123,504 research outputs found
Portrait of J. V. McDonald [picture] /
No full textTitle from inscription on reverse.; Condition: Fair, some creases and scratches.; Inscriptions: "Sidney Riley, Brisbane" --Embossed lower right. "J. V. McDonald" --In ink on reverse
Charles V. Riley, undated
No full textBlack and white photo of a man. Caption: "Charles V. Riley, Entomologist 1893-1895"
Australian Team v. England, First Test, Brisbane Cricket Ground, December 1950 [picture] /
No full textTitle from item.; Condition: good.; Inscriptions: "Australia won by 70 runs" -- on mount below title. Names of team, umpires and Bradman listed below on mount. "Sidney Riley, 246 Queen St. Brisbane" -- on mount beneath image. Group photograph of the Australian cricket team including: Tallon, Morris, Hassett (Captain), Miller, Harvey, Lindwall, Loxton, Archer, Moroney, Iverson, Jeanes (Manager), and Johnston. In background Donald Bradman with umpires Andy Barlow and H. Elphinston
Recommended from our members
Oral History Interview with George Riley, February 3, 1994
No full textInterview with George Riley concerning his experiences while employed by the Civilian Conservation Corps during the Great Depression. Riley worked at camps in Duncan, Arizona (Company 1814); Fredonia, Arizona (Company 1814); and Grand Junction, Colorado (Company 3892)
Oral History Interview with George Riley, February 3, 1994
No full textInterview with George Riley concerning his experiences while employed by the Civilian Conservation Corps during the Great Depression. Riley worked at camps in Duncan, Arizona (Company 1814); Fredonia, Arizona (Company 1814); and Grand Junction, Colorado (Company 3892)
Lt. Col. Riley V. Jackson
No full textHeadshot of Lt. Col. Riley V. Jackson, Professor of Military Science
The Life of Riley (v. California)
No full textIn The Life of Riley (v. California), Ohm examines the significance of Riley v. California and its limitation of the search‐incident‐to‐arrest exception when law enforcement seeks to search digital contents of a cell phone. He explores how the decision draws on doctrines such as the third-party doctrine, the extension of the home, and the mosaic theory to analyze location and information privacy. Ohm shows that Riley signals a meaningful rethinking of Fourth Amendment doctrine in the digital age: although cell phones are detachable physical items, their contents are qualitatively different from traditional objects subject to arrest‐incident searches. He further cautions that the privacy protection offered by Riley comes with a cost, particularly in creating procedural burdens for government agencies and possibly shifting investigative practices. Ultimately, The Life of Riley (v. California) places Riley in the broader context of evolving doctrinal analogies and emphasizes that while Riley was a landmark victory for privacy, it is not the end point of digital Fourth Amendment jurisprudence
Correspondence : Riley (Charles) and Engelmann (George), 1878-1881
No full textRiley to Engelmann, 1878-188
Ludic Inventions
No full textThe premiere performance at Sound Scotland Festival 2023 [see: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XsEVb24dIHI].
Music and live electronics - Colin Riley
Piano - Agnese Toniutti
Live audio-reactive visuals - Sabina Covarrubias
Film - Kristijonas Dirse
More information:
https://krisdirse.com/ludic-invention...Two Part Inventions: for solo piano. 1. Opinion Piece 2. Going Down 3. Tempus Fugue It 4. All Hands 5. Dara-Diddle 6. What Will B 7. Up And Running 8. Over To You 9. Dr Awkward 10. A Stitch In Time 11. Slow Talking 12. Exchange Rate Mechanism. duration c20 minutes.Score, live performance, interactive visuals. A collaborative project synergising sound and visuals for piano, live electronics, film and live visuals. https://krisdirse.com/ludic-inventions-2/Brunel University London; Sound Scotlan
Riley v. California: A Pyrric Victory for Privacy
No full textIn Riley v. California, the United States Supreme Court ushered privacy protections into the digital era and signaled that the Fourth Amendment would not become a constitutional afterthought. The Court unanimously held that, absent exigent circumstances, law enforcement officers could not search any area of an arrestee’s cell phone, including the outgoing call log, without a warrant and probable cause. At first glance, Riley appears to be a landmark decision in favor of individual privacy rights. As with most things, however, the devil is in the details, and the details in Riley make any celebration over the seemingly enhanced protections for privacy rights premature
- …
