3,183 research outputs found
Clercs et jongleurs dans la société médiévale (XIIe et XIIIe siècles)
No full textClerks and jesters in mediaeval society 2th- 13th centuries Carla CASAGRANDE et Silvana VECCHIO The image of the jester elaborated by the priests in the XIIth and XIIIth centuries was that of social figure placed outside the Societas Christiana number of charges are levelled at the jester his improper and excessive use of speech and body his vagrancy and his being socially useless and dangerous Moreover histriones mimi joculatores are confined in space at once real and symbolic peopled by marginal and dangerous figures prostitutes charlatans of every kind animals and demons Often the condemnation of the jester becomes the condemnation of his public too While on the one hand these charges desmonstrate the marginal character of the jesters on the other they are used as negative pattern which shapes the figure and conduct of churchmen in particular This hostile attitude undergoes partial change with the rise of the Mendicant Orders Franciscans and Dominicans who enjoy closer contact with the Jesters minstrels buffoons because of their apostolic engagement are led to face them in more realistic fashion This is the beginning of revaluation of the figure which eventually leads to his reintegration into society St Thomas Furthermore it is possible to observe in the Franciscan milieu more ambiguous process both imitative and competitive when Franciscan preachers adopt the techniques St Francis Roger Bacon) their impact on the audience in the public squares becomes more dramaticCasagrande Caria, Vecchio Silvana. Clercs et jongleurs dans la société médiévale (XIIe et XIIIe siècles). In: Annales. Économies, Sociétés, Civilisations. 34ᵉ année, N. 5, 1979. pp. 913-928
Industrializzazione del processo di elettrodeposizione di rivestimenti ni-μSiC su lingottiere per colata continua dell’acciaio,
No full textExternal morphology of Almeidaia aidae Mielke & Casagrande (Lepidoptera, Saturniidae, Arsenurinae, Almeidaiini). I. Head, appendages and cervical region
No full textA morfologia externa do adulto de Almeidaia aidae Mielke & Casagrande, 1981 é descrita e ilustrada pela pela primeira vez. Os resultados obtidos foram comparados com outras espécies de Saturniidae. É uma espécie rara e endêmica da região do Cerrado. Estudos sobre sua biologia foram publicados recentemente pelo quarto autor.The external morphology of adult head of Almeidaia aidae Mielke & Casagrande, 1981 is described and illustrated for the first time. The results obtained were compared with other species of Saturniidae. This species is rare and endemic of the Cerrado region. Biological studies were published recenthly by the fourth author
Bia rebeli subsp. cuprea Penz & Casagrande, NEW SSP.
No full textBia rebeli cuprea Penz & Casagrande, NEW SSP. (Figs 7 a–c, 10j, 12) Diagnostic description. Defined by the following combination of characters: (1) MF DFW white apical ocelli small. (2) MF DFW orange band wide, orange scales extended proximally along veins, including the anterior tip of discal cell. (3) M DFW iridescent band absent or barely visible at tornus only. F DFW iridescent band shorter, more diffuse and narrower than that of actorion, especially noticeable below CuA2 where the iridescence is less extended towards the tornus. (4) DFW androconial organ on Cu-CuA2 pale, contrasting scale color of surrounding area. (5) M DHW discal androconial pad cream-colored. (6) M DHW discal hairpencil pale brown to cream-colored. (7) F VFW ripple pattern usually slightly less dense than that of M, with the VFW postmedial area showing a more predominantly yellow color. Etymology. Cuprum is the Latin word for copper, which is used in reference to the fact that males of rebeli cuprea lack blue iridescence, being only orange and brown dorsally. Type material. Holotype M (Fig. 7 a), deposited in the DZUP collection, five labels separated by // and transcribed verbatim: HOLOTYPUS // Comunidade Paxiúba, Rio Abacaxis, Borba, Amaz [onas], 2–4-VI -2008, 4°28’48’’S 58°34’24’’ Mielke & Casagrande leg. // gen.[itália] prep.[arada] Casagrande, 2011 // DZ 16.378 // Holotypus Bia rebeli cuprea Penz & Casagrande, 2017. Paratypes are listed in Appendix, and Fig. 7 b–c show paratypes F and M. Distribution and examined specimens. Fig. 12 and Appendix. Remarks. Eurides Furtado (private collection, Appendix) provided photographs of two females seemingly of rebeli cuprea from Brazil, Amazonas, Maués (Penera River). Note that the examined material includes one male and two females from the Amazonian municipality of Manacapuru, which extends north and south of the Solimões River. Although we find it less likely that B. rebeli cuprea was collected north of the Solimões, this should be confirmed in future fieldwork.Published as part of Penz, Carla M., Casagrande, Mirna M., Devries, Phil & Simonsen, Thomas J., 2017, Documenting diversity in the Amazonian butterfly genus Bia (Lepidoptera, Nymphalidae), pp. 201-237 in Zootaxa 4258 (3) on page 220, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4258.3.1, http://zenodo.org/record/56972
Is Hyper-extensionality Preservable Under Deletions of Graph Elements?
No full textAny hereditarily finite set S can be represented as a finite pointed graph –dubbed membership graph– whose nodes denote elements of the transitive closure of {S} and whose edges model the membership relation. Membership graphs must be hyper-extensional, that is pairwise distinct nodes are not bisimilar and (uniquely) represent hereditarily finite sets.
We will see that the removal of even a single node or edge from a membership graph can cause “collapses” of different nodes and, therefore, the loss of hyper-extensionality of the graph itself. With the intent of gaining a deeper understanding on the class of hyper-extensional hereditarily finite sets, this paper investigates whether pointed hyper-extensional graphs always contain either a node or an edge whose removal does not disrupt the hyper-extensionality property
Rufocumbre schneideri Dolibaina & Mielke & Casagrande 2017, sp. nov.
No full textRufocumbre schneideri sp. nov. urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:71BC9F9D-5A62-4244-9B7E-10216822228B Figs 13–16, 24, 36, 41, 46, 56. Cumbre belli eberti [misidentification]; K. Brown & Mielke, 1967. Jour. Lep. Soc. 21: 166. Cumbre sp. n.; Dolibaina; Mielke & Casagrande, 2011. Biota Neotrop. 11 (1): 345. Diagnosis. This species is distinguished from all the other species of Rufocumbre by having the uncus widely bifid, with the arms extremely narrowed; proximal margin of ampulla not projected; distal projection of harpe exceeding the distal margin of ampulla by a short distance (Fig. 36); lamella antevaginalis widely bifid, with narrow projections, and a patch of membrane in the middle (Fig. 41). Description. Forewing length: Male 15.5–17.2 mm, female 14.2–17 mm. Forewing dorsal (Figs 13, 15, 24): brand with the distal margin of the superior projection irregular near the middle, and the inferior projection angled; ellipsoid cream spot on 2A, at the center of 2A, developed in both sexes. Hind wing ventral (Figs 14, 16): basal and postdiscal bands dark orange, without gray to purple scales on the basal band; postdiscal band very short in Rs-M1. Male genitalia (Fig. 36): Fenestra semicircular and large; uncus widely bifid, arms parallel to gnathos, narrow, about 1/3 the width of the gnathos arm, tip pointed; ampulla with the proximal margin not projected, and dorsodistal margin with a small tip; distal spine of harpe larger and less pointed than in other species, short, exceeding the distal margin of ampulla by a short distance; aedeagus distally bifid, with convergent and unequal projections; cornutus absent. Female genitalia (Figs 41, 46): Lamella antevaginalis widely bifid from base, with narrow and divergent projections, and a patch of membrane at the middle of each projection; lamella postvaginalis distally bifid, with large and convergent rounded projections; ductus bursae smooth at the insertion with corpus bursae; corpus bursae with two long and large lines of signa, extending for almost all its extension, each line medially crossed by a narrow and smooth area. Comments. This species is very similar and potentially sympatric with R. celioi sp. nov. (Figs 1–4). Both species were collected in adjacent areas in Paraná state (Figs 54, 56); however, unlike the situation for R. celioi sp. nov., R. schneideri sp. nov. is known from few and sparse records from Tocantins to Paraná (Fig. 56), with just one specimen collected for each locality (with the exception of Sobradinho, Brasília, Distrito Federal where a male and a female were collected in 1966 and 1968, respectively). The males of R. schneideri sp. nov. are readily distinguished from those of R. celioi sp. nov. by the developed brand on the dorsal forewing (Fig. 24) and by the deeply bifid uncus with narrow arms (Fig. 36). Females are easily separated by the presence of the lamella antevaginalis in R. schneideri sp. nov. (Fig. 41) whereas it is absent in R. celioi sp. nov. (Fig. 38), a character easily observable in dry specimens after removing the scales of the tip of the abdomen (dissection is not required). Brown & Mielke (1967) listed this new species as Cumbre belli eberti from Central Brazil Plateau (specimen from Sobradinho, Brasília), while Dolibaina et al. (2011) mentioned it as Cumbre sp. n. from Guarapuava region, Paraná. Geographical distribution and phenology. Rufocumbre schneideri sp. nov. is known from a few records from Tocantins, Distrito Federal, Minas Gerais and Paraná, in areas between 200 and 1365 m (Fig. 56). Specimens were collected in January, February, March, May, October and December. Etymology. This new species is dedicated in memory of our friend the late Hipólito Schneider, an amateur insect collector that lived in Guarapuava, Paraná, whose work inspired the first author to study Lepidoptera. Examined material. The holotype male has the following labels: / HOLOTYPUS / 29-30-I-2006 12,5 Km N VENTANIA, PARANÁ [, BRAZIL], 1000m O. MIELKE LEG. / Gen[italia]. Prep[ared]. Dolibaina 2010 / DZ 15.736/ BC-DZ / HOLOTYPUS Rufocumbre schneideri Dolibaina, Mielke & Casagrande det. 2017/. DZUP. The allotype female has the following labels: / ALLOTYPUS / 19-III-1991 Água Mineral, Tibagi, P[a]R[aná, Brazil]. Mielke & Casagrande leg / Gen[italia]. Prep[ared]. Dolibaina 2010 / DZ 17.114 / ALLOTYPUS Rufocumbre schneideri Dolibaina, Mielke & Casagrande det. 2017/. DZUP. Paratypes: BRAZIL – Tocantins: Ilha do Bananal, 28.V.1979, Gifford leg. 1 female (DZ 15.619*) (DZUP). Distrito Federal: Brasília (Sobradinho), 1050 m, 24.II.1966, Mielke leg. 1 male (OM 8.992*) (OM), 26.XII.1968, Ebert leg. 1 female (DZ 15.647*) (DZUP). Minas Gerais: Conceição dos Ouros, 1365 m, 30.III.2005, Almeida leg. 1 male (OM 66.843*) (OM), (Serra Grande), 8.II.2003, Mielke & Casagrande leg. 1 female (OM 59.073*) (OM); Poços de Caldas, 1250 m, 2-4.X.1966, Ebert leg. 1 female (DZ 10.346*) (DZUP). Paraná: Ponta Grossa (20 Km N – Piriquitos), 900 m, 31.I.1990, Mielke leg. 1 male (OM 25.079*) (OM); Prudentópolis (RPPN Ninho do Corvo), 800 m, 12.X.2008, Dolibaina leg. 1 male (DD 207*) (DD).Published as part of Dolibaina, Diego Rodrigo, Mielke, Olaf Hermann Hendrik & Casagrande, Mirna Martins, 2017, Taxonomy of Rufocumbre gen. nov., a new Moncini skipper genus (Lepidoptera: Hesperiidae: Hesperiinae), pp. 196-216 in Zootaxa 4365 (2) on pages 210-211, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4365.2.5, http://zenodo.org/record/111760
Rufocumbre eberti Dolibaina & Mielke & Casagrande 2017, stat. nov., comb. nov.
No full textRufocumbre eberti (Evans, 1955) stat. nov., comb. nov. Figs 9–12, 23, 30–32, 35, 40, 45, 48–53, 55. Cumbre belli eberti Evans, 1955. Cat. Amer. Hesp. 4, p. 170; holotype male, 14-IX-1952, Fazenda Barcellos, Bergland um Ouro Preta [sic], Minas Gerais, [Brazil], 1100 m, H. Ebert leg.; BM(NH).- Bridges, 1983. Lep. Hesp. 1, p. 37; 2, p. 10.- Bridges, 1988. Cat. Hesp. 1, p. 59; 2, p. 17.- K. Brown & Freitas, 2000. Bol. Mus. Biol. Mello Leitão, n. s., Sta. Teresa, 11/12: 113.- Mielke, 2004. Hesperioidea, p. 65, in Lamas (ed.). Checklist: Part 4A, Hesperioidea-Papilionoidea, in Heppner (ed.). Atlas Neotrop. Lep. 5A.- Mielke, 2005. Cat. Amer. Hesperioidea 4, p. 902.- Zacca & Bravo, 2012. Biota Neotrop. 12 (2): 123. (no genus) eberti; Beattie, 1976. RHop. Direct., p. 133. Diagnosis. This species can be distinguished from all the species belonging to Rufocumbre by the presence of gray to purple scales in the basal band on hind wing ventral; however, considering that this character is difficult to see in old or damaged specimens, the characters from genitalia are necessary to distinguish it properly. Rufocumbre eberti is distinguished from R. celioi and R. emeryi by the largely bifid uncus (Fig. 35) and the presence of lamella antevaginalis (Fig. 40). These features are also present in R. schneideri sp. nov. (Figs 36, 41) and R. lucasi sp. nov. (Figs 37, 42), from which R. eberti is separated by having the arms of uncus slightly divergent and four times longer than wide, proximal margin of the ampulla pointed, below the midline of valva (Fig. 35); lamella antevaginalis bifid after 1/3 of its length, with large projections separated from each other by a short distance (Fig. 40). Variation. Only a female specimen of R. eberti from Serra da Maravilha, Senhor do Bonfim, Bahia, Brazil (Zacca & Bravo 2012), the northernmost record for this species (Fig. 55), has the ventral hind wing with the basal and postdiscal bands yellow as in R. lucasi sp. nov. (Figs 18, 20) (see discussion in R. lucasi sp. nov.). In the male genitalia, variations were observed in the thickness and inclination of the dorsal projection of saccus, in the width of the uncus arms, and in the length of the distal projection of harpe. On the other hand, female genitalia are notably variable throughout the range of this species. In the central area of its distribution (Ouro Preto, Minas Gerais state, type locality), the females have the lamella antevaginalis bifurcated before its half-length, with two long, pointed and divergent projections, and the distal margin of the lamella postvaginalis pointed and with straight projections (Fig. 48). Females from south (Delfim Moreira, Minas Gerais) and easternmost (Rio de Janeiro and Espírito Santo) distribution have the lamella antevaginalis with the basal plate larger than described above, bifurcated at the middle of its length, with irregular projections and straight tips, and the distal margin of the lamella postvaginalis curved, with rounded projections (Fig. 49). In the northernmost distribution (Bahia), females of R. eberti have two morphological extremes, one with the lamella antevaginalis bifurcated above its half-length, with irregular internal projections, close to each other and with large, pointed and divergent tips (Fig. 50); in the other extreme, the bifurcation of the lamella antevaginalis is before its half-length, and the projections are straight, distally tapered and pointed (Fig. 53); however, intermediates between these two extremes were also found (Figs 51–52). Comments. This taxon was described by Evans (1955) as a subspecies of Cumbre belli (Hayward, 1939), a species recently considered a junior subjective synonym of Cumbre meridionalis (Hayward, 1934) (Dolibaina et al. 2014). As stated by Dolibaina et al. (2014), the taxon eberti does not belong to Cumbre; in addition, C. belli eberti must be elevated to the rank of species and transferred to a new genus, as proposed here. Rufocumbre eberti was misidentified in some studies of the butterflies of Central Brazil (Brown & Mielke 1967, Pinheiro & Emery 2006, Mielke et al. 2008). Those records belong to R. emeryi sp. nov. and R. schneideri sp. nov. Geographical distribution and phenology. This species is widely distributed in Brazil, from Bahia to São Paulo in areas between 600 and 1800 m (Fig. 55). Specimens were collected throughout the year except November. Etymology. Although it was not mentioned in the original description (Evans 1955), this species was probably dedicated to Heinz Ebert, collector of the type series. Examined material. The holotype male of Cumbre belli eberti is deposited at NHMUK with the following labels: / Bergland un Ouro Preto (Min. Ger.): Fazenda Barcellos, 1100-1200m; 10- 14.9.1952 H. Ebert / Brasil: Dr. H. Ebert BM. 1953-824 / Type eberti Evans /. BRAZIL – Bahia: Erico Cardoso (Pico do Barbado), 1300-1500 m, 1.II.2007, Mielke & Casagrande leg. 4 males (DZ 8.766*, DZ 8.710*, DZ 8.694, DZ 8.686) (DZUP); Lençóis (Morro do Pai Inácio), 800-1200 m, 2.XII.1997, Mielke & Casagrande leg. 1 male (OM 47.187*) (OM), 800 m, 3-7.XII.1997, Mielke & Casagrande leg. 1 male (OM 47.914*) (OM), 10.III.1999, Mielke & Casagrande leg. 2 females (OM 50.023*, OM 50.030*) (OM), 850 m, 12.III.1999, Mielke & Casagrande leg. 1 male and 4 females (OM 50.172*, OM 50.158, OM 50.144*, OM 50.137*, OM 50.165*) (OM), (Morro do Camelo) 800 m, 18.V.1999, Moser leg. 1 male (CLAM); Morro do Chapéu, 1000 m, 23-24.IV.1991, Becker leg. 1 male (OM 50.780*) (OM); Senhor do Bonfim (Serra da Maravilha), 950 m, 20.VII.2009, Zacca leg. 1 female (MZUEFS 45.340) (MZUEFS). Espírito Santo: Santa Teresa, 750 m, 25.VIII.1966, C. & C. T. Elias leg. 1 male (DZ 17.067) (DZUP), 10.IX.1966, C. & C. T. Elias leg. 1 female (DZ 17.080*) (DZUP), 15.IX.1966, C. & C. T. Elias leg. 2 males (DZ 17.082, DZ 17.081*) (DZUP), 8.I.1967, C. & C. T. Elias leg. 1 male and 1 female (DZ 15.771, DZ 17.090) (DZUP), 10.V.1967, C. & C. T. Elias leg. 1 male and 1 female (DZ 15.743*, DZ 17.073*) (DZUP), 20.VII.1969, C. & C. T. Elias leg. 1 male and 1 female (DZ 17.071, DZ 17.068) (DZUP), 750 m, 25-29.III.1970, H. Ebert leg. 1 male and 1 female (DZ 15.388*, DZ 15.785*) (DZUP), 28.VIII.1968, H. Ebert leg. 1 male (DZ 17.074*) (DZUP), 900 m, 22.III.1971, Callaghan leg. 1 female (MGCL). Minas Gerais: Alto Caparaó (Parque Nacional do Caparaó), 1400 m, 6-8.II.1987, Mielke & Casagrande leg. 1 male (OM 13.750*) (OM). Barbacena (Serra da Mantiqueira), 1100 m, 25.III.1951, H. Ebert leg. 1 male (DZ 17.083) (DZUP), 30.VI.1951, H. Ebert leg. 1 male (DZ 17.085) (DZUP), 29.VIII.1951, H. Ebert leg. 1 male (DZ 17.104) (DZUP), 11.VIII.1952, H. Ebert leg. 1 male (DZ 17.101*) (DZUP), 22.VIII.1952, H. Ebert leg. 1 male (OM 65.974*) (OM), 5.XII.1953, H. Ebert leg. 1 female (DZ 17.107*) (DZUP), 11.IV.1955, H. Ebert leg. 1 male (DZ 17.076) (DZUP), 8.V.1967, H. Ebert leg. 2 males (DZ 17.070*, DZ 17.108) (DZUP), 1100 m, 14.VI.1972, Mielke & Brown leg. 1 male (DZ 16.419*) (DZUP), 22.VII.1972, Ebert leg. 3 males (DZ 17.105, DZ 17.062, OM 75.974) (DZUP, OM), 1200 m, 6.XII.1970, Callaghan leg. 1 male and 1 female (MGCL), 1100 m, 20.IV.1975, Callaghan leg. 3 males (MGCL); Catas Altas (Caraça), 24.IV.1975, Callaghan leg. 1 female (MGCL), II.1978, N. Tangerini leg. 1 female (DZ 36.533) (DZUP), 2-4.I.1985, Becker leg. 1 male (OM 50.773*) (OM), 1300-1500m, 1-5.II.1985, Mielke & Casagrande leg. 9 males and 3 females (DZ 17.091, DZ 17.075, DZ 17.094, DZ 17.098, DZ 17.764, DZ 15.757, DZ 15.381*, DZ 15.367*, DZ 17.069*, DZ 15.806*, DZ 17.061, DZ 17.087*) (DZUP), 1300 m, 1.XII.1988, O. & E. Mielke leg. 1 male and 1 female (OM 19.363*, OM 19.333) (OM), 1300 m, 4-6.III.2003, Mielke & Casagrande leg. 7 males and 3 females (OM 59.180, OM 59.397, OM 59.360, OM 59.279, OM 59.544*, OM 59.297*, OM 59.751, OM 59.325*, OM 59.680, OM 59.370) (OM), 19.IV.2003, Mielke leg. 2 males (OM 60.715, OM 60.806) (OM), 16-18.IX.2006, Mielke & Casagrande leg. 4 males (DZ 17.095, DZ 15.591*, DZ 17.093* DZ 17.096) (DZUP); Congonhas (Rio de Janeiro-Belo Horizonte road Km 344), 10- 12.IV.1973, Callaghan leg. 1 male (MGCL); Cristália (Morro do Chapéu), 1300 m, 14.II.2010, P. Grossi leg. 1 male (DZ 16.662*) (DZUP); Delfim Moreira (15 Km SE), 1500-1800 m, 17-18.I.2004, Mielke & Casagrande leg. 1 male (DZ 15.729*) (DZUP), 22-23.I.2004, Mielke & Casagrande leg. 1 female (DZ 17.117*) (DZUP); Ouro Branco, 1150m, 7.III.1954, Ebert leg. 2 males (OM 10.331*, OM 10.330) (OM); Ouro Preto, 1100 m, 21.VII.1953, Ebert leg. 2 males and 1 female (OM 65.904*, OM 66.002, OM 66.016*) (OM); Poços de Caldas, 1200 m, 3- 4.X.1966, Ebert leg. 1 male (DZ 17.078) (DZUP); Santana do Riacho (Serra do Espinhaço, Alto Palacio), 1350 m, 12.VIII.2013, A. C. V. Pires leg. 1 male (DZ 36.542) (DZUP); São João del Rei, 1000 m, 19.VIII.1956, Ebert leg. 1 male (DZ 17.079) (DZUP). Rio de Janeiro: Petrópolis (São José do Rio Preto), 600 m, 16.IV.1965, Mielke leg. 3 males (OM 7.124, OM 7.123, OM 7.125*) (OM). São Paulo: Atibaia (Pedra Grande), 1200-1500 m, 31.XII.2001, Moser leg. 1 male (CLAM); Joanópolis, 1000-1400 m, 2.I.2002, Moser leg. 1 female (CLAM).Published as part of Dolibaina, Diego Rodrigo, Mielke, Olaf Hermann Hendrik & Casagrande, Mirna Martins, 2017, Taxonomy of Rufocumbre gen. nov., a new Moncini skipper genus (Lepidoptera: Hesperiidae: Hesperiinae), pp. 196-216 in Zootaxa 4365 (2) on pages 208-209, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4365.2.5, http://zenodo.org/record/111760
Développement social du jeune enfant. Structure et complexité des interactions dyadiques entre jeunes enfants : Contribution à une nouvelle méthode d’étude
No full textCasagrande Christine, Magnusson M.-S. Développement social du jeune enfant. Structure et complexité des interactions dyadiques entre jeunes enfants : Contribution à une nouvelle méthode d’étude. In: Diplômées, n°163, 1992. Congrès de Stanford. pp. 229-233
Telemiades cryptus Siewert, Mielke & Casagrande 2020, sp. nov.
No full textTelemiades cryptus Siewert, Mielke & Casagrande, sp. nov. (Figs 140, 141, 179, 219) Diagnosis. Telemiades cryptus Siewert, Mielke & Casagrande, sp. nov. resembles the species from the “ meris group” and from the “ trenda group”, but is distinguished by the posterior margin of tegumen with the proximal pair of apophysis flat and four times larger than distal pair in dorsal view; central margin of uncus with triangular projection in lateral view; dorso–distal region of valva as a spine–like projection curved inwards and distal region elongated and sharp. Description. Head: frons and vertex dark brown and yellow. Eyes surrounded by greyish scales. Labial palpi with first and second segments dark brown and greyish; third segment dark brown. Thorax: dorsally dark brown; ventrally dark brown and yellow. FW: length of males 18 mm (n=2). DFW (Fig. 140): ground color brown; four dark brown spots: two cellular (upper and lower) and two discal in CuA 1 –CuA 2 and CuA 2 +2A; three apical hyaline spots in R 3 –R 4, R 4 –R 5 and R 5 –M 1; five dark brown submarginal spots in M 1 –M 2, M 2 –M 3, M 3 –CuA 1, CuA 1 –CuA 2, and CuA 2 –2A. DHW (Fig. 140): ground color brown; two discal dark brown rounded spots in lower cell and CuA 2 –2A; six dark brown submarginal spots as an irregular band in Rs–M 1, M 1 –M 2, M 2 –M 3, M 3 –CuA 1, CuA 1 –CuA 2 and CuA 2 –2A. VFW (Fig. 141): as DFW; ground color light brown; spots darker. VHW (Fig. 141): as DHW; ground color light brown; spots darker; dark brown spot in anal region. Abdome: dorsally dark brown; ventrally dark brown and yellow. Male genitalia (Fig. 179): tegumen rounded; posterior margin with two pairs of lateral apophysis extending to half of uncus, the proximal pair flat and four times larger than distal pair in dorsal view. Anterior projection of saccus triangular, anterior margin rounded. Uncus rectangular, about same size of tegumen; posterior margin with two rounded lateral apophysis and with central region truncated. Valva rectangular, twice as long as wide; costa rectangular; dorso–distal region of valva as a spine–like projection curved inwards and distal region alongated and sharp; sacculus rectangular, about 1/2 the length of valva. Fultura inferior distally bifid, with distal margin rounded and ventral portion truncated. Aedeagus cylindrical; insertion of manica in the middle of aedeagus; opening for ejaculatory bulb rounded; distal margin truncated; opening for vesica dorsal and lateral left, about 1/3 of size of aedeagus; cornuti as two lines of sharp spines, the first smaller. Female unknown. Distibution. Telemiades cryptus, sp. nov. is known from Villavicencio, Meta, Colombia, and from Mâncio Lima, Porto Acre, and Marechal Thaumaturgo, Acre, Brazil. Etymology. The specific epithet is derived from the Greek kryptos, hidden. The name represents the fact which this species could be easily mistaken with species from “ meris group” and from “ trenda group”. Taxonomic discussion. Telemiades cryptus, sp. nov. is similar to the species of the “ meris group” and “ trenda group” but has a unique morphology of the male genitalia that differs from any other Telemiades group. Type material. Holotype male deposited at DZUP–OM with the following labels: / HOLOTYPUS / 4–X–1980 Villavicencio [Meta] Colombia Callaghan leg/ OM 29.585 / GEN. PREP. MIELKE 1997 / Holotypus Telemiades cryptus Siewert, Mielke & Casagrande det. 2019/. Paratype. BRAZIL: Acre— Mâncio Lima, Parque Nacional da Serra do Divisor, 7° 26’ 50’’ S, 73° 39’ 52’’ W, 10–21–IX–2011, 1 male, Dolibaina & Moura leg., DZ 33.910 (DZUP); 20–27–VI–2013, 1 male, Mielke, Casagrande, Carneiro, Dias & Dolibaina leg., DZ 33.912 (DZUP); Marechal Thaumaturgo, Rio Juruá, E da Vila do Breu, 3–IX–1997, 1 male, K. Brown leg., OM 45.352 * (DZUP–OM); Porto Acre, Reserva Humaitá, 200 m, 8–10–IX–2004, 1 male, Mielke & Casagrande leg., DZ 26.268* (DZUP).Published as part of Siewert, Ricardo Russo, Mielke, Olaf Hermann Hendrik & Casagrande, Mirna Martins, 2020, Taxonomic revision of the Neotropical genus Telemiades Hübner, [1819] (Lepidoptera: Hesperiidae: Eudaminae), with descriptions of fourteen new species, pp. 1-111 in Zootaxa 4721 (1) on pages 79-80, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4721.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/360290
Telemiades quammeni Siewert, Mielke & Casagrande 2020, sp. nov.
No full textTelemiades quammeni Siewert, Mielke & Casagrande, sp. nov. (Figs 66–69, 159, 195, 212) Diagnosis. Telemiades quammeni Siewert, Mielke & Casagrande, sp. nov. is easily distinguished from other species of the “ corbulo group” by the ground color brown in both sexes, without bluish or purple reflections. Besides, it’s the only known species of the group with records in Atlantic Forest areas. Description. Head: frons and vertex dark brown. Eyes surrounded by white scales. Labial palpi with first and second segments dark brown and greyish; third segment dark brown. Antennae dark brown, base of each segment ventrally cream from the second half towards apiculus; nudum of 25–27 segments. Thorax: dorsally dark brown; ventrally dark brown and greyish. FW: length of males 19–21 mm (n=12) and females 21–24 mm (n=10). DFW (Figs 66, 68): ground color dark brown in males and light brown in females; dark spot on basal area extending until the half of wing; six dark brown submarginal spots in R 5 –M 1, M 1 –M 2, M 2 –M 3, M 3 –CuA 1, CuA 1 –CuA 2 and CuA 2 –2A; three apical hyaline spots in R 3 –R 4, R 4 –R 5 and R 5 –M 1, the last smaller. DHW (Figs 66, 68): ground color dark brown in males and light brown in females; dark spot in basal area; submarginal dark brown spots as an irregular band in Rs–M 1, M 1 –M 2, M 2 –M 3, M 3 –CuA 1, CuA 1 –CuA 2 and CuA 2 – 2A; males with a tuft of long dark hair–like scales in Sc–R 1 –Rs; oval greyish patch under the tuft of androconial scales. VFW (Figs 67, 69): as DFW; ground color dark brown; spots darker; males with oval cream patch below CuA 2 –2A. VHW (Figs 67, 69): as DHW; ground color light brown; spots darker. Abdome: dorsally dark brown; ventrally dark brown and greyish. Male genitalia (Fig. 159): tegumen rounded; distal margin with two pairs of lateral apophysis with half size of uncus. Anterior projection of saccus triangular, anterior margin rounded. Uncus shorter, about 1/2 the length of tegumen; distal margin with two lateral apophysis rounded with median region truncated. Valva rectangular, twice as long as wide; costa rectangular; distal process of harpe long and rounded, with margin serrated and dorsal process with a spine–like projection curved inwards; sacculus rectangular, about 1/2 the length of valva. Fultura inferior distally bifid, with distal margin rounded and base truncated. Aedeagus cylindrical, insertion of manica the middle of aedeagus; opening for ejaculatory bulb rounded; distal margin truncated; opening for vesica dorsal, about 1/3 of size of aedeagus; cornuti as numerous spines, all with same size. Female genitalia (Fig. 196): tergum VIII rounded; papilla analis covered by scales on apical third; posterior apophysis with same size of papilla. Lamella antevaginalis rectangular. Lamela postvaginalis rectangular and bifid, distal margin truncated. Ductus bursae membranous, sclerotized proximally of ostium, corpus bursae membranous and globular, with same size of ductus; signa absent. Distribution. Telemiades quammeni sp. nov. occurs in Altantic Forest areas, being registered from the Brazilian states of Pernambuco to Paraná. Etymology. This species is named to honor David Quammen, an American science, nature and travel writer, and author of several books, including “The Song of the Dodo”, “Spillover”, and “The Flight of the Iguana”. Taxonomic discussion. Telemiades quammeni sp. nov. is easily distinguished from the other species of the “ corbulo group” by the absence of blue and purple reflections on DW, and to the distribution restricted to the Atlantic Forest. In addition, there is a significant difference in the morphological patterns of the male and female genitalia when compared to the other species of the “ corbulo group”. Type material. Holotype male deposited at DZUP–OM with the following labels: / HOLOTYPUS / Cacatu, Antonina P [a]R[aná] [Brazil], 25–IV–87 20m, Mielke leg./ OM 14.182 / Holotypus Telemiades quammeni Siewert, Mielke & Casagrande det. 2019/. Allotype female deposited at DZUP with the following labels: / ALLOTYPUS / Alexandra Paraná—Brasil 12–IV–1969 O. Mielke leg./ DZ 26.385/ Allotypus Telemiades quammeni Siewert, Mielke & Casagrande det. 2019/. Paratypes. BRAZIL: Pernambuco— Recife, Camaragibe, 2–X–1968, 1 male, Ebert leg., ex–coll. Ebert, DZ 26.387 (DZUP). Bahia— Camacan, Serra Bonita, 27–XI–14–XII–2005, 1 male, Emery leg., ex–coll. Emery, DZ 34.043 (DZUP); Mucuri, 20–VI–1968, 1 female, C. Elias leg., DZ 26.382 (DZUP). Espírito Santo— Conceição da Barra, 5–IV–1968, 1 female, C. & C. T. Elias leg., DZ 2.952* (DZUP); 4–IX–1969, 1 male, C. & C. T. Elias leg., DZ 26.377 (DZUP); 10–IX–1969, 1 female, C. & C. T. Elias leg., DZ 26.384 (DZUP); XII–1985, 1 male, Elias leg., DZ 26.371 (DZUP); Linhares, 28–III–1970, 1 male, C. Elias leg., DZ 26.372 (DZUP); 9–14–IV–1973, 1 female, C. Elias leg., DZ 26.380 (DZUP); 11–16–VI–1973, 1 male, C. Elias leg., DZ 3.846* (DZUP); 25–30–VI–1973, 1 male and 2 females, C. Elias leg., DZ 26.376, DZ 26.383, DZ 26.391 (DZUP); 12–17–VIII–1974, 1 male, C. Elias leg., DZ 26.375 (DZUP); 19–24–VIII–1974, 1 female, C. Elias leg., DZ 26.381 (DZUP); XI–1978, 1 male, C. Elias leg., DZ 26.373 (DZUP). Minas Gerais— Marliéria, Parque Estadual do Rio Doce, 200 m, 14–XII–1972, 1 male, H. & H. D. Ebert leg., ex–coll. Ebert, DZ 26.379 (DZUP); 15–XII–1972, 1 male, H. & H. D. Ebert leg., ex–coll. Ebert, DZ 26.378 (DZUP); 350 m, 8–9–III–1994, 2 males, Mielke leg., DZ 26.388, DZ 26.389 (DZUP). Rio de Janeiro— Angra dos Reis, VI–1934, 1 female, Travassos leg., OM 12.773 * (DZUP–OM); Cachoeiras de Macacu, Boca do Mato, 17–V–1992, 1 female, N. Tangerini leg., ex–coll. Tangerini, DZ 36.137 (DZUP); Duque de Caxias, Imbariê, 150 m, 15–II–1966, 1 female, Ebert leg., ex–coll. Ebert, DZ 26.390 (DZUP); 16–II–1966, 1 female, Ebert leg., ex–coll. Ebert, DZ 26.386 (DZUP); Petrópolis, 16–V–1969, 1 male, Ebert leg., ex–coll. Ebert, OM 39.543 * (DZUP–OM). Paraná— Antonina, Cacatu, 20 m, 20–IV–1987, 1 female, Mielke leg., DZ 14.044 (DZUP); 25–IV–1987, 2 males and 2 females, Mielke leg., OM 14.162, OM 14.163, DZ 14.181, DZ 14.183* (DZUP–OM); 15–IV–2003, 1 female, Mielke leg., OM 60.752 (DZUP–OM); Paranaguá, Alexandra, 12–IV–1969, 1 male, Mielke leg., DZ 26.374 (DZUP); Querência do Norte, RPPN Fazenda da Mata, 22° 58’ 60’’ S, 53º 31’ 59’’ W, 5–X–2012, 1 male, LABLEP leg., DZ 36.136 (DZUP); RPPN Fazenda Santa Fé, 23° 05’ 37’’S, 53° 35’ 43’’W, 11–12-IX-2018, 7 males, Casagrande, Mielke, Carneiro & Orlandin leg., DZ 47.101, DZ 47.102, DZ 47.092, DZ 47.091, DZ 47.112, DZ 47.111, DZ 47.113 (DZUP).Published as part of Siewert, Ricardo Russo, Mielke, Olaf Hermann Hendrik & Casagrande, Mirna Martins, 2020, Taxonomic revision of the Neotropical genus Telemiades Hübner, [1819] (Lepidoptera: Hesperiidae: Eudaminae), with descriptions of fourteen new species, pp. 1-111 in Zootaxa 4721 (1) on pages 45-46, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4721.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/360290
- …
