1,721,034 research outputs found

    CCES 2014 Supplemental Data

    No full text
    Supplemental datasets including race/ethnicity of House candidates and incumbents for the 2014 Cooperative Congressional Election Study

    Replication Data for: Optimizing the Measurement of Sexism in Political Surveys

    No full text
    Political scientists are paying increasing attention to understanding the role of sexist attitudes on predicting vote choices and opinions on issues. However, the research in this area measures sexist attitudes with a variety of different items and scales. In this paper, I evaluate some of the most prominent contemporary measures of sexism and develop an approach for identifying optimal items based on (1) convergent validity, (2) predictive validity, and (3) distance from politics. I find that a subset of items from the hostile sexism scale exhibit the most desirable measurement properties and I conclude by recommending a simple 2- to 5-item reduced hostile sexism battery that will allow scholars to efficiently, validly, and consistently measure sexism

    DFP Covid-19 Response Weekly Tracking Poll

    No full text
    This is data from periodic tracking polls conducted in collaboration with Data for Progress to track how Americans evaluated the government's response to the COVID-19 pandemic and economic crisis. The Data for Progress COVID-19 tracking poll was fielded regularly using respondents recruited via Lucid. Each week's survey includes interviews with approximately 800 - 1200 respondents. Post-stratification weights are implemented to make each week’s sample nationally representative of American adults and American registered voters by gender, age, region, education, race, the interaction of education and race, and previous presidential vote

    CCES 2014 Supplemental Data

    No full text
    Supplemental datasets including race/ethnicity of House candidates and incumbents for the 2014 Cooperative Congressional Election Study

    Replication Data for: Misinformation or Expressive Responding? What an inauguration crowd can tell us about the source of political misinformation in surveys

    No full text
    Code and data to reproduce findings from: Brian F. Schaffner and Samantha C. Luks. 2018. “Misinformation or Expressive Responding? What an inauguration crowd can tell us about the source of political misinformation in surveys." Public Opinion Quarterly Vol. 82(1), pp.135-147

    CCES, Common Content, 2015

    No full text
    2015 Cooperative Congressional Election Study Common Content data and questionnaire

    2017 CCES Common Content

    No full text
    2017 Cooperative Congressional Election Study Common Content data and questionnaire

    2017 CCES Common Content

    No full text
    2017 Cooperative Congressional Election Study Common Content data and questionnaire

    CCES Common Content, 2014

    No full text
    Common Content for the 2014 Cooperative Congressional Election Study

    2010-2014 Cooperative Congressional Election Study Panel Survey

    No full text
    Panel survey of 9,500 American adults conducted during the 2010, 2012, and 2014 election cycles
    corecore