1,005 research outputs found

    Leung, L. Ruby

    No full text

    Correction to: Urbanization Impact on Regional Climate and Extreme Weather: Current Understanding, Uncertainties, and Future Research Directions (Advances in Atmospheric Sciences, (2022), 39, 6, (819-860), 10.1007/s00376-021-1371-9)

    No full text
    The article “Urbanization Impact on Regional Climate and Extreme Weather: Current Understanding, Uncertainties, and Future Research Directions”, written by Yun QIAN, TC CHAKRABORTY, Jianfeng LI, Dan LI, Cenlin HE, Chandan SARANGI, Fei CHEN, Xuchao YANG, and L. Ruby LEUNG was originally published electronically on the publisher’s internet portal on 25 of January 2022 with open access.</p

    MJO-QBO Model Inter-comparison Data

    No full text
    Data in support of the paper "The Lack of a QBO-MJO Connection in Climate Models with a Nudged Stratosphere" by Zane K. Martin, Isla R. Simpson, Pu Lin, Clara Orbe, Qi Tang, Julie M. Caron, Chih-Chieh Chen, Hyemi Kim, L. Ruby Leung, Jadwiga H. Richter, and Shaocheng Xie, currently in preparation for submission. Data is organized by model, then ensemble member, then the temporal data resolution. Daily data are daily model OLR (olr/) and precipitation (precip/) in lat/lon/time format, over at least the tropical region spanning all longitudes and 20N to 20S. Daily data also include the Real-time Multivariate MJO index (RMM; RMM_index/) value from each model and ensemble members. OLR and precip files are provided on a 2.5 x 2.5 degree similar grid, rather than the models' native grid. Monthly data are temperature (temp/, at all vertical levels and all longitudes, from at least 20N to 20S, and the 100 hPa temperature file, as described more in the paper) zonal wind (at all vertical levels, and the 50 hPa wind file; wind/), and TEM vertical velocity (wtem/)

    Atmospheric_river_land_hydrology_western_US_HUC8_datasets

    No full text
    Dataset for the manuscript entitled "Impact of Atmospheric Rivers on Surface Hydrological Processes in Western U.S. Watersheds".   It includes daily meteorological and surface hydrological data from western U.S. WRF simulation. Data is aggregated to 8-digit Hydrological Unit (HUC8) watersheds.   To use this dataset, please cite the following two publications:   Chen, X., Leung, L. R., Gao, Y., Liu, Y., Wigmosta, M., & Richmond, M. (2018). Predictability of extreme precipitation in western U.S. watersheds based on atmospheric river occurrence, intensity, and duration. Geophysical Research Letters, 45, 11,693–11,701. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GL079831   Chen, X., Leung, L. R., Wigmosta, M., & Richmond, M. (2019). Impact of Atmospheric Rivers on Surface Hydrological Processes in Western U.S. Watersheds. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JD03468</p

    A multi-algorithm approach for modeling coastal wetland eco-geomorphology

    No full text
    Coastal wetlands play an important role in the global water and biogeochemical cycles. Climate change makes it more difficult for these ecosystems to adapt to the fluctuation in sea levels and other environmental changes. Given the importance of eco-geomorphological processes for coastal wetland resilience, many eco-geomorphology models differing in complexity and numerical schemes have been developed in recent decades. However, their divergent estimates of the response of coastal wetlands to climate change indicate that substantial structural uncertainties exist in these models. To investigate the structural uncertainty of coastal wetland eco-geomorphology models, we developed a multi-algorithm model framework of eco-geomorphological processes, such as mineral accretion and organic matter accretion, within a single hydrodynamics model. The framework is designed to explore possible ways to represent coastal wetland eco-geomorphology in Earth system models and reduce the related uncertainties in global applications. We tested this model framework at three representative coastal wetland sites: two saltmarsh wetlands (Venice Lagoon and Plum Island Estuary) and a mangrove wetland (Hunter Estuary). Through the model–data comparison, we showed the importance of using a multi-algorithm ensemble approach for more robust predictions of the evolution of coastal wetlands. We also found that more observations of mineral and organic matter accretion at different elevations of coastal wetlands and evaluation of the coastal wetland models at different sites in diverse environments can help reduce the model uncertainty

    Correction to: Understanding what matters most to patients in acute care in seven countries, using the flash mob study design

    No full text
    Following publication of the original article [1], the authors identified an error in the author name of Ling Yan LEUNG. The incorrect author name is: L. E. U. N. G. Ling Yan The correct author name is: Ling Yan LEUNG The author group has been updated above and the original article [1] has been corrected.</p

    Cerebral atrophy in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer disease: rates and acceleration.

    No full text
    OBJECTIVE: To quantify the regional and global cerebral atrophy rates and assess acceleration rates in healthy controls, subjects with mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and subjects with mild Alzheimer disease (AD). METHODS: Using 0-, 6-, 12-, 18-, 24-, and 36-month MRI scans of controls and subjects with MCI and AD from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) database, we calculated volume change of whole brain, hippocampus, and ventricles between all pairs of scans using the boundary shift integral. RESULTS: We found no evidence of acceleration in whole-brain atrophy rates in any group. There was evidence that hippocampal atrophy rates in MCI subjects accelerate by 0.22%/year2 on average (p = 0.037). There was evidence of acceleration in rates of ventricular enlargement in subjects with MCI (p = 0.001) and AD (p < 0.001), with rates estimated to increase by 0.27 mL/year2 (95% confidence interval 0.12, 0.43) and 0.88 mL/year2 (95% confidence interval 0.47, 1.29), respectively. A post hoc analysis suggested that the acceleration of hippocampal loss in MCI subjects was mainly driven by the MCI subjects that were observed to progress to clinical AD within 3 years of baseline, with this group showing hippocampal atrophy rate acceleration of 0.50%/year2 (p = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: The small acceleration rates suggest a long period of transition to the pathologic losses seen in clinical AD. The acceleration in hippocampal atrophy rates in MCI subjects in the ADNI seems to be driven by those MCI subjects who concurrently progressed to a clinical diagnosis of AD

    Correction to:Understanding what matters most to patients in acute care in seven countries, using the flash mob study design (BMC Health Services Research, (2021), 21, 1, (474), 10.1186/s12913-021-06459-4)

    No full text
    Following publication of the original article [1], the authors identified an error in the author name of Ling Yan LEUNG. The incorrect author name is: L. E. U. N. G. Ling Yan The correct author name is: Ling Yan LEUNG The author group has been updated above and the original article [1] has been corrected.</p

    Correction to:Understanding what matters most to patients in acute care in seven countries, using the flash mob study design (BMC Health Services Research, (2021), 21, 1, (474), 10.1186/s12913-021-06459-4)

    No full text
    Following publication of the original article [1], the authors identified an error in the author name of Ling Yan LEUNG. The incorrect author name is: L. E. U. N. G. Ling Yan The correct author name is: Ling Yan LEUNG The author group has been updated above and the original article [1] has been corrected.</p

    Correction to:Understanding what matters most to patients in acute care in seven countries, using the flash mob study design (BMC Health Services Research, (2021), 21, 1, (474), 10.1186/s12913-021-06459-4)

    No full text
    Following publication of the original article [1], the authors identified an error in the author name of Ling Yan LEUNG. The incorrect author name is: L. E. U. N. G. Ling Yan The correct author name is: Ling Yan LEUNG The author group has been updated above and the original article [1] has been corrected.</p
    corecore