134 research outputs found
Erratum: High-efficiency gene transfer into adult fish: A new tool to study fin regeneration (Genesis (January 2002) 32 (27-31))
High-Efficiency Gene Transfer into Adult Fish : a New Tool to Study Fin Regeneration
Zebrafish represents an excellent model to study the function of vertebrate genes (e.g., well-developed genetics, large number of mutants, and genomic sequencing in progress), inasmuch as we have tools to manipulate gene expression. Recent use of injected morpholinos in eggs provides a good method to " knockdown " gene expression in early development (Nasevicius and Ekker, 2000), and the "caged" RNA injected in eggs allows to overexpress a gene in a specific set of cells (Ando et al., 2001). However, a method to specifically modify gene expression in the juvenile or in the adult is still missing. Such a method would be a very powerful tool to understand gene function in differentiated tissues. We describe here an electroporation-based approach, which allows gene transfer in adult tissues. Its efficiency was assessed using a GFP (green fluorescent protein) dependent assay. We then used this method to disrupt the Fgf signalling pathway during the process of regeneration
Comparison of sequentially measured Aloka echo-tracking one-point pulse wave velocity with SphygmoCor carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity.
Objectives: Recently, echo-tracking-derived measures of arterial stiffness have been introduced in clinical practice for the
assessment of one-point pulse wave velocity. The purpose of this study was to find a relation between carotid–femoral pulse
wave velocity and one-point carotid pulse wave velocity, and to find a value of one-point carotid pulse wave velocity that
predicts carotid–femoral pulse wave velocity higher than 12 m/s.
Methods: A total of 160 consecutive subjects (112 male/48 female, mean age = 51.5 ± 14.1 years; 96 healthy, 44 hypertensives,
13 with aortic valve disease, and 7 with left ventricular dysfunction) were studied. Carotid–femoral pulse wave velocity was
measured with the SphygmoCor system and one-point carotid pulse wave velocity with high-definition echo-tracking system
(ProSound Alpha10; Aloka, Tokyo, Japan).
Results: Both carotid–femoral pulse wave velocity and one-point carotid pulse wave velocity correlated significantly with
each other (r = 0.539, p < 0.001) and with age (one-point carotid pulse wave velocity r = 0.618, carotid–femoral pulse wave
velocity r = 0.617, p < 0.0001 for both). Median value of carotid–femoral pulse wave velocity (7.2 m/s, 95% confidence interval
= 6.2–8.9) was systematically higher than that of one-point carotid pulse wave velocity (5.8 m/s, 95% confidence interval =
5–6.6). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.85, identifying the cutoff for one-point pulse wave
velocity of 6.65 m/s as the best predictor of carotid–femoral pulse wave velocity more than 12 m/s (sensitivity = 0.818,
specificity = 0.819).
Conclusions: One-point carotid pulse wave velocity correlates with carotid–femoral pulse wave velocity, and the cutoff of
6.65 m/s was the best predictor of carotid–femoral pulse wave velocity over 12 m/s
AORTIC ROOT DIAMETERS AND AORTIC REGURGITATIONS IN HYPERTENSIVE PATIENTS COMPARE TO A CONTROL GROUP OF NORMAL SUBJECTS
ONE-POINT LOCAL ARTERIAL STIFFNESS IN SUBJECTS WITH CHRONIC SPINAL CORD INJURY AND NO OVERT CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE
Normal Values and Differences in Ascending Aortic Diameter in a Healthy Population of Adults as Measured by the Pediatric versus Adult American Society of Echocardiography Guidelines
Right ventricular function in patients with systemic sclerosis without pulmonary arterial hypertension
Carotid Artery Stiffness and Diastolic Function in Subjects without Known Cardiovascular Disease
- …
