660 research outputs found
Fluid pressure arrival time tomography: Estimation and assessment in the presence of inequality constraints, with an application to production at the Krechba field, Algeria
No full text
Deep Learning for InSAR Phase Filtering: An Optimized Framework for Phase Unwrapping
No full textInterferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar (InSAR) data processing applications, such as deformation monitoring and topographic mapping, require an interferometric phase filtering step. Indeed, the filtering quality significantly impacts the deformation and terrain height estimation accuracy. However, the existing classical and deep learning-based phase filtering methods provide artefacts in the filtered areas where a large amount of noise prevents retrieving the original signal. In this way, we can no longer distinguish the underlying informative signal for the next processing step. This paper proposes a deep convolutional neural network filtering method, developing a novel learning strategy to preserve the initial phase noise input into these crucial areas. Thanks to the encoder–decoder powerful phase feature extraction ability, the network can predict an accurate coherence and filtered interferometric phase, ensuring reliable final results. Furthermore, we also address a novel Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) interferograms simulation strategy that, using initial parameters estimated from real SAR images, considers physical behaviors typical of a real acquisition. According to the results achieved on simulated and real InSAR data, the proposed filtering method significantly outperforms the classical and deep learning-based ones
"Fluid pressure arrival-time tomography: Estimation and assessment in the presence of inequality constraints with an application to production at the Krechba field, Algeria
No full text
Learning Ground Displacement Signals Directly from InSAR-Wrapped Interferograms
No full textMonitoring ground displacements identifies potential geohazard risks early before they cause critical damage. Interferometric synthetic aperture radar (InSAR) is one of the techniques that can monitor these displacements with sub-millimeter accuracy. However, using the InSAR technique is challenging due to the need for high expertise, large data volumes, and other complexities. Accordingly, the development of an automated system to indicate ground displacements directly from the wrapped interferograms and coherence maps could be highly advantageous. Here, we compare different machine learning algorithms to evaluate the feasibility of achieving this objective. The inputs for the implemented machine learning models were pixels selected from the filtered-wrapped interferograms of Sentinel-1, using a coherence threshold. The outputs were the same pixels labeled as fast positive, positive, fast negative, negative, and undefined movements. These labels were assigned based on the velocity values of the measurement points located within the pixels. We used the Parallel Small Baseline Subset service of the European Space Agency’s GeoHazards Exploitation Platform to create the necessary interferograms, coherence, and deformation velocity maps. Subsequently, we applied a high-pass filter to the wrapped interferograms to separate the displacement signal from the atmospheric errors. We successfully identified the patterns associated with slow and fast movements by discerning the unique distributions within the matrices representing each movement class. The experiments included three case studies (from Italy, Portugal, and the United States), noted for their high sensitivity to landslides. We found that the Cosine K-nearest neighbor model achieved the best test accuracy. It is important to note that the test sets were not merely hidden parts of the training set within the same region but also included adjacent areas. We further improved the performance with pseudo-labeling, an approach aimed at evaluating the generalizability and robustness of the trained model beyond its immediate training environment. The lowest test accuracy achieved by the implemented algorithm was 80.1%. Furthermore, we used ArcGIS Pro 3.3 to compare the ground truth with the predictions to visualize the results better. The comparison aimed to explore indications of displacements affecting the main roads in the studied area
- …
