396 research outputs found

    Amarillo National Resource Center for Plutonium

    No full text
    This report was prepared with the support of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Cooperative Agreement No. DEFC04 -95AL85832. However, any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of DOE. This work was conducted through the Amarillo National Resource Center for Plutonium. This page intentionally left blank. ANRCP-1999-14 AMARILLO NATIONAL RESOURCE CENTER FOR PLUTONIUM/ A HIGHER EDUCATION CONSORTIUM A Report on Recharge Monitoring in an Interplaya Setting Bridget R. Scanlon, Robert C. Reedy, and Jinhuo Liang Bureau of Economic Geology The University of Texas at Austin Austin, Texas 78712 Submitted for publication to ANRC Environmental Program March 1999 This page intentionally left blank. i

    The food-energy-water nexus: Transforming science for society

    No full text
    Emerging interdisciplinary science efforts are providing new understanding of the interdependence of food, energy, and water (FEW) systems. These science advances, in turn, provide critical information for coordinated management to improve the affordability, reliability, and environmental sustainability of FEW systems. Here we describe the current state of the FEW nexus and approaches to managing resource conflicts through reducing demand and increasing supplies, storage, and transport. Despite significant advances within the past decade, there are still many challenges for the scientific community. Key challenges are the need for interdisciplinary science related to the FEW nexus; ground-based monitoring and modeling at local-to-regional scales; incorporating human and institutional behavior in models; partnerships among universities, industry, and government to develop policy relevant data; and systems modeling to evaluate trade-offs associated with FEW decisions

    Use of flow modeling to assess sustainability of groundwater resources in the North China Plain

    No full text
    The North China Plain (NCP) is one of the global hotspots of groundwater depletion. Currently, our understanding is limited on spatiotemporal variability in depletion and approaches toward more sustainable groundwater development in this region. This study was intended to simulate spatiotemporal variability in groundwater depletion across the entire NCP and explore approaches to reduce future depletion. Simulated predevelopment groundwater recharge (similar to 13 km(3)/yr) primarily discharged as base flow to rivers and evapotranspiration. Initial groundwater storage was estimated to be 1500 km(3) of drainable storage in shallow aquifers and 40 km(3) of compressive storage in deep aquifers. Simulated groundwater depletion from 1960s to 2008 averaged similar to 4 km(3)/yr. Cumulative depletion was 50 km(3) (similar to 20% of pumpage) in the piedmont district, 103 km(3) (similar to 20%) in the central plain, and 5 km(3) (12%) in the coastal plain. However, depletion varied with time: similar to 2.5 km(3)/yr in the 1970s, similar to 4.0 in the 1980s, similar to 2.0 in 1990-1996; similar to 7.0 in 1997-2001, and similar to 4.0 in 2002-2008. Recharge also varied spatially, averaging similar to 120 mm/yr and concentrated in the piedmont district (200-350 mm/yr) while lower in the central and coastal plains (50-100 mm/yr). Simulation of several alternatives, including managed aquifer recharge, increased water use efficiency, brackish water use, and interbasin water transfer, indicated that the combination of these strategies could be used to recover groundwater storage by 50 km(3) over a 15-year period. This study provides valuable insights for developing more sustainable groundwater management options for the NCP; the methods are useful for managing other depleted aquifers. Citation: Cao, G., C. Zheng, B. R. Scanlon, J. Liu, and W. Li (2013), Use of flow modeling to assess sustainability of groundwater resources in the North China Plain, Water Resour. Res., 49, doi:10.1029/2012WR011899.Environmental SciencesLimnologyWater ResourcesSCI(E)EI23ARTICLE1159-1754

    Author Correction: Global water resources and the role of groundwater in a resilient water future

    No full text
    In the version of this article originally published, reference 9 was incorrectly cited in the last sentence of the second paragraph under ‘Introduction’ and in the first sentence of the second paragraph under the ‘Water scarcity’ subsection. Scanlon et al. (Environ. Res. Lett. https://doi.org/ 10.1088/1748-9326/ac3bfc, 2022) was incorrectly cited in the last sentence under ‘Drivers of water-resource variability’ but is now replaced with reference 38, and Figure 3 was wrongly stated to be adapted from reference 19 instead of reference 36. Reference 40 was mistakenly cited in the last sentence of the second paragraph under the ‘Increasing water access and supplies’ subsection, and reference 37 was inadvertently duplicated in the reference list. References 28 (now reading ‘Winter, T. C., Harvey, J. W., Franke, O. L. and Alley, W. M. Ground Water and Surface Water: A Single Resource. Circular 1139 (United States Geological Survey, 1998)’) and 94 (now reading ‘Scanlon, B. R., Reedy, R. C., Faunt, C. C., Pool, D. and Uhlman, K. Enhancing drought resilience with conjunctive use and managed aquifer recharge in California and Arizona. Environ. Res. Lett. 11, 035013 (2016)’) initially referred to incorrect sources. Lastly, the name of author Hannes Müller Schmied was incorrectly spelled Hannes Mueller Schmied, and an affiliation for him was missing: Senckenberg Leibniz Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre (SBiK-F), Frankfurt am Main, Germany. The errors have been corrected in the HTML and PDF versions of the article
    corecore