1,721,073 research outputs found
Liberalismo, constitucionalismo y el legado de la Revolución: Chateaubriand, Constant y el nacimiento de los partidos de la Restauración (1814–1816)
Full text linkLa evolución del panorama político francés en las fases iniciales de la Restauración es reconstruida a través de los escritos de François–René de Chateaubriand y Benjamin Constant y su alineación en favor del nuevo régimen de Luis XVIII. Con la publicación de De la monarchie selon la Charte, habiendo asumido el liderazgo de los ultraroyalistes convertidos a los principios del parlamentarismo, Chateaubriand expone los principios de una auténtica monarquía parlamentaria y reivindica la necesidad de excluir a todos los partidarios de los principios revolucionarios de los puestos de poder. Constant vuelve a Francia tras su exilio en Bélgica e Inglaterra y responde a Chateaubriand en su panfleto De la doctrine politique qui peut réunir les partis en France, un manifiesto para la reconciliación nacional y al mismo tiempo una agenda liberal para el naciente partido de los Independientes
Figure 5 in Evolutionary history of the devilrays (Chondrichthyes: Myliobatiformes) from fossil and morphological inference
No full textFigure 5. Argoubia barbei gen. nov., sp. nov. A-E, Antero-lateral tooth, holotype, DAK3-1. A, lingual view; B, profile; C, labial view; D, occlusal view; E, basal view. F-J, Antero-lateral tooth, paratype, DAK3-2. F, lingual view; G, profile; H, labial view; I, occlusal view; J, basal view.Published as part of Adnet, Sylvain, Cappetta, Henri, Guinot, Guillaume & Sciara, Giuseppe Notarbartolo Di, 2012, Evolutionary history of the devilrays (Chondrichthyes: Myliobatiformes) from fossil and morphological inference, pp. 132-159 in Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 166 (1) on page 144, DOI: 10.1111/j.1096-3642.2012.00844.x, http://zenodo.org/record/540858
Figure 9. A in Evolutionary history of the devilrays (Chondrichthyes: Myliobatiformes) from fossil and morphological inference
No full textFigure 9. A: Probable evolution of toothed jaw in mobulids, compared to sister groups of Myliobatidae (Myliobatis) and Rhinopteridae (Rhinoptera). Except for the living taxa, layout of teeth and number of tooth files were artificially reconstructed based on tooth morphologies and phylogenetic relationships performed on isolated teeth (number of tooth files and scales were not respected between taxa). B, Phylogenetic relationships from Fig. 8B constrained by the fossil record of Mobulidae (see text). Vertical bar, stratigraphical occurrences; dashed bar, uncertain records.Published as part of Adnet, Sylvain, Cappetta, Henri, Guinot, Guillaume & Sciara, Giuseppe Notarbartolo Di, 2012, Evolutionary history of the devilrays (Chondrichthyes: Myliobatiformes) from fossil and morphological inference, pp. 132-159 in Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 166 (1) on page 153, DOI: 10.1111/j.1096-3642.2012.00844.x, http://zenodo.org/record/540858
Figure 6 in Evolutionary history of the devilrays (Chondrichthyes: Myliobatiformes) from fossil and morphological inference
No full textFigure 6. Oromobula dakhlaensis gen. nov., sp. nov. A-D, DAK2B-4, tooth position unknown. A, lingual view; B, profile; C, labial view; D, occlusal view. E-H, holotype DAK2B-5, tooth position unknown. E, lingual view; F, profile; G, labial view; H, occlusal view; I-L, DAK2B-6, tooth position unknown; I, lingual view; J, profile; K, labial view; L, occlusal view. M-N, young element DAK2B-7, tooth position unknown. M, lingual view; N, profile. O-P, young element DAK2B-8, tooth position unknown. O, lingual view; P, occlusal view. Vertical scale bar for A-H, horizontal scale bar for I-P.Published as part of Adnet, Sylvain, Cappetta, Henri, Guinot, Guillaume & Sciara, Giuseppe Notarbartolo Di, 2012, Evolutionary history of the devilrays (Chondrichthyes: Myliobatiformes) from fossil and morphological inference, pp. 132-159 in Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 166 (1) on page 146, DOI: 10.1111/j.1096-3642.2012.00844.x, http://zenodo.org/record/540858
Figure 7 in Evolutionary history of the devilrays (Chondrichthyes: Myliobatiformes) from fossil and morphological inference
No full textFigure 7. Eoplinthicus underwoodi sp. nov. A-E, DAK2A-2, holotype: tooth position unknown. A, lingual view; B, labial view; C, occlusal view; D, basal view; E, profile. F-G, DAK2A-3, paratype, tooth position unknown. F, lingual view; G, occlusal view. H-J, DAK2B-2, tooth position unknown. H, lingual view; I, labial view; J, occlusal view. K-O, DAK2B-3: young element, tooth position unknown. K, lingual view; L, labial view; M, occlusal view; N, basal view; O, profile.Published as part of Adnet, Sylvain, Cappetta, Henri, Guinot, Guillaume & Sciara, Giuseppe Notarbartolo Di, 2012, Evolutionary history of the devilrays (Chondrichthyes: Myliobatiformes) from fossil and morphological inference, pp. 132-159 in Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 166 (1) on page 147, DOI: 10.1111/j.1096-3642.2012.00844.x, http://zenodo.org/record/540858
Figure 1 in Evolutionary history of the devilrays (Chondrichthyes: Myliobatiformes) from fossil and morphological inference
No full textFigure 1. Body shapes of pelagic Myliobatiformes are expanded to show familial differences in head shape. The two main phylogenetic hypotheses (see text for references) concerning the myliobatoids are reported on both sides: according the first one (A), more derived myliobatoids possess more enlarged cephalic lobes (shaded grey), according the second one (B), more derived myliobatoids possess a complete fusion of cephalic lobes. Line drawing inspired by Sasko et al. (2006).Published as part of Adnet, Sylvain, Cappetta, Henri, Guinot, Guillaume & Sciara, Giuseppe Notarbartolo Di, 2012, Evolutionary history of the devilrays (Chondrichthyes: Myliobatiformes) from fossil and morphological inference, pp. 132-159 in Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 166 (1) on page 133, DOI: 10.1111/j.1096-3642.2012.00844.x, http://zenodo.org/record/540858
Figure 4 in Evolutionary history of the devilrays (Chondrichthyes: Myliobatiformes) from fossil and morphological inference
No full textFigure 4. Comb-like tooth morphology of sexed specimen of A-T, Mo. munkiana (NS 82-015: ♂ 895 mm DW, NS 84-004:♀ 931 mm DW); U-L′, Mo. rochebrunei (UM-REC 25M: ♂ 1170 mm DW, UM-REC 14M: ♀ 1310 mm DW); M′-Z′, Mo. hypostoma (UM-REC 28M: ♂ size unknown, UM-REC 29M: ♀ size unknown). For each species and sex, teeth are sorted from anterior (right) to lateral (left) positions. A-E, K-O, U-X, A′-F′, M′-P′, U′-W′, upper teeth; F-J, P-T, Y-Z, G′-L′, Q′-T′, X′-Z′, lower teeth. Abbreviations of the view are indicated on the right hand side of each tooth, o, occlusal view; li, lingual view; la, labial view; p, profile; b, basal view. Detail of specimens in Appendix 1.Published as part of Adnet, Sylvain, Cappetta, Henri, Guinot, Guillaume & Sciara, Giuseppe Notarbartolo Di, 2012, Evolutionary history of the devilrays (Chondrichthyes: Myliobatiformes) from fossil and morphological inference, pp. 132-159 in Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 166 (1) on page 138, DOI: 10.1111/j.1096-3642.2012.00844.x, http://zenodo.org/record/540858
Figure 2 in Evolutionary history of the devilrays (Chondrichthyes: Myliobatiformes) from fossil and morphological inference
No full textFigure 2. Peg-like tooth morphology of sexed specimens of A-N, Mo. mobular (UM-REC 26M: ♂ 2400 mm DW; UM-REC 27M: ♀ 1400 mm DW); O-W, Mo. japanica (NS 83-024: ♂ 2077 mm DW; NS 83-070: ♀ 2108 mm DW); X-G′, Ma. birostris (NS 83-003: ♂ and NS 83-160: ♀ size unknown). For each species and sex, teeth are sorted from anterior (right) to lateral (left) positions. A-J, O-W, upper teeth; K-N, X-G′, lower teeth. Abbreviations of the view are indicated on the right hand side of each tooth: o, occlusal view; li, lingual view; la' labial view; p, profile; b, basal view. Detail of specimens in Appendix 1.Published as part of Adnet, Sylvain, Cappetta, Henri, Guinot, Guillaume & Sciara, Giuseppe Notarbartolo Di, 2012, Evolutionary history of the devilrays (Chondrichthyes: Myliobatiformes) from fossil and morphological inference, pp. 132-159 in Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 166 (1) on page 135, DOI: 10.1111/j.1096-3642.2012.00844.x, http://zenodo.org/record/540858
Figure 3 in Evolutionary history of the devilrays (Chondrichthyes: Myliobatiformes) from fossil and morphological inference
No full textFigure 3. Cobblestone and comb-like tooth morphologies of sexed specimens of A-S, Mo. tarapacana (UM-REC 30M: ♂ 2500 mm DW, NS 83-141: ♀ 3015 mm DW) and T-M′, Mo. thurstoni (NS 83-077: ♂ 1770 mm DW, NS 83-020: ♀ 1626 mm DW). For each species and sex, teeth are sorted from anterior (right) to lateral (left) positions. A-E, J-N, T-X, D′-H′, upper teeth; F-I, O-S, Y-C′, I′-M′, lower teeth. Abbreviations of the view are indicated on the right hand side of each tooth, o, occlusal view; li, lingual view; la, labial view; p, profile; b, basal view. Detail of specimens in Appendix 1.Published as part of Adnet, Sylvain, Cappetta, Henri, Guinot, Guillaume & Sciara, Giuseppe Notarbartolo Di, 2012, Evolutionary history of the devilrays (Chondrichthyes: Myliobatiformes) from fossil and morphological inference, pp. 132-159 in Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 166 (1) on page 137, DOI: 10.1111/j.1096-3642.2012.00844.x, http://zenodo.org/record/540858
- …
