1,721,025 research outputs found
The Os Navicular of Humans, Great Apes, OH 8, Hadar, and Oreopithecus: Function, Phylogeny, and Multivariate Analyses
SARMIENTO, ESTEBAN E., MARCUS, LESLIE F. (2000): The Os Navicular of Humans, Great Apes, OH 8, Hadar, and Oreopithecus: Function, Phylogeny, and Multivariate Analyses. American Museum Novitates 3288: 1, DOI: 10.1206/0003-0082(2000)288<0001:TONOHG>2.0.CO;2, URL: http://www.bioone.org/doi/abs/10.1206/0003-0082%282000%29288%3C0001%3ATONOHG%3E2.0.CO%3B
Fig. 5 in The Os Navicular of Humans, Great Apes, OH 8, Hadar, and Oreopithecus: Function, Phylogeny, and Multivariate Analyses
Fig. 5. Entocuneiform facet crosssectional area (mm2) vs. total navicular facet crosssectional areaPublished as part of <i>SARMIENTO, ESTEBAN E. & MARCUS, LESLIE F., 2000, American Museum Novitates 3288</i> on page 1, DOI: 10.1206/0003-0082(2000)288<0001:TONOHG>2.0.CO;2, <a href="http://zenodo.org/record/10110926">http://zenodo.org/record/10110926</a>
Fig. 8 in The Os Navicular of Humans, Great Apes, OH 8, Hadar, and Oreopithecus: Function, Phylogeny, and Multivariate Analyses
Fig. 8. Total cuneiform facet crosssectional area (mm2) vs. total navicular facet crosssectionalPublished as part of <i>SARMIENTO, ESTEBAN E. & MARCUS, LESLIE F., 2000, American Museum Novitates 3288</i> on page 1, DOI: 10.1206/0003-0082(2000)288<0001:TONOHG>2.0.CO;2, <a href="http://zenodo.org/record/10110926">http://zenodo.org/record/10110926</a>
Fig. 2 in The Os Navicular of Humans, Great Apes, OH 8, Hadar, and Oreopithecus: Function, Phylogeny, and Multivariate Analyses
Fig. 2. Talar facet crosssectional area (mm2) vs. total navicular facet crosssectional area (mm2) in humans, great apes, and fossil hominoids. Arrows point to fossils.Published as part of <i>SARMIENTO, ESTEBAN E. & MARCUS, LESLIE F., 2000, American Museum Novitates 3288</i> on page 1, DOI: 10.1206/0003-0082(2000)288<0001:TONOHG>2.0.CO;2, <a href="http://zenodo.org/record/10110926">http://zenodo.org/record/10110926</a>
Fig. 11 in The Os Navicular of Humans, Great Apes, OH 8, Hadar, and Oreopithecus: Function, Phylogeny, and Multivariate Analyses
Fig. 11. Cube root of lower limbvolume (mm) vs. square root of total navicular crosssectional area (mm) in humans, great apes, and fossil hominoids.Published as part of <i>SARMIENTO, ESTEBAN E. & MARCUS, LESLIE F., 2000, American Museum Novitates 3288</i> on page 1, DOI: 10.1206/0003-0082(2000)288<0001:TONOHG>2.0.CO;2, <a href="http://zenodo.org/record/10110926">http://zenodo.org/record/10110926</a>
Fig. 4 in The Os Navicular of Humans, Great Apes, OH 8, Hadar, and Oreopithecus: Function, Phylogeny, and Multivariate Analyses
Fig. 4. Mesocuneiform facet crosssectional area (mm2) vs. total navicular facet crosssectional areaPublished as part of <i>SARMIENTO, ESTEBAN E. & MARCUS, LESLIE F., 2000, American Museum Novitates 3288</i> on page 1, DOI: 10.1206/0003-0082(2000)288<0001:TONOHG>2.0.CO;2, <a href="http://zenodo.org/record/10110926">http://zenodo.org/record/10110926</a>
Fig. 3 in The Os Navicular of Humans, Great Apes, OH 8, Hadar, and Oreopithecus: Function, Phylogeny, and Multivariate Analyses
Fig. 3. Ectocuneiform facet crosssectional area (mm2) vs. total navicular facet crosssectional areaPublished as part of <i>SARMIENTO, ESTEBAN E. & MARCUS, LESLIE F., 2000, American Museum Novitates 3288</i> on page 1, DOI: 10.1206/0003-0082(2000)288<0001:TONOHG>2.0.CO;2, <a href="http://zenodo.org/record/10110926">http://zenodo.org/record/10110926</a>
Fig. 10 in The Os Navicular of Humans, Great Apes, OH 8, Hadar, and Oreopithecus: Function, Phylogeny, and Multivariate Analyses
Fig. 10. The sum of the femoral and tibial crosssectional areas (mm2) vs. talar facet crosssectional area (mm2) in humans, great apes, and fossil hominoids.Published as part of <i>SARMIENTO, ESTEBAN E. & MARCUS, LESLIE F., 2000, American Museum Novitates 3288</i> on page 1, DOI: 10.1206/0003-0082(2000)288<0001:TONOHG>2.0.CO;2, <a href="http://zenodo.org/record/10110926">http://zenodo.org/record/10110926</a>
Fig. 6 in The Os Navicular of Humans, Great Apes, OH 8, Hadar, and Oreopithecus: Function, Phylogeny, and Multivariate Analyses
Fig. 6. Cuboid facet crosssectional area (mm2) vs. total navicular facet crosssectional area (mm2) in humans, great apes, and fossil hominoids. Arrows point to fossils.Published as part of <i>SARMIENTO, ESTEBAN E. & MARCUS, LESLIE F., 2000, American Museum Novitates 3288</i> on page 1, DOI: 10.1206/0003-0082(2000)288<0001:TONOHG>2.0.CO;2, <a href="http://zenodo.org/record/10110926">http://zenodo.org/record/10110926</a>
Fig. 18 in The Cross River Gorillas: A Distinct Subspecies, Gorilla gorilla diehli Matschie 1904
Fig. 18. Plot of upper limb length vs. 3rd manual ray length in Cross River gorillas and in nonCross River western gorillas. Least square regression of the nonCrossRiver gorilla datum points fits a line with a slope = 3.799, y'= 3.630, adjusted R2 = 0.79.Published as part of SARMIENTO, ESTEBAN E. & OATES, JOHN F., 2000, The Cross River Gorillas: A Distinct Subspecies, Gorilla gorilla diehli Matschie 1904, pp. 1-56 in American Museum Novitates 3304 on page 35, DOI: 10.1206/0003-0082(2000)33042.0.CO;2, http://zenodo.org/record/537003
- …
