22,942 research outputs found
William Booth Taliaferro correspondence, 1859
No full text74 items. Unfinished letter of [?] to Rufus J. Colley (bears legal notes concerning estate of William H. Roy), Francis M. Boykin, Jr., Upperville Male Academy, John Haw, Thomas H. Ellis, P.M. Tabb & Son, order from Henry A. Wise to Gibson to call on Superintendent of Arsenal at Harper's Ferry for amunition, John Blair Hoge to Wise, S. Bassett French to Jno. B. Hoge, Morton Marye, Sister to William Booth Taliaferro, H.H. Dent, Medical Report of R. A. Straith, David S. Watson, J. Lucins Davis, William Munford to J.M. Rowan, Alfred M. Barbour (issuing ammunition and bursting of guns), E. W. Balch, William Booth Taliaferro to Wise, James L. Kemper, Alexander Galt Taliaferro, William B. Hartley, Robert F. Getty (E.G. Otis Yonkers Examiner Reporter), W. (leter to Wise, anti-hanging John Brown), William Munford to H.L. Bowen (transmitting denial of Bowen's request by William Booth Taliaferro), George W. Munford, J.A. Vadenbousch to William Booth Taliaferro, S. Bassett French (for William Booth Taliaferro) to M.M. Anderson, L.H. King to [?] Wargh concerning credentials of E.G Otis, Capt. to [?] (promise to rescue him), Chas. G. Stone to J.L. Davis (publication), John Scott, J. Lucinus, William, R.D., Edmund Mason, William H. anthony Henry C. Allen--conditions at Charlestown Jail, Powhatan Robinson page (for William Booth Taliaferro) to John B. Hoge, William Booth Taliaferro per O. Jennings Wise to William Sherrard, Ap.P. Shutt, E.G. Otis to his wife (including description of Mt. Vernon), Draft of William Booth Taliaferro to Haw, William Booth Taliaferro (per I. Jennings Wise to [?] Moore), William Booth Taliaferro to [?] Clarke, (Congressman) A. W. Boteler to William Booth Taliaferro, Edward Graham to William Booth Taliaferro, Pohatan Robinson Page, J.R. Chambliss, H. H. Mays, J.D. Bright, James C. Van Dyke, Henry M. Phillips to Charles J. Faukner, P. Ranchfoss, Ro[bert] Tyler, ?Francis B, Jones, W.B. Stanard [at Bendover], J.W. Ware, William H. Richardson, A.K. Syester, J.W. Rowan, Bond of B.R. Gaine to Warner Throckmorton Toliaferro (executor of William H. Roy
Ki-67 is a PP1-interacting protein that organises the mitotic chromosome periphery
No full textCopyright @ 2014 Booth et al. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.When the nucleolus disassembles during open mitosis, many nucleolar proteins and RNAs associate with chromosomes, establishing a perichromosomal compartment coating the chromosome periphery. At present nothing is known about the function of this poorly characterised compartment. In this study, we report that the nucleolar protein Ki-67 is required for the assembly of the perichromosomal compartment in human cells. Ki-67 is a cell-cycle regulated protein phosphatase 1-binding protein that is involved in phospho-regulation of the nucleolar protein B23/nucleophosmin. Following siRNA depletion of Ki-67, NIFK, B23, nucleolin, and four novel chromosome periphery proteins all fail to associate with the periphery of human chromosomes. Correlative light and electron microscopy (CLEM) images suggest a near-complete loss of the entire perichromosomal compartment. Mitotic chromosome condensation and intrinsic structure appear normal in the absence of the perichromosomal compartment but significant differences in nucleolar reassembly and nuclear organisation are observed in post-mitotic cells
A Conversation with Char Booth
No full textWelcome to a special audio edition of In the Library with the Lead Pipe. Ellie Collier talks to Char Booth, E-Learning Librarian at the University of California at Berkeley and author of Informing Innovation: Tracking Student Interest in Emerging Library Technologies at Ohio University, a book length research report recently published by ACRL and available [...
Booth, S, WX6684
No full textThis record was harvested from a previous catalogue system and will be withdrawn in 2025. Information in this record may be superseded or incomplete. Visit this record in UMA's new catalogue at: https://archives.library.unimelb.edu.au/nodes/view/372646Surname: BOOTH
Given Name(s) or Initials: S
Military Service Number or Last Known Location: WX6684
Missing, Wounded and Prisoner of War Enquiry Card Index Number: 43523183564
Item: [2016.0049.04971] "Booth, S, WX6684
Phenomenographic perspectives on the learning experience and process in higher education physics
No full textPresented at the Higher Education Close-Up conference (HECU4), Cape Town, June 2008The focus of phenomenographic research has been the experience of learning (Marton & Säljö, 1976a;
Marton & Säljö, 1976b; Säljö, 1979; Marton et al., 1984/1997; Booth, 1997; Marton & Booth, 1997;
Pang, 2003). Drawing on our recent research into the process of learning in higher education physics
contexts, we present a discussion of the experience and process of learning, and perspectives from
which it can be analysed and understood that emerge from the phenomenographic tradition. First we
will relate our empirical work, then elaborate on it as an example of a study of learning. Then we will
enter into a reflection on phenomenography as a research approach for the 21st century, in the
delimited field of researching learning and teaching practices in higher education, and make an
argument that phenomenography has a role to play in the transformative processes demanded by a
changing society
Paul Henry Gore-Booth and President F.L. Hovde
No full textPhotograph of President F.L. Hovde; Mr. Paul Henry Gore - Booth (British Diplomat and Author) and President Hovde, Ca. late 1940's
Rules, discretion and local responsibility : development control case studies in the urban community of Lyon.
No full textThe research presented in this thesis rests on the premise that the administrative and legal systems of France have a critical bearing on the way that decisions on applications for permissions to build are taken, and the nature of the
decisions themselves. In the knowledge that the French system of law offered a legalistic, regulatory franiework for planning policy and policy implementation, four
specific questions are posed: firstly about the relationship of plans to development control decisions; secondly about the effects of the system on applicants; thirdly about the possibilities for third parties to be involved in, and seek redress from, development control decisions and fourthly about the effects of the decentralisation of development control powers that has taken place since 1983. These questions are then located within a broader discussion of discretion, accountability and the management of uncertainty. The theoretical discussion of the first chapter paves the way for a more detailed presentation of the nature and origins of French local administration and French planning law and procedure which in turn lead to a case study of the 55 communes of the Urban Community of Lyon and eight studies of development control applications which are explored through an examination of the case file documents and interviews with participants. Two sets of conclusions are drawn from the study. The first set concerns the
effects of a legalised system on the making and implementation of planning policy. The first conclusion is that the legalistic approach of the French planning system
appears to create serious difficulties for finding an appropriate expression for policy. In part the problem is shown to be as much a question of ethos as of what is really
possible under the law, amid some examples of practice in Lyon show how flexibility is still possible even within a legalised system. The second conclusion is that once the
rules are departed from, the system offers no alternative means of testing policy in its specific application, although the use of non-statutory consultation meetings in Lyon has gone some way to meeting the problem. The third is that the pattern of zoning and regulations does not appear to help the maintenance of a planning strategy. The fourth is that a legalised system does not promote certainty for either administrators or applicants. The fifth is that a legalised system does not permit third parties to participate in the decision-making and ensures that objections are seen mainly as being about property values.
The second set of conclusions has to do with the question of the power to decide and the accountability of decision-makers. The first is that the legalised system, while offering potential for agency discretion, nevertheless appears to favour officer discretion which on the evidence of the case studies is rife. While offering mayors the possibility of tactical power, it appears to reduce the accountability for decisions taken. Moreover, the control of the legality of decisions is dependent equally upon the discretion of the prefect. The second is that the pattern of crossregulation within the French system of local government has ensured the continuity of dependencies between the principal actors in the planning system. The final
conclusion is that decentralisation has had relatively little effect on the balance of power. In the Lyon conurbation, COURLY would appear to be the principal
beneficiary of the new powers, which would suggest that more power will be concentrated in future at the local level, but that the power will not be any more susceptible to control by the electorate
- …
