1,721,025 research outputs found

    The Os Navicular of Humans, Great Apes, OH 8, Hadar, and Oreopithecus: Function, Phylogeny, and Multivariate Analyses

    No full text
    SARMIENTO, ESTEBAN E., MARCUS, LESLIE F. (2000): The Os Navicular of Humans, Great Apes, OH 8, Hadar, and Oreopithecus: Function, Phylogeny, and Multivariate Analyses. American Museum Novitates 3288: 1, DOI: 10.1206/0003-0082(2000)288<0001:TONOHG>2.0.CO;2, URL: http://www.bioone.org/doi/abs/10.1206/0003-0082%282000%29288%3C0001%3ATONOHG%3E2.0.CO%3B

    Fig. 5 in The Os Navicular of Humans, Great Apes, OH 8, Hadar, and Oreopithecus: Function, Phylogeny, and Multivariate Analyses

    No full text
    Fig. 5. Entocuneiform facet cross­sectional area (mm2) vs. total navicular facet cross­sectional areaPublished as part of <i>SARMIENTO, ESTEBAN E. & MARCUS, LESLIE F., 2000, American Museum Novitates 3288</i> on page 1, DOI: 10.1206/0003-0082(2000)288<0001:TONOHG>2.0.CO;2, <a href="http://zenodo.org/record/10110926">http://zenodo.org/record/10110926</a&gt

    Fig. 8 in The Os Navicular of Humans, Great Apes, OH 8, Hadar, and Oreopithecus: Function, Phylogeny, and Multivariate Analyses

    No full text
    Fig. 8. Total cuneiform facet cross­sectional area (mm2) vs. total navicular facet cross­sectionalPublished as part of <i>SARMIENTO, ESTEBAN E. & MARCUS, LESLIE F., 2000, American Museum Novitates 3288</i> on page 1, DOI: 10.1206/0003-0082(2000)288<0001:TONOHG>2.0.CO;2, <a href="http://zenodo.org/record/10110926">http://zenodo.org/record/10110926</a&gt

    Fig. 2 in The Os Navicular of Humans, Great Apes, OH 8, Hadar, and Oreopithecus: Function, Phylogeny, and Multivariate Analyses

    No full text
    Fig. 2. Talar facet cross­sectional area (mm2) vs. total navicular facet cross­sectional area (mm2) in humans, great apes, and fossil hominoids. Arrows point to fossils.Published as part of <i>SARMIENTO, ESTEBAN E. & MARCUS, LESLIE F., 2000, American Museum Novitates 3288</i> on page 1, DOI: 10.1206/0003-0082(2000)288<0001:TONOHG>2.0.CO;2, <a href="http://zenodo.org/record/10110926">http://zenodo.org/record/10110926</a&gt

    Fig. 11 in The Os Navicular of Humans, Great Apes, OH 8, Hadar, and Oreopithecus: Function, Phylogeny, and Multivariate Analyses

    No full text
    Fig. 11. Cube root of lower limb­volume (mm) vs. square root of total navicular cross­sectional area (mm) in humans, great apes, and fossil hominoids.Published as part of <i>SARMIENTO, ESTEBAN E. & MARCUS, LESLIE F., 2000, American Museum Novitates 3288</i> on page 1, DOI: 10.1206/0003-0082(2000)288<0001:TONOHG>2.0.CO;2, <a href="http://zenodo.org/record/10110926">http://zenodo.org/record/10110926</a&gt

    Fig. 4 in The Os Navicular of Humans, Great Apes, OH 8, Hadar, and Oreopithecus: Function, Phylogeny, and Multivariate Analyses

    No full text
    Fig. 4. Mesocuneiform facet cross­sectional area (mm2) vs. total navicular facet cross­sectional areaPublished as part of <i>SARMIENTO, ESTEBAN E. & MARCUS, LESLIE F., 2000, American Museum Novitates 3288</i> on page 1, DOI: 10.1206/0003-0082(2000)288<0001:TONOHG>2.0.CO;2, <a href="http://zenodo.org/record/10110926">http://zenodo.org/record/10110926</a&gt

    Fig. 3 in The Os Navicular of Humans, Great Apes, OH 8, Hadar, and Oreopithecus: Function, Phylogeny, and Multivariate Analyses

    No full text
    Fig. 3. Ectocuneiform facet cross­sectional area (mm2) vs. total navicular facet cross­sectional areaPublished as part of <i>SARMIENTO, ESTEBAN E. & MARCUS, LESLIE F., 2000, American Museum Novitates 3288</i> on page 1, DOI: 10.1206/0003-0082(2000)288<0001:TONOHG>2.0.CO;2, <a href="http://zenodo.org/record/10110926">http://zenodo.org/record/10110926</a&gt

    Fig. 10 in The Os Navicular of Humans, Great Apes, OH 8, Hadar, and Oreopithecus: Function, Phylogeny, and Multivariate Analyses

    No full text
    Fig. 10. The sum of the femoral and tibial cross­sectional areas (mm2) vs. talar facet cross­sectional area (mm2) in humans, great apes, and fossil hominoids.Published as part of <i>SARMIENTO, ESTEBAN E. & MARCUS, LESLIE F., 2000, American Museum Novitates 3288</i> on page 1, DOI: 10.1206/0003-0082(2000)288<0001:TONOHG>2.0.CO;2, <a href="http://zenodo.org/record/10110926">http://zenodo.org/record/10110926</a&gt

    Fig. 6 in The Os Navicular of Humans, Great Apes, OH 8, Hadar, and Oreopithecus: Function, Phylogeny, and Multivariate Analyses

    No full text
    Fig. 6. Cuboid facet cross­sectional area (mm2) vs. total navicular facet cross­sectional area (mm2) in humans, great apes, and fossil hominoids. Arrows point to fossils.Published as part of <i>SARMIENTO, ESTEBAN E. & MARCUS, LESLIE F., 2000, American Museum Novitates 3288</i> on page 1, DOI: 10.1206/0003-0082(2000)288<0001:TONOHG>2.0.CO;2, <a href="http://zenodo.org/record/10110926">http://zenodo.org/record/10110926</a&gt

    Fig. 18 in The Cross River Gorillas: A Distinct Subspecies, Gorilla gorilla diehli Matschie 1904

    No full text
    Fig. 18. Plot of upper limb length vs. 3rd manual ray length in Cross River gorillas and in non­Cross­ River western gorillas. Least square regression of the non­Cross­River gorilla datum points fits a line with a slope = 3.799, y'= 3.630, adjusted R2 = 0.79.Published as part of SARMIENTO, ESTEBAN E. & OATES, JOHN F., 2000, The Cross River Gorillas: A Distinct Subspecies, Gorilla gorilla diehli Matschie 1904, pp. 1-56 in American Museum Novitates 3304 on page 35, DOI: 10.1206/0003-0082(2000)33042.0.CO;2, http://zenodo.org/record/537003
    corecore