105,110 research outputs found
Reeve, S J G, NX46731
No full textThis record was harvested from a previous catalogue system and will be withdrawn in 2025. Information in this record may be superseded or incomplete. Visit this record in UMA's new catalogue at: https://archives.library.unimelb.edu.au/nodes/view/412678Surname: REEVE. Given Name(s) or Initials: S J G. Military Service Number or Last Known Location: NX46731. Missing, Wounded and Prisoner of War Enquiry Card Index Number: 42693.229388
Item: [2016.0049.44940] "Reeve, S J G, NX46731
reeve
No full textreeve 1 v"Reeve" it out - unravel it (a knitted garment)G. M. Story JUL 1973JH JUL 1973Used IUsed I2Used IThe Word Form "reeve" appears in Sup, but with a different definition (under "reeve 2 n"); the quotation has been modified in the dictionary
Triphoris nodifera A. Adams & Reeve 1850
No full textTriphoris nodifera A. Adams & Reeve, 1850 Triphoris nodiferus A. Adams & Reeve, 1850: 46, pl. 11, fig. 37A–B. Triforis nodiferus A. Adams & Reeve, 1850 — Tryon 1887: 177, pl. 37, fig. 77. Triphora nodifera A. Adams & Reeve, 1850 — Kuroda & Habe 1952: 91. Type locality. China Sea. Type material. Not found in the NHMUK (Albano et al. 2019). Distribution. China Sea (Adams & Reeve 1850; Tryon 1887; Paetel 1888; Hidalgo 1905), Japan (Kuroda & Habe 1952), Philippines (Hidalgo 1905). Remarks. The genus Triphoris is of feminine gender, therefore the name should be Triphoris nodifera. Kosuge (1981) considered Triphoris nodifera A. Adams & Reeve, 1850 a junior synonym of Triphoris (Ino) concors Hinds, 1843.Published as part of Bakker, Piet A. J. & Albano, Paolo G., 2022, Nomenclator, geographic and stratigraphic distribution of the family Triphoridae (Mollusca: Gastropoda), pp. 1-216 in Zootaxa 5088 (1) on page 125, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5088.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/583653
Triphoris suturalis A. Adams & Reeve 1850
No full textTriphoris suturalis A. Adams & Reeve, 1850 Triphoris suturalis A. Adams & Reeve, 1850: 45, pl. 11, fig. 29A–B. Triforis suturalis A. Adams & Reeve, 1850 — Tryon 1887: 183, pl. 38, fig. 20. Triphora suturalis A. Adams & Reeve, 1850 — Kuroda & Habe 1952: 91. Type locality. China Sea. Type material. NHMUK 196513 is not considered a type specimen (Albano et al. 2019). Distribution. China Sea (Adams & Reeve 1850; Tryon 1887; Paetel 1888; Hidalgo 1905; Albano et al. 2019), Japan (Kuroda & Habe 1952; Higo et al. 1999), Philippines (Hidalgo 1905). Remarks. This species is considered a nomen dubium by Albano et al. 2019.Published as part of Bakker, Piet A. J. & Albano, Paolo G., 2022, Nomenclator, geographic and stratigraphic distribution of the family Triphoridae (Mollusca: Gastropoda), pp. 1-216 in Zootaxa 5088 (1) on page 168, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5088.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/583653
reeve
No full textreeve 2 v[5th category - Words shifted from one part of speech to another] . . . or _reeve_, meaning 'to wander far and wide'.PRINTED ITEM G. M. Story MAY 1970JH MAY 1970Used I and SupUsed I and SupNot use
A parallel Viterbi decoder for block cyclic and convolution codes
No full textWe present a parallel version of Viterbi's decoding procedure, for which we are able to demonstrate that the resultant task graph has restricted complexity in that the number of communications to or from any processor cannot exceed 4 for BCH codes. The resulting algorithm works in lock step making it suitable for implementation on a systolic processor array, which we have implemented on a field programmable gate array and demonstrate the perfect scaling of the algorithm for two exemplar BCH codes. The parallelisation strategy is applicable to all cyclic codes and convolution codes. We also present a novel method for generating the state transition diagrams for these codes
Carditella tegulata Reeve 1843
No full textCarditella tegulata (Reeve, 1843) Figs. 5 A– O, 9 E, Appendix 5 Cardita tegulata Reeve, 1843: pl. 9, fig. 48. Cardita tegulata— Reeve, 1844: 194; Hupé, 1854: 318. Cardita tegulina [sic] [recte tegulata]—d’Orbigny, 1845: 581. Actinobolus tegulatus Reeve—Adams & Adams, 1857: 487. Carditella tegulata Reeve—Smith, 1881: 43; Lamy, 1922: 357. Carditella pallida Smith, 1881: 43, pl. 5, figs. 9, 9b. Cardita tegulata Reeve—Clessin, 1888: 33, pl. 12, fig. 10. Erycinella (Carditella) pallida Smith, 1881 — Dall, 1903: 702. Carditella pallida Smith—Lamy, 1922: 355. Carditella Pallida Smith, 1881 —dell, 1964: 193. Carditella tegulata (Reeve, 1843) — Dell, 1964: 194, texfig. 3, no. 8; Reid & Osorio, 2000: 136, fig. 7 J. Carditopsis flabellum flabellum (Reeve, 1843) — Reid & Osorio, 2000: 136 (in part) (non Reeve). Carditella tegulata Reeve, 1843 — Cárdenas et al., 2008: 230 (in part) (not fig 7.91). Carditopsis flabellum Reeve, 1843 — Cárdenas et al., 2008: 232, figs. 7.92–94 (non Reeve). Type localities: Valparaíso, South America, 25 fathoms [46 m] (Cardita tegulata); Port Rosario, 2–30 fathoms [4– 55 m] (Carditella pallida). Material examined: 3 syntypes of Cardita tegulata (NHMUK 1967583); 2 syntypes of Carditella pallida (NHMUK 1879.10.15.122- 4), and 15 lots (Appendix 5, Table 1). Other published records: none. Known distribution: Valparaíso [33 °S], Chile to Beagle Channel [55 °S]. Although Dall (1909) reported C. tegulata as distributed from “Callao [Perú] to Valparaíso”, no formal records on the occurrence of this species in northern Chile or Perú are known. Living specimens: 10– 50 m. Description: Shell small in size (maximum observed L = 7.0 mm), widely triangular (H/L = 0.87 ± 0.03, n = 31), equilateral to somewhat inequilateral, flat (W/H = 0.55 ± 0.04, n = 31), solid (Figs. 5 A–L, O). Posterior end equal in height or slightly higher than anterior end. Anterior end sometimes slightly produced. Antero-dorsal margin long, descent straight to somewhat concave, forming a week angle at the junction with anterior margin. Anterior, ventral and posterior margins forming a continuous wide curve; ventral margin slightly expanded and truncated posteriorly. Postero-dorsal margin straight, as long as or longer than the antero-dorsal margin, sloping at a similar angle, forming well marked angle at the junction with posterior margin (Figs. 5 A–L). Lunule and escutcheon elongated and narrow; lunule one-half the length of the escutcheon (Fig. 5 O). Beaks low, acute, subcentrally located, anteriorly directed (Figs. 5 A–L, O). Prodissoconch eroded in studied specimens. Shell surface white, sculptured with 11–15 flat but strong radial ribs, paved with rectangular, juxtaposed scales; interspaces narrower than rib width, with fine commarginal lamellae (Figs. 5 A–G, J). Periostracum thick, beige to pale-buff (Figs. 5 A, B, D, E). Inner shell surface coincident with outer sculpture; inner margin crenulated (Figs. 5 H, I, K, L). Pallial line continuous. Hinge plate narrow (Figs. 5 M, N). Right valve (Fig. 5 N): anterior cardinal tooth (CA 3) hooked, with anterior part (CA 3 a) narrow, merged to dorsal margin, and posterior part (CA 3 b) larger, triangular at the base; posterior cardinal tooth (CP 5 b) short and narrow, oblique, close to CA 3 b, parallel to nymph. Anterior lateral tooth (LAI) elongated, narrow, with distal cusp. Posterior lateral tooth (LPI) elongated, high, not clearly differentiated from shell margin. Left valve (Fig. 5 M): with two small and divergent cardinal teeth, the anterior tooth (CA 2) elongated, ventrally directed, the posterior one (CA 4 b) conical, with subcentral cusp. Anterior lateral tooth (LAII) high, with subcentral cusp, close to dorsal margin. Posterior lateral tooth (LPII) elongated, relatively narrow, with distal cusp. External ligament located on a nymph which extends for one-third the length of postero-dorsal margin (Figs. 5 M– O). Internal ligament small, in a resilifer just below the beak, over the CP 5 b in the right valve, and behind CA 4 b, in the left valve (Figs. 5 M, N). Anatomy (Fig. 9 E): Transverse section of anterior and posterior adductor muscles large, the anterior ovate, the posterior pyriform, slightly smaller than the anterior. Both inner and outer demibranchs, present, posteriorly fused with each other. Outer demibranch one-fifth of size of inner demibranch, with 24 filaments in the larger specimens; ascending and descending lamellae equally developed. Inner demibranch with 35 filaments in the larger specimen; ascending and descending lamellae almost equal in height. Foot with posterior byssal gland. Remarks: Carditella pallida was originally differentiated from C. tegulata by the number of radial ribs ( 14–15 in the former, 11–12 in the latter), and the subcentrally located beaks. Reid & Osorio (2000) reported specimens from Estero Elefantes (45 º 55 ’S), with intermediate characters, suggesting that both names could refer to clinal variations of a single species. Our study of additional specimens allows us to confirm that Carditella pallida and C. tegulata are synonyms. The shell of this species varies from triangular and almost equilateral (similar to that described for C. pallida) to trapezoidal and inequilateral forms (corresponding to what was previously referred to as C. tegulata). Examination of the specimen figured by Reid & Osorio (2000) as “ Carditopsis flabellum flabellum ” (NHMUK 20080555), reveals a well-developed external ligament, therefore corresponding to Carditella tegulata. However, another specimen from the same expedition and station (MNHNCL 169) actually corresponds to the species referred to by the authors. Figure 5. Carditella tegulata. A, D, H, K: Syntype of Cardita tegulata, Valparaíso, 46 m (NHMUK 1967583); B, E: Syntype of Carditella pallida, Port Rosario, 4–55 m (NHMUK 1879.10.15.122- 124); C, F, I, L, M– O: Playa Llonco, 30–50 m (MACN-In 39064); G, J: Bahía Tom, 14 m (LACM 73 - 72). A–G, J: Outer views; A–C, G: Right valve; D–F, J: Left valve; H, I, K, L: Inner views; H, I: Left valve; K, L: Right valve; M, N: Detail of hinge plate; M: Left valve; N: Right valve; O: Dorsal view. Abbreviations: 2, 3a, 3 b, 4 b, 5 b = cardinal teeth; LAI, LAII = anterior lateral teeth; LPI, LPII = posterior lateral teeth; eL = external ligament; iL = internal ligament. Scale bars: A, B, D, E, G–L = 2 mm; C, F, M– O = 1 mm. Cárdenas et al. (2008) identified valves from Golfo Corcovado, Chile as Carditopsis flabellum. Although described as “lacking an outer ligament”, the figures they provided, as well as the material they studied (MZUC 32643), actually has an external ligament. The morphological characteristics of these valves reveal that they correspond to C. tegulata. The specimen figured by Cárdenas et al. (2008) as C. tegulata, actually corresponds to C. naviformis; however, the other specimens from the same lot (MZUC 32641) do correspond to C. tegulata. Melvill & Standen (1912) described Carditella pallida duodecimcostata from Burdwood Bank. The study of the type specimens reveals that they are not members of the genus Carditella but Carditopsis (see under Carditopsis flabellum).Published as part of Güller, Marina & Zelaya, Diego G., 2013, The Families Carditidae and Condylocardiidae in the Magellan and Perú – Chile provinces (Bivalvia: Carditoidea), pp. 201-239 in Zootaxa 3682 (2) on pages 211-214, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3682.2.1, http://zenodo.org/record/21732
Trochus (Infundibulops) cariniferus Reeve 1842
No full textTrochus (Infundibulops) cariniferus Reeve, 1842 Trochus cariniferus Reeve, 1842 b: 165 [Beck mss], pl. 218, fig. 8. Steyn & Lussi, 1998: 24, fig. 81. Deuss et al., 2013: 136, fig. e. Type loc.: unknown, designated Mozambique Island by Herbert (1993); neotype in NHM (NHMUK 1844.6.3.448), designated by Herbert (1993: 297, figs 94–97) [one of four ‘probable syntypes’ in NHM, without provenance]. Trochus (Infundibulops) cariniferus — Herbert, 1993: 292, figs 5, 94–108 (detailed synonymy and chresonymy). Distribution. Western Indian Ocean south to central KwaZulu-Natal (Isipingo); low intertidal and shallow subtidal reefs to 20 m.Published as part of Herbert, David G., 2015, An annotated catalogue and bibliography of the taxonomy, synonymy and distribution of the Recent Vetigastropoda of South Africa (Mollusca), pp. 1-98 in Zootaxa 4049 (1) on page 66, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4049.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/24536
Overture to the Turnpike Gate.
No full textsectionalpianoJohns Hopkins University, Levy Sheet Music Collection, Box
111, Item 085Composed by Reeve
Pustulatirus attenuatus Reeve 1847
No full textPustulatirus attenuatus (Reeve, 1847) (Figures 5–7) Turbinella attenuata Reeve, 1847: pl. 13, fig. 69. Reeve, 1860: 121; Krebs, 1864: 16; Kobelt in Küster and Kobelt, 1876: 101, 102, pl. 24, fig. 5; Dall, 1885: 314; Clench et al., 1947: 35; Bullock, 1968: 67; Snyder, 2003: 45. Lathyrus attenuata [sic] (Reeve)—Mørch, 1852: 99. Latirus attenuatus (Reeve) —H. and A. Adams, 1853: 152. Kobelt, 1877: 58; Tryon, 1881: 90, 234, 299, pl. 67, fig. 122, pl. 68, fig. 144; Paetel, 1887: 162; Abbott, 1958: 77; Bullock, 1968: 26; Santos Galindo, 1977: 221; Sutty, 1986: 62. Turbinella (Plicatella) attenuata Reeve—Kobelt, 1876: 20. Turbinella attenuata ? Reeve—Arango y Molina, 1880: 221. Plicatella attenuata (Reeve) —Dall, 1885: 240. Latirus alternatus [sic] (Reeve)—Melvill, 1891 b: 403. Latirus [unnamed subgenus] attenuatus (Reeve) —Bullock, 1968: 67 (pars). Non Latirus attenuatus Bullock (1968: 67–69, pl. 4, figs. 3 –5, 10, pl. 5, figs. 11, 12, 14), = Pustulatirus virginensis (Abbott, 1958), Recent, eastern Caribbean. Turbinella attenuale [sic] Coomans, 1974: 185. [?] Latirus attenuata [sic] (Reeve, 1847)—Mallard and Robin, 2005: 16, pl. 40. Pustulatirus attenuata [sic] (Reeve)—Vermeij and Snyder, 2006: 421 (pars). Non Pustulatirus attenuata [sic] Vermeij and Snyder (2006: fig. 4 B), = Pustulatirus virginensis (Abbott, 1958), Recent, eastern Caribbean. Description: Shell small for genus (holotype 31.1 mm sl), narrowly fusiform, with rounded whorls, broad axial ribs, well-developed spiral cords, shallow suture, and narrow post-sutural ramp bearing closely-packed axial lamellae. Teleoconch of about 7 regularly expanding convex whorls separated by shallow suture; suture undulant in accord with adjacent whorls and interspaces; each whorl with about 8 broad axial ribs; 4 subequal spiral cords on first whorl, enlarging in size but not increasing in number on succeeding whorls of spire, 10–11 cords on body whorl; cords on sutural ramp low, parallel to and undulating in concert with suture, crossed by numerous welldeveloped subsutural lamellae; cords crossing ribs larger than those of ramp, sometimes with single spiral threads between; 6 or more oblique cords of unequal size on siphonal process, occasionally with single smaller thread between. Aperture ovate, constricted adapically by thick parietal node and abapically by small tooth-like node opposite fold at base of columella; outer lip broadly arcuate, rendered serrate by extensions of interspaces between spiral cords, inner surface with about 8 beaded lirae; columella with 4 oblique plicae, another smaller plica adapically; siphonal canal typical of genus, outer lip thin, crenulated by termini of interspaces between larger dorsal cords, inner lip simple, straight. Shell outer surface yellow with white axial ribs on first 3 or 4 teleoconch whorls, interior white. Operculum and radula unknown. Type Material: Holotype (Figures 5–7), 31.1 mm, dd, locality unknown, NHMUK 196735. Type Locality:Unknown; probably tropical western Atlantic. Remarks: The holotype of Turbinella attenuata Reeve, 1847 resembles shells in the Pustulatirus virginensis species-complex of the eastern Caribbean and also resembles shells of a new species from Honduras and Panamá that is described herein, yet it differs from both. Described without locality, T. attenuata was soon recognized as a western Atlantic species by nineteenth century authors (Mørch 1852, Krebs 1864, Kobelt in Küster & Kobelt 1876, Kobelt 1876, 1877, Arango y Molina 1880). However, Kobelt in Küster and Kobelt (1876) suggested that the name might represent a variety of Turbinella infundibulum (Gmelin, 1791), now the type species of Polygona Schumacher, 1817, prompting Tryon (1881) to relegate the name to synonymy with that species. Tryon’s action effectively shelved the name until Abbott (1958) mentioned specimens at ANSP, previously labeled Latirus attenuatus, among those he was naming L. virginensis. Bullock (1968, in thesis) also addressed the name but distinguished it as a species separate from L. virginensis and others in a related species-complex (see below). The name (as Turbinella attenuale [sic]) also appeared on an early list of shells from St. Martin prepared by H. E. Rijgersma, but Coomans (1974) dismissed it as a supposed synonym of Latirus [= Polygona] brevicaudatus (Reeve, 1847). Then Sutty (1986: 62, 64, 65, fig. 70) reported and figured as “ Latirus species (cf. attenuatus (Reeve, 1847)) ” a shell from Guadeloupe that in her opinion “bears a distinct resemblance to Latirus virginensis Abbott, 1958 and, better still, [to] L. attenuatus (Reeve, 1847).” Thereafter, Snyder (2003) cited L. attenuatus as a valid Caribbean species that ranged from Cuba to the Lesser Antilles, apparently sympatrically with L. virginensis. Mallard and Robin (2005) cited L. attenuata [sic], range Cuba to Lesser Antilles, and L. virginensis, range “Caribbean,” again suggesting sympatry. Those authors speculated that attenuata may be the species they figured as L. bernadensis Bullock, 1974, on their plate 41, but that shell was correctly identified and is a species of Polygona. Vermeij and Snyder (2006) reclassified both attenuatus and virginensis in Pustulatirus and treated them as distinct. In this we concur. However, we include other shells figured as attenuatus by Bullock (1968), Sutty (1986) and Vermeij and Snyder (2006) in Pustulatirus virginensis.Published as part of Lyons And Martin Avery Snyder, William G., 2013, The Genus Pustulatirus Vermeij and Snyder, 2006 (Gastropoda: Fasciolariidae: Peristerniinae) in the Western Atlantic, with Descriptions of Three New Species, pp. 35-58 in Zootaxa 3636 (1) on pages 37-38, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.28357
- …
