152,999 research outputs found
Letterhead of Tom B. Saunders & Co. Cattle Buyers and Brokers
No full textLetterhead for Tom B. Saunders & Co. Cattle Buyers and Brokers. Fort Worth, Texas. Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
Opt-out organ donation without presumptions
No full textThis paper defends an 'opt-out' scheme for organ procurement, by distinguishing this system from 'presumed consent' (which the author regards as an erroneous justification of it). It, first, stresses the moral importance of increasing the supply of organs and argues that making donation easier need not conflict with altruism. It then goes on to explore one way that donation can be increased, namely by adopting an opt-out system, in which cadaveric organs are used unless the deceased (or their family) registered an objection. Such policies are often labelled 'presumed consent', but it is argued that critics are right to be sceptical of this idea -- consent is shown to be an action, rather than a mental attitude, and thus not something that can be presumed. Either someone has consented or they have not, whatever their attitude to the use of their organs. Thankfully, an opt-out scheme need not rest on the presumption of consent. Actual consent can be given implicitly, by one's actions, so it is argued that the failure to register an objection (given certain background conditions) should itself be taken as sign of consent. Therefore, it is permissible to use the organs of someone who did not opt out, because they have -- by their silence -- actually consented
The comet march [music] /
No full text2nd ed. Cover title.; Dedicated to Gordon Saunders Esq -- p.1.; Also available online http://nla.gov.au/nla.mus-an6450271; MUS: N, GE93069.; Library's copy has publisher's label pasted over imprint: Wm. C. Daniel
Photograph of Benk Green and Tom B. Saunders III at Saunders Ranch Museum
No full textPhotograph at the Saunders Ranch Museum of author Benk Green and Tom B. Saunders III
Contract between Wagoner Cotton Oil Company and Saunders and Lindsey
No full textContract to provide food and water for 175 head of cattle. (Tom B. Jr. is actually Thomas B. Saunders, III
[Correspondence between Meyer Bodansky and Dr. W. B. Saunders - July 27, 1926]
No full textCorrespondence between Dr. Meyer Bodansky and Dr. W. B. Saunders dated July 27, 1926, seeking permission to use information from Dr. Saunder's publications in Dr. Bodansky's upcoming textbook
Handwritten note re: T.B. Saunders & Son Land and Title Co.
No full textHandwritten note: From the desk of Tom B. Saunders. Looks like they were writing out various titles to put on their letterhead. Not dated, but circa 1930
How to teach moral theories in applied ethics
No full textRecent discussion has focused on whether or not to teach moral theories, and, if yes, to what extent. In this piece the author argues that the criticisms of teaching moral theories raised by Rob Lawlor should lead us to reconsider not whether but how to teach moral theories. It seems that most of the problems Lawlor identifies derive from an uncritical, theory-led approach to teaching. It is suggested that we might instead start by discussing practical cases or the desiderata of a successful moral theory, and then build up to comparing theories such as consequentialism, deontology, and so on. In this way, theories are taught but students do not take them to be the alpha and omega of moral thinking
Saunders Ranch Museum with Jane Saunders Calhoun, James M. Calhoun, Ann Osborne Saunders, and Tom B. Saunders IV
No full textBlack and white photograph inside the Saunders Ranch Museum. Left to right: Jane Saunders Calhoun, James M. Calhoun, Ann Osborne Saunders, and Tom B. Saunders I
Jane Venita Saunders, 9, and Tom B. Saunders, 7
No full textJane Venita Saunders, 9, and Tom B. Saunders, 7.https://mavmatrix.uta.edu/specialcollections_startelegram1940s/13606/thumbnail.jp
- …
