterior part; about 1.9 times longer than wide at base; anterior edge margined, laterally grooved; moderately strongly and densely punctured (Figs. 4, 16, 17). Metaventral process with two well-defined, but slightly confluent impressions on both sides, not impressed in the middle; moderately punctured (Fig. 16). Metacoxal plates reaching to the fifth sternite, densely punctured. Fifth and sixth sternites densely punctured; last sternite punctured only at base (Fig. 4). Legs. Orange-brown to brown. Fore- and mid legs: femur basally narrowed, medially enlarged, surface covered with dense, coarse micropunctures; tibia with long hairs on inner margin, apically with two equal spurs; tarsi with 5 tarsomeres, the 5th longest, tarsal claws of equal length. Hind legs: coxal plates enlarged covering trochanter and most of the femoral region; femur broadest at apex; tibia slender with unequal apical spurs, setiferous striole on dorsal face of 1/5 × length and longer apical spur as long as the length of first tarsomere (Fig. 15); tarsi with 5 tarsomeres, 1st the longest, with a pair of equal claws. Male. First three tarsomeres of fore- and midlegs widened and ventrally with a tuft of sucker hairs. Aedeagus: Median lobe in lateral view curved, straight in the apical third, wider at base, narrowed towards the apex and slightly widened at tip; apex strongly truncated (Fig. 19). Left paramere in lateral view short and broad, subtriangular, almost as long as wide, with basal process narrow, and with apex angular; with a series of long setae and some sparse setae at the apex (Fig. 18). Right paramere in lateral view slender, moderately curved, base bilobed, apex rounded; inner margin with a series of large setae in the apical two thirds (Fig. 20). Etymology. This species is named in honor of Juan Antonio Régil Cueto, the PhD supervisor of the first author, a good friend and colleague, in gratitude for all the shared moments during our long friendship and in recognition of his contribution to the knowledge of water beetles. Distribution and habitat. Northern Brazil, currently only known in the state of Roraima (Fig. 21). Specimen was collected in a shallow pond with macrophytes covering the entire surface (Fig. 23). Taxonomic comments. Haliplus regili sp. n. can be distinguished from other neotropical species of Haliplus by the combination of characteristics of elytra, prosternal and metaventral processes and the male genitalia shape. The new species resembles H. langleyi Vondel & Spangler, 2008 and H. triplehorni Vondel & Spangler, 2008, but differs from these species in the shape of prosternal process (Fig. 16), gradually widening anteriorly (almost parallel in H. langleyi and H. triplehorni); male median lobe (Fig. 19), shorter and less curved downward in H. langleyi and H. triplehorni and right paramere (Fig. 20), without distal appendage (with distal appendage in H. langleyi and H. triplehorni.Published as part of Benetti, Cesar João & Hamada, Neusa, 2017, Two new species of Haliplus Latreille, 1802 (Coleoptera, Haliplidae) from Northern Brazil, pp. 584-592 in Zootaxa 4282 (3) on pages 587-592, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4282.3.10, http://zenodo.org/record/82787

    Apobaetis biancae Cruz & Boldrini & Hamada 2020, sp. nov.

    No full text
    Apobaetis biancae sp. nov. Boldrini (Figs 2 A–2J, 4A, 4B) Apobaetis sp. nov. A in Boldrini & Cruz 2014: 4 Diagnosis. Larva. 1) labrum rectangular, distal margin without shallow medial emargination, medial area of distal margin with four robust pointed setae (Fig. 2A); 2) maxillary palp long, more than 2.5× the length of galea-lacinia, segment I slightly longer than galea-lacinia (Fig. 2D); 3) lingua subquadrate with one medial lobe (Fig. 2E); 4) glossa distally rounded; 5) inner projection of labial palp segment II rounded, segment III triangular (Fig. 2F); 6) tarsal claws 1.4× the length of tarsus, without row of denticles (Fig. 2G); 7) posterior margin of tergum IV with triangular spines (longer than wide) (Fig. 2H). Description. Larva. Body: 4.0– 4.2 mm; cercus approximately 1.5 mm. Body whitish (Fig. 4 A–B). Head. Antenna with minute spines on the apex of each segment. Frontal keel absent. Labrum (Fig. 2A): rectangular; distal margin without shallow medial emargination and medial lobe; distolateral area and distal margin with robust setae; medial area of distal margin with four robust setae on dorsal surface; ventral surface with one row of thin setae on medial area near distal margin. Left mandible (Fig. 2B): outer and inner sets of incisors with 5 and 3 denticles, respectively; prostheca robust, bifid at apex, inner margin frayed at middle; margin between prostheca and mola concave, with frayed lobe close to subtriangular process; tuft of robust setae at base of mola present; subtriangular process wide; denticles of mola not constricted; lateral margin convex. Right mandible (Fig. 2C): outer and inner sets of incisors with 3 denticles each; prostheca slender, bifurcated at apex; margin between prostheca and mola concave; tuft of setae at base of mola absent; denticles of mola constricted; lateral margin convex. Maxilla (Fig. 2D): maxillary palp long, more than 2.5× the length of galea-lacinia; segment I slightly longer than galea-lacinia, segment II without distal constriction; maxillary palp with scarce, thin, simple setae scattered over the surface. Hypopharynx (Fig. 2E): lingua subquadrate and longer than superlingua, with one medial lobe and without distal tuft of setae; superlingua not expanded, with short, thin, simple setae scattered over distal margin. Labium (Fig 2F): glossa narrowing slightly distally with apex rounded, longer than paraglossa; dorsal surface with one arc of setae on distal half, from inner to outer margin; ventral surface covered with small robust setae (not completely illustrated). Paraglossa curved inward; dorsal surface with three robust setae on apex and with one longitudinal row of five robust setae near inner margin; outer margin with one row of 14 robust setae; ventral surface with one longitudinal row of five robust setae in the middle. Labial palp with segment I shorter than the length of segments II and III combined; inner projection of labial palp of segment II rounded and laterally directed, outer margin and projection covered with thin, long, simple setae; ventral surface of segment II with of thin, long setae near the outer margin; segment III triangular, covered with thin, long, simple setae on outer margin, dorsal surface with one row of nine robust setae, outer margin concave. Thorax. Foreleg (Fig. 2G). Femur: with one row of 14 short robust setae on dorsal margin. Tibia: ventrally with one row of four short robust setae. Patella-tibial suture from dorsal to ventral margin. Tarsus: ventrally with one row of 12 short robust setae. Tarsal claws 1.4× the length of tarsus, row of denticles absent. Abdomen. Terga II and VII with a reddish medial mark, tergum V with a reddish lateral mark, terga IX and X reddish. Tergal surface covered by scale-like triangular spines (Fig. 2H); posterior margin with triangular spines (longer than wide) (Fig. 2H). Gill VI (Fig. 2I) oblong. Paraproct (Fig. 2J) with four marginal spines, posterolateral extension without spines. Cerci and paracercus with lateral spines on all segments. Comments. This species is found with low abundance on the sand bottom of a small stream. Etymology. After Bianca M. P. O. Boldrini, friend, wife of second author (R.B.), a great teacher and a fellow scientist, who gives him all the support needed. Material examined. Holotype, one larva in alcohol, Brazil, Rondônia, Colorado do Oeste, Rio Cabixi, S 13°15’31.8” / W060°20’04.8”, 06.ix.2012, Boldrini, R., Fernandes, A.S., Hamada, N., Nascimento, J.M.C. cols, INPA. Paratypes, same data as holotype, one larva in alcohol and two mounted on slides, UFRR.Published as part of Cruz, Paulo Vilela, Boldrini, Rafael & Hamada, Neusa, 2020, Redescription of Apobaetis lakota McCafferty, 2000 (Ephemeroptera: Baetidae) and description of two new species from Brazil, pp. 249-258 in Zootaxa 4885 (2) on pages 252-254, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4885.2.6, http://zenodo.org/record/429658

    Fittkauimyia mayumiae Dantas & Hamada, 2013, new species

    No full text
    Fittkauimyia mayumiae new species (Figs. 1 –3) Type material. Holotype male, Brazil, Amazonas State, Novo Airão, Km 3 of the Ramal do Hotel Mercuri, 02º 50 '44,4"S, 60 º 54 '56,9" W, 25 /viii/ 2008, in decayed wood, G.P.S. Dantas, (INPA, slide mounted in Euparal®). Paratypes: 1 male with pupal exuviae, as holotype except for 02/ix/ 2008; 1 male, as holotype except for 05/ix/ 2008; 1 female with pupal exuviae, as holotype except for 30 /viii/ 2008. Diagnosis. The male of F. mayumiae sp. n. can be distinguished from the other species of the genus by the combination of iridescent eyes; acrostichals confined from the anterior region to the scutal tubercle; antepronotum with 1 setae; scutellum with 9–11 setae; tibial comb on hind leg with 9–10; gonocoxite brown, gonostylus light brown and slightly covered with bristles in the 2 / 3 apical region. The pupae can be distinguished by the combination of anal lobe with fringe on both inner and outer border; 5 LS setae on segment VIII and all abdominal segments with shagreen. Etymology. Named to honor Erika Mayumi Shimabukuro, a young biologist whose enthusiasm has made the work of the first author pleasant indeed. Male (n = 3, except when otherwise stated). Total length 4.43–4.60 mm. Wing length 1.97–2.10 mm. Total length/ wing length 2.12–2.25. Wing length/ length of profemur 1.89–1.95. General coloration brownish. Eyes iridescent. Head, antennae, thorax, wings and legs brownish. Abdomen: T I pale, TII–TIV with anterior half brown, TV-TVII with anterior 2 / 3 brown, TVIII with anterior half brown, hypopygium brown (Fig. 1 D). Head (Fig 1 A). AR 1.91–2.06. Thirteenth flagellomere 795–877 µm long. Apical flagellomere 81–96 µm long; 20–25 µm wide; with a subapical setae 55–61 µm long. Temporal setae 14. Clypeus with 15 setae. Tentorium 206 µm long; 45 µm wide at sieve pore; 17 µm wide at posterior tentorial pit. Palpomere lengths (1–5 in µm): 43–47; 49–55; 88–105; 178; 230. Thorax (Fig. 1 B). Scutal tubercle present. Acrostichals 10–12, distributed between the anterior end of the scutum and the scutal tubercle; dorsocentrals 17, in a single irregular row; prealars 4–7, in a single row. Antepronotum with 1 setae. Scutellum with 9–11 setae, in two rows. Postnotum with 2 setae on posterior margin. Haltere with 12 setae. Wing (Fig. 1 C). VR 0.92–0.96. Membrane with dense covering of macrotrichia except for cells r, m, r 2 + 3 and cu; C produced beyond apex of R 4 + 5. Brachiolum with 3–4 setae. All veins with setae except for M–Cu. Squama with 16–18 setae. Legs. Spur of fore tibia 55–60 µm long, with 16–18 teeth; spurs of middle tibia 50–54 µm long, with 11 teeth and 65–67 µm long, with 15–16 teeth; spurs of hind tibia 50–56 µm long, with 12–14 teeth and 58–62 µm long. Tibial comb on hind leg with 9–10 bristles, the lateral longer than the medial. Claws of fore and hind legs normal, sharply pointed; claws of middle leg spoon-shaped; pulvilli present. Lengths (in µm) and proportions of legs as in Table 1. fe ti ta 1 ta 2 ta 3 ta 4 p 1 1008–1118 1406–1483 1446–1497 630 – 578 468–524 311–363 p 2 1301–1485 1473–1594 1442 (1) 585 (1) 347 (1) 191 (1) p 3 1170–1353 1700–1887 1516–1612 504–560 410–443 323–367 ta 5 LR BV SV BR p 1 112–115 1.01–1.03 2.54–2.59 1.67–1.74 3.13 (1) p 2 100 (1) 0.98 (1) 3.45 (1) 1.92 (1) 3.43 (1) p 3 115–120 0.85–0.89 3.24–3.26 1.89–2.01 4.09 (1) Hypopygium (Fig. 2 A). Gonocoxite elongated, subcylindrical and about 2.5 x as long as broad; 178–185 µm long; 68–69 µm wide. Gonostylus 95–108 µm long; basal 2 / 3 covered by hair, 2 / 3 apical slightly covered with bristles; megaseta 16–17 µm long. HR 1.71–1.87; HV 4.26–4.66. Female (n = 1). Total length 3.02 mm. Wing length 2.28 mm. Total length/ wing length 1.32. Wing length/ length of profemur 2.00. General coloration brownish. Eyes iridescent. Head. AR 0.15. Apical flagellomere 114 µm long; 31 µm wide, with a pre-apical setae 66 µm long. Pedicel with 14 setae. Temporal setae 18. Clypeus with 18 setae. Palpomere lengths (1–3 in µm): 43; 54; 107. Thorax. Scutal tubercle present. Acrostichals present; dorsocentrals 27, in two rows; prealars present. Scutellum with 17 setae, in two rows. Postnotum with 2 setae. Haltere with 12 setae. Wing. VR 0.90. Wing membrane densely covered by macrotrichia except in cells r, m, r 2 + 3 and cu; C produced beyond apex of R 4 + 5. Brachiolum with 11 setae and 20 sensilla campaniformia. All veins with setae except M-Cu. Squama with 17 setae. Legs. Spur of fore tibia 67 µm long, with about 19 teeth; spurs of middle tibia 61 µm long, with 15 teeth and 74 µm long, with 19 teeth; spurs of hind tibia 61 µm long, with 16 teeth and 67 µm long, with about 13 teeth. Tibial comb with 10 bristles on hind leg. Claws of hind legs normal, sharply pointed, pulvilli present. Lengths (in µm) and proportions of legs are in Table 2. Genitalia (Fig. 2 B). Three spherical seminal capsules; spermathecal ducts separate for all of their length. T VIII with about 31 setae. Gonapophysis IX well developed; notum 141 µm long. Cercus 64 µm long and 28 µm wide. Pupa (n = 1). Total length 5.58 mm. Coloration: cephalothorax and abdomen light brown. Cephalotorax. Thoracic horn (Fig. 3 A) 413 µm long, maximum width 222 µm; plastron plate 65 µm long, 105 µm wide. Median suture granulose. FIGURE 3. Fittkauimyia mayumiae sp. n. Pupa. A. Thoracic horn. B. Basal tubercle of D 1 -seta with sclerotized beak (left) and base of D 2 - and D 3 -setae (right) with large tubercles on tergite III. C. Abdomen, in dorsal view. Abdomen (Fig. 3 C). Tergite I–II with small field of very fine shagreen restricted to central area; tergite III–VIII with field of shagreen restricted to central posterior area; genital sac of male with shagreen on basal half. Tergite I with 4 pairs of D-setae, tergite II with 5 pairs of D-setae, all these setae short and taeniate. D 1 -setae somewhat taeniate on tergite III, 171 µm long; sclerotized and spiniform on tergite IV–VII, 74, 84, 90 and 96 µm long respectively, all arising from a more or less distinct tubercle; basal tubercle of D 1 -seta large with sclerotized beak on tergite III and IV (Fig. 3 B). D 2 - and D 3 -setae very long, about 2 times as long as the segment length and arising from large tubercles on tergite III and IV (Fig. 3 B), short and not arising from tubercles on tergites V–VII, all taeniate. D 4 - and D 5 -setae short and taeniate on tergites III–VII. Segments I–VI with 2 pairs of taeniate L-setae, segment VII with 1 pair of taeniate L-setae, segment VIII with 5 pairs of taeniate L-setae. Lateral fringe with about 23 setae at the middle of segments II; with about 39 setae at the basal 2 / 3 of segment III; about 80–150 setae along each entire lateral margin of segments IV–VII; segment III with a single additional setae in posterolateral corner. Anal lobe 787 µm long and 339 µm wide; with fringe on both the outer and inner border. Male genital sac 182 µm long. Larva unknown. Systematic remarks. The male imago of F. mayumiae sp. n. resembles F. c r y p t a, since both have iridescent eyes and a similar coloration pattern, but can be differentiated by the distribution of the setae on gonostylus and the number of antepronotals and scutellar setae. The pupa of F. m a y u m i a e sp. n. resembles the pupa of F. nipponica by having all abdominal segments with shagreen and 5 LS setae on segment VIII, but in F. mayumiae sp. n. the anal lobe has fringe on both the outer and inner border, contrasting with F. nipponica that has fringe only on outer border. Notes on species biology. The specimens of Fittkauimyia mayumiae sp. n. were obtained from decayed wood collected in small black water streams. Probably, larvae of the new species inhabit the surface of wood or in clefts in the bark, in which they are searching for or waiting for preys. The stream where the larvae were collected had an average width of 1.8 m, average depth of 0.14 m and average flow of 0.14 ms - 1, and was characterized by acidic water (average pH = 4.74), low conductivity (average = 15 μScm - 1), high concentration of dissolved oxygen (average = 6.45 mgL - 1) and low temperature variation (average = 25.5 °C). The dominant substrate types in the stream beds were sand (average = 50 %), coarse litter (average = 30 %) and fine litter (average = 12 %).Published as part of Dantas, Galileu P. S. & Hamada, Neusa, 2013, Two new species of Fittkauimyia Karunakaran (Diptera: Chironomidae) from Brazil, pp. 573-582 in Zootaxa 3681 (5) on pages 574-578, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3681.5.6, http://zenodo.org/record/22308

    Smicridea (Smicridea) jeaneae Desiderio, Pes & Hamada 2021, sp. nov.

    No full text
    Smicridea (Smicridea) jeaneae Desiderio, Pes & Hamada sp. nov. urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act: B3B2E393-F3E0-4FAD-8838-32481EB11877 Figs 3, 11 – 12 Diagnosis Smicridea jeaneae sp. nov. also belongs to the albosignata complex.Among the species in this complex, it is most similar to S. bulbosa Flint, 1974 from Suriname based on the strong, parallel, pointed apicomesal lobes on tergum X and the short, slender apical segment of the inferior appendage with slightly acute apex. In both species the claw-shaped internal dorsolateral plates of the phallic apparatus are as long as the basal width, but in S. jeaneae sp. nov. the plates are straight mesally, while in S. bulbosa they are curved. In addition, the phallotremal sclerite of the phallic apparatus has a hastate shape distally in dorsal view and is kidney-shaped in lateral view in the new species, but is strap-like in dorsal view and rod-like in lateral view in S. bulbosa. Smicridea jeaneae sp. nov. can also be recognized by the three stout apical spine-like setae on the basal segment of the inferior appendage, one long seta dorsally and two mediumsized setae on the mesal margin. Etymology This new species is named in honor of Dr Jeane Marcelle Cavalcante do Nascimento (Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia, INPA – Brazil) for her valuable friendship, cooperation in the field and the laboratory, and in gratitude for her help in collecting material during the doctoral studies of the first author. Material examined Holotype BRAZIL • ♂; Amapá, Oiapoque, Oiapoque River, Buraco do Cristal; 03º48′16″ N, 51º51′25″ W; 7 Dec. 2018; M. Silva leg.; INPA-TRI 000116. Description Adult male (Figs 11–12) FOREWING LENGTH. 6.37 mm (n = 1). COLOR. General color dark brown (in alcohol) (Fig. 11A). Antennae yellowish brown (Fig. 11A). Head brown, with grayish to brown setae (Fig. 11B–C); dorsally with weakly pronounced median suture; with five setal warts; anteromesal wart small, rounded; anterolateral pair undivided, weakly delimited; posterolateral pair large, ovoid (Fig. 11C). Maxillary palp with segments 1–4 increasing gradually, about 0.8× in size toward the more apical segments, segment 5 long, about 1.2× as long as all previous segments combined (Fig. 11B). Thorax dark brown, covered with pale-brown setae; legs brown, with mid-leg tarsi yellowish (Fig. 11A). Wing venation typical for subgenus (Fig. 11D–E). Forewings, in alcohol, brown, with white transverse band subapically reaching base of R2+3, another arising on M1+2 and reaching base of Cu1a+b, and small white spot on apex of Cu2 (Fig. 11D). Sternum V with anterolateral glandular processes slightly shorter than sternum. Abdominal segments VI and VII with 2 pairs of internal glands, both pairs longer than their containing segments (Fig. 11F). MALE GENITALIA (Fig. 12). Segment IX in lateral view with anterolateral margin nearly straight, strongly sclerotized (Fig. 12A); posterodorsal margin bearing small spicules, distributed in two subtriangular bands (Fig. 12B). Tergum X elongate; in lateral view, ventrolateral margin strongly sclerotized, with three medium-sized, thin setae on apical third; apex with shallow notch, ending in a slender, straight lobe (Fig. 12A); in dorsal view, lateral margin slightly rounded; dorsomesal setose area bearing four mediumsized, thin setae; divided apicomesally by V-shaped incision about ½ its length; apex of tergite rounded, with strong, pointed apicomesal lobe, each bearing three medium-sized, thin apical setae (Fig. 12B). Inferior appendages 2-segmented; basal segment long, slightly inflated distally, covered with long, thin setae, with group of stout apical spine-like setae (one very long dorsal seta and two long setae on mesal margin); apical segment short, about ⅓ as long as basal segment, slender, strongly curved medially, apex slightly acute with numerous short, thin setae on mesal margin (Fig. 12B). Phallic apparatus long and tubular; basal section, in lateral view, enlarged, 4× diameter of phallotheca at its narrowest point, forming an angle of about 103° with apical section; median section of phallotheca straight, without processes (Fig. 12C); apex enlarged, with pair of claw-shaped internal dorsolateral plates, as long as basal width, straight mesally and directed posterad; endothecal membranes without spines; phallotremal sclerite, in dorsal view, distinct, strongly sclerotized, with U-shaped proximal region and hastate distal region (Fig. 12D–E); in lateral view, dorsal region kidney-shaped, ventrally slender and sinuous (Fig. 12C). Ejaculatory duct of endophallus, in lateral view, distinct, slightly sclerotized (Fig. 12C). Bionomics The only male specimen of S. jeaneae sp. nov. was collected near the Oiapoque River, at a place known as “Buraco do Cristal”; this river is about 400 m in width. The prevalent vegetation is Dense Ombrophilous Lowland Forest. The collection site is located in the northern-most part of the Brazilian Amazon. Distribution (Fig. 3) Brazil: Amazon (Amapá).Published as part of Desiderio, Gleison Robson, Pes, Ana Maria, Andrade-Souza, Vanderly & Hamada, Neusa, 2021, The Smicridea (Smicridea) fasciatella species group (Trichoptera: Hydropsychidae) in Brazil: six new species and new distributional records, pp. 156-196 in European Journal of Taxonomy 750 (1) on pages 175-178, DOI: 10.5852/ejt.2021.750.1371, http://zenodo.org/record/545171

    The Literary Polemic Hamada – Mináč and Its Contemporary Context

    No full text
    The presented article reconstructs the literary polemic between the writer and essayist V. Mináč and the literary critic M. Hamada which took place in the liberal enviroment of the first half of the 1960s in Slovakia and became emblematic of that period of time. The author pays attention to its impact as well as the events and the writings preceeding it. The central subject of the polemic was the category of estrangement in the context of various interpretations of Marxist philosophy. It also helps identify the political and cultural processes forming the intellectual climate of the 1960s. On the one hand it became a part of the wide-ranging social discussion about the critical „acknowledgement“ of the Stalinism´s legacy, which continued until its violent interruption by Normalization after 1968, on the other hand, it made space for new ideological, philosophical and aesthetical initiatives. However, the polemic also raised other issues, which have reached beyond the context of the period of time in question and are permanently present in the current discussions about finding alternatives to technological rationality and other strategies of the „Post-Modern“ power (Foucault, Derrida, Deleuze, Bauman, Žižek)

    Eliciting Requirements of a Knowledge Management System for Gaming in an Organization: The Role of Tacit Knowledge

    No full text
    Green Open Access added to TU Delft Institutional Repository ‘You share, we take care!’ – Taverne project https://www.openaccess.nl/en/you-share-we-take-care Otherwise as indicated in the copyright section: the publisher is the copyright holder of this work and the author uses the Dutch legislation to make this work public.Policy AnalysisOrganisation & Governanc

    ANALISIS SEMIOTIKA CHARLES MORRIS DALAM LAGU SAYYIDI AR-RAIS KARYA HAMA MESHARY HAMADA

    No full text
    This study aims to describe the meaning of the song Sayyidi Ar-Rais in the work of Hama Meshary Hamada using Charles Morris Semiotics analysis which divides the analysis into 3, namely Semantics, Pragmatics, and Syntax. The author uses descriptive qualitative research in describing the research data. The data taken from Zain Ramadhan Channel's youtube account was collected through several stages: first, the author documented the lyrics of the Sayyidi Rais song taken from the data source; second, the writer chooses several song stanzas as the corpus of analysis; third, the authors classify the data and determine the final data. The data were analyzed by Charles Morris's theory. The result of this research is that it can be concluded that the data analyzed by Charles Morris's theory has 3 divisions: Semantics, Pragmatics, and Syntax. In terms of semantics, the meaning of the quote in the song has a symmetrical relationship between the signifier and the signified. From a pragmatic point of view, it is found what the meaning of the speech in the quotes from Sayyidi Ar-Rais's song is. Meanwhile, in terms of syntax, the sentence structure of this song tends to be simple and conforms to the standard Arabic structure

    Stenochironomus bare Dantas, Hamada & Mendes, 2016, new species

    No full text
    Stenochironomus bare new species (Figs. 6–8) Type material. Holotype male with pupal and larval exuviae, BRAZIL: Amazonas State, Itacoatiara, Madeireira Mil, 02º 46 ’ 37.7 ’’ S, 58 º 50 ’ 38.3 ’’ W, 13.v.09, in decayed leaves, G.P.S. Dantas (INPA). Diagnostic characters. Male: scutelum with 25 setae; anal point large at apex; inferior volsella with 4 setae, restricted to apex, apical setae stout; gonostylus with constant width along its length; HR<1. Pupa: tubercle on wing sheath; spines on apex of anal lobes and frontal apotome elongated. Etymology. the species name is a reference to the “ Baré ” ethnic group, which occupied a large area in central Amazon. The name is to be treated as a noun in apposition. Male (n = 1). Total length 4.61 mm. Wing length 1.95 mm. Total length/ wing length 2.36. Coloration—Eyes markedly metallic green when alive or in alcohol. Thorax: light brown patch on anterior portion of lateral vitta; light-brown patch on central region of scutelum (Fig. 6 B); a transversal light-brown band on the preepisternum. Wing: transparent membrane, with a medial light-brownish band. Legs: mid leg yellowish; hind femur yellowish, with a brownish band at base and at apex; hind tibia yellowish, with a basal brownish band, tarsus yellowish. Abdomen: brown pigmentation on posterior margin of T II–III and posterolateral margin of T VIII; hypopygium light brown, with bare areas near pre-apical constrictions. Head (Fig. 6 A). AR 2.05. Thirteenth flagellomerum 840 µm long. Temporal setae 10, extending to the posterior margin. Clypeus with 21 setae. Tentorium, stipes and cibarial pump as in Figure 6 A. Tentorium 167 µm long; 40 µm wide at sieve pore; 28 µm wide at posterior tentorial pit. Stipes 151 µm long; 7 µm wide. Palpomere length (1–3 in µm): 44; 52; 180. Thorax (Fig. 6 B). Acrostichals 10; dorsocentrals 11, in a single row; prealars 7, in two rows. Scutellum with 25 setae in two rows. Anterior edge of scutum angled in lateral aspect. Wing (Fig. 6 C). VR 1.10. Brachiolum with 3 setae, with about 20 sensilla campaniformia. R with 32 setae; R 1 with 35 setae; R 4 + 5 with 52 setae; M with 1 setae; RM with 1 setae; remaining veins bare. Squama with 8 setae. Legs. Spurs of middle tibia 41 µm and 50 µm long; spurs of hind tibia 46 µm and 49 µm long. Apex of mid tibia 60 µm wide, of hind tibia 64 µm wide. Lengths (in µm) and proportions of legs as in Table 3. Hypopygium (Figs. 7 A, 7 B). Anal point large at base; 86 µm long; 19 µm wide at base; 17 µm wide at half; 29 µm wide at apex. Tergite IX with 35 setae, caudal apex edge-shaped, with several setae posterior to the pre-apical constriction. Laterosternite IX with 4 setae. Phallapodeme 111 µm long; transverse sternapodeme 47 µm long. Gonocoxite 170 µm long; inferior volsella 188 µm long, with 4 setae, restricted to apex, apical setae stout; superior volsella 62 µm long, with 6 setae. Gonostylus 185 µm long, with constant width along its length. HR 0.92. HV 2.49. Pupa (n = 1). Total length 5.46 mm. General coloration light brown. Cephalothorax (Figs. 8 A, 8 B). Frontal apotome markedly elongated (Fig. 8 A); frontal warts absent. Precorneal setae 127 µm long. Dorsocentrals (Dc) 98 µm long. Distance between Dc 1 and Dc 2 6 µm; between Dc 2 and Dc 3 122 µm; between Dc 3 and Dc 4 4 µm. Median suture smooth. A ventral tubercle close to wing sheath base; a laterodorsal tubercle, anterior to Dc 1 (Fig. 8 B). Abdomen (Figs. 8 C, 8 D). T I bare; T II–III with large field of shagreen, slightly thicker near posterior margin, with a somewhat circular bare area near anterior margin; T IV with large field of shagreen, thicker near posterior margin, with a somewhat elliptical bare area near anterior margin, paratergites with posterior fine shagreen; T V with two fields of shagreen separated by 117 µm, one anterior larger field of thinner shagreen with a central bare area larger anteriorly, and one posterior smaller field of thicker shagreen; T VI with two fields of shagreen separated by 64 µm, one anterior somewhat triangular field of thinner shagreen, and a posterior field of thicker shagreen; T VII–VIII with shagreen restricted to a small area near anterolateral margin; anal segment with anterior pair of shagreen patches. T II with posterior row of hooklets not extending to lateral margin of tergite, divided medially into two groups by 38 µm, each row 100 µm long; pedes spurii B absent. Abdominal setation: S I without L setae; S II–IV with 3 L setae; S V–VII with 4 LS setae; S VIII with 5 LS setae. Spur on S VIII (Fig. 8 E) with teeth yellowish brown, with one extremely elongate lateral tooth 130 µm long, an elongate penultimate tooth 56 µm long, and four smaller medial teeth; from a dorsal view, teeth arranged in a slightly curved row (Fig. 8 D). Genital sac 257 µm long, overreaching the posterior margin of the anal lobe by 15 µm; anal lobe with fringe of about 42 filaments, apex rounded, with spicules (Fig. 8 F). Female and larva unknown. Systematic remarks. Borkent (1984) described a pupal morphotype (“pupal form one”) that was associated with the genitalia of a male, probably pharate, indistinguishable from S. bacrionis Borkent. According to the author the two species could be differentiated by pupal features, which in the morphotype have spicules on the posterior region of the anal lobes, missing in the pupae of S. bacrionis. The pupa of S. bare sp. n. has such spicules on the anal lobes, but the male can be distinguished from S. bacrionis by the size of the superior volsella, that in the first species does not exceed the apex of the gonocoxite. The new species is also similar to S. triannulatus Borkent by the pigmentation of the thorax and wings and by the general morphology of the hypopygium. However, S. bare sp. nov. has the preapical constriction of T IX more pronounced, gonostylus with constant width along its length, hind tibia with one brown band, abdominal brown pigmentation on posterior margin of T II–III and posterolateral margin of T VIII, whereas S. triannulatus has the preapical constriction of T IX less pronounced, gonostylus with a preapical swelling, hind tibia with two brown bands, abdominal brown pigmentation on very lateral and posterior margins of T II–IV and posterior margin of T VI. Notes on biology of the species. The stream where S. bare sp. nov. was collected is a small typical blackwater stream of the Amazon lowlands forest, with an average width of 1.5 m (range: 0.70–2.20), average depth of 0.10 m (range: 0.033–0.240) and average flow of 0.02 m 3 /s (range: 0.004–0.148). These water courses are characterized by acidic black water (average = 4.50, range: 2.60 –6.00), low conductivity (average = 7.60 µS/cm, range: 6.80–9.95), high concentration of dissolved oxygen (average = 6.50 mg /L, range: 5.12–7.10) and low temperature variation (average = 24.6 C, range: 23.2–25.5). The opening of the forest canopy was small (average = 0.07 %, range: 0.02–0.19) and the dominant substrate types in the stream beds were sand (average = 31 %, range: 3– 61), coarse litter (average = 28 %, range: 6–50) and fine litter (average = 13 %, range: 0–41).Published as part of Dantas, Galileu P. S., Hamada, Neusa & Mendes, Humberto F., 2016, Contribution to the knowledge of Stenochironomus Kieffer (Diptera, Chironomidae) from Brazil: seven new species and description of females and immatures of some previously known species, pp. 1-47 in Zootaxa 4117 (1) on pages 10-12, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4117.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/26625

    Comprehensive Analysis of Minimally Invasive Management for Persistent Anterolateral Ankle Pain: A Systematic Review

    No full text
    Persistent anterolateral ankle pain is a debilitating condition often associated with soft tissue impingement following inversion injuries. It can lead to significant limitations in daily activities and overall quality of life, particularly in individuals with chronic ankle instability. This systematic review examines the efficacy and safety of minimally invasive arthroscopic decompression techniques in managing anterolateral ankle impingement syndrome. A total of 246 cases from nine studies were reviewed, involving 135 males with a mean age of 29.6 years and an average follow-up period of 29.5 months (range: 15-83.7 months). Outcomes were assessed using the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) scores and Meislen criteria. The AOFAS scores improved significantly from a mean of 40.75 preoperatively to 84.2 postoperatively, reflecting substantial functional recovery. Based on the Meislen criteria, 124 cases (50%) were rated as excellent, 71 (29%) as good, 14 (6%) as fair, and three (1%) as poor. Postoperative mobility was restored to normal in 130 cases, with complications reported in 24 cases (9.8%), including hypoesthesia, infections, intra-articular haemarthrosis, scar tissue formation, nerve irritation, and persistent pain or numbness. Patient satisfaction was high, with most patients reporting significant improvements in pain relief and functional capacity. Arthroscopic decompression is a safe, minimally invasive, and effective intervention for managing persistent anterolateral ankle impingement, offering substantial improvements in pain, mobility, and overall function with low morbidity and a manageable complication rate. This approach is an invaluable option for patients unresponsive to conservative treatments.This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License CC-BY 4.0., which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.RDUH staff can access the full-text of this article by clicking on the 'Additional Link' above and logging in with NHS OpenAthens if prompted
    corecore