323,138 research outputs found
The EU's socio-economic model(s) and the crisi(e)s - any perspectives?
The paper discusses the question how the EU's socio-economic models pursued in the past will fare in an on-going economic crisis. It discusses the notion of the EU socio-economic model, since what has been debated as EU social model was always inextricably linked to economic policy. The section argues that such a socio-economic model constitutes a programmatic vision common to the EU and its Member States in spite of the diversity of its concretisations at national levels. This vision has always been underpinned by values expressed in the EU Treaties, a normative base that has been strengthened through successive Treaty reforms, and particularly by the Treaty of Lisbon. EU can fulfil its normative commitment to a socio-economic model that does not, in fact, prioritise the economic side of things. Uncovering a confusing mix of socio-economic governance, it concludes that hard law and resulting judicial governance and so called “new governance” through targets that are not legally binding do not necessarily differ in efficiency. However, hard law, legislative competences and “new governance” instruments tend to be more efficient in contributing to the economic aspects of the EU socio-economic model than in relation to the social ones. The paper thus concludes that much needs to be done to reconcile the EU's normative aspirations (which are enshrined in its legal base) with the practical development of its socio-economic model. First published as CELLS working paper at the University of Leeds, the paper also constitutes the first chapter of Schiek (ed) The EU Economic and Social Model in the Global Crisis (Farnham: Ashgate 2013). This is the penultimate version, before some smaller editorial changes were made for printing.<br/
Constitutional Principles and Horizontal Effect: Kücükdeveci revisited
Analyses the European Court of Justice ruling in Kucukdeveci v Swedex GmbH & Co KG (C-555/07) on whether the German Civil Code s.622, providing that an employee's length of service before the age of 25 was irrelevant to the calculation of the minimum notice period to be provided before redundancy dismissal, breached the prohibition of age discrimination deriving either from Directive 2000/78 or the general principles of EU law. Considers the extent to which the ruling clarifies Mangold v Helm (C-144/04) on the effects of Directives expressing constitutional principles in horizontal cases
Der Umgang mit Nichtwissen in Worten (qualitative Befunde)
Wilkesmann M, Schiek D, Steden S. Der Umgang mit Nichtwissen in Worten (qualitative Befunde). In: Wilkesmann M, Steden S, eds. Nichtwissen stört mich (nicht). Zum Umgang mit Nichtwissen in Medizin und Pflege. Wiesbaden: Springer VS; 2019: 163-216
Herausforderungen von Online-Erhebungen am Beispiel asynchroner Gruppendiskussionen. Ergebnisse eines Methodenexperiments.
Ullrich CG, Schiek D. Herausforderungen von Online-Erhebungen am Beispiel asynchroner Gruppendiskussionen. Ergebnisse eines Methodenexperiments. . In: Lessenich S, ed. Geschlossene Gesellschaften. Verhandlungen des 38. Kongresses der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Soziologie in Bamberg 2016. Essen: Deutsche Gesellschaft für Soziologie; 2017
Methodische Überlegungen zur Erhebung von Nichtwissen
Wilkesmann M, Schiek D. Methodische Überlegungen zur Erhebung von Nichtwissen. In: Wilkesmann M, Steden S, eds. Nichtwissen stört mich (nicht). Zum Umgang mit Nichtwissen in Medizin und Pflege. Wiesbaden: Springer VS; 2019: 151-162
Von Generation zu Generation? Armutskarrieren aus familiengeschichtlicher Perspektive
Schiek D, Ullrich CG. Von Generation zu Generation? Armutskarrieren aus familiengeschichtlicher Perspektive. In: Lessenich S, ed. Geschlossene Gesellschaften. Verhandlungen des 38. Kongresses der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Soziologie in Bamberg 2016. Essen: Deutsche Gesellschaft für Soziologie; 2017
Führt die Bewältigung konjunktureller Krisen durch Recalls auch zu persönlichen Krisen?
Hense A, Schiek D. Führt die Bewältigung konjunktureller Krisen durch Recalls auch zu persönlichen Krisen? In: Lessenich S, ed. Routinen der Krise - Krise der Routinen. Verhandlungen des 37. Kongresses der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Soziologie in Trier 2014. Verhandlungen des .. Kongresses der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Soziologie . Vol 37. Deutsche Gesellschaft für Soziologie: Essen; 2015
The EU’s socio-economic model(s) and the crisi(e)s – any perspectives?
The paper discusses the question how the EU's socio-economic models pursued in the past will fare in an on-going economic crisis. It discusses the notion of the EU socio-economic model, since what has been debated as EU social model was always inextricably linked to economic policy. The section argues that such a socio-economic model constitutes a programmatic vision common to the EU and its Member States in spite of the diversity of its concretisations at national levels. This vision has always been underpinned by values expressed in the EU Treaties, a normative base that has been strengthened through successive Treaty reforms, and particularly by the Treaty of Lisbon. EU can fulfil its normative commitment to a socio-economic model that does not, in fact, prioritise the economic side of things. Uncovering a confusing mix of socio-economic governance, it concludes that hard law and resulting judicial governance and so called “new governance” through targets that are not legally binding do not necessarily differ in efficiency. However, hard law, legislative competences and “new governance” instruments tend to be more efficient in contributing to the economic aspects of the EU socio-economic model than in relation to the social ones. The paper thus concludes that much needs to be done to reconcile the EU's normative aspirations (which are enshrined in its legal base) with the practical development of its socio-economic model. First published as CELLS working paper at the University of Leeds, the paper also constitutes the first chapter of Schiek (ed) The EU Economic and Social Model in the Global Crisis (Farnham: Ashgate 2013). This is the penultimate version, before some smaller editorial changes were made for printing.<br/
Diffusive author(s), cohesive author: Analysis of S/N (1994)
This study indicates the ways in which various aspects of the author(s) are brought forth in Dumb type’s performance art, the S/N production. Previous research has suggested a non-hierarchical organization of Dumb type and the absence of a “privileged author” in Dumb type’s collaborative work, S/N. However, the results that I have investigated from member’s interviews on the creative process of S/N along with my analysis of the recorded images of S/N, indicate a different aspect of the author(s). First, S/N was created through, so to speak, the collective ideas of the members of Dumb type. Further, S/N has at least nine quotations from previous performances, installations, and printed writings, besides the work-in-progress technique. Explicating one of the “author functions” as given by Michel Foucault, each text has plural subjects of the author. However, it has been revealed from members’ interviews that Teiji Furuhashi had a decision-making role in selecting the members’ ideas within the performance. Since then, S/N has had plural subjects of creation; however, Furuhashi is one of the subjects of creation along with the “privileged author.” S/N has plural authors (diffusive authors) yet at the same time, it has a “privileged author,” Teiji Furuhashi (cohesive author)
- …
