1,721,141 research outputs found

    Climatic interpretation of carbon isotope content of mid-Holocene archaeological charcoals from eastern Anatolia

    Full text link
    The 13C/12C ratio of juniper charcoals from the archaeological site of Arslantepe, Malatya (Turkey) was analysed for the mid-Holocene period spanning from 3350 to 2000 years BC. In addition, modern juniper and deciduous oak specimens were collected during a botanical survey around Arslantepe in August 2008. After the evaluation of weather parameters, the modern 13C/12C ratio was compared with the archaeological one, to infer past seasonal precipitation relative magnitude patterns. δ13C values obtained from these samples suggest that the present-day climate is, on average, drier than that recorded in the past.Comparing the δ13C juniper record with the already published curve for archaeological charcoals of deciduous oaks from Arslantepe, it appears that the two curves show similar trends in the short period between ca. 2850 and 2500BC, in which the curves are substantially parallel and the δ13C difference between them is quite reduced, but they are shifted by ca. 50-150 years in the rest of the record.For the interpretation of the arboreal curves, however, it was necessary to consider the autoecology of modern plants and the source of the water used for photosynthesis, as the two selected trees show δ13C curves with rather different patterns. Overall, 13C/12C contrasting ratios in juniper and deciduous oaks suggest that seasonality in rainfall distribution and aquifer recharge played a complex role. Thus, a consistent seasonal contrast in precipitation (similar to the one in recent times) took place at ca. 3350, 3100, and 2300BC indicating that semi-arid conditions have occurred in the past, in alternation with periods characterised by minor differences in the distribution of annual precipitation. In particular, the period between ca. 2850 and 2500BC may suggest more humid conditions in late winter/early spring. The combination of the two records suggests that 1) two periods of drought are found at ca. 3350-3100 and at ca. 2300-2200BC and 2) that at present winter precipitation is lower than that recorded during the period 3350-2000BC and summer aridity less or equal to that recorded ca. 2200BC.Changes in precipitation seasonality and the complex and the peculiar hydrogeological situation hindered the interpretation of the isotope records. The use of two taxa having different autoecology and different growing season allows interpretation of the data in terms of changes in precipitation seasonality and of specific habitat in this complex and peculiar hydrological settin

    Reconstructing past cultural landscape and human impact using pollen and plant macroremains.

    No full text
    Three examples of plant landscape shaping, carried out by Iron Age populations living in different geographical areas, are presented. The examples differ in population type (Garamantes, Etruscans, and Romans), archaeological context (settlement, necropolis, furnace, port), and area of plant exploitation (respectively, Fezzan – Libyan Sahara and Tuscany, Latium – central Italy). The leitmotiv of the three parallel investigations highlighted that humans induced clear changes in plant cover modifying the quantitative ratio among native elements and spreading the plants of economic interest even outside of their natural habitats. Micro- and macroremain analyses once more enhanced that landscape reconstruction depends on both wild and cultivated plants, and that the cultural plant landscape is composed of a complex mixture of indigenous and exotic elements. Archaeobotany results in great help in reviewing ancient prejudices, rewriting history in a modern ecological view, also discovering a different role in the landscape evolution of past civilizations. In this light, the Garamantes deeply transformed the oases in agrarian producer sites, and the Etruscans, in the area of the Gulf of Follonica, modified the previous forest vegetation, probably enhancing the xeric features. The Romans, believed as the main creators of the environmental changes in the Mediterranean basin, surprisingly did not produce consistent plant changes in the area of the Tiber delta, in the surroundings of the imperial port of Rome, during the first century AD
    corecore