1,721,017 research outputs found
Teleologia come via per la religione. Hölderlin e l’antinomia della facoltà di giudizio
Full text linkThe paper discusses Hölderlin’s reading of the Kantian antinomy of the faculty of judgement from a letter to Hegel in January 1795. Its meaning is first explored in relation to a kind of distinctiveness that Hölderlin recognizes to the solution of the antinomy, to the point of considering it the place where the entire spirit of the Kantian system comes to the fore. Secondly, the prototypical role of the antinomy of the faculty of judgement for the other antinomies is shown according to a feature they share in the way in which they are solved. The aim of the paper is to bring out the distinctive feature of Hölderlin’s theoretical confrontation with the Critique of teleological judgement as a task and orientation of Hölderlin’s philosophical commitment itself, which understands Kant’s efforts from a different perspective than the one of his contemporaries
Pistilli Emanuela, Tra dogmatismo e scetticismo. Fonti e genesi della filosofia di F.H. Jacobi
No full textSoggetto e fondamento in Hölderlin. Tra filosofia trascendentale e pensiero speculativo
No full textL’espressione «speculativo pro e contro» descrive il conflitto teorico che impegna Hölderlin tra il 1794 e il 1796 nel confronto con il criticismo di Kant e con i sistemi concettuali della generazione filosofica immediatamente successiva. La concezione teoretica del frammento Urtheil und Seyn rappresenta il contributo originale con cui Hölderlin prende posizione rispetto al dibattito sull’eredità kantiana e si colloca con un profilo autonomo nella costellazione post-kantiana. Nella determinazione del rapporto tra il soggetto e il fondamento sta il contesto problematico e il tema portante della riflessione filosofica di Hölderlin
All'origine della religione. Hölderlin e il sentimento della gratitudine
No full textThis paper concentrates on Hölderlin’s view on religion as it is presented in the fragment Über Religion. The underlining assumption is that this fragment, which concerns the reciprocal implication between philosophy, religion
and poetry, succeeds in illuminating the most radical aspects of Hölderlin’s
thinking on the topic. The paper aims to show that the question on the origin of religion is the kernel of the argument in the fragment and that, according to Hölderlin, it is from a feeling of gratitude that all reasoning on God stems, and that it arises in a way that links it intimately with a peculiar use of language
Hölderlin und die höhere Aufklärung: zur Frage nach der europäischen Neuzeit
No full textHölderlin and The Höhere Aufklärung: on The Issue of European Modernity· In this essay, I intend to examine Hölderlin’s höhere Aufklärung project and propose an interpretation of it from a philosophy of religion perspective. Specifically, my aim is twofold: first to argue that Hölderlin’s project arises from a critical confrontation with the program of the Kantian Enlightenment, and second to demonstrate the reason why, according to Hölderlin’s project, the issue of the Religionssachen is what requires a step beyond Kant’s Enlightenment. By highlighting the relationship between Enlightenment and religion, that in my examination turns out to be an original feature of Hölderlin’s project, it is possible to bring out a particularly significant genealogical line of European modernity and to outline the concept of secularization in a provocative way. In the context of the discourse on the genesis of European modernity, Hölderlin’s project of the höhere Aufklärung mobilizes resources for thinking to a relationship between secularization and religion that is neither an emancipation from nor a naturalization of the Religionssachen
Sein, Vereinigung, Verletzung. Hegel e Hoelderlin
No full textThe paper highlights the importance of Hegel’s years in Frankfurt for the later development of the theme of the Objektivität des Gedankens in his philosophy. The main theoretical issues and the results of Hegel’s inquiry lead him to decide for a deep revision of the notion of Denken. The genesis of his decision becomes evident from the comparison between Hegel’s fragment Glauben und Sein and Hölderlin’s fragment Urteil und Sein. On the basis of a similar need to overcome the transcendental perspective, both texts formulate the thesis of “being as union”. The analysis of these fragments shows that, even if Hegel and Hölderlin adopt a similar conception of being, they take this conception as the basis for two different philosophical approaches. The first is logic and rational, the second is existential and practical
Bewusstsein, Antinomien und System. Hölderlins Auseinandersetzung mit der Fichteschen Philosophie
No full textThrough the analysis of the letters about Fichte’s philosophy, with particular regard to the letter to Hegel (January 26th 1795), the present contribution discusses Hölderlin’s under-standing of the philosophical issues which are included in the concepts “consciousness”, “antinomies” and “system”
- …
