137,366 research outputs found
Formica anatolica Seifert & Schultz 2009, sp. n.
No full textFormica anatolica sp. n. Derivatio nominis: from the distribution in Anatolia. Type material examined: Holotype worker plus 4 worker paratypes labelled "TUR: 37.348° N, 34.360° E Hal-kapinar-32 rkm SE, Aydos Dagi 1600-1800 m, A. Schulz 1997.05.08-214" and " Holotype Formica anatolica Seifert & Schultz " / " Paratype Formica anatolica Seifert & Schultz "; SMN Görlitz. Material examined: 13 samples with 54 workers from Anatolia (Turkey) were subject to a numeric analysis of 18 characters (Fig. 18). For details, see Appendix, as digital supplementary material to this article, at the journal's web pages. Description of worker (Tab. 2, Fig. 8): large Servifor-mica species (CS 1.401 mm), head and scape significantly shorter than in F. rufibarbis (CL / CW1.4 1.110, SL / CS1.4 1.031) and eye distinctly larger (EYE / CS1.4 0.303). Petiole very wide (PEW / CS1.4 0.484). Clypeus with sharp median keel and fine longitudinal microcarinulae. Frontal triangle finely transversely rippled and with 55 - 80 short pubescence hairs. Eyes with microsetae of 8 - 10 μ m maximum length. Total mean of unilateral setae numbers on different body parts predicted for a specimen with CS = 1.4 mm: pronotum 8.9, mesonotum 4.2, propodeum plus dorsolateral metapleuron 0.1, petiole dorsal of spiracle 0.8, flexor profile of hind tibia 1.4, underside of head 1.6 (only species of the F. rufibarbis group usually having gular setae). Posterior margin of head normally without setae. Ventral coxae and gaster tergites with long setae. Dorsal mesonotum in profile broadly convex. Metanotal depression rather deep. Propodeal dome in profile obtuse-angled or rounded, the basal profile sometimes linear or slightly concave. Dorsal crest of petiole in frontal view rounded, sometimes (especially in larger specimens) with a straight or slightly excavated median portion. Petiole scale in lateral aspect thin, with convex anterior and more straight posterior profile. Gaster with transverse microripples of small distance (RipD 4.6 μ m) and covered by dense silvery pubescence (sqPDG 3.4). Pubescence on head, meso-soma and petiole dense. Posterior vertex, often dorsal pro-mesonotum, coxae and all appendages dark brown, gaster always dark brown. Other body parts reddish. In overall impression, this species appears relatively dark with remarkable contrasts between brown and reddish parts, especially on genae. Comments on taxonomy: Well separable from any other Palaearctic species. The very clear distinction from the other two setose species, F. rufibarbis and F. tarimica sp. n., has already been presented above (Fig. 15). The short head, short scape, large eye and pilosity on underside of head suggest certain affinities to the F. cinerea group but the very wide petiole scale and overall pilosity pattern indicate an allocation to the F. rufibarbis group. 13 samples with 54 workers were subject to a numeric analysis of 18 characters. Turkey: Halkapinar (type), 8.V.1997 [37.348° N, 34.36° E]; Bakirdagi, 10.V.1997 [38.217° N, 35.917° E]; Belören (3 samples), 4.VI.1993 [37.211° N, 32.546° E]; Cankurtaran, 10.V.2003 [38.155° N, 31.239° E]; Carmadi (2 samples), 31. V.1993 [37.823° N, 35.102° E]; Imrasan Gecidi (2 samples), 3.V.1997 [37.133° N, 31.800° E]; Seydisehir, 5.VI.1993 [37.350° N, 31.750° E]; Sylemaniye, 5.VI.1993 [37.100° N, 31.750° E]; Ücpinnar, 4.VI.1993 [37.126° N, 32.250°]. Distribution and biology: So far only known from south-central Anatolia in the region of the Taurus Mountains (Toros Daglari). Occurring there at elevations between 1300 and 1900 m. Most remarkable habitat selection: so far only found in woodland stands with Abies, Juniperus, Quercus and other deciduous tree species, occasionally interspersed with grassland patches.Published as part of Seifert, B. & Schultz, R., 2009, A taxonomic revision of the Formica rufibarbis Fabricius, 1793 group (Hymenoptera: Formicidae)., pp. 255-272 in Myrmecologische Nachrichten 12 on page 2
Formica orangea Seifert & Schultz 2009, sp. n.
No full textFormica orangea sp. n. Derivatio nominis: from the mainly orange body colour. Type material examined: Holotype worker plus 4 worker paratypes labelled "KIR: 41.8327° N, 71.1948° E Tshat-kal valley, 1830 m R. Schultz 1998.07.28-115" and "Holo-type Formica orangea Seifert & Schultz " / " Paratype Formica orangea Seifert & Schultz ", 5 paratype workers in etha-nol, SMN Görlitz; from the same nest series: 3 mounted paratype workers and 19 paratype workers in ethanol, coll. RS. Material examined: 32 samples with 100 workers were subject to a numeric analysis of 18 characters (Figs. 18, 19): Afghanistan (2), Iran (1), Kazakhstan (4), Kyrgyzstan (10), Mongolia (14), Uzbekistan (1). For details, see Appendix, as digital supplementary material to this article, at the journal's web pages. Description of worker (Tab. 1, Fig. 6): medium-sized Serviformica species (CS 1.349 mm), head short (CL / CW1.4 1.111), scape shortest and distance of lateral ocelli largest within the F. rufibarbis group (SL / CS1.4 1.021, OceD / CS1.4 0.172), eye relatively small (EYE / CS1.4 0.288), petiole relatively narrow (PEW / CS1.4 0.421). Clypeus with sharp median keel and fine longitudinal microcarinulae. Frontal triangle finely transversely rippled and with 35 -60 short pubescence hairs. Eyes with microsetae of 10 -13 μ m maximum length. Total mean of unilateral setae numbers on different body parts predicted for a specimen with CS = 1.4 mm: pronotum 1.5, mesonotum 0.8, petiole scale dorsal of spiracle 0.2, flexor profile of hind tibia 0.3. Posterior margin of head and propodeum plus dorsolateral metapleuron normally without setae. Ventral coxae and gaster tergites with long setae. Dorsal mesonotal profile broadly rounded. Metanotal depression moderately deep. Propodeal dome in profile flatly rounded to angled, the basal profile sometimes slightly concave. Dorsal crest of petiole in frontal view broadly convex. Petiole scale in lateral aspect relatively low and thicker than in other species of the F. rufi-barbis group, except F. tarimica sp. n., with convex anterior and straight to slightly convex posterior profile. Gaster with transverse microripples of rather large distance (RipD 6.7 μ m, second largest within the F. rufibarbis group) and covered by dense silvery pubescence (sqPDG 3.15). Pubescence on head, mesosoma and petiole less dense. Whole head, mesosoma, coxae, all appendages, and petiole in typical cases reddish yellow; sometimes in smaller specimens brown spots may occur on posterior vertex and dorsal pro-mesonotum, but always with low contrast between the pig-mented and the light parts, gaster always brown. Comments on taxonomy: Formica orangea sp. n. shows an unmistakable combination of orange colour, short head, short scape, high interocellar distance, low pronotal setae numbers and large microripple distance on gaster tergites (Tab. 1). 32 samples with 100 workers were subject to a numeric analysis of 18 characters. Afghanistan: Kabul, 18.IX.1952 [34.41° N, 69.16° E, coordinates estimated]; Tangi Saidan, 27.V.1952 [34.42° N, 69.17° E, coordinates estimated]. Iran: Ghuchan, 29.VII.2005 [37.41° N, 58.5° E, coordinates estimated]. Kazakhstan: Lake Zaysan (2 samples, No. 215, 355), 26.VII.2001 [47.682° N, 84.646° E]; Zaysan Basin, 25.VII.2001 [47.707° N, 85.300° E]; Zaysan Basin, 26.VII.2001 [47.711° N, 85.303° E]. Kyrgyzstan: Issyk Kul (3 samples, No. 174, 177, 181), 22.VII. 2000 [42.367° N, 76.200° E]; Issyk Kul (2 samples, No. 55, 56), 22.VII.2000 [42.368° N, 76.195° E]; Karavshin vall. (2 samples, No. 152b, 162b), 24.VII.2004 [39.781° N, 70.412° E]; Shamaldy-Say, 31.VII.2004 [41.119° N, 72.189° E]; Tshatkal vall. (2 samples, 115: type, 116), 28.VII.1998 [41.833° N, 71.195° E]. Mongolia: Bogd Sum, 19.VIII.1997 [45.141° N, 100.900° E]; Elsen Tasarkhai, 21.VII.2003 [47.389° N, 103.661° E]; Gobi Altai, 29.VII.2003 [44.54° N, 99.34° E, coordinates estimated]; Urtiyn ekh Oasis (6 samples, No. 326, 329, 403, 404, 405, 414), 31.VII.2003 [44.811° N, 97.368° E]; Zuun Mod Oasis (3 samples, No. 165, 166, 183), 16.VIII.1997 [43.232° N, 99.008° E]; Zuun Mod Oasis, 18.VIII.1997 [43.265° N, 99.218° E]; M515B, 2003, [leg. Pfeiffer, without location]. Uzbekistan: Tash-Kurgan, 22.VIII.1897 [38.37° N, 67.93° E, coordinates estimated]. Distribution and biology: Occurring in the Oriental-Turanian and Central Asian floristic region of the south sub-meridional and meridional zones. Ranging from 58° (Iran) to 104° E (Mongolia) and 34° (Afghanistan) to 48° N (Kazakhstan) at elevations between 400 and 2200 m. Prefers dry steppe and semi-desert habitats, in the vicinity of rivers or lakes. Invades rural areas and gardens. Nests found in moderately dry sand, often with characteristic slant gateways leading to the underground. Foraging on available trees, probably tending trophobionts.Published as part of Seifert, B. & Schultz, R., 2009, A taxonomic revision of the Formica rufibarbis Fabricius, 1793 group (Hymenoptera: Formicidae)., pp. 255-272 in Myrmecologische Nachrichten 12 on page 26
Formica tianshanica Seifert & Schultz 2009, sp. n.
No full textFormica tianshanica sp. n. Derivatio nominis: from Tian Shan, the region of the first finding. Type material examined: Holotype worker plus 4 worker paratypes labelled "KIR: 42.4079° N, 73.7893° E Kap Tshigai valley, R. Schultz 1998.07.16-004" and " Holotype Formica tianshanica Seifert & Schultz " / " Paratype Formica tianshanica Seifert & Schultz ", SMN Görlitz; 3 mounted paratype workers and 10 paratype workers in ethanol, coll. RS. Material examined: 32 samples with 119 workers were subject to a numeric character analysis (Fig. 21): China (28), Kazakhstan (1), Kyrgyzstan (3). For details, see Appendix, as digital supplementary material to this article, at the journal's web pages. Description of worker (Tab. 1, Figs. 9, 16): small Ser-viformica species (CS 1.220 mm). Compared to F. cuni-cularia, head more elongated (CL / CW1.4 1.143), scape slightly shorter (SL / CL1.4 1.057) and petiole narrower (PEW / CS1.4 0.434). Distance between lateral ocelli moderate (OceD / CS1.4 0.165), eyes rather large (EYE / CS1.4 0.299). Frontal triangle finely transversely rippled and with 25 - 40 short pubescence hairs. Eyes with microsetae of 7 -12 μ m maximum length. Total mean of unilateral setae numbers on different body parts predicted for a specimen with CS = 1.4 mm: pronotum 1.7, mesonotum 0.5, flexor profile of hind tibia 0.6. Petiole, posterior margin of head, propodeum, and dorsolateral metapleuron normally without setae. Ventral coxae and gaster tergites with long setae. Dorsal mesonotum in lateral aspect broadly convex. Meta-notal depression of moderate depth. Propodeal dome in profile convex, the basal profile sometimes slightly concave, in smaller specimens more or less linear and horizontal. Dorsal crest of petiole in frontal view bluntly angled in smaller specimens to broadly convex in larger specimens in which the median portion is occasionally linear or weakly excavate. Petiole scale in lateral aspect slender, with convex anterior and more straight posterior profile. Gaster ter-gites with transverse microripples of a significantly larger distance than in F. cunicularia (RipD 6.2 μ m, Fig. 16), increasing from West (W-Tianshan, E-Kazakhstan: 5.7 μ m) to East (Bogda Shan: 6.5 μ m). Dorsum of gaster covered by dense silvery pubescence (sqPDG 3.3). Pubescence on head, mesosoma and petiole less dense, ants appear mildly shining. Posterior vertex, sometimes dorsal promesonotum, coxae, and all appendages normally brown, gaster always dark brown. Other body parts more or less reddish, in the Bogda Shan population more yellowish-brown. Comments on taxonomy: The character combination and overall phenotypic impression of F. tianshanica sp. n. is similar to that of F. cunicularia and F. persica sp. n., and we assume that these species are closely related allopatric and parapatric species. The discrimination, however, seems to be no problem. A three-class DA considering the characters CS, CL / CW1.4, SL / CS1.4, OceD / CS1.4, EYE / CS1.4, PEW / CS1.4, nPN1.4, nMN1.4, nPRME1.4, nPE1.4, nHFFL1.4, RipD1.4, sqPDG1.4, and PIGM 1.4, separated each of the 138 nest samples of these three species with p> 0.97 and 0% error indication in a LOOCV-DA (Fig. 17). The type samples were allocated to the right clusters with the following probabilities: neotype sample of F. cunicu-laria (p = 1.000), the holotype sample of F. cunicularia fuscoides and syntype sample of F. fusca var. rubescens (both p = 1.000, to F. cunicularia), the holotype sample of F. tianshanica sp. n. (p = 0.999) and holotype sample of F. persica sp. n. (p = 0.998). F. tianshanica sp. n. is in no contact with F. persica sp. n. but is sympatric with F. cunicu-laria in the Tarbagatay-Saur Mountains in East Kazakhstan. There seems to exist no reduction of interspecific pheno-typic contrast in this sympatric region but the small sample size available does not allow to really discuss possible interspecific hybridisation. Considerable morphological variation within the F. tianshanica sp. n. population is apparently existing in the gynes: Two gynes from the Tian Shan and Tarbagatay differ from five gynes from the Bogda Shan by larger CS, smaller OceD / CS and EYE / CS, more voluminous meso-somas and lighter colour. The sparse information currently available does not allow to decide if these differences represent a gyne dimorphism (as for instance found in European Formica fusca) or indicate different allopatric species. Since there are no significant differences between the worker populations of Tian Shan and Bogda Shan, we provisionally assume a gyne polymorphism but the problem needs a detailed investigation by integrative taxonomy. 32 samples with 119 workers were subject to a numeric character analysis of 18 characters. China: Bogda Shan (No. 148), 18.IX.2004 [43.869° N, 88.138° E]; Bogda Shan (No. 152), 18.IX.2004 [43.868° N, 88.138° E]; Bogda Shan (No. 166), 19.IX.2004 [43.871° N, 88.143° E]; Bogda Shan (2 samples, No. 173, 174), 19.IX.2004 [43.868° N, 88.143° E]; Bogda Shan (No. 177), 20.IX.2004 [43.864° N, 88.146 E]; Bogda Shan (No. 182), 20.IX.2004 [43.861° N, 88.146° E]; Bogda Shan (No. 186), 20.IX.2004 [43.861° N, 88.144° E]; Bogda Shan (No. 188), 20.IX.2004 [43.852° N, 88.162° E]; Bogda Shan (No. 192), 20.IX.2004 [43.840° N, 88.173° E]; Bogda Shan (No. 193), 20.IX.2004 [43.841° N, 88.173° E]; Bogda Shan (No. 194), 21.IX.2004 [43.821° N, 88.181° E]; Bogda Shan (No. 195), 21.IX.2004 [43.821° N, 88.180° E]; Bogda Shan (No. 196), 21.IX.2004 [43.819° N, 88.186° E]; Bogda Shan (No. 199), 21.IX.2004 [43.817° N, 88.191° E]; Bogda Shan (No. 202), 21.IX.2004 [43.835° N, 88.172° E]; Bogda Shan (No. 206), 22.IX.2004 [43.858° N, 88.177° E]; Bogda Shan (No. 216), 23.IX.2004 [43.868° N, 88.215° E]; Bogda Shan (No. 217), 23.IX.2004 [43.868° N, 88.210° E]; Bogda Shan (2 samples, No. 209, 211), 23.IX.2004 [43.859° N, 88.180° E]; Bogda Shan (2 samples, No. 223, 224), 23.IX.2004 [43.859° N, 88.175° E]; Bogda Shan (2 samples, No. 230, 233), 23.IX.2004 [43.859° N, 88.174° E]; Bogda Shan (No. 236), 25.IX.2004 [43.923° N, 88.233° E]; Bogda Shan (No. 252), 25.IX.2004 [43.943° N, 88.173° E]; Bogda Shan (No. 258), 26.IX.2004 [43.936° N, 88.106° E]. Kazakhstan: Saur, 25.VII.2001 [47.357° N, 85.518° E]. Kyrgyzstan: Kara Bura, 29.VII.1998 [42.250° N, 71.549° E]; Kap Tshigai vall. (samples No. 3, 4: type), 16.VII.1998 [42.408° N, 73.789° E]. Distribution and biology: Only known from mountain areas of the Turkestanian floristic subregion (Tian Shan, Tarbagatay-Saur, Bogda Shan). Range between 71° and 89° E and 42° and 47° N. Apparently rare in regions with competing montane and subalpine Serviformica species as observed in the Tian Shan, Tarbagatay and Quin Ling Shan. In contrast, very abundant in the Bogda Shan where these competitors are missing, occupying here a wide altitudinal range from 1380 to 3010 metres. This correlates with variable habitat selection in Bogda Shan: it was found here in pastures of any kind above and below the tree line, in open rural areas, in clear-cuttings of former Picea forest, in habitat mosaics of grassland, Picea and Juniperus and in light Picea forests.Published as part of Seifert, B. & Schultz, R., 2009, A taxonomic revision of the Formica rufibarbis Fabricius, 1793 group (Hymenoptera: Formicidae)., pp. 255-272 in Myrmecologische Nachrichten 12 on pages 21-26
Formica persica Seifert & Schultz 2009, sp. n.
No full textFormica persica sp. n. Derivatio nominis: from Persia - the terra typica of this species. Type material examined: Holotype worker plus 6 worker paratypes (4 stored in ethanol) labelled "IRAN: 36.767° N, 54.567° E, Tuskestan forest, 900 m Juniperus forest O. Paknia 2005.09.23-517" and " Holotype Formica persica Seifert & Schultz " / " Paratype Formica persica Seifert & Schultz "; SMN Görlitz. Material examined: 20 samples with 54 workers from Iran were subject to a numeric analysis of 18 characters (Fig. 20). For details. see Appendix, as digital supplementary material to this article, at the journal's web pages. 20 samples with 54 workers from Iran were subject to a numeric analysis of 18 characters. Iran: Tuskestan forest (type), 23.IX.2005 [36.767° N, 54.567° E]; Chorteh, 8.VII.1973 [36.767° N, 50.583° E]; Dela-restagh vill., 13.VII.2004 [36.400° N, 52.535° E]; Golestan N.P., 29.V.2004 [37.383° N, 55.767° E]; Golestan N.P., 14. V.2007 [37.367° N, 55.817° E]; Golestan N.P., 11.VI.2008 [37.398° N, 55.798° E]; Golestan N.P., 11.VI.2008 [37.388° N, 55.804° E]; Golestan N.P., 14.VI.2008 [37.383° N, 55.817° E]; Asalem, 26.VI.1973 [38.400° N, 48.600° E]; Mazandaran, 30.07.2007 [36.170° N, 53.215° E]; Nowshahr, 25.VI.2008 [36.601° N, 51.585° E]; Abpari forest, 27.VI.2008 [36.502° N, 51.932° E]; Abpari forest, 27.VI.2008 [36.501° N, 51.982° E]; Talesh (2 samples, No. 3400, 3454), 6.VII.2008 [37.617° N, 48.744° E]; Talesh, 6.VII.2008 [37.681° N, 48.834° E]; Talesh, 7.VII.2008 [37.679° N, 48.808° E]; Talesh, 7.VII. 2008 [37.705° N, 48.887° E]; Talesh, Alasem r., 9.VII.2008 [37.681° N, 48.834° E]; Tehran, Pol-e-Zanguleh, 12.VII. 1973 [36.217° N, 51.317° E]. Description of worker (Tab. 1, Fig. 10): medium-sized Serviformica species (CS 1.332 mm), head and scape much longer than in F. cunicularia (CL / CW1.4 1.162, SL / CS1.4 1.152). Petiole rather wide (PEW / CS1.4 0.450). Distance between lateral ocelli moderate (OceD / CS1.4 0.162), eye medium-sized (EYE / CS1.4 0.297). Clypeus with sharp median keel and fine longitudinal microcarinulae. Frontal triangle finely transversely rippled and with 45 - 85 short pubescence hairs. Eyes with microsetae of 9 μ m maximum length. Pronotum, mesonotum, petiole, flexor profile of hind tibia, posterior margin of head, propodeum, and dorso-lateral metapleuron normally without setae. Ventral coxae with long setae, setae on dorsum of first gaster tergite sometimes lacking. Dorsal mesonotum in lateral aspect broadly convex, but in small ants flatter. Metanotal depression in larger specimens deep, in small specimens shallow. Propo-deal dome in profile obtuse-angled or rounded. Dorsal crest of petiole in frontal view convex, sometimes obtuse-angled. Petiole scale in lateral aspect slender, with convex anterior and more straight posterior profile. Mean distance of transverse microripples on dorsum of gaster larger than in F. cunicularia (RipD 5.8 μ m). Gaster covered by a dense silvery pubescence (sqPDG 3.3). Pubescence on head, me-sosoma and petiole less dense, ants appear somewhat shiny. Posterior vertex, often dorsal promesonotum, coxae, and all appendages brown, gaster always dark brown. Other body parts yellowish-reddish. Comments on taxonomy: The clear separation of F. tianshanica sp. n. from F. cunicularia and F. persica sp. n. has already been stated above (Fig. 17). It is unknown if there are contact areas with the Anatolian and Caucasian population of F. cunicularia. Distribution and biology: So far, only known from the North Iranian region of the Elburs Mountains between 48.5° to 56° E and 36.2° to 38.4° N, in a region with much precipitation (600 - 1500 mm per year). Altitudinal range from sea level up to 2300 metres. Occurs in highly diverse habitats from steppe, human settlements, rural areas, river sides, and frequently inside of forests. The forest sites are below 1000 metres and include deciduous and Juniperus forests.Published as part of Seifert, B. & Schultz, R., 2009, A taxonomic revision of the Formica rufibarbis Fabricius, 1793 group (Hymenoptera: Formicidae)., pp. 255-272 in Myrmecologische Nachrichten 12 on pages 268-26
Neoceratodontidae Schultz 1948
No full textFamily Neoceratodontidae Schultz 1948 Neoceratodontidae Schultz in Schultz with Stern 1948:227 [ref. 31938] (family) Neoceratodus [genus inferred from the stem, Article 11.7.1.1; name only, but used as valid by Miles 1977:308 [ref. 32643] Article 13.2.1]Published as part of Laan, Richard Van Der, Eschmeyer, William N. & Fricke, Ronald, 2014, Family-group names of Recent fishes, pp. 1-230 in Zootaxa 3882 (2) on page 135, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3882.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/704777
[Frankenheim in der Rhön] / von Otto Schultz, Pfarrer.
No full text[FRANKENHEIM IN DER RHÖN] / VON OTTO SCHULTZ, PFARRER.
[Frankenheim in der Rhön] / von Otto Schultz, Pfarrer. (1)
Cover (1)
Widmung (10)
No I. Frankenheim auf der Rhön, in ca. 1000 m. Entfernung von S gesehen. (12)
No II. Frankenheim auf der Rhön, von W gesehen. (14)
No III. Die Pfarrkirche in Frankenheim. (16)
No IV. Das Pfarrhaus ... / No V. Die III. Schule in Frankenheim. (18)
No VI. Die II. Schule ... / No VII. Die I. Schule in Frankenheim. (20)
No VIII. Das Gemeindehaus Carolinenheim, von N gesehen. / No IX. ... von O gesehen. (22)
No X. Die Kinderbewahranstalt zu Frankenheim. / No XI. Die Sophienhöhe mit dem "S". (24)
No XII. Spritzenhaus mit Steigerturm. / No XIII. Die Dümmlerschen Fabrikgebäude. (26)
No XIV. Der Ellenbogen bei Frankenheim. / No XV. Die Miethäuser der Jubiläumsstiftung. (28)
Beschreibende Erläuterung vorstehender Ansichten. (29
Bagreinae Schultz 1944
No full textSubfamily Bagreinae Schultz 1944 Bagreidae Schultz 1944a:182 [ref. 3959] (family) BagrePublished as part of Laan, Richard Van Der, Eschmeyer, William N. & Fricke, Ronald, 2014, Family-group names of Recent fishes, pp. 1-230 in Zootaxa 3882 (2) on page 52, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3882.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/704777
On master test plans for the space of BV functions
No full textNobili F, Pasqualetto E, Schultz T. On master test plans for the space of BV functions. Advances in Calculus of Variations . 2022.We prove that on an arbitrary metric measure space a countable collection of test plans is sufficient to recover all BV functions and their total variation measures. In the setting of non-branching CD(K, N) spaces (with finite reference measure), we can additionally require these test plans to be concentrated on geodesics
Ctenoluciidae Schultz 1944
No full textFamily Ctenoluciidae Schultz 1944 Xiphostomi Swainson 1838:259 [ref. 4302] (no family-group name) Xiphostominae Boulenger 1904b:576 [ref. 31880] (subfamily) Xiphostoma Agassiz [stem corrected to Xiphostomat- by Regan 1911e:20 [ref. 3642], confirmed by Myers & Storey 1956:27 [ref. 32831] and by Lindberg 1971:84 [ref. 27211]; invalid, Article 39] Ctenolucinae Schultz 1944b:258, 259 [ref. 3960] (subfamily) Ctenolucius [stem emended to Ctenoluci- by Fowler 1950:327 [ref. 18869], confirmed by Lindberg 1971:84 [ref. 27211], by Géry 1972b:50, 64 [ref. 1594] and by Vari 1995:41 [ref. 21840]] Spixostomatidae Whitley 1951b:407 [ref. 4715] (family) Spixostoma [replacement name for Xiphostomidae]Published as part of Laan, Richard Van Der, Eschmeyer, William N. & Fricke, Ronald, 2014, Family-group names of Recent fishes, pp. 1-230 in Zootaxa 3882 (2) on page 46, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3882.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/704777
[P,P-Di-tert-butyl-N-trimethylsilyl-\ud P-(trimethylsilylamino)phosphineimidato-N,N]bis(pyridine-N)-\ud lithium(I)
No full textIn the title compound, [Li(C14H36N2PSi2)(C5H5N)2], the bulky chelating monoanionic P,P-di-tert-butyl-N-trimethylsilyl-P-(trimethylsilylamino)phosphine imidate ligand and two pyridine ligands bind to Li in a pseudo-tetrahedral arrangement with twofold symmetry. The Li-N [phosphine]distance is 2.048 (5) Å, while the LiP distance is 2.520 (6)
- …
