196,396 research outputs found
Hydroporus kraatzii Schaum 1868
No full text<i>Hydroporus kraatzii</i> Schaum, 1868 <p> <i>Hydroporus kraatzii</i> Schaum, 1868 in KRAATZ (1868: 384) (original description).</p> <p> <i>Hydroporus kraatzii</i> Schaum, 1868 in SCHAUM & KIESENWETTER (1868: 66), <b>syn. nov.</b> (objective junior synonym and primary homonym, preoccupied by <i>H. kraatzii</i> Schaum, 1868 in KRAATZ (1868: 384); synonymy personally communicated by A. N. Nilsson, Umeå, Sweden).</p> <p> <i>Hydroporus kraatzii</i> Schaum, 1868 in SCHAUM & KIESENWETTER (1868: 66): SHARP (1882: 481) – NILSSON & HOLMEN (1995: 67) – NILSSON (2009a: 146).</p> <p> <i>Hydroporus kraatzi</i> Kiesenwetter, 1868: GEMMINGER & HAROLD (1868: 435) (incorrect authorship, referring to <i>H. kraatzii</i> Schaum, 1868 in SCHAUM & KIESENWETTER (1868)).</p> <p> <i>Hydroporus kraatzi</i> Schaum, 1868: ZIMMERMANN (1919: 169, 1920: 88, 1931: 153). – SCHAEFLEIN (1971: 38).</p> <p> <i>Hydroporus hedwigi</i> Reitter, 1897: 45: ZIMMERMANN (1919: 169) (synonymy with <i>H. kraatzii</i>). – NILSSON (2007: 51).</p> <p> <i>Hydroporus hedwigae</i> Schenkling, 1917: 52 (unjustified emendation of <i>H. hedwigi</i> Reitter): NILSSON (2007: 51) (synonymy).</p> <p> <b>Type locality.</b> Poland, ‘ Glatzer Schneeberg’ [‘Schneeberg’ = ‘snow mountain’; this mountain is called Králický Sněžník in Czech and Śnieżnik Kłodzki in Polish]. The border between the Czech Republic and Poland runs exactly across the peak of the mountain. The co-ordinates of the ‘ Glatzer Schneeberg’ are given in Wikipedia (access January 2009) as 50.201N 16.849E. According to KRAATZ (1968: 384), Kraatz himself collected at least some specimens on the northern slope of the ‘Glatzer Schneeberg’. It is therefore more likely that the type locality is in Poland and not in the Czech Republic.</p> <p> <b>Type material.</b> LECTOTYPE (by present designation): J, a small rectangular dark blue label, ‘Type’ [hw Cl. Müller], ‘Glatzer Schneebg’ [hw Cl. Müller], ‘Type von Hydr. Kraatzi Schaum’ [red, hw?], ‘ Lectotype, Hydroporus kraatzii Schaum, 1868, des. H. Fery 2009 ’ [red, printed] (ZSM).</p> <p> <b>Notes on the type material.</b> According to HORN et al. (1990: 345) and SCHERER (1982: 60), at least parts of Schaum’s Hydroporinae came ‘via E. A. H. v. Kiesenwetter, via Cl. Müller’ to the ZSM in 1905. It is known from other Schaum’s types that at least some of them were provided with a small rectangular dark blue label and/or that Clemens Müller, owing to his knowledge about the origin of the specimens, added labels in his own handwriting (see FERY 1992a: 67, 1992b: 119, 1992c: 343, 351; FERY et al. 1996: 315; FERY & BRANCUCCI 1997: 247). Thus, I have no doubt that the designated lectotype is a (former) syntype of <i>H. kraatzii</i> Schaum, 1868.</p> <p> HORION (1941: 393) reported that ‘types’ should be stored in the Deutsches Entomologisches Institut (DEI). However, DÖBLER (1976) did not list any types of <i>H. kraatzii</i> in the collections of the DEI and I have not been able to find such specimens during several visits at that institute.</p> <p> The first publication of the name <i>Hydroporus kraatzii</i> (KRAATZ 1868: 384) cites the species as ‘ <i>Hydroporus Kraatzii</i> Schaum n. sp. in litt.’ Although the author of that work is Kraatz, the authorship of the taxon must be assigned to Schaum because he is cited as the author. In addition, the taxon was described by Schaum a second time in SCHAUM & KIESENWETTER (1868: 66) (compare Article 50.1.1 including the Example in ICZN 1999).</p>Published as part of <i>Fery, Hans, 2009, New species of the Hydroporus longulus-group from Iran, Armenia and Turkey with a synopsis of the group (Coleoptera: Dytiscidae), pp. 529-558 in Acta Entomologica Musei Nationalis Pragae 49 (2)</i> on pages 550-551, DOI: <a href="http://zenodo.org/record/5320178">10.5281/zenodo.5320178</a>
Trigonopeltastes geometricus Schaum 1841
No full textTrigonopeltastes geometricus Schaum in Burmeister & Schaum, 1841 Trigonopeltastes geometrica Schaum: Howden 1968: 43-45 (re-description; distribution). Distribution: MEXICO: Campeche: Ensenada (Howden 1968); San Luis Potosi: 5 mi W Xilitla (Howden 1968); Veracruz: Almolonga; Atoyac; Coatepec; Cordoba; El Fortín; Jalapa; (San Rafael); Jicaltepec; Lago Catemaco (Howden 1968). BELIZE [= British Honduras]: M-tee (= Mananatee?) District (Howden 1968). COSTA RICA: Cartago: TurriLABA (Howden 1968); Limon: Reventazon, Hamburg Farm (Howden 1968). GUATEMALA: Alta Verapaz: Finca San Juan (Howden 1968, Orozco 2012). COLOMBIA: San Antonio, Berlin collection (Howden 1968, Howden & Joly 1998). VENEZUELA: Aragua: Rancho Grande, Portachuelo, 1100 m; Tiara (Howden & Joly 1998). ECUADOR: Banos, Paris collection (Howden 1968, Howden & Joly 1998). BOLIVIA: Cochabamba: Pcia. Chapare (Howden & Joly 1998). Lectotype (examined) Lectotype, here designated: MEXICO: 1 ex. syntype [HBBA], “ geometricus / Burm. / Mexico ” [handwritten by Burmeister, pinned to the bottom of the drawer], “ Trigonopeltastes / geometricus / Schaum / Syntypus [handwritten by A. Bachmann] / Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales [printed]” on red paper, black frame, “ Trigonopeltastes / geometricus / Schaum in Burm. & Schaum, 1841 / Lectotypus / Di Iorio desig. 2013” [handwritten by Di Iorio, red paper]. Material examined: BOLIVIA: Nor-Yungas, Nigrillani, Williner leg., I-1949, 1 ex. [ODIC], “ Trigonopeltastes / sp. / A. Martínez det. 1951”, I-1950, 2 exx. [ODIC]. Note 1: Howden (1968) and Howden & Joly (1998) state that the location of the type of T. geometricus is uncertain, and that the specimen labeled as “type” in MNHN is not the species described by Schaum nor figured by Burmeister (1846: 34, Fig. 2). Trigonopeltastes geometricus was described by Schaum (1841 in Burmeister & Schaum 1841) from “Vaterland: Mexico. Ein Pärchen aus Dupont’s Sammlung, ein Weibchen aus der des Hrn. Sommer” (making a total of three syntypes), and later it was re-described by Burmeister (1842) from “ Mexico, von Herrn Dupont”, “ ♂ ♀ ”. The specimen in the Burmeister Collection is considered here as one specimen of the syntypical series as it matches with the data given by Schaum (1841 in Burmeister & Schaum 1841) and Burmeister (1842). Therefore, this specimen is designated here as the lectotype of T. geometricus. Note 2: The record of T. geometricus from Colombia (Howden & Joly 1998) was omitted in Suárez-G. & Amat-García (2007).Published as part of Iorio, Osvaldo Di, 2013, A review of the Cetoniinae (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) from Argentina and adjacent countries: systematics and geographic distributions, pp. 1-87 in Zootaxa 3668 (1) on page 83, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3668.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/526623
Lissogenius Schaum 1844
No full textGenus Lissogenius Schaum, 1844 The genus was not revised and has seven recognized species (Krajcik 2008b). The species of this genus are myrmecophilous. There is only one species recorded for Guinea-Bissau (Janson 1907).Published as part of Serrano, Artur R. M., 2022, The rose chafers (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Cetoniinae) of Guinea-Bissau: an annotated checklist and new records, pp. 151-195 in Zootaxa 5104 (2) on page 171, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5104.2.1, http://zenodo.org/record/628069
Lissogenius planicollis Schaum 1844
No full textLissogenius planicollis Schaum, 1844 Distribution: GBI, GUI. Distribution in Guinea-Bissau (Administrative Regions): 1) BOL. Historic records: — Bolama (BOL) (Janson 1907). Material examined: none. Remarks. The species is only known from GBI and GUI ((Brivio 1958; Schoolmeesters 2019). The GBI record is based in a singleton from Bolama collected by Leonardo Fea. Basilewsky (1956) provided some ecological remarks on Lissogenius. Biological data are not available for this species.Published as part of Serrano, Artur R. M., 2022, The rose chafers (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Cetoniinae) of Guinea-Bissau: an annotated checklist and new records, pp. 151-195 in Zootaxa 5104 (2) on pages 171-172, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5104.2.1, http://zenodo.org/record/628069
Myodermum Burmeister & Schaum 1840
No full textGenus Myodermum Burmeister & Schaum, 1840 The genus was not revised. Ricchiardi & Gyll (2009) provided some preliminary notes for its revision. These authors listed seventeen valid species, but Schoolmeesters (2019) recognizes nineteen species. One of them was recorded for Guinea-Bissau (Brivio 1958).Published as part of Serrano, Artur R. M., 2022, The rose chafers (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Cetoniinae) of Guinea-Bissau: an annotated checklist and new records, pp. 151-195 in Zootaxa 5104 (2) on page 183, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5104.2.1, http://zenodo.org/record/628069
Clastocnemis Burmeister & Schaum 1840
No full textGenus <i>Clastocnemis</i> Burmeister & Schaum, 1840 <p>The genus was not revised. There are nine recognized species (Antoine 2005b; Krajcik 2008a; Schoolmeesters 2019), one of them recorded for Guinea-Bissau (Brivio 1958).</p>Published as part of <i>Serrano, Artur R. M., 2022, The rose chafers (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Cetoniinae) of Guinea-Bissau: an annotated checklist and new records, pp. 151-195 in Zootaxa 5104 (2)</i> on page 181, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5104.2.1, <a href="http://zenodo.org/record/6280698">http://zenodo.org/record/6280698</a>
Bembidion mixtum Schaum 1863
No full textBembidion mixtum Schaum, 1863 Material examined. GRNR: 2409 m: 06. VI.2014, HP, 1 ♂. MGD: 2616 m: 24.II.2014, LT, 1 ♂. Distribution: SAR species that is found in the extreme northeastern Africa (EG), Levant (PS, SY) and southwestern Arabian Peninsula (SA, YE). Life forms and Remarks. ZS(C)SL species. Recently this species was reported to occur at the Dam of Tamniyah (Asir Province) at an elevation of 2301 m (Bonavita et al. 2016). The adults were collected from the African pencil cedar forest in the GRNR and outside the Park.Published as part of Abdel-Dayem, Mahmoud S., Rasool, Iftekhar, Elgharbawy, Ali A., Nagel, Peter & Aldhafer, Hathal M., 2018, Faunistic inventory and zoogeographical analysis of the ground beetles (Coleoptera, Carabidae) of Garf Raydah Nature Reserve, Southwestern of Saudi Arabia, and description of a new species of Paussinae, pp. 341-371 in Zootaxa 4514 (3) on page 362, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4514.3.3, http://zenodo.org/record/377023
Clastocnemis Burmeister & Schaum 1840
No full textGenus Clastocnemis Burmeister & Schaum, 1840 The genus was not revised. There are five recognized species (Antoine 2005b; Krajcik 2008a; Schoolmeesters 2018), one of them recorded for Angola (Harold 1879).Published as part of Serrano, Artur R. M., Capela, Rúben A., Nunes, Telmo & Santos, Carmen Van-Dú- Nem Neto, 2020, The rose chafers (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Cetoniinae) of Angola: a descriptive checklist with new records and synonymic notes, pp. 1-130 in Zootaxa 4776 (1) on page 115, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4776.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/382128
Scaptobius Schaum 1841
No full textGenus Scaptobius Schaum, 1841 The genus was revised by Schein (1957) which recognized ten species. Later Holm & Marais (1992) and Krajcik (2008b) added one more species. The species of this genus are myrmecophylous. There is one species recorded for Angola (Schein 1957).Published as part of Serrano, Artur R. M., Capela, Rúben A., Nunes, Telmo & Santos, Carmen Van-Dú- Nem Neto, 2020, The rose chafers (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Cetoniinae) of Angola: a descriptive checklist with new records and synonymic notes, pp. 1-130 in Zootaxa 4776 (1) on page 66, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4776.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/382128
Discopeltis concinna Schaum 1844
No full text* Discopeltis concinna Schaum, 1844 (Fig. 4a) Distribution: GAM, GBI, RCI, SEN, TOG. Distribution in Guinea-Bissau (Administrative Regions): 2) GAB. Historic records: None. Material examined: Béli (11º 49´38.60´´ N, 13º 55´34.36´´ W, 76m alt.) (GAB), 3.VII.2009, 1♂, 1♀, DO, A. Serrano leg., ASC. Remarks. The species was described from Senegambia, but Holm (1991) stated it as a western African subspecies of D. tricolor Burmeister, 1842. Recently was considered as valid by Beinhundner (2017). See also the remarks under P. cordata. Biological and ecological data are not available for this species. It is a new species record for Guinea-Bissau.Published as part of Serrano, Artur R. M., 2022, The rose chafers (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Cetoniinae) of Guinea-Bissau: an annotated checklist and new records, pp. 151-195 in Zootaxa 5104 (2) on page 165, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5104.2.1, http://zenodo.org/record/628069
- …
